Re-inventing the wheel -- from Andrew Skinbags Lynn

[Guest guest]

Dear Chris

 

In regards to this post by Martin. What he has correctly explained is the

whole basis to "Stellar Astrology" as used by many of the old timers like

Krishnamurti, Seshadri Iyer, R.G. Iyer and others. It is nothing new or

revolutionary but when explained free of bullshit and dogma with a real life

example it appears like a revelation. The problem with so many other

astrologers is they are unable to explain something clearly and simply or

prefer to baffle with the BS to sound all knowing and wise. As King Solomon

said a long time ago- "there is nother new under the Sun".

 

> >We tend to think of Vimshottari dashas as blocks of time belonging to the

> >nine planets. As I was recently reminded, however, they belong primarily

to

> >the nakshatras: Vimshottari is an udu- or nakshatra-dasha. This has

certain

> >consequences in forecasting.

 

Hear Hear, This is the same as house and signs, while they influence each

other, they still keep a certain amount of their own integrity and

character. It is like a stew with many ingredients-each adds a certain

flavour to the brew.

 

> >The Horasara 31.4-5 states (and is echoed by Jatakaparijata 18.26): 'In

the

> >dasha of a constellation holding a malefic planet, one meets with

> >suffering. As far as [it] has gone in the constellation of the dasha

ruler,

> >at that [corresponding time] one should predict its result. If in one of

> >the three groups [of stars] (trimandala), a malefic stands bereft of

> >strength, and is not conjunct a benefic, one will meet with death at the

> >end of the dasha.'

 

Exactly, This is what Krishnamurti tries to explain in his work.

Unfortunately Krishnamurti makes a bit of a dogs breakfast of his attempts

to explain it simply and logically. Krishnamurti like many old timers tends

to take huge steps where he starts to explain something then jumps to ---

"and so he died at 7pm on the 6/5/76". We are left thinking "what about the

bit after he entered Saturn dasha??"

 

> >

> >In other words, the dasha of any nakshatra will, at the appropriate time,

> >give the result of the planets occupying that nakshatra, or its trinal

> >nakshatras. According to this model, the result of a planet occupying the

> >beginning of Asvini, Makha, or Mula will be felt at the beginning of Ketu

> >dasha; etc.

 

This is Krishnamurti's very first rule of judgement. A house lord, dasha or

Bhukti lord will get the strongest influence from planets located in its

constellations. I have told you and others this so many times. If planets

are located in the constellations of yogi or ava yogi they are also

influenced for good or bad. There is a mutual effect of both on each other.

I hope this works as I am in Mars dasha and my 2nd and 11th lord Jupiter is

in the nakshatra of Mars. If this rule works I should gain a quid under the

Mars dasha as Jupiter is well placed in the lagna and the only planet in

Mar's constellation. Mars is exalted in Navamsha so I have a vested interest

in this being right. LOL

 

> >

> >Many nakshatras, of course, will be untenanted; and even those holding

> >planets will not give the results of these planets throughout the dasha.

> >Hence the planetary ruler of the nakshatra/dasha will make its influence

> >felt most of the time. But as, in judging a house, 'occupation is more

> >important than rulership', so it may be with dashas too.

 

This is a point that that can be debated in terms of which is stronger or

least afflicted. My point is careful judgement of a planets overall capacity

for good or evil must be determined first before any comment of what it will

do or won't do. Still using these techniques is a long way better than James

Brahas "its a wild card." There should be no wild cards if deep inspection

is given.

 

 

> >

> >The particular chart which reminded me of this rule was one that I have

> >mentioned previously (now again brought to my notice by Tommy Larsen): a

> >woman born on 13 January, 1959, at 21:30 CET, Copenhagen, Denmark, with

> >25Le15 rising. She died from cancer on 1 September, 1997, in Mercury

dasha

> >Rahu bhukti. To be precise, 59.9% of Mercury dasha had passed. Another

way

> >of expressing this would be to say that the Moon had progressed to a

point

> >59.9% into Mercury's nakshatra Revati, or 24Pi39, conjunct not only Ketu

at

> >24Pi11, but also the 8th cusp at 25Pi23. At the time of death, this point

> >was transited by Saturn at 25Pi51.

 

 

Excellent call. This is what Krishnamurti teaches in a more confusing and

indirect way. This is like the pure Vedic astrology way of coming up with a

Richard Houck style prediction on death. I have just returned from exile in

Thailand and my group the "Sivathondan Astrological Research Group" will be

operating as of tomorrow. If anybody wants to join email me and I will give

you the address. I have many things to discuss that I have been researching.

I read a chart today for an Indian lady that was mind blowing in the way it

showed how a number of old rules applied exactly as laid down by the

ancients. I was stunned how accurate the reading was and how these

principals never let you down in actual interpretation when you place your

faith in them. Principals never change- manifestations of them can vary but

once grasped the principal holds up in any chart- whether that person is

whilte, black or brindle........

 

P.S The guy who invented the wheel was a fool- it was the guy who invented

the other three was the real smart one.

 

Skinbags.

 

 

> >

> >Martin

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

 

 

 

 

 

 

Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya; Hare Krishna; Om Tat Sat

: gjlist-

 

 

 

Your use of is subject to