Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

GJ List Quiz #1\Explanation

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Hello Members,

 

I guess Chris would like my explanation. So here it is:

 

On Dec 3 1974 she was running the Vimsottari Dasa of Rahu/Mars/Saturn

as per 360 days/yr.

 

Using D-1 chart:

 

Rh is with UL or the Upapada Lagna which denotes marriage.

 

Mars is in 3H(Taurus) from UL. The 3H & 8H stands for longevity, from UL they

denote longevity in marriage or getting married.

 

Sa aspects both 3(Taurus) & 8(Libra) houses from UL.

 

Using D-9 or Navamsa:

 

Rh is along 1/7 axis.

Ma is in trine with UL.

Sa is 3H from UL.

 

Using D-1 Narayana Dasa:

 

Cp-Ge was running.

Cp has Ju the lord of UL.

Ge is aspected by UL.

 

Using D-9 Narayana Dasa:

 

Le-Sg was running.

Le is trines with UL.

Sg is in trines too.

 

Moreover, both Le & Sg are aspected by Me & Ke the 3 & 8 lords from UL in D-9.

 

Since there is a lot of influence of GL(authority & power) associated with all

these dasas, I concluded that it is also a period of fame and/or spouse should

be a person of authority or fame.

 

Regards

-Narayan

 

 

 

 

 

 

gjlist, "Narayan Iyer" <narayaniyer@v...> wrote:

> Hi Chris,

>

> Did she get Married to a famous personality???

>

> Regards

> -Narayan

gjlist, Christopher Kevill <ckevill@i...> wrote:

> > Hi All:

> >

> > Thanks to those who responded to my suggestion. I'll assume an iceberg

> > theory of approval here (10% above the water line corresponds to a majority

> > of silent but approving lurkers).

> >

> > I thought I would throw a totally blind test out first just so you know how

> > these things work. To my mind, this is a real yardstick for astrology,

> > although as I said, it is more difficult than what one usually encounters

> > when seeing a real live human being for a reading. OTOH, lots of

> > unexpected things can pop up in people's charts that aren't related to

> > their life options at any given time, so understanding how to read charts

> > blindly really is useful.

> >

> > Here's the data:

> >

> > Female born Jul 3 1949 10.05 pm CCT (Tz 8)

> > Manila, Philippines 14n25 121e00

> >

> > Source: birth certificate

> > Asc(lahiri): 16Aq48

> > residence on birthday prior to event: Manila

> >

> >

> > What happened on Dec 3 1974?

> >

> > Let's try one week on this one, OK? Answers due by June 11. Please

> > include an account of your astrological reasoning.

> >

> > Have fun!

> >

> > Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Namaste Narayan,

Eventhough I cannot afford some time for the chart reading, there is

something that I would like to add on your commentary:

 

 

> Hello Members,

>

> I guess Chris would like my explanation. So here it is:

>

> On Dec 3 1974 she was running the Vimsottari Dasa of Rahu/Mars/Saturn

> as per 360 days/yr.

>

> Using D-1 chart:

>

> Rh is with UL or the Upapada Lagna which denotes marriage.

>

> Mars is in 3H(Taurus) from UL. The 3H & 8H stands for longevity, from UL they

denote longevity in marriage or getting married.

>

> Sa aspects both 3(Taurus) & 8(Libra) houses from UL.

>

 

RAHU tends to eclipse Sun, which is dharmakarak ruling Marriage, and

that is why Sun and Rahu conjunction is baneful for happy and prosperous

marriage particularly in navamsa chart. Therefore,

rahu in Upapada Lagna is not a sure shot for rahu bringing marriage in

its mahadasha. That is why rahu signifies non-traditional marriages, or

non-conventional relationships. Do have this in

mind. When you say that Mars in 3rd from UL may bring marriage, it is so

solely due to its argala over 3rd house since mars is a papa. However,

since 3rd and 8th houses from Arudha lagna give

death and circumstances of death, 3rd and 8th houses from UL signify

death of Spouse. What is more, 8th house from UL stands for second

marriage, so do reconsider your statement above.

 

> Using D-9 or Navamsa:

>

> Rh is along 1/7 axis.

> Ma is in trine with UL.

> Sa is 3H from UL.

>

 

Rahu should be well associated with navamsa lagna to give marriage in

its mahadasha. It should be also well placed from Surya. Antardasha lord

, in this case Mangal, should be well associated

with 7th house in navamsha chart, while pratyantara dasha should be well

associated or ruling/placed in 7th house of navamsa chart or its trines.

So kindly have in mind, that your argument above

is not sufficient

You should also keep basic rules in mind, that rahu mahadasha with mars

antardasha is often an omen for some unpleasent event, while in certain

cases, where both grahas are exceptionally well

placed it may give auspicious results, which is quite rare I must admit.

Best wishes from

Zoran

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Namaste Zoran,

 

 

> RAHU tends to eclipse Sun, which is dharmakarak ruling Marriage, and

> that is why Sun and Rahu conjunction is baneful for happy and prosperous

> marriage particularly in navamsa chart. Therefore,

> rahu in Upapada Lagna is not a sure shot for rahu bringing marriage in

> its mahadasha. That is why rahu signifies non-traditional marriages, or

> non-conventional relationships. Do have this in

> mind.

 

Rahu is not *always* baneful. It is posited both in Rasi & DharmaAmsa in the

brahmanical sign of Pisces. It has argala from Brihaspati too keep him in check.

BTW I have seen many charts where Rahu's Mahadasa gives marriage, albeit

non-traditional!!

 

 

>When you say that Mars in 3rd from UL may bring marriage, it is so

> solely due to its argala over 3rd house since mars is a papa.

 

My statement is correct. I was referring to the Rasi where UL is in Pi and Mars

is posited in Ta the 3H from Pi.

 

> However,

> since 3rd and 8th houses from Arudha lagna give

> death and circumstances of death, 3rd and 8th houses from UL signify

> death of Spouse. What is more, 8th house from UL stands for second

> marriage, so do reconsider your statement above.

 

The 3H & 8H stand for longevity. From UL it denotes longevity in marriage, if

married. If not, it gives marriage. So if married and divorced then 2nd marriage

is seen from 8H from UL. Please read Pt. Narasimha Rao's "Vedic Astrology: An

Integrated Approach"

 

BTW only the 3H from AL is seen for the circumstances of death.

 

>

> > Using D-9 or Navamsa:

> >

> > Rh is along 1/7 axis.

> > Ma is in trine with UL.

> > Sa is 3H from UL.

> >

>

> Rahu should be well associated with navamsa lagna to give marriage > in

> its mahadasha. It should be also well placed from Surya. Antardasha lord

> , in this case Mangal, should be well associated

> with 7th house in navamsha chart, while pratyantara dasha should be well

> associated or ruling/placed in 7th house of navamsa chart or its trines.

> So kindly have in mind, that your argument above

> is not sufficient

> You should also keep basic rules in mind, that rahu mahadasha with mars

> antardasha is often an omen for some unpleasent event, while in certain

> cases, where both grahas are exceptionally well

> placed it may give auspicious results, which is quite rare I must admit.

 

 

What makes you say that Rahu is not well associated with Lagna and with Sun????

 

I agree that Ma is in 6H and is not good. But since Ke is in 7H. Argalas on 7H

should be considered in reverse and Ma has argala on 7H.

 

Moreover from Mo Antaradasa lord Ma is in 2H, giving Vesi yoga(Moon Related

Yoga) in its antaradasa.

 

Ma is also the UL lord in Navamsa.

 

Regards

-Narayan

PS: My guess could be wrong here, but my reasoning is definitely not a stretch

of imagination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Namaste Narayan

I am glad that you have clearly understand what you are saying. I still do not

receive mails from varahamihira list, and as soon as it gets in line, I will

post a word doc with many discussion from previous period, where you will see my

points. Until then,

please see my comments below:

 

Narayan Iyer wrote:

 

> Namaste Zoran,

>

> > RAHU tends to eclipse Sun, which is dharmakarak ruling Marriage, and

> > that is why Sun and Rahu conjunction is baneful for happy and prosperous

> > marriage particularly in navamsa chart. Therefore,

> > rahu in Upapada Lagna is not a sure shot for rahu bringing marriage in

> > its mahadasha. That is why rahu signifies non-traditional marriages, or

> > non-conventional relationships. Do have this in

> > mind.

>

> Rahu is not *always* baneful. It is posited both in Rasi & DharmaAmsa in the

brahmanical sign of Pisces. It has argala from Brihaspati too keep him in check.

BTW I have seen many charts where Rahu's Mahadasa gives marriage, albeit

non-traditional!!

>

 

Please see Sanjay's lesson on Marriage and Dharma. You are right about rahu

giving marriage, but it is and it will always be the enemy of marriege and

dharma, since it still dhi shakti and satya from guru, being debilitated in

guru's sign

 

>

> > However,

> > since 3rd and 8th houses from Arudha lagna give

> > death and circumstances of death, 3rd and 8th houses from UL signify

> > death of Spouse. What is more, 8th house from UL stands for second

> > marriage, so do reconsider your statement above.

>

> The 3H & 8H stand for longevity. From UL it denotes longevity in marriage, if

married. If not, it gives marriage. So if married and divorced then 2nd marriage

is seen from 8H from UL. Please read Pt. Narasimha Rao's "Vedic Astrology: An

Integrated Approach"

>

 

Yes, I agree, but mariage timing is seen from the strongest graha influencing

Upapada not from the 3rd/8th thereof. Papas in 8th from Ul will tend to destroy

1st marriage particularly in dual signs.

 

>

> BTW only the 3H from AL is seen for the circumstances of death.

>

 

Of course. 8th from AL is seen from longevity and chronic illness

 

>

> >

> > > Using D-9 or Navamsa:

> > >

> > > Rh is along 1/7 axis.

> > > Ma is in trine with UL.

> > > Sa is 3H from UL.

> > >

> >

> > Rahu should be well associated with navamsa lagna to give marriage > in

> > its mahadasha. It should be also well placed from Surya. Antardasha lord

> > , in this case Mangal, should be well associated

> > with 7th house in navamsha chart, while pratyantara dasha should be well

> > associated or ruling/placed in 7th house of navamsa chart or its trines.

> > So kindly have in mind, that your argument above

> > is not sufficient

> > You should also keep basic rules in mind, that rahu mahadasha with mars

> > antardasha is often an omen for some unpleasent event, while in certain

> > cases, where both grahas are exceptionally well

> > placed it may give auspicious results, which is quite rare I must admit.

>

> What makes you say that Rahu is not well associated with Lagna and with

Sun????

>

 

Rahu and Sun are never well associated for marriage. Refer to Marriage and

dharma lesson of Sanjay. Further there is Parivarthana of Rahu and Guru in the

Navamsa lagna if it is correct(but let's keep it this way for the sake of

illustration). Parivarthana

would reverse results, so rahu would act as guru. This adds a new dimension to

Rahu in lagna navamsa. What is more, rahu being in 12th house from UL not

obstructing the papa argala on UL in navamsa chart would in no way by itself be

favourable for

marriage.However, due to Parivarthana it may trasnfer guru signficiations what

is different. This situation in navamsa chart, would add foreign influences to

marriage, and give a spouse who has already been married before. However, THIS

NAVAMSH indicates

SPIRITUAL spouse, is it so?

 

 

>

> I agree that Ma is in 6H and is not good. But since Ke is in 7H. Argalas on 7H

should be considered in reverse and Ma has argala on 7H.

>

 

You should count ketu's argala backwords, indeed. It means that ketu has argala

over 8th house, while mangal still has no argala over ketu. Start counting from

ketu not from mangal.

 

>

> Moreover from Mo Antaradasa lord Ma is in 2H, giving Vesi yoga(Moon Related

Yoga) in its antaradasa.

>

> Ma is also the UL lord in Navamsa.

>

 

These points are valid. But what would Vesi Yoga has to do with marriage. They

are primarily yogas that prevent Kemadruma Yoga. Do exaplain please.

 

>

> Regards

> -Narayan

> PS: My guess could be wrong here, but my reasoning is definitely not a stretch

of imagination.

 

My dear Narayan, I've never thought so... You are a good student of Narasimha i

keep on.. you will be a good jyotishi..

Jaya Jagannath

Zoran

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...