Guest guest Posted June 4, 2001 Report Share Posted June 4, 2001 Hi All: Thanks to those who responded to my suggestion. I'll assume an iceberg theory of approval here (10% above the water line corresponds to a majority of silent but approving lurkers). I thought I would throw a totally blind test out first just so you know how these things work. To my mind, this is a real yardstick for astrology, although as I said, it is more difficult than what one usually encounters when seeing a real live human being for a reading. OTOH, lots of unexpected things can pop up in people's charts that aren't related to their life options at any given time, so understanding how to read charts blindly really is useful. Here's the data: Female born Jul 3 1949 10.05 pm CCT (Tz 8) Manila, Philippines 14n25 121e00 Source: birth certificate Asc(lahiri): 16Aq48 residence on birthday prior to event: Manila What happened on Dec 3 1974? Let's try one week on this one, OK? Answers due by June 11. Please include an account of your astrological reasoning. Have fun! Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 4, 2001 Report Share Posted June 4, 2001 Christopher Kevill wrote: > > Asc(lahiri): 16Aq48 > residence on birthday prior to event: Manila > Dear Chris, Please also give RESIDENCE on date of occurrence, IF THEN PERMANENT AND NOT A VISIT -also say if relocation was very recent. This is needed for my LSRs! regards Mani Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 6, 2001 Report Share Posted June 6, 2001 Om Krsnaaya Namah Hey Chris! > > Here's the data: > > Female born Jul 3 1949 10.05 pm CCT (Tz 8) > Manila, Philippines 14n25 121e00 > > Source: birth certificate > Asc(lahiri): 16Aq48 > residence on birthday prior to event: Manila > > > What happened on Dec 3 1974? > Looks like I'll be the first to look foolish! Was it some health problem, perhaps resulting in surgery or hospitalisation, perhaps afflicting the reproductive organs e.g. hysterectomy etc? High embarrassment potential here, so I'll write up my analysis if it's right. Thanks, Pursottam P.S. Great idea BTW! _______ Get your free @ address at Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 6, 2001 Report Share Posted June 6, 2001 Pursottam: Thanks for being the first to go public. I've already a received a guess from another person but it was sent to me off list. This is also fine with me. I know not everyone wants to risk embarrassment. Please also send your astrological reasoning that explains your guess. Chris At 12:27 AM 6/7/01 +0100, you wrote: >Om Krsnaaya Namah > >Hey Chris! > >> >> Here's the data: >> >> Female born Jul 3 1949 10.05 pm CCT (Tz 8) >> Manila, Philippines 14n25 121e00 >> >> Source: birth certificate >> Asc(lahiri): 16Aq48 >> residence on birthday prior to event: Manila >> >> >> What happened on Dec 3 1974? >> > >Looks like I'll be the first to look foolish! Was it some health problem, >perhaps resulting in surgery or hospitalisation, perhaps afflicting the >reproductive organs e.g. hysterectomy etc? > >High embarrassment potential here, so I'll write up my analysis if it's >right. > >Thanks, > >Pursottam > >P.S. Great idea BTW! > > >_______ > >Get your free @ address at > > > >gjlist- > > > >Your use of is subject to > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 7, 2001 Report Share Posted June 7, 2001 Christopher Kevill wrote: > Pursottam: > > Thanks for being the first to go public. I've already a received a guess > from another person but it was sent to me off list. This is also fine with > me. I know not everyone wants to risk embarrassment. Dear Chris, I have no objection to my letter being on the list, but I wanted to avoid influencing anybody´s approach. Also I only wanted a "hot" or "cold" answer, so I could either try again or just give up. Don´t mind my post being on the list, but I do beg you to give me an answer OFF the list. I have erased my letter, but you are welcome to put it on the list, if you think it would be right. I´m sur Pursottam too would appreciate a hot/cold answer from you. None of us wants to spend a lot of time writing up a report if we have goofed it anyway. so an answer like: off the mark, close to mark, neutral etc would help. This means more work for you, unfortunately. regards Mani Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 7, 2001 Report Share Posted June 7, 2001 Mani: > >I have no objection to my letter being on the list, but I wanted to avoid >influencing anybody´s approach. That's fine. One quiz series I've participated in doesn't post the guesses before the answer is revealed either. The other one does. I prefer the latter approach because I think it creates more of a collective learning atmosphere, where everyone sees everyone's else's thinking as it's happening. When you don't see the reasoning until after the fact, it's too much all at once. Doesn't encourage as much learning and debate once the answer is known. But either way is fine with me. Let's hope we can properly examine the right answer when it's known and try to figure out how it was arrived at. > >Also I only wanted a "hot" or "cold" answer, so I could either try again or just >give up. Don´t mind my post being on the list, but I do beg you to give me an >answer OFF the list. I have erased my letter, but you are welcome to put it on >the list, if you think it would be right. Actually, I wasn't thinking of you when I mentioned that someone had submitted a guess already. Yours seemed preliminary and subject to revision. Anyway, I wanted this quiz to be like the others out there: totally blind. No hot or cold. It takes too much away from the whole process. In future, we can have mutiple choice quizzes or true false that are easier than this one, but on principle, I'm against this tipping my hand approach during the process. I´m sur Pursottam too would >appreciate a hot/cold answer from you. None of us wants to spend a lot of time >writing up a report if we have goofed it anyway. I'm not asking for some huge report. Just a few sentences with the broad outline of how you arrived at your answer. This way we can distinguish it from people who make their guesses using means other than astrology like pulling tarot cards, reading tea leaves, or just plain old guessing. There's really no harm in guessing wrong here. Without prejudging most of your efforts, in my experience most posts (>80%) are wrong. And there are some quizzes that never get answered correctly. That's how hard these tests are. So one should *expect* to get it wrong. I'm quite hopeless at these things, FWIW. I hope to demonstrate how hopeless I truly am when someone else posts a quiz in the future. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 7, 2001 Report Share Posted June 7, 2001 Hi Chris, Did she get Married to a famous personality??? Regards -Narayan gjlist, Christopher Kevill <ckevill@i...> wrote: > Hi All: > > Thanks to those who responded to my suggestion. I'll assume an iceberg > theory of approval here (10% above the water line corresponds to a majority > of silent but approving lurkers). > > I thought I would throw a totally blind test out first just so you know how > these things work. To my mind, this is a real yardstick for astrology, > although as I said, it is more difficult than what one usually encounters > when seeing a real live human being for a reading. OTOH, lots of > unexpected things can pop up in people's charts that aren't related to > their life options at any given time, so understanding how to read charts > blindly really is useful. > > Here's the data: > > Female born Jul 3 1949 10.05 pm CCT (Tz 8) > Manila, Philippines 14n25 121e00 > > Source: birth certificate > Asc(lahiri): 16Aq48 > residence on birthday prior to event: Manila > > > What happened on Dec 3 1974? > > Let's try one week on this one, OK? Answers due by June 11. Please > include an account of your astrological reasoning. > > Have fun! > > Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 7, 2001 Report Share Posted June 7, 2001 Dear Christ, The person is a martial man , and a daring one. Prone to accident , fights and self invited troubles. At the time of incident the person was in Jupiter Mahadasa and Saturn Antra with Jupiter Sub. As Jupiter is in Sun star lord of 11th a badhka place , it is bad for health and may give other troubles to related to 12th house due to 4rth 5th and 10th house matters. To narrow down , it cannot be marriage as Saturn is 10th house occupant. Saturn is aspected by Mars and is aspecting back to Mars. The day was Tuesday. Sun Mars Mercury and Venus were aspecting to 8th from Scorpio in such a way that they include natal mars and mercury in between them. A surgery or a police case both are possible. Inder Jit Sahni Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 7, 2001 Report Share Posted June 7, 2001 Om Krsnaaya Namah Hi Chris, > > I'm not asking for some huge report. Just a few sentences with the broad > outline of how you arrived at your answer. This way we can distinguish it The only problem is that I don't think a one factor approach that is summarised in a few sentences really leads anyone (well me anyway!) to their solution. I can give you many factors that lead me to look into a possibility more deeply, or others which convince me more, and yet others which I feel support my argument more. That's why I can't be bothered to write the mental process I took, unless it is correct - forgive the laziness...it's hot here! :-) Thanks, Pursottam P.S. Although I didn't use tea-leaves, tarot-cards, tulips, the tap-water, or whatever in my analysis, they are classically speaking (in a sense) still jyotish, as they fall in the nimitta/shakuna/lakshana category i.e. signs and omens (in the Samhita section of jyotish). As such, they still qualify as jyotishical factors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 7, 2001 Report Share Posted June 7, 2001 Hello Chris, so much views, different and of our best astrologers... One thing is the dasa: rahu moon, another thing is, that moon in this case is malefic, rahu, my special friend, too is not the fellow, I would like to meet. Mars is a malefic. Nevertheless there are some inclinations for me, to believe, it is a matter of career. An important and radical changement in career, (politics, research...) though my pendulum denies it... 10th house metters in this case seem to be too important. Planets of 7 houses joined here in scorpio, the 10th. Transit sun in 10 will go well. Transit mercury will go well too, as venus does too. Mars is a malefic, but in his own house, might give a boost to career. Rahu in ten: may become a leader of the masses. Why not? Neptune: may bring unexpected honours or discredits, so why not honours? Malefic moon is in his own house in 6, destroyer of enemies. Saturn in 5: ruler of one in 5: good intellect... Jupiter, though very weak in shad bala: exactly with the ascendant. Inspite of Ketu in 4, bringing changement to hostile affairs, there would be no bad effect to house ten. Ashtakavarga is high: 34. Means this house might be capable to deal with this heavy energy. Though I must admit, only average bindus on dec 3. 1974. Age of 25: Venus does its best. Transiting house ten, being ruler of 4 and 9 must be favorable. Co-ruler of aquarius is Uranus. Conception took place under stationary Uranus. Day of event: Uranus was exactly forming a trigone with transit uranus in 9. Even this woman might have been surprised herself. Some days before this event she might have had some kind of exhaustion. Regards, ILona Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 8, 2001 Report Share Posted June 8, 2001 Christopher Kevill : > Mani: > That's fine. One quiz series I've participated in doesn't post the guesses > before the answer is revealed either. The other one does. I prefer the > latter approach because I think it creates more of a collective learning > atmosphere, where everyone sees everyone's else's thinking as it's > happening. OKAY Chris! Here my effort, purely western/ Mani. The LSR for Dec 3 happens on 2 Dec, therefore strong. LSR AC is nearly conj. natal Jupiter, ruler of 2nd and 11th - money and popularity. LSR jupiter is close conj. natal AC LSR DC is conj. natal venus the Yogakaraka. LSR Venus, Yogakaraka, is conj. natal MC, opposite to natal Mars, lord of natal 10th. Close to this a conj of sun, mercury and neptune. LSR MC is trine to natal sun, lord of 7th. LSR Mercury is sextile to LSR AC Mars, lord of 10th is just entering 10th scorpio But Saturn lord of 1st and 12h is quincunx natal MC and square natal moon, lord of natal 6th. All this denotes IMHO a sudden success, gain of power and money and honour, but the saturn aspect might have brought stress and some health problems. But these will last for a perod of 3 months and cannot be taken as acute. An appointment to a high and lucrative post is what I´d expect, if not downright winning in Lotto or in a casino. The following LSR on 29 DEc: Lsr jupiter still on natal AC IC onj natal jupiter Ac conj natal venus MC square natal jupiter Mars conj natal MC, as owner of house Mercury opposite naral sun Venus quincunx natal mars/mercury saturn square natal moon, quincunx MC The benefic and negative elements persist: still a period of success, but increased strain on the health. This could fit a politician going through an election campaign, winning the elections and the struggling to build a cabinet etc. BUT the person was only 26 years old and this solution is very unlikely! But one can get catapulted into a high rank as happened to me when I was 27. Another aspect: venus aslord of 9th and jupiter as jupiter could have brought either a great spiritual experience, or made one the head of a monastery etc.! regards Mani Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 8, 2001 Report Share Posted June 8, 2001 Dear Christ, Forgive me i had done mistake again . I took Tz as -8 instead of +8. Here is the correct one. This is female born in Venus sub has lot of reasoning power introvert but Jupiter aspect gives balance of mind and have lot of patience. She is known in the world due to her own personality and efforts as Venus is in Saturn star and Saturn is ascendant lord. Rahu mahadasa in general indicates 7th house maters connected with 11th. Mars antardasa is more to do with 4rth house matters through 10th and 3rd. On the day of incident , day was ruled by mars and Sun was transiting through the Rashi of Mars and constellation of Mercury. Moon was also transiting through the star of Saturn and from his own Rashi. So mars mercury Saturn moon has the connection with the incident. As Saturn is connected and it is in 6th in bhava it is not marriage but some success. As Mars is connected it is some education or contest . As Moon is connected it may be with pleasure and enjoyment and may be with speculation. Inder Jit Sahni Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 8, 2001 Report Share Posted June 8, 2001 Inder Jit Sahni schrieb: > Dear Christ, > Forgive me i had done mistake again . I took Tz as -8 instead of +8. Dear folks, I have often posted about time zones. The best way to give time zones is to relate it to GMT (UT). Say, "8 hours more than GMt" or " 8 hours less than GMT". Eastern zones are minus zones, western are plus! regards Mani PS: CCT is also AWST. Dear Inder Jit, by a cmpletely different method you seem to have arrived at the same conclusions as I! Fools seldom differ, hahaha! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 8, 2001 Report Share Posted June 8, 2001 Dear Mani, My conclusion are based on personality factor too, by Christ standard's and of course mine too this lady is beautiful .A cancer woman has style /acting in behave and thus attract others and Saturn constellation is very careful about appearance , which is today norm of checking beauty , such woman or man will move out very well dressed will comb there hairs even if he or she is to move a short distance added to this Jupiter gives simplicity and behave as one is not cautious about his appearance though one is too much from his inner. Just apply it in your day to day astrology and show me the results. And in the end it is good to be a fool along with you. Inder Jit Sahni - subra gjlist Friday, June 08, 2001 11:32 PM Re: [gjlist] GJ List Quiz #1 Inder Jit Sahni schrieb: > Dear Christ, > Forgive me i had done mistake again . I took Tz as -8 instead of +8. Dear folks, I have often posted about time zones. The best way to give time zones is to relate it to GMT (UT). Say, "8 hours more than GMt" or " 8 hours less than GMT". Eastern zones are minus zones, western are plus! regards Mani PS: CCT is also AWST. Dear Inder Jit, by a cmpletely different method you seem to have arrived at the same conclusions as I! Fools seldom differ, hahaha! gjlist- Your use of is subject to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2001 Report Share Posted June 9, 2001 Inder Jit Sahni wrote > Dear Mani, > My conclusion are based on personality factor too, by Christ standard's and > of course mine too this lady is beautiful .A cancer woman has style /acting > in behave and thus attract others and Saturn constellation is very careful > about appearance , which is today norm of checking beauty , such woman or > man will move out very well dressed will comb there hairs even if he or she > is to move a short distance added to this Jupiter gives simplicity and > behave as one is not cautious about his appearance though one is too much > from his inner. > Just apply it in your day to day astrology and show me the results. Dear Inder Jit, I agree with your remarks, but do not see how she is a cancer woman. Her Lagna is aquarius, saturn in leo, moon in virgo. Only venus is in cancer. Please clarify. My own assumption that she must be attractive was based on this: jupiter lord of 2nd, though in debility, gets full aspect from venus in moon´s house and is trine to moon. Moon, dispositor of venus, has full aspect on 2nd. Rahu in 2nd can make the person "strangely attractive", some charming asymmetry or mole. regards Mani Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2001 Report Share Posted June 9, 2001 My short answer Looks like a very tough chart to me. Aquarius lagna, all the benefics in dushtanas, Moon in 8th, Venus in 6th, Jup in 12th born on Ashtami day with Parigha Yoga governed by Magha, and lagna lord Saturn in Magha, Moon conjunct Ketu in 8th, under papakartari from Saturn and Mars in Navamsa. Rahu and Mars not placed well wrt each other in rasi, navamsa, drekkana, and since Rahu-Mars is usually a bad time (personal experience) resulting in depression, illness etc., . The annual chart doesn't look good(debilitated Mars in the ascendant and lagnesh in the 6th house) and the transits are significant. I would predict she had a major illness afflicting her kidneys or liver, her longevity looks short too, I hope she lived past it. Ravi gjlist, Christopher Kevill <ckevill@i...> wrote: > Hi All: > > Thanks to those who responded to my suggestion. I'll assume an iceberg > theory of approval here (10% above the water line corresponds to a majority > of silent but approving lurkers). > > I thought I would throw a totally blind test out first just so you know how > these things work. To my mind, this is a real yardstick for astrology, > although as I said, it is more difficult than what one usually encounters > when seeing a real live human being for a reading. OTOH, lots of > unexpected things can pop up in people's charts that aren't related to > their life options at any given time, so understanding how to read charts > blindly really is useful. > > Here's the data: > > Female born Jul 3 1949 10.05 pm CCT (Tz 8) > Manila, Philippines 14n25 121e00 > > Source: birth certificate > Asc(lahiri): 16Aq48 > residence on birthday prior to event: Manila > > > What happened on Dec 3 1974? > > Let's try one week on this one, OK? Answers due by June 11. Please > include an account of your astrological reasoning. > > Have fun! > > Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2001 Report Share Posted June 9, 2001 Dear Chris I looked at your mystery chart and think this lady lost her partner in a vehicle accident on this day in Feb 3 1974. She may have also been in the accident but survived. I would say sudden loss of partner through accident or fire. Andrew Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2001 Report Share Posted June 9, 2001 Andrew Lynn wrote: > Dear Chris > > I looked at your mystery chart and think this lady lost her partner in a > vehicle accident on this day in Feb 3 1974. She may have also been in the > accident but survived. I would say sudden loss of partner through accident > or fire. Dear andrew, the date given was DECEMBER 3, not FEBRUARY. Maybe you should try again, before the deadline! The incident you refer to could have happened in february, but then at least a day later, if not more. regards Mani Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2001 Report Share Posted June 9, 2001 Dear Mani, Here i mean Venus in cancer.It is sublord of Ascendent , but in the case of women venus is effective and jupiter in the case of men. Inder Jit Sahni - subra gjlist Saturday, June 09, 2001 12:47 PM Re: [gjlist] GJ List Quiz #1 Inder Jit Sahni wrote > Dear Mani, > My conclusion are based on personality factor too, by Christ standard's and > of course mine too this lady is beautiful .A cancer woman has style /acting > in behave and thus attract others and Saturn constellation is very careful > about appearance , which is today norm of checking beauty , such woman or > man will move out very well dressed will comb there hairs even if he or she > is to move a short distance added to this Jupiter gives simplicity and > behave as one is not cautious about his appearance though one is too much > from his inner. > Just apply it in your day to day astrology and show me the results. Dear Inder Jit, I agree with your remarks, but do not see how she is a cancer woman. Her Lagna is aquarius, saturn in leo, moon in virgo. Only venus is in cancer. Please clarify. My own assumption that she must be attractive was based on this: jupiter lord of 2nd, though in debility, gets full aspect from venus in moon´s house and is trine to moon. Moon, dispositor of venus, has full aspect on 2nd. Rahu in 2nd can make the person "strangely attractive", some charming asymmetry or mole. regards Mani gjlist- Your use of is subject to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2001 Report Share Posted June 9, 2001 Dear Inder, Thanks for your revised guess. Everyone should remember that when casting these quiz charts, please pay attention to the given information. They are there for checking. The Asc here was 16Aq48. If you don't get that Asc, then you know you've goofed. I do this all the time, making typos here, a bit of forgetfulness there. Oh, and as nice a person as I am, I cannot be properly called "Christ" -- that's a moniker for someone else entirely different! Drop the "t", and you have it. Chris At 08:00 PM 6/8/01 +0530, you wrote: >Dear Christ, >Forgive me i had done mistake again . I took Tz as -8 instead of +8. >Here is the correct one. >This is female born in Venus sub has lot of reasoning power introvert but Jupiter aspect gives balance of mind and have lot of patience. >She is known in the world due to her own personality and efforts as Venus is in Saturn star and Saturn is ascendant lord. >Rahu mahadasa in general indicates 7th house maters connected with 11th. >Mars antardasa is more to do with 4rth house matters through 10th and 3rd. >On the day of incident , day was ruled by mars and Sun was transiting through the Rashi of Mars and constellation of Mercury. >Moon was also transiting through the star of Saturn and from his own Rashi. >So mars mercury Saturn moon has the connection with the incident. >As Saturn is connected and it is in 6th in bhava it is not marriage but some success. >As Mars is connected it is some education or contest . >As Moon is connected it may be with pleasure and enjoyment and may be with speculation. > >Inder Jit Sahni > > > > > > >gjlist- > > > >Your use of is subject to > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2001 Report Share Posted June 9, 2001 Dear Chris, As you will like it but why drop why not to add opher. Inder Jit Sahni - Christopher Kevill gjlist Saturday, June 09, 2001 8:29 PM Re: [gjlist] GJ List Quiz #1 Dear Inder, Thanks for your revised guess. Everyone should remember that when casting these quiz charts, please pay attention to the given information. They are there for checking. The Asc here was 16Aq48. If you don't get that Asc, then you know you've goofed. I do this all the time, making typos here, a bit of forgetfulness there. Oh, and as nice a person as I am, I cannot be properly called "Christ" -- that's a moniker for someone else entirely different! Drop the "t", and you have it. Chris At 08:00 PM 6/8/01 +0530, you wrote: >Dear Christ, >Forgive me i had done mistake again . I took Tz as -8 instead of +8. >Here is the correct one. >This is female born in Venus sub has lot of reasoning power introvert but Jupiter aspect gives balance of mind and have lot of patience. >She is known in the world due to her own personality and efforts as Venus is in Saturn star and Saturn is ascendant lord. >Rahu mahadasa in general indicates 7th house maters connected with 11th. >Mars antardasa is more to do with 4rth house matters through 10th and 3rd. >On the day of incident , day was ruled by mars and Sun was transiting through the Rashi of Mars and constellation of Mercury. >Moon was also transiting through the star of Saturn and from his own Rashi. >So mars mercury Saturn moon has the connection with the incident. >As Saturn is connected and it is in 6th in bhava it is not marriage but some success. >As Mars is connected it is some education or contest . >As Moon is connected it may be with pleasure and enjoyment and may be with speculation. > >Inder Jit Sahni > > > > > > >gjlist- > > > >Your use of is subject to > > > > gjlist- Your use of is subject to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2001 Report Share Posted June 9, 2001 Hi Chris, hi all, Here is my try. On that day she was running Rahu/Mars/Rahu. Rahu in her horoscope promisses problems with family in general. Mars conjunct 8th lord in the 4th house (actually conjunct her IC!)emphasizes this, and diractly afflicts her home. 4th lord Venus occupies the 6th, a Dushtana. The dispositor of Venus, the Moon, is conjunct practically stationary Neptune in the 8th, the worst of the Dushtanas, square 7th lord (Maraka) the Sun. The other Maraka, 2nd lord Jupiter, sits debilitated in the 12th and casts aspects on the 4th, 6th and 8th house! Unpleasant houses were activated in that period. Mars and Lagnesh Saturn are in mutual aspect. There are also several Yogas in this chart indicating afflicted health. Benefics in malefic houses and malefics in benefic houses, afflicted 8th house and 8th lord, afflicted 5th house and 5th lord, the Moon in the 8th, Mercury, dispositor of both the Moon and the Sun afflicted by Mars, Mars being the 3rd+8th lord counted from Chandra Lagna! VARSHAPHALA for 1974 shows debilitated Bhukti-lord Mars in the 1st house(!), aspecting the 4th, and Jupiter(significator for children) in the 8th. 7th house as well, ofcourse (spouse)Lagnesh (the Moon) occupies the 6th, aspected by the Sun (Maraka), 7th+8th lord Saturn + 12th lord Mercury! By the "Sun-Arch-Direction" (in german "Sonnenbogen Direktion") on Dec.3 Mars (conj. radix IC) joined her radix Sun square radix Moon- Neptune conjunction! Neptune practicaly stationary! That's heavy! Mars conjunct IC in a horoskope promisses afflicted home. Conj. Sun and squre Moon-Neptune makes it worse. So I think MARS DID IT. Mars wreaked havoc in her life on Dec. 3, 1974. I am not sure if he hurt only her family, or only her own body, or both. I gues both. Either a catastrophe happened at home, or in an accident (6th house)on a short journy (Mars is 3rd lord) involving a car or another mean of transport(4th house). There is confluence of factors indicating evil to her mother(4th house afflicted + Moon in the 8th), (father seems to be less afflicted), perhaps children (Rahu's dispositor is debilitated Jupiter in the 12th, 5th lord Mercury is afflicted by Mars, maraka the Sun is in the 5th). If her own body was at stake, organs in the breast (4th house), face, eyes (Rahu in the 2nd + Mars in Torus, 2nd house of the natural horoscope) and/or reproductory organs (8th lord Mercury afflicted by Mars) would be my gues. 10th lord Mars conj. 5th lord Mecury in the 4th and aspecting the 10th does indicate succes in career, + transitting Mars, Mercury and the rest of them were in the 10th, but I don't think that her succes is what we are to expect on Dec. 3, 1974. If she survived (I gues she did) she probably left Philipines and became successful abroad (10th lord Mars in mutual aspect with 12th lord Saturn). She is a VERY sensitive person, probably psychic, and there are also several factors indicating that she might be an astrologer. OK. Enough for tonight. Looking forward to feedback! Regards and love, Liliana >Christopher Kevill <ckevill >gjlist >gjlist >[gjlist] GJ List Quiz #1 >Mon, 04 Jun 2001 09:58:28 -0400 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from [64.211.240.230] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id >MHotMailBCE4E16C00904004315640D3F0E60FD211; Mon Jun 04 07:09:12 2001 >Received: from [10.1.4.55] by ej. with NNFMP; 04 Jun 2001 >13:59:14 -0000 >Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 4 Jun 2001 13:59:13 -0000 >Received: (qmail 52408 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2001 13:59:12 -0000 >Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9. with QMQP; 4 Jun 2001 >13:59:12 -0000 >Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.ca.inter.net) (38.210.35.210) by mta1 >with SMTP; 4 Jun 2001 13:59:12 -0000 >Received: from ip36.toronto84.dialup.canada.psi.net ([154.20.78.36] >helo=default) by smtp.ca.inter.net with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id >156ut0-0007R6-00 for gjlist; Mon, 04 Jun 2001 09:59:14 >-0400 >From sentto-490438-5598-991663153-astrolila Mon Jun 04 07:10:41 2001 >X-eGroups-Return: >sentto-490438-5598-991663153-astrolila=hotmail.com (AT) returns (DOT) >X-Sender: ckevill >X-Apparently-gjlist >Message-Id: <3.0.2.32.20010604095828.00b3758c >X-Sender: ckevill >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.2 (32) >In-<1e.16ac3bbf.284bd871 >Mailing-List: list gjlist; contact >gjlist-owner >Delivered-mailing list gjlist >Precedence: bulk >List-Un: <gjlist> > >Hi All: > >Thanks to those who responded to my suggestion. I'll assume an iceberg >theory of approval here (10% above the water line corresponds to a majority >of silent but approving lurkers). > >I thought I would throw a totally blind test out first just so you know how >these things work. To my mind, this is a real yardstick for astrology, >although as I said, it is more difficult than what one usually encounters >when seeing a real live human being for a reading. OTOH, lots of >unexpected things can pop up in people's charts that aren't related to >their life options at any given time, so understanding how to read charts >blindly really is useful. > >Here's the data: > >Female born Jul 3 1949 10.05 pm CCT (Tz 8) >Manila, Philippines 14n25 121e00 > >Source: birth certificate >Asc(lahiri): 16Aq48 >residence on birthday prior to event: Manila > > >What happened on Dec 3 1974? > >Let's try one week on this one, OK? Answers due by June 11. Please >include an account of your astrological reasoning. > >Have fun! > >Chris > > >gjlist- > > > >Your use of is subject to > > _______________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2001 Report Share Posted June 9, 2001 Dear Chris I made a typo and actually did look at Dec 4, but I will stick with what I said about loss of spouse or partner through accident involving a vehicle. Andrew Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2001 Report Share Posted June 9, 2001 Dear Chris, It was Dec 3, not Dec 4. I did look at the right day. My Parasharas light program will not save this chart for some strange reason. Can you email me the degree position of my planets in navamsha as I have forgotten how to calculate them manually. Can one of the more mathematically minded put up the maths for doing it so I can re-remember it! Andrew Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2001 Report Share Posted June 10, 2001 Hi Chris and list members, Just want to add something to my previous e-mail. Since the Moon is so closely conjunct slow Neptune, and Neptune signifies (among other things) water, also drugs, alcochol, so perhaps one of these things played a role in this event? I'll stop here, before my imagination starts constructing scenarios. Liliana >Christopher Kevill <ckevill >gjlist >gjlist >[gjlist] GJ List Quiz #1 >Mon, 04 Jun 2001 09:58:28 -0400 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from [64.211.240.230] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id >MHotMailBCE4E16C00904004315640D3F0E60FD211; Mon Jun 04 07:09:12 2001 >Received: from [10.1.4.55] by ej. with NNFMP; 04 Jun 2001 >13:59:14 -0000 >Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 4 Jun 2001 13:59:13 -0000 >Received: (qmail 52408 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2001 13:59:12 -0000 >Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9. with QMQP; 4 Jun 2001 >13:59:12 -0000 >Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.ca.inter.net) (38.210.35.210) by mta1 >with SMTP; 4 Jun 2001 13:59:12 -0000 >Received: from ip36.toronto84.dialup.canada.psi.net ([154.20.78.36] >helo=default) by smtp.ca.inter.net with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id >156ut0-0007R6-00 for gjlist; Mon, 04 Jun 2001 09:59:14 >-0400 >From sentto-490438-5598-991663153-astrolila Mon Jun 04 07:10:41 2001 >X-eGroups-Return: >sentto-490438-5598-991663153-astrolila=hotmail.com (AT) returns (DOT) >X-Sender: ckevill >X-Apparently-gjlist >Message-Id: <3.0.2.32.20010604095828.00b3758c >X-Sender: ckevill >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.2 (32) >In-<1e.16ac3bbf.284bd871 >Mailing-List: list gjlist; contact >gjlist-owner >Delivered-mailing list gjlist >Precedence: bulk >List-Un: <gjlist> > >Hi All: > >Thanks to those who responded to my suggestion. I'll assume an iceberg >theory of approval here (10% above the water line corresponds to a majority >of silent but approving lurkers). > >I thought I would throw a totally blind test out first just so you know how >these things work. To my mind, this is a real yardstick for astrology, >although as I said, it is more difficult than what one usually encounters >when seeing a real live human being for a reading. OTOH, lots of >unexpected things can pop up in people's charts that aren't related to >their life options at any given time, so understanding how to read charts >blindly really is useful. > >Here's the data: > >Female born Jul 3 1949 10.05 pm CCT (Tz 8) >Manila, Philippines 14n25 121e00 > >Source: birth certificate >Asc(lahiri): 16Aq48 >residence on birthday prior to event: Manila > > >What happened on Dec 3 1974? > >Let's try one week on this one, OK? Answers due by June 11. Please >include an account of your astrological reasoning. > >Have fun! > >Chris > > >gjlist- > > > >Your use of is subject to > > _______________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.