Official Ramakanta vs. IRM discussion thread

[Guest guest]

Posted by Yaduraja on May 11, 2006:

 

Dear Ramakanta Prabhu,

PAMHO. AGTSP!

 

> Wow! You have proven that Srila Prabhupada wanted to DO what he DID.

> Congratulations!

 

Thank you very much!

 

> But, as I already wrote several times, this is not what I asked you to

> prove. Now please look up the meaning of "to do" and "to be" to find out

> the difference between these two verbs, then return to this debate and

> prove that in 1966 Srila Prabhupada wanted to BE what he WAS, namely the

> sole diksa guru for ISKCON. I am waiting.

 

He did what he did to be what he was. We know this since he always wanted to

act deliberatly to carry out Krishna's plan.

 

If he did not want to be what he was (the sole diksa guru for ISKCON) then

he obviously would not have done what he did (make himself recognised and

accepted as such) would he?

 

He could easily have not initiated anyone at all, just instruct for example.

But instead he deliberately made himself recognised and accepted as the sole

diksa guru for ISKCON in 1966.

 

In the sentence you agree is proven the word ‘made’ is the verb or ‘doing

word’ and ‘recognition and acceptance as the sole diksa guru’ is what he

became (to be). You have obviously forgotten what you agreed was proven.

Best wishes

Ys

Yadu