Guest guest Posted January 8, 2002 Report Share Posted January 8, 2002 Dear Chris In regards to this post by Martin. What he has correctly explained is the whole basis to "Stellar Astrology" as used by many of the old timers like Krishnamurti, Seshadri Iyer, R.G. Iyer and others. It is nothing new or revolutionary but when explained free of bullshit and dogma with a real life example it appears like a revelation. The problem with so many other astrologers is they are unable to explain something clearly and simply or prefer to baffle with the BS to sound all knowing and wise. As King Solomon said a long time ago- "there is nother new under the Sun". > >We tend to think of Vimshottari dashas as blocks of time belonging to the > >nine planets. As I was recently reminded, however, they belong primarily to > >the nakshatras: Vimshottari is an udu- or nakshatra-dasha. This has certain > >consequences in forecasting. Hear Hear, This is the same as house and signs, while they influence each other, they still keep a certain amount of their own integrity and character. It is like a stew with many ingredients-each adds a certain flavour to the brew. > >The Horasara 31.4-5 states (and is echoed by Jatakaparijata 18.26): 'In the > >dasha of a constellation holding a malefic planet, one meets with > >suffering. As far as [it] has gone in the constellation of the dasha ruler, > >at that [corresponding time] one should predict its result. If in one of > >the three groups [of stars] (trimandala), a malefic stands bereft of > >strength, and is not conjunct a benefic, one will meet with death at the > >end of the dasha.' Exactly, This is what Krishnamurti tries to explain in his work. Unfortunately Krishnamurti makes a bit of a dogs breakfast of his attempts to explain it simply and logically. Krishnamurti like many old timers tends to take huge steps where he starts to explain something then jumps to --- "and so he died at 7pm on the 6/5/76". We are left thinking "what about the bit after he entered Saturn dasha??" > > > >In other words, the dasha of any nakshatra will, at the appropriate time, > >give the result of the planets occupying that nakshatra, or its trinal > >nakshatras. According to this model, the result of a planet occupying the > >beginning of Asvini, Makha, or Mula will be felt at the beginning of Ketu > >dasha; etc. This is Krishnamurti's very first rule of judgement. A house lord, dasha or Bhukti lord will get the strongest influence from planets located in its constellations. I have told you and others this so many times. If planets are located in the constellations of yogi or ava yogi they are also influenced for good or bad. There is a mutual effect of both on each other. I hope this works as I am in Mars dasha and my 2nd and 11th lord Jupiter is in the nakshatra of Mars. If this rule works I should gain a quid under the Mars dasha as Jupiter is well placed in the lagna and the only planet in Mar's constellation. Mars is exalted in Navamsha so I have a vested interest in this being right. LOL > > > >Many nakshatras, of course, will be untenanted; and even those holding > >planets will not give the results of these planets throughout the dasha. > >Hence the planetary ruler of the nakshatra/dasha will make its influence > >felt most of the time. But as, in judging a house, 'occupation is more > >important than rulership', so it may be with dashas too. This is a point that that can be debated in terms of which is stronger or least afflicted. My point is careful judgement of a planets overall capacity for good or evil must be determined first before any comment of what it will do or won't do. Still using these techniques is a long way better than James Brahas "its a wild card." There should be no wild cards if deep inspection is given. > > > >The particular chart which reminded me of this rule was one that I have > >mentioned previously (now again brought to my notice by Tommy Larsen): a > >woman born on 13 January, 1959, at 21:30 CET, Copenhagen, Denmark, with > >25Le15 rising. She died from cancer on 1 September, 1997, in Mercury dasha > >Rahu bhukti. To be precise, 59.9% of Mercury dasha had passed. Another way > >of expressing this would be to say that the Moon had progressed to a point > >59.9% into Mercury's nakshatra Revati, or 24Pi39, conjunct not only Ketu at > >24Pi11, but also the 8th cusp at 25Pi23. At the time of death, this point > >was transited by Saturn at 25Pi51. Excellent call. This is what Krishnamurti teaches in a more confusing and indirect way. This is like the pure Vedic astrology way of coming up with a Richard Houck style prediction on death. I have just returned from exile in Thailand and my group the "Sivathondan Astrological Research Group" will be operating as of tomorrow. If anybody wants to join email me and I will give you the address. I have many things to discuss that I have been researching. I read a chart today for an Indian lady that was mind blowing in the way it showed how a number of old rules applied exactly as laid down by the ancients. I was stunned how accurate the reading was and how these principals never let you down in actual interpretation when you place your faith in them. Principals never change- manifestations of them can vary but once grasped the principal holds up in any chart- whether that person is whilte, black or brindle........ P.S The guy who invented the wheel was a fool- it was the guy who invented the other three was the real smart one. Skinbags. > > > >Martin > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 10, 2002 Report Share Posted January 10, 2002 hi Chris It's Ashok from Gerrard St., can you please give me Andrew's e-mail address so i can join his mailing list. Thank you very much. With Kind Regards Ashok Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 10, 2002 Report Share Posted January 10, 2002 Hi Ashok, Wow, it's been a long time! Andrew has had some "technical difficulties" launching the list so he might wait another few days until a good muhurta chart can be found. But mail him to sign up at : skinbags He'll be happy to have another afficianado of KP on his list. I'm in Vancouver now but will be returning to Toronto next week for a job interview. I'll drop by the store soon. see you, Chris At 05:16 PM 1/10/02 -0500, Ashok Navani wrote: >hi Chris > It's Ashok from Gerrard St., can you please give me Andrew's e-mail >address so i can join his mailing list. Thank you very much. > > With Kind Regards > Ashok > > > >Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya; Hare Krishna; Om Tat Sat >: gjlist- > > > >Your use of is subject to > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.