Guest guest Posted May 7, 2005 Report Share Posted May 7, 2005 One key document in the controversy about soy products is this New York Times article from January 2000 by Marian Burros. Below is the first half of the article, just to give an idea about some of the worries being presented. The article is a little long, but I can send the complete article to anyone who is interested. What does all this have to do with cow protection? The answer is: the problem of protein. We must have protein to build and maintain muscles in our bodies. 1. Ideal solution: work the oxen and protect cows, then drink milk from the cows. Unfortunately this solution is not available to most people right now. Alternatives: 2. Eat meat. Objection: cruely to animals, bad karma, unhealthy for a number of reasons. 3. Drink milk from commercial cows. Objection: exploitation of cows in modern dairy practice (including slaughter and inhumane treatment), pollutants in modern milk 4. Eat legumes such as soy beans. Be a vegan. Objection: Vegan diet is unnatural. There is no history of a vegan community in the world before the 20th century -- because vegan diet does not provide vitamin B12 needed for brain and nerve tissue. In moder times artificial alternatives can be produced. Not enough vitamin D for strong bones. New Objection: Dangers of soy, such as dangers of soy isoflavones. 5. Combination of various paths above, mixing the dangers of several. ANSWER: There appears to be no clear cut answer to this whole dilemma. It almost seem like anyone who feels they have a smug answer to this situation is either not in tune to the realities of life for most people, is ignorant, or simply arrogant. What do others think? your servant, Hare Krsna dasi ************************************ New York Times 1/26/2000 Doubts Cloud Rosy News on Soy By Marian Burros OVER the last several years, millions of Americans who had turned a deaf ear to the virtues of soy have had a change of heart. Sales of the lowly bean, which has been a staple of the Asian diet for millennia, have been skyrocketing because preliminary research suggested that soy has many life-enhancing benefits, from preventing bone density loss to easing some symptoms of menopause. In October, the federal government put its imprimatur on soy when it allowed food companies to make the claim that soy protein reduces cholesterol and the risk of heart disease. The other claims are still unproved, even though soy in all its forms, from tofu and veggie burgers to shakes and supplements, is being heavily promoted by its sellers as a panacea. The news media, too, have been almost unanimous in praising its safety and efficacy. Against the backdrop of widespread praise, however, there is growing suspicion that soy -- despite its undisputed benefits -- may pose some health hazards. The scientific world is divided over many of the claims for efficacy and over some safety issues, but there are two points on which there is agreement. Soy is useful for reducing cholesterol. And there may be an increased risk of cancer associated with consuming the components of soy called isoflavones in supplement form, particularly for post-menopausal women; and for these women, there may also be hazards in adding soy foods to their diets. Isoflavones, particularly genistein and daidzein, are phytoestrogens. These plant chemicals, which have estrogen-like hormonal effects on the body, occur naturally in soybeans and foods made from them. Compared with chemical estrogens, the kind taken by women to reduce the symptoms of menopause, phytoestrogens are weak, but they act the same way: they can both inhibit and stimulate the growth of certain types of cells. Not one of the 18 scientists interviewed for this column was willing to say that taking isoflavones was risk free. Some particularly cautioned against it. Dr. Margo Woods, an associate professor of medicine at Tufts University School of Medicine, who specializes in nutrition and breast cancer, said: "As a food, soy does a lot of great things, but once you start looking at different components like phytoestrogens, you are talking about pharmacological things. It's wiser to talk about soy and soy foods. A whole food behaves very differently in the body than when you take one compound. We are looking into the components, but we haven't been studying in the area long enough. I would not recommend to anyone that they take isoflavones." Even before the Food and Drug Administration approved the cholesterol-lowering health claim for soy, sales were booming. In 1998, 770,000 metric tons of soybeans were sold in this country to be turned into food products; in 1999 the figure rose to 1.007 million metric tons. Total sales of soy foods in supermarket chains during the 12 months ending in October were almost $420 million, up 45 percent from the previous year's, according to Spins, a natural products market research company in San Francisco. In natural food stores, sales in the six months ending in October were up 37 percent from the previous six-month period. Many large companies like Kellogg's, General Mills, Campbell Soup and ConAgra are developing new soy products in response to the demand. The biggest jump has been in soy supplements, the isoflavone pills, whose sales were up 246 percent in the 12 months ending in October. But the carefully worded health claim the Food and Drug Administration permits for cholesterol reduction is for soy protein, not for isoflavones. To have that health claim on its label, a food must be low in fat, saturated fat and cholesterol and contain 6.5 grams of soy protein per serving. For the cholesterol-lowering effect, 25 grams of soy protein must be added daily to a diet low in saturated fat and cholesterol. The scientists are worried that the public is interpreting the approval of soy protein as a recommendation to take soy supplements, which generally have higher levels of isoflavones than occur naturally in food. The highest levels of naturally occurring isoflavones are found in soy beverages, cooked soybeans and tempeh, and the range is wide. Some processed products, like sports bars, have added isoflavones. Supplements can contain more than 85 milligrams of isoflavones in a single pill, and some manufacturers advise taking two pills a day. There are soy protein concentrate powders with as much as 160 milligrams of isoflavones in a single serving. "People don't distinguish isoflavones from soy protein," said Dr. Daniel Sheehan, a research biologist at the F.D.A.'s National Center for Toxicological Research in Jefferson, Ark. He also directs a program that studies endocrine disrupters, which are chemicals like isoflavones with hormonal activity that disrupts the endocrine system. "The approval of soy protein for cardiovascular disease is going to lead to tremendous increase in the use of isoflavones, and this rachets up concern levels," he added. For that reason, Dr. Sheehan opposed the Food and Drug Administration's health claim label... (article continues for 10 more paragraphs) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.