Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

A Lecture By HH Giriraja Swami Mharaj

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

hare krishna

Dear Devotees

PAMHO,AGTSGM,AGTSP

Pl find below the lecture of HH Giriraja Swami

Maharaj given about the art of Dying in krishna

Conciousness.Its very informative

your humble servant

radhabhava gaur das

 

On May 19, 2005, Giriraj Swami was invited to address

the physicians

and nurses of San Diego Hospice and Palliative Care.

This extraordinary

institution has a staff of six hundred and serves, at

any one time, 850

to 900 patients. It is the only hospice in the US that

boasts its own

free-standing hospital, treating terminally ill

patients' incidental

maladies as well as offering relief for their pain.

Dr. Parag Bharadwaj

hosted the talk.

 

 

 

DEATH AND DYING IN KRSNA CONSCIOUSNESS

 

A talk by Giriraj Swami

San Diego Hospice

May 19, 2005

 

 

yam yam vapi smaran bhavam

tyajaty ante kalevaram

tam tam evaiti kaunteya

sada tad-bhava-bhavitah

 

"Whatever state of being one remembers when he quits

his body, O son of

Kunti, that state he will attain without fail." (Bg

8.6)

 

anta-kale ca mam eva

smaran muktva kalevaram

yah prayati sa mad-bhavam

yati nasty atra samsayah

 

"And whoever, at the end of his life, quits his body

remembering Me

alone at once attains My nature. Of this there is no

doubt." (Bg 8.5)

 

First I will give you a little background about myself

in relation to

today's subject, "Death and Dying in the Hindu

Tradition." As a student

of psychology at Brandeis University near Boston, in

1969, I met my

spiritual teacher, Srila A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami

Prabhupada. He had been

invited to give a lecture on campus. Then, after

studying with him for

a year and a half in Boston, I went with him to India

in 1970, and I

was based there for the next thirty years. And in 1977

my spiritual

master, as our instructor, taught us by his example

how one leaves the world

in proper consciousness. He retired to a holy place in

India called

Vrndavana and surrounded himself with devotees who

were always chanting or

reading to him from sacred literature. Of course,

being in such a holy

place was itself conducive to spiritual consciousness,

to God

consciousness. And the atmosphere was enhanced by

loving disciples singing songs

of the Lord and reading books about the Lord.

 

My next experience came some years later when one of

my students, who

was elder to me, was diagnosed with cancer. She was a

renowned artist

from South Africa. Earlier, she had gotten the

inspiration to buy some

land in the same holy place, Vrndavana, to establish a

studio. She would

travel all over the world and find subjects for

painting. So she

thought that she could combine her spiritual interests

with her artwork. She

bought a plot of land and built a house to serve as a

studio, and she

was kind enough to build another floor upstairs for me

when I would

visit. Although the doctors had given her six months,

she actually lived

for three years. For the last two or three months of

her life I was with

her almost constantly because, as my colleague

explained to you, the

perfection (and this is not just in the Hindu

tradition; I have seen the

same thing in other traditions) is to think of God, or

to chant the

name of God, or at least to hear the name chanted, at

the time of death.

 

Being based in India for many years I would travel

frequently to

Pakistan and Sri Lanka, and in Pakistan I came across

a book called "The

Ninety-nine Names of Allah." There is a similar book

in Sanskrit called

"The Thousand Names of Visnu," or

"Visnu-sahasra-nama." Visnu is another

name for Krsna. So I read the book "The Ninety-nine

Names of Allah," and

there was a section about how a pious Muslim should

meet death. The

book stated that the best that his or her friends and

relatives can do is

to chant the names of God and to help the loved one to

either chant or

at least hear others chant the name of God at the

final moment. And

there is a similar tradition in the Jewish religion,

where the ideal is

that at the time of death the family and friends are

chanting the name of

God, or reciting a prayer that contains the name of

God. So I saw that

the same tradition that we have in Krsna

consciousness, or in Hinduism,

is also there in Islam and Judaism, and it could very

well be there in

other traditions that I have not had much occasion to

study.

 

So, with my student we followed the same pattern that

we had seen with

our spiritual master, and devotees would come and

chant. The chanting

can be done in a personal, meditative way, quietly yet

audibly, or it

can be done with musical instruments, generally with

hand cymbals and

drum and harmonium, which is like a hand organ. The

whole idea is to help

the patient fix his or her consciousness on the

Supreme, to keep it

fixed on the Supreme at the time of death. And along

with the chanting is

the reading and talking about God consciousness.

 

As you know, when one gets closer to the end, there

are certain signs,

and we could see the signs coming. Now, there are some

specifics

practices in the Hindu tradition that may not be

applicable here, partly

because the circumstances are different and partly

because Hindus here may

change a little, living in the West. But the original

tradition is that

when the person is nearing death, at the very end the

person is placed

on a straw mat on the floor and surrounded by

chanting. Of course, with

our own teacher, he stayed on his bed surrounded by

chanting. And there

are certain rituals performed on the body or with

body, which I imagine

would be beyond your purview. Then the body is

cremated. In some

traditions the people believe that the soul hovers

around the body for some

time, so their followers don't want anyone to come in

the room after the

soul departs; they do not want anyone to come in the

way of the

interaction between the departed soul and its previous

home in a particular

body, and they could take offense if any of the

hospice staff intruded.

But in the Hindu tradition, we do not have that idea.

 

You cater to the needs of patients at home as well as

in the

residential facility. In India, traditionally, because

of the tight family bonds,

most of the elders or sick ones would stay in the home

until the

end--or retire to some holy place.

 

So, that is the basic idea. Within the general

category of Hindu there

is a wide variety of practices, because the term Hindu

itself is not

indigenous. It is not found in the Vedic literature.

It is actually a

term that was coined later by Muslims to refer to the

people across the

Indus River, whom they called Sindus or Hindus. But

seventy to

seventy-five percent of Hindus are Vaisnavas,

worshipers of Visnu, or Krsna. And

another twenty percent are worshipers of Siva and

Sakti. The worshipers

of Sakti, called saktas, are related to the

worshippers of Siva, called

Saivites, because Lord Siva's energy, or sakti, is

called Durga. Saktas

generally worship Durga, or Kali. Together, the

Saivites and saktas

comprise about twenty percent. And in the other five

percent, there are

different varieties.

 

But on the existence of the soul, and the fact that

our activities in

our present lives--actions that are called

karma--create reactions that

we suffer in our future lives, all Hindus agree. In

general, there are

two categories of activities in the material world:

prescribed, or

pious activities done within the guidelines of

scripture, within the laws

of God, the laws of nature, and prohibited, or sinful

activities, which

violate the laws of God or nature. Sometimes people

don't like to hear

the word "sin" because it is often used without any

clear definition.

But as we use it--and of course, we have actually

translated the

Sanskrit term "vikarma"--sinful activities are any

acts that transgress the

laws of God, just as crimes are any acts that violate

the laws of the

state. So vikarma is any action that violates the laws

of God,

specifically as they are recorded in Vedic

literatures.

 

So, on the one side we have forbidden, sinful

activities, vikarma. And

on the other we have pious activities. Now, everyone

engages in a

combination of pious and sinful activities. No one is

all good, and no one

is all bad. And according to one's karma, one will

enjoy and suffer the

results. The result of a pious activity, an activity

that is beneficial

for oneself and for others, is material happiness, and

the result of a

sinful activity, or an activity that is harmful to

oneself or to

others, is pain and suffering. We all have engaged in

a combination of pious

and sinful activity, and so our present lives are

composed of a

combination of pleasurable and distressful situations.

 

Now, the same act can have a pious aspect to it and a

sinful aspect to

it. For example, a man's family is starving, so he

steals some money or

food for them. Under ordinary circumstances, bringing

food for his

family is his duty; that is what a husband and father

is supposed to do.

But stealing, obviously, is outside of his prescribed

duty. His

prescribed duty is to earn by honest means and provide

for his family. And there

are sins that are sort of accidental: you do something

with a good

intention, but it ends up producing a different

result. Still, the

consequences are there. As it is said, the road to

hell is paved with good

intentions. There are consequences, and therefore in

the Vedic culture

knowledge is considered important, so that you know

the consequences of

your deeds. In a way it is similar to medicine. In

ordinary circumstances,

if someone is sick we presume that he or she came in

contact with a

disease. We may not be able to trace exactly when and

where, but the fact

that he or she has the disease implies that he or she

came in contact

with it. For example, a tourist may go to India and

get dysentery. Now,

what exactly caused it? Was it this water? Was it that

food? It may be

hard to trace, but the fact that the person has

dysentery suggests that

the person came in contact with worms or amoebas or

another

microorganism in their food or drink.

 

So karma is like that. We are suffering, and the fact

that we are

suffering suggests that we did something in the past

that is giving rise to

our suffering, although we may not be able to trace

exactly when and

where or what we did. But just as you can learn that

you will pick up

disease by drinking impure water or eating improperly

cooked food or by

coming in touch with other people who are infected, so

too you can learn

that if you do this there is that consequence, and if

you want avoid

the consequence you avoid the action or perform some

other action that

would counteract it.

 

This knowledge of action and reaction is given in

Vedic literatures

such as the Bhagavad-gita and Srimad-Bhagavatam. And

such information is

very important. Vedic authorities state that suffering

is caused by sin

and that sin is caused by ignorance. For example, if

an ignorant child

touches a flame he will be burned. Ignorance of the

law is no excuse.

The child can't say, "Well, I was ignorant. I did not

know I would be

burned." The fire won't excuse you because you are

ignorant of the law,

although I may add that responsibility for karma

begins only when the

child is five years old. Until then the parents are

responsible and they

get the reactions for the child. But from the age of

five the child

enjoys and suffers according to his activities, and

therefore knowledge is

important. We want to remove the ignorance. Most

people transgress the

laws of nature unwittingly, but they still have to

suffer, because

ignorance is no excuse. Thus, knowledge is the real

remedy. If someone gets

dysentery, you may give the person some medicine and

put the person on

some diet and they will be cured. But if they don't

know the cause, if

they remain in ignorance, they will go out and drink

the same

contaminated water or eat the same infected food and

get sick again. So we can

do things to temporarily mitigate the condition of

distress, but unless

the person has knowledge of what caused the sequence

of events that led

to the distress, he or she will continue the same

pattern and continue

to suffer.

 

Lady (1): Is there any way to gain release from such

suffering?

 

Giriraj Swami: Excellent question. As long as we are

engaged in

material activities, whether pious or sinful, we

remain bound to the material

world, and as long as we are in the material world and

have a material

body, we have to suffer--whether the majority of our

actions are pious

or sinful. There are four principles of suffering that

everyone must

endure, whoever they may be: disease, old age, death,

and rebirth. So the

real goal of human life or Vedic civilization is to be

released from

the cycle of birth and death. That is called

liberation, in Sanskrit

moksa or mukti. Now, how do we achieve that release

from material bondage?

By engaging in activities that do not bring any

material result. Of

course, in a general sense all of our activities are

karma because in a

generic sense karma just means activity. But in a more

specific sense

karma means activities performed within the laws of

God, as opposed to

vikarma, which are activities outside the laws of God,

in the material

sphere. And then there is the third category called

akarma, and akarma

does not bring any material result. Akarma releases

one from material

bondage altogether, and that is really the goal,

because even if you are

ninety-nine percent pious, you will still have to take

birth again in a

material body to enjoy the material happiness that is

due to you. And as

soon as you are in a material body, you must suffer

disease, old age,

and death.

 

So the real solution is not to have to take birth in

another material

body but to go to our original home in the spiritual

world, to go back

to God.

 

Gentleman (1): Could you give some examples of actions

that would be

neutral? I'm not quite sure of this. I always thought

they would be

either good or bad.

 

Giriraj Swami: In technical language those activities

are called either

yoga or bhakti, because the ultimate process to gain

release is called

bhakti-yoga. Yoga literally means to connect with God,

and the

astanga-yoga practice--which is not really practical

today--but the

astanga-yoga practice begins with yama and niyama,

following rules and

regulations. Any spiritual practice will begin with

following rules and

regulations. For example, in the Vaisnava tradition

the rules and regulations are

no eating meat, no gambling, no taking intoxicants,

and no sex outside

of marriage. So yoga begins with yama and niyama. Then

there is asana.

That is also a preliminary stage, and that is very

popular in the West.

And there is pranayama, breathing exercises. That is

also popular. But

the actual purpose of these preliminary practices is

to reduce the

pains of the body so that the yogi can meditate on God

for long periods

without being disturbed. That is the actual purpose.

So to take the

preliminary practices of yoga, which are beneficial to

one's health, as the

end, so that one can be healthy and energetic to enjoy

the material

aspects of life--that is not the original intention.

 

And the higher practices. There are pratyahara and

dharana, which is

meditation but at intervals. Then there is dhyana, a

concentrated type of

meditation. And the eighth or final stage is samadhi,

complete

absorption in God consciousness. That complete

absorption in God consciousness

is beyond material dualities. It is beyond material

pious activities

and material sinful activities, and it brings one to

liberation.

 

Now, in the present context, that type of yogic

discipline that was

performed in the Himalayas is very difficult.

Therefore, for the modern

age, the scriptures recommend the chanting of mantras,

especially the

maha-mantra: Hare Krsna, Hare Krsna, Krsna Krsna, Hare

Hare/ Hare Rama,

Hare Rama, Rama Rama, Hare Hare. And there are other

mantras. But that is

called the maha-mantra, "the great chant for

deliverance." Yet even

though chanting, as a physical practice, is easier

than meditating in a

cave for hours or days on end, still it is hard,

because we get restless.

Therefore, in the practice of bhakti-yoga there are

various activities,

all connected with God. The idea is that somehow or

other all of our

activities throughout the day should be connected with

God.

 

Specifically, there are nine processes: sravanam

kirtanam visnoh

smaranam pada-sevanam/ arcanam vandanam dasyam sakhyam

atma-nivedanam. There

is hearing and chanting the name of God--or not just

the name, but

chanting about God in general, including His form, His

qualities, and His

pastimes. And hearing about God. In a way, that is

what we are doing

now; we are hearing about God. Then, remembering God

(smaranam) and

serving Him (pada-sevanam). Arcanam, worshiping in the

temple or church, and

vandanam, offering prayers. And these nine have been

analyzed into

sixty-four, and the sixty-four have been further

analyzed. For example, in

offering prayers there are two subdivisions. One is

offering prayer

that comes out of one's own heart, and the other is

reciting prayers from

the scriptures or from sages and saintly persons of

the past. So that

is vandanam, offering prayers. Then dasyam,

considering God to be your

master or father, and sakhyam, considering God to be

your best friend.

And finally, atma-nivedanam, giving everything to God.

The idea is that

whatever we do should be done in relation to God. And

activities done

in relation to God are called bhakti-yoga, and they

bring no material

result. It may sound a bit theoretical, but it is

practical.

 

In Vedic civilization the time of death is considered

the final test.

In school we attend the lectures, do the assignments,

take the quizzes,

and write the mid-term, but whether we graduate or not

really depends

on whether we pass the final examination. So in life,

the time of death

is considered the final examination, and passing the

final examination

means thinking of God. That is why the whole focus at

the time of death

is to help the person remember God. And the other

activities that we

perform during our life, besides freeing us from

activities that will

bring results that will oblige us to take birth again,

are practice for

thinking of God. And we get little tests along the

way. We get sick. Am I

going to remember God, or am I just going to worry

about the toothache?

I am just going to frantically call the dentist and

forget about God?

So these are the tests along the way. Are we going to

remember God or

not? And then the final examination is the time of

death, and if we can

remember God then, we graduate. We are free: no more

material bodies, no

more repetition of birth and death.

 

Lady (2): In the work that we do we are often looking

at physical pain.

I was just curious in terms of the medication that we

administer to

alleviate physical pain and suffering, should those be

discouraged? Would

those be considered as interfering with consciousness

at the time of

death?

 

Giriraj Swami: Very good question. How do we feel

about medication to

control the pain? Again, we come back to the goal. The

goal is to

remember God at the time of death. So our general

approach is that we want to

take enough of the medication so that the pain is not

so excruciating

that our consciousness is just absorbed in the pain.

But at the same

time, we do not want to take so much of the medication

that it dulls us to

the point that we cannot really think of God. That is

the fine line

that we look for.

 

Lady (3): If a foreign devotee or just a foreigner

from another country

would like to spend their last days in India and would

like to be

cremated there, is that difficult?

 

Giriraj Swami: No. It is not. Are you talking about

someone who goes to

India to die or someone who . . .

 

Lady (3): Someone from another country who is ill and

wants to spend

their last days in India.

 

Giriraj Swami: Yes. I will tell you exactly. I won't

burden you with

all the details now, but the basic idea is that you

need to make a living

will that says that you want your body to be cremated

in India. If you

are American, you take that to the United States

Embassy or Consulate

so that they are included from the beginning. I think

there is also

another form where your immediate family sign their

consent. You take that

to the American Embassy or Consulate, get the

necessary papers, and

then when you actually do leave your body everyone

knows what your desire

was. No one has any objections and you will be

cremated without any

problem.

 

Lady (3): I have another question: if someone expires

here and they

want to bring their ashes to India?

 

Giriraj Swami: Yes, that happens often.

 

Lady (3): In case they search your luggage, do you

have to have some

papers?

 

Giriraj Swami: I have never heard of that. I can look

into it. I know

so many devotees who have taken ashes and scattered it

in the holy

places; I have never heard of any of them having any

difficulty.

 

Lady (4): I have two questions. Is Krsna the earthly

manifestation of

God and, according to the Hindu tradition, is there

any benefit to

suffering?

 

Giriraj Swami: Very good questions. Krsna exists as

Krsna in the

spiritual world eternally. He comes to earth on

occasion, but He is the same

Krsna. He is like the president or the governor who

chooses to visit

the prison. He is free to enter the prison whenever he

wants and to leave

whenever he wants. An ignorant prisoner might think,

"Oh, he is another

prisoner just like us." But he is not. He is visiting

the prison, but

he is not bound by the laws of the prison. So when God

or an incarnation

of God descends from the spiritual world into the

material world, he or

she is called an avatara. The Sanskrit word avatara

literally means one

who descends. Within our line of Vaisnavaism we

consider Jesus to be a

saktyavesa-avatara. He is in that category of someone

who descended

from above to the world for some purpose. He delivered

the message of

Godhead.

 

Lady (4): Is Krsna an avatara? Or is Krsna just Krsna

and others are

avataras?

 

Giriraj Swami: Technically, Krsna is called avatari,

which means that

He is the source of all avataras. But He can also be

considered an

avatara, because He also descends, like just Rama or

any other incarnation.

But He is called avatari because He is the original.

They are all

eternal. It is a little subtle, but He is considered

the original, or the

full manifestation.

 

Now for the question of suffering. On the material

platform, the value

of suffering is that it burns up your bad karma. That

is why many

Hindus prefer to tolerate rather than protest, because

they know that by

tolerating the suffering they are exhausting their

sinful reactions, and

they feel that they would rather get it over with than

try to postpone

it by trying to counteract it, and then have to suffer

it again later in

another form. That is on the material platform. On the

spiritual

platform, the benefit is that it makes us more

detached from the body and

from the world. We are trying to become

transcendentalists, but we still

have material attachments. So when there is some

upheaval or calamity we

think, "Yes, actually the material world is not a

happy place. I should

not be spending my energy trying to make it happy,

because by nature it

is not a happy place. Lord Krsna confirms in the

Bhagavad-gita,

duhkhalayam asasvatam: 'This material world is a place

of misery, and it is

temporary.' I should be using my energy to realize God

and get out of

here."

 

Gentleman (2): Can you expound a bit more about

remembering God? Is it

just saying the name or thinking the name of God, or

is it coming back

into a state of divine consciousness where one

actually feels a

connection with God?

 

Giriraj Swami: What do we mean when we talk about

remembering God? Now,

God is a person. That is the first point. He is not a

person like you

and me, who have bodies made of flesh and bone. He is

transcendental.

But He is a person. The Bible says, "Man is made in

the image of God." We

are persons, and so our supreme father or mother must

also be a person.

This is a difficult point, because we are so

conditioned by the

material concept of personality that when we hear

about God's personality we

think in terms of our material conception. Sometimes

people think, "If

you say that God is a person you are limiting Him."

For example, I am

sitting here. Because I am sitting here, I cannot be

in the temple at

Pacific Beach; I cannot be at my asrama in Santa

Barbara. But God, He is a

person, but He is in this room, He is in the temple in

Pacific Beach,

He is in Santa Barbara, He is in our hearts, He is in

every molecule and

every atom. But He is still a person.

 

Here I would like to use an example of a person and

who holds a high

office, but the thing is, today's politicians are all

so controversial

that it is hard to come up with a good example.

[laughter] So let us make

up a country [laughter], the president of a country.

The term president

describes his office. Or let us say the mayor. We hope

the mayor is not

controversial. [laughter] Oh, the mayor here is very

controversial. All

right, then let us take the mayor of some place we

don't know about.

[laughter] Let us take the mayor of Davenport, Iowa.

[laughter] So,

"mayor" describes the office, but there is a person

that occupies the

office. And the person has a name; the person has an

appearance; the person

has personal qualities; the person has certain

activities. Take the

president--minus the controversy. He has a name:

George W. Bush. He looks

a certain way. If you see a picture of him you know,

"There he is.

There is President Bush." And he has certain

qualities. Some people like

them more than others. But we know that he is bit of a

cowboy, or that he

is sort of religious and Christian. He has certain

qualities, and he

has certain activities. Apart from his official

duties, he likes to go

his ranch and walk around and ride around and whack

weeds. So when we

remember the president . . . Yes, there are things

about the office that

we consider, but to really remember the president

means to know his

name, his form, his features, his qualities, his

activities, his

associates. God, too, has a name; He has many names.

He has a form; He has many

forms. He has many qualities. He has many activities.

 

And the real goal is to love God. "To know Him is to

love Him." The

actual goal is to develop love for God, because when

you love God then

naturally you will think of Him. Anyone you love, you

will naturally think

of the person. So that is the goal--to develop love

for God. And out of

love you will be thinking of how beautiful His form

is, how sublime His

qualities are, how wonderful His activities are; you

will like to

repeat His name, just as one would repeat the name of

a loved one; and you

will think how best you can serve Him and please Him.

 

So, one distinction between some of the Vedic

literatures and other

scriptures in that they give more details about the

Personality of

Godhead--not just that He is the supreme authority,

the creator, the

maintainer, the destroyer, and the protector,

omniscient, omnipresent, and

omnipotent, which He is, but in a more personal sense.

And when we know Him

in a more personal way and develop affection and

attachment for Him in

a personal relationship, then it will be very easy to

think of Him all

the time, and naturally we will think of Him at the

time of death.

 

Here I may mention that the fullest conception of God

includes a male

and a female form. This is not something we are making

up to be

politically correct, but this has been in the

tradition for thousands of years.

So although I have used the pronouns "He" and "Him,"

in the highest

conception there are actually two, male and female.

Yet this is not

polytheism either. It is really God and His energy,

and together They

comprise the complete form of the Supreme. In the Hare

Krsna maha-mantra, Hare

refers to the feminine feature and Krsna refers to the

male aspect of

God.

 

Gentleman (3): As workers in hospice we work with the

families of

patients and deal a lot with the grief, the loss of

the soul in this body

that they have enjoyed in the physical context. It

seems that at the time

of death--and I might not be saying this right--but a

person could hear

the name of God or think of the name of God, but we're

outside of that

person, so in what ways can we can bring comfort and

assurance to the

family members? How can we be a comforter and

supporter for them in

their grief and the loss of their loved one?

 

Giriraj Swami: That is another good question. The

first instruction of

the Bhagavad-gita, and I believe it is common to many

other traditions,

is that the person is not the body. The person is the

soul living in

the body. When the person leaves the body, we say that

the person is

dead, but actually the body was always dead; it was

just animated by the

presence of the soul. So at the moment that the soul

leaves the body, all

the elements of the body are still there, lying on the

bed. You may

lament: "Oh, my husband is gone.My wife is gone."

But why do you say

they are gone? The body is lying on the bed. You might

have thought that

the body was your husband or your wife or your father

or your mother,

but when they pass away, you say, "Oh, my father is

gone.My mother is

gone." But the body is still there. Why do you say

they are gone?

Intuitively, we know that the person was not the body.

That loved one is

something other than the body that he or she now has

left; that person is

the soul.

 

When a person has led a good life, and even more so

when he or she has

tried to develop their relationship with God and hear

the name of God

and think of God at the time of death, we can be

assured that the person

will be going to a better destination. So there are

many emotions. In

part there is the sense of personal loss, that the

person whom we loved

and shared so many good times with is gone. In part,

out of love, there

is concern. Where is the person now? But if we know

that the person has

gone to a better place, we feel solace. And in painful

illnesses such

as cancer, we may also think, "All right. The soul has

left this body,

and this body had become very painful. It had become a

painful place for

the soul to inhabit, so it is actually better that the

person has gone

elsewhere." The person, the soul, continues to exist.

He or she has

gone to live somewhere else, where there will be less

pain and suffering.

 

Still, we do not deny the sense of personal loss. Even

among

transcendentalists there are various emotions. When a

perfect yogi leaves the

body, we know that the person is qualified to enter

the kingdom of God, so

we are happy. We are both--happy and sad. We are happy

because we know

that the person has gone to God, to serve God, but we

are sad because

we will miss the person's association. Still, the

departed soul, we

believe, can inspire and guide their loved ones who

remain behind.

 

Then there is also the idea that God is responsive to

prayer. So if a

loved one leaves the body, we know that the soul

exists somewhere. We

don't know where, but we want to help the soul,

because we love that

person. So we can pray to God, "Wherever my mother is

now"--or "my father"

or whomever--"please be merciful. Please help that

person come closer

to You." And I believe that those prayers will help

the departed soul,

and they will also give us a chance to continue our

relationship with

our loved one and to try and help our loved one even

after he or she has

left the body.

 

Then there are the bereaved's own spiritual

practices--chanting or

meditation or prayer or whatever. Yes, we are attached

to our loved one and

we are sorry because we will miss our loved one, but

by chanting or

prayer or meditation we come in contact with God. Of

course, in the

initial stage they may be too distraught. But then

when we do engage in some

practice that will bring us in touch with God, we

feel, "God is there.

It is all right. God is there. God is taking care. My

real relationship

is with God. By God's grace I can gain His shelter in

the future."

 

Dr. Bharadwaj: We are almost out of time, but I just

have to ask you

this question. A lot of patients ask, "Why is this

happening to me? Is

God punishing me?" and this causes a lot of spiritual

suffering. From

your perspective in the Hindu tradition, how would you

approach this

question?

 

Giriraj Swami: If someone is suffering from a terminal

disease, I would

not get into the idea that God is angry with them and

is punishing

them. I would rather say, "Anyone who takes birth in a

material body has to

die." That is the point. "Birth, disease, old age, and

death are

inevitable for every conditioned soul. It may be this

disease or that, it may

be this symptom of old age or that, or it may be this

or that way to

death. But these factors are there for everyone. And

now that you are in

this position, you should use what time you have to

develop your

relationship with God, so that you do not have to take

birth in another

material body and suffer through the same cycle

again."

 

Dr. Bharadwaj: A lot of it is a fear that bad karma is

causing it?

 

Giriraj Swami: Well, it may have. Our teacher gave the

example of

someone drowning and another person coming along in a

boat to rescue him.

And the drowning person says, "Now wait a minute. How

did I get here in

the first place?" But that is not the point here. The

rescuer would say,

"Okay, we can talk about that later. [laughter] You

are drowning. Just

get in the boat! Don't worry about the past." So we

are drowning in

this body, in this samsara, this ocean of repeated

births and deaths. Let

us not worry how we got here. Let us try to get out.

And it is never

too late. That is power of God's name and God's mercy.

It is never too

late. There are stories in the Vedic literature of

people who were very

sinful but at the last moment chanted God's name and

were delivered. So

it is never too late. That is the main point. So I

would think, "Yes,

let us not worry about that. Let us worry about how we

can rectify the

situation."

 

Lady (5): A lot of our patients never made it to old

age, and then it's

very difficult for everybody--the patient's family and

us--when they

seem to not complete, in our perception, their life.

What's the approach

to that?

 

Giriraj Swami: Their destiny is caused by their

activity, their karma.

For whatever reason, they did something that is

causing them to leave

the body before the normal time. But the positive

side--we always have

to see the positive side, which is the spiritual

side--the positive side

is, depending on the circumstance, that a younger

person may be better

equipped to think of God at the time of death than an

older one who has

lost more of his or her faculties. In fact, there is a

Sanskrit prayer:

 

krsna tvadiya-pada-pankaja-panjarantam

adyaiva me visatu manasa-raja-hamsah

prana-prayana-samaye kapha-vata-pittaih

kanthavarodhana-vidhau smaranam kutas te

 

It may seem contrary to our Western culture, our

materialistic culture,

which is so preoccupied with pampering and preserving

the body, with

staying in the body as long as possible, with

squeezing out the last drop

of pleasure from the body. [laughter] But this prayer,

in opposition to

that mad pursuit, offers a more philosophical

perspective. In it the

devotee prays to the Lord, "My dear Krsna, please let

me die immediately

so that the swan of my mind may be encircled by the

stem of Your lotus

feet. Otherwise, at the time of my final breath, when

my throat is

choked up, how will it be possible for me to remember

You and chant Your

holy name?" That is another perspective on dying

before old age--one

that is positive and spiritual.

 

Hare Krsna.

 

 

 

 

_________

How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday

snaps for FREE with Photos http://uk.photos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...