Guest guest Posted April 9, 2001 Report Share Posted April 9, 2001 Namaste. All astrologers should use Lahiri until they find its faults, then chose another Ayanamsa. Look at your chart and try to explain the events related to it. Astrologers that have been practicing for tens of years with Lahiri have spotted some errors in Lahiri Ayanamsa, but they are very small and are related to Divisional charts, so please try to exaplain your events using Lahiri, and then with time if it all fails make the appropriate corrections. Inder wrote a very good email about this, in the past, i recommend finding it in the archives. Best wishes, Visti. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 9, 2001 Report Share Posted April 9, 2001 Visti Larsen schrieb: > Namaste. > > All astrologers should use Lahiri until they find its faults, then chose > another Ayanamsa. > > Look at your chart and try to explain the events related to it. Dear visti, You are right in the negative way, but don´t give a real answer. Who can? For years I have thought about this problem, but there seems to be no tangible solution in the scientific sense. One tries to evaluate a certain experience and tries to tally it with possible predictive methods like vargas. But the evaluation of the circumstance itself is not absolute: the birth of a child may be great for a happily married woman, a burden for an unhappily married woman, a disaster (at least some years ago) for an unmarried woman! So the subjective feeling is perhaps what counts. Then too, the subjective feeling fades with time and in revewing the past, the native´s estimation of past experiences is not what he or she felt at that time! With the change of ayanamsa a number of things change: vargas, balas etc. To compare all the possibilities is a terrible task. To say which suits best is impossible! We have NO control to show how things would be if other combinations were right! Even Rasi readings don´t really mean much. Am I taurus lagna or Gemini 9s a question. A difference of a few minutes in TOB could change he lagna. But somewhere there is a limit, a second, a nona-second or smaller would change the lagna. But then, are the divisions absolute or analog? Do the qualities change abruptly or gradually? What if one is born at the junction, neither here nor there? The seeds of circumstances are sown long before they sprout. So even dasas do not help, nothing needs to jappen during an "appropriate dasa", could be a bit earlier or later. The only test for ayanamsas lies in studying unexpected and unplanned circumstances in the life of the same person. An accident, a sudden sickness or an operation - not one fixed in advance but suddenly necessary, or one planned but suddenly postponed - meeting the Great LOve, death - sdeden- of a particularly lovrd persn etc. would help. .... Nothing that needs incubation period. Here too, one has to go to at least the third level of the Dasa. Further one has to check each method with 360/365 days, not/or with parallax Moon. So the job is pretty tough. Then you have such problems as exalted Jupiter as owner of 8th or 12th, being perhaps retrograde... all controversial matters - they have been discussed to death on the list, without any conclusive results being arrived at! There are too few clear-cut cases to test with. Rather than aspiring for accuracy, one should try to improve one´s intuition. regards Mani Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 9, 2001 Report Share Posted April 9, 2001 Dear Mani, Namaste. Its true that many people develope very strong intuitions with time in astrology, yet it shouldn't be encouraged to master ones clairvoyant ability, but to master this science to its finest.. the rest will come with time, and one day you may become a Maharishi, and will have no need of astrological calculations. On this list you rarely portray any astrological ability, yet you feel you have a say in sticky astrological matters. I'm not trying to undermine your capabilities, but a priest who only qoutes one or two phrases from the bible isn't a serious priest, but may still have the right essence of spirituality. Encourage all Jyotishas to use Lahiri and learn to rectify propperly with the same..As its been done for so long! Once things look wrong with lahiri we should try adjusting the aynamsa to the appropriate degree, but if one choses an ayanamsa out of the blue and only knows the name of the same, then why bother even trying to understand the topic at all(not reffering to you). Keywords are: knowledge and understanding.. we want clever Jyotishas. If any of these points seems wrong, please answer. Best wishes, Visti. _______________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 9, 2001 Report Share Posted April 9, 2001 Hi Visti, what you wrote has been on my mind lately, so, I think it should be added as a keyword a person's caring capacity, because I think I remember in a post a while back, that Jyotish is a brahminical science, so compassion should be there too, along with the knowledge. It makes me wonder though how different Jyotish was, way back when all the Jyotishis were priests. I would think they helped people because it was the right thing to do, rather than helping people for the recognition of doing the right thing, that seems very priestly. Angie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 9, 2001 Report Share Posted April 9, 2001 Is there only one to choose for every purpose really ? I had reason to look something up for an astrologer on another list in Shil-Ponde's book that I have and noticed fortuitously ( praise be to Ganesha ) that the ayanamsha that he uses for the dashas is different from the one he uses for the natal chart . He makes great show of pointing this out . Forgive me for saying so , but IMHO it could be that with the 'ancient' ayanamshas the differences arise from the differing dates at which these rishis' work/s took form ( or there is some technical reason for perceived discrepancies that arose from the specific purposes they had in their illumined minds and that we are no longer privy to ? ) . Martin Howe KIRKWALL Orkney Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.