Guest guest Posted September 2, 2002 Report Share Posted September 2, 2002 It struct me now: The Vedic Zodiac, based in stars, insensitive to, and thus needing adjustment to, the tilt of the Earth which causes a new "perceived and moveable" Zodiac to be around us always, the perceived Zodiac, the Western Zodiac, where Matriarchy, the circle, ruled, the tilt, is a circular wobble, causing seasons, changes, motion, movement, precession backwards the Patriarchy feels, movement forward the world feels. What is an equinox? It's a perception, which happens at the whim of the circular wobble, do you see? Our "real" living life we perceive NOW is based on Western Zodiac. The karmic original powerful and dominant Zodiac is yet another thing. By the one we know our father, by the other, our mother. This is very significant. Neither alone is complete. The truth hurts, to those who are it's enemies. By one half of reality alone you will not know your current self, but only your self in relation to leaving this world or staying in it, which may be not in your present reality, which may be the mix, or gradual progress. Patriarchy is perhaps, the dark night of the soul. For the night isn't dark to those one with mothers dark half. Some say, "Western is better for personality". This is a dumbed-down-over-time way of saying what is perhaps quite true, and better said as "Western shows you your position in the current relative living world of perception with peer humans", and Vedic shows you "You position in relationship to the absolute and eternal non perceived reality". These statements could of couse be improved finer, more educated thinking. I find this realization quite scientific, though such support I'm not going into much here. I find this realization quite significant because of science as well as mystical reasons and rationale. I am "tripping on" the play of these two halves of the whole. I am trying these days to see the basic Hora division, night and day, male and female, in things, so excuse the focus there, it's my current study. I do think, Western Zodiac is more "Mother" and Eastern, Sidereal, more "Father". They spawn the likened two kinds of ways of thinking- perilistic, ominous, verse malable, mutable, relative to us now here. Water, is adjusting, more related to mother, and there's more water up North. The Earth is drier, harder, more deserts exist, where the Sun, the Patriarchy, originates from and is still stronger today. The wet and emotional "new age" movement does not arise in Lahore, or Delhi, or Cairo, or Israel's old guard. No, it arises in Wet Eugene, with little hippies in dreadlocks. I have always been a child of the Green, the Water, the wet. I have always taken to this stuff. The way Krishna is, so covered with flowers, girlfriends, music, passion, cows, love and abilities chivalrously splendid, is all very Celtic, and wet, and covered with turns and twists, dirt between toes, not straight roman roads. To "Preach" for Krishna is just about a perfect oximoron. These splits of the two halves living in me have split me in two, but that's OK, it's all good learning. The earliest authors of our time, Greek historians, wrote of Celts "they are tall, very white and wet skinned". Things are white and wet where there is no Sun (ie, ocean bottom) Celts do not digest fat properly, they need certain fish or the oil from certain seeds, otherwise, they actually feel bad. A developed genetic disposition to a certain diet, showing certain karmic alignments for those with eyes. And from where and whom do Celts trace their ancestry? The Sun, one day, met the Moon, and after subjegating it, retired in exaustion. The moon, not caring that it was subjegated, such being it's normal state, cared for the Sun while he slept. Hope this is interesting. I think so. By the way, according to most calculations, there was an "alignment" around 300 AD say. This is a very key time in history. I suggest everyone look into what was going on on an emotional level for all of the Western world at that time, all of Europe. Very very interesting. That was when the great Patriarch fell out of control of the West, Europe that is, and the "Natives" began again their old ways, without Romans, but in the wake of their total dominance and presence. It was a time when "Mother" got ahold again of all her Western Children, without "Father" around, but all his forts, roads, and systems were in place, never to again go away. It was a balance point folks. Quite significant one. You and I are literally living in the wake of those events of those days. They were VERY Pivotal. For example, that IS when Germany took over England. It did happen. Germans took over, and to this day, that's who's there, and that's who conquered India, and the world, the British, are essentially predominantly Germanic people. The Celts however did at that time gain and have remained since, confined in a way to the Western edges, in all ways, cultural, blood, art, etc. That is when Saxxons and Celts began to really intermingle heavily, for better or worse, in Europe, and they worked out their stuff slowly to this day. They are the two halves of the West, the brethren of magic, the Celts, and the brethren of control, the Saxxons. They are the male and female half of the West whereas India and other are the male and female halves of the east perhaps. I am trying to see this broad divisions at this time, it's generalization, but it's helpful for understanding basic directional impulses in ourselves always. It is VERY significant what happened when the two zodiacs aligned. Study it. VERY interesting. I'm hinting at a possible ocean of understanding for us here, I think, maybe? Note that Germany hit the Celts "From the East". Note that Ireland, the most protected by distance, a sanctuary, was the least and last hit, and the last to hold a strong ancient blood line and culture which shows how Eastern the West used to be, how Matriarchal, how mystical, how feminine, which is why the dominant masculine cultures letters, musical systems, thought systems, dominate here today, because we were actually originally too weak, too feminine, and both the Germans and Romans could have there ways with us, so Rome jumped in, and Germany took it later, showing that Rome had the Mars, of the two, and Germany the Saturn, of the two, who are both otherwise dominant and strong in nature originally, or solar. Of the two Irelands, Scotland and Ireland, Scotland is more dominant, and thus, we see, Hilly, whereas Ireland is flat to the point of ridiculed and jest. Do you see the omens? They teach, instruct, they are real. In America, thousands of years ago, a Native stood on the shore in Washington state, and looked out across the Pacific, and saw thus: Over there, in the East, they have huge palaces and highly organized religious and materially successful societies, but they are all part of, and development of personal strengths and virtues, relationship with mother Earth, are less. Conformity is more. Down South of me, our brothers, also are like that, they build alot, in square arrangements, and they have centralization thus, whereas here in the North, we do not. We struggle more with nature, and know her better, for we must work with her, and always have. But a new time has come, after so long, the two halves will now meet. Something that is happening now starting as always in the East, will soon reach us here in the West, and for a long time, it shall have to be sorted out in all of us, the contact, the balance, the aligning of the two halves of ourselves, the circle, and square, mother, father, male, female, dominating, dominated. Likewise, Druids in France studied the phenom, and saw it coming, and predicted what has happened, and is happening. We have realized: We came from father, but we are on mother, and on her we depend. Father continues to provide, but mother is our home, the breast we suckle. We have both sides in ourselves, and must honor both. We must straighten our matters each day, and then mix them up again, when the Sun sets. Brush and clean your hair, then tie it in knots with sticks and other things mixed in. Know your blade, and put it away. Count your money, and forget about it. BOTH. -- Das Goravani Roik the mutable Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2002 Report Share Posted September 3, 2002 All - Here! Here! Master Goravani! I am merely an amateur in this field - though a fairly well-studied one, but I have LONG believed that it was the combination of the two or three zodiacal systems which gave the "true" picture of one's life. It has been apparent from my first exposure to "horoscopes" that there was no way that there are only TWELVE types of people. All three of these systems divide the zodiac into twelve. The Hindu "vedic" and Western systems, both by Month; the Chinese system by Year. A good many years ago, I came across a book which combined the Western and Chinese zodiacs resulting in combinations (i.e. - Dog/Aires, Tiger/Virgo, etc.) totaling 144. Still, this is somewhat limiting - though by my observations, a good deal more accurate than either one alone. About 6 years ago, I discovered the Vedic system through Goravani Jyotish. And while I can't say that people are divided into types, per se, the READ one gets from the Vedic system does somewhat classify people into groups with similar characteristics. Now, we have 1728 different "types". On that alone, we have a clearer picture of an individuals tendancies. But, the Vedic system goes beyond that... Whereas, both the Chinese and Western horoscopes tend to give insight into .. "attitude" - the Vedic system gives insight into "events" - surprisingly accurately. I will confess, that I personally do not believe that our lives are completely "fated" or "predetermined" - I DO believe that we are guided to some extent. There would be no purpose to life if this were true! This would mean that heroes and murderers alike had no more to do with their own actions than does a stone. There would be no reason to punish criminals - after all, it's not THEIR choice to do their crimes. What I DO believe is that the choices we are faced with are given to us ahead of time. And I think that the voice which guides the "seers" who practice astrology (Vedic, Western, Chinese or otherwise) are themselves guided by the choices we as individuals make. That is to say, the seers see the choices left to us created by our own actions. Mr Goravani - I like the Mother/Father thing... It fits well with my own philosophy... Best Regards, Martin Michaels Das Goravani [] Monday, September 02, 2002 12:55 PM gjlist [GJ] Two Zodiacs? Perhaps it's Ma and Pa, Again! It struct me now: The Vedic Zodiac, based in stars, insensitive to, and thus needing adjustment to, the tilt of the Earth which causes a new "perceived and moveable" Zodiac to be around us always, the perceived Zodiac, the Western Zodiac, where Matriarchy, the circle, ruled, the tilt, is a circular wobble, causing seasons, changes, motion, movement, precession backwards the Patriarchy feels, movement forward the world feels. What is an equinox? It's a perception, which happens at the whim of the circular wobble, do you see? Our "real" living life we perceive NOW is based on Western Zodiac. The karmic original powerful and dominant Zodiac is yet another thing. By the one we know our father, by the other, our mother. This is very significant. Neither alone is complete. The truth hurts, to those who are it's enemies. By one half of reality alone you will not know your current self, but only your self in relation to leaving this world or staying in it, which may be not in your present reality, which may be the mix, or gradual progress. Patriarchy is perhaps, the dark night of the soul. For the night isn't dark to those one with mothers dark half. Some say, "Western is better for personality". This is a dumbed-down-over-time way of saying what is perhaps quite true, and better said as "Western shows you your position in the current relative living world of perception with peer humans", and Vedic shows you "You position in relationship to the absolute and eternal non perceived reality". These statements could of couse be improved finer, more educated thinking. I find this realization quite scientific, though such support I'm not going into much here. I find this realization quite significant because of science as well as mystical reasons and rationale. I am "tripping on" the play of these two halves of the whole. I am trying these days to see the basic Hora division, night and day, male and female, in things, so excuse the focus there, it's my current study. I do think, Western Zodiac is more "Mother" and Eastern, Sidereal, more "Father". They spawn the likened two kinds of ways of thinking- perilistic, ominous, verse malable, mutable, relative to us now here. Water, is adjusting, more related to mother, and there's more water up North. The Earth is drier, harder, more deserts exist, where the Sun, the Patriarchy, originates from and is still stronger today. The wet and emotional "new age" movement does not arise in Lahore, or Delhi, or Cairo, or Israel's old guard. No, it arises in Wet Eugene, with little hippies in dreadlocks. I have always been a child of the Green, the Water, the wet. I have always taken to this stuff. The way Krishna is, so covered with flowers, girlfriends, music, passion, cows, love and abilities chivalrously splendid, is all very Celtic, and wet, and covered with turns and twists, dirt between toes, not straight roman roads. To "Preach" for Krishna is just about a perfect oximoron. These splits of the two halves living in me have split me in two, but that's OK, it's all good learning. The earliest authors of our time, Greek historians, wrote of Celts "they are tall, very white and wet skinned". Things are white and wet where there is no Sun (ie, ocean bottom) Celts do not digest fat properly, they need certain fish or the oil from certain seeds, otherwise, they actually feel bad. A developed genetic disposition to a certain diet, showing certain karmic alignments for those with eyes. And from where and whom do Celts trace their ancestry? The Sun, one day, met the Moon, and after subjegating it, retired in exaustion. The moon, not caring that it was subjegated, such being it's normal state, cared for the Sun while he slept. Hope this is interesting. I think so. By the way, according to most calculations, there was an "alignment" around 300 AD say. This is a very key time in history. I suggest everyone look into what was going on on an emotional level for all of the Western world at that time, all of Europe. Very very interesting. That was when the great Patriarch fell out of control of the West, Europe that is, and the "Natives" began again their old ways, without Romans, but in the wake of their total dominance and presence. It was a time when "Mother" got ahold again of all her Western Children, without "Father" around, but all his forts, roads, and systems were in place, never to again go away. It was a balance point folks. Quite significant one. You and I are literally living in the wake of those events of those days. They were VERY Pivotal. For example, that IS when Germany took over England. It did happen. Germans took over, and to this day, that's who's there, and that's who conquered India, and the world, the British, are essentially predominantly Germanic people. The Celts however did at that time gain and have remained since, confined in a way to the Western edges, in all ways, cultural, blood, art, etc. That is when Saxxons and Celts began to really intermingle heavily, for better or worse, in Europe, and they worked out their stuff slowly to this day. They are the two halves of the West, the brethren of magic, the Celts, and the brethren of control, the Saxxons. They are the male and female half of the West whereas India and other are the male and female halves of the east perhaps. I am trying to see this broad divisions at this time, it's generalization, but it's helpful for understanding basic directional impulses in ourselves always. It is VERY significant what happened when the two zodiacs aligned. Study it. VERY interesting. I'm hinting at a possible ocean of understanding for us here, I think, maybe? Note that Germany hit the Celts "From the East". Note that Ireland, the most protected by distance, a sanctuary, was the least and last hit, and the last to hold a strong ancient blood line and culture which shows how Eastern the West used to be, how Matriarchal, how mystical, how feminine, which is why the dominant masculine cultures letters, musical systems, thought systems, dominate here today, because we were actually originally too weak, too feminine, and both the Germans and Romans could have there ways with us, so Rome jumped in, and Germany took it later, showing that Rome had the Mars, of the two, and Germany the Saturn, of the two, who are both otherwise dominant and strong in nature originally, or solar. Of the two Irelands, Scotland and Ireland, Scotland is more dominant, and thus, we see, Hilly, whereas Ireland is flat to the point of ridiculed and jest. Do you see the omens? They teach, instruct, they are real. In America, thousands of years ago, a Native stood on the shore in Washington state, and looked out across the Pacific, and saw thus: Over there, in the East, they have huge palaces and highly organized religious and materially successful societies, but they are all part of, and development of personal strengths and virtues, relationship with mother Earth, are less. Conformity is more. Down South of me, our brothers, also are like that, they build alot, in square arrangements, and they have centralization thus, whereas here in the North, we do not. We struggle more with nature, and know her better, for we must work with her, and always have. But a new time has come, after so long, the two halves will now meet. Something that is happening now starting as always in the East, will soon reach us here in the West, and for a long time, it shall have to be sorted out in all of us, the contact, the balance, the aligning of the two halves of ourselves, the circle, and square, mother, father, male, female, dominating, dominated. Likewise, Druids in France studied the phenom, and saw it coming, and predicted what has happened, and is happening. We have realized: We came from father, but we are on mother, and on her we depend. Father continues to provide, but mother is our home, the breast we suckle. We have both sides in ourselves, and must honor both. We must straighten our matters each day, and then mix them up again, when the Sun sets. Brush and clean your hair, then tie it in knots with sticks and other things mixed in. Know your blade, and put it away. Count your money, and forget about it. BOTH. -- Das Goravani Roik the mutable Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2002 Report Share Posted September 3, 2002 Appended is the post borrowed from another egroup: ---------------- On the calendar issue, I feel the word "tropical zodiac" is a misnomer. Tropical (i.e., seasonal) calendar originated in Greece is a primitive notion of keeping track of days wrt seasons only. Hence primitive notions such as "zodiac" moves, and so on. Even in modern astronomy, or Inertial reference frames, these notions are JOKES, but the primitive MacCaulay west clings to its Greek wisdom. Let it be so, we need not even address it...Just ignore it as some child's prank... There is only one zodiac. Zodiac, i.e., stars in the sky are "relatively" fixed wrt earth and aaditya mandala. That it is the other way around is the Ptolemy mind of Greece. We must use this "fixed" star base as the definition of the term "zodiac". Then the misnomer goes away. The Greek & western error is to see the seasonal framework as "fixed". ------------------- gjlist, Das Goravani <das@g...> wrote: > > > > It struct me now: The Vedic Zodiac, based in stars, > insensitive to, and thus needing adjustment to, the tilt of > the Earth which causes a new "perceived and moveable" Zodiac > to be around us always, the perceived Zodiac, the Western > Zodiac, where Matriarchy, the circle, ruled, the tilt, is a > circular wobble, causing seasons, changes, motion, movement, > precession backwards the Patriarchy feels, movement forward > the world feels. > > What is an equinox? It's a perception, which happens at the > whim of the circular wobble, do you see? > > Our "real" living life we perceive NOW is based on Western > Zodiac. > > The karmic original powerful and dominant Zodiac is yet > another thing. > > By the one we know our father, by the other, our mother. > > This is very significant. Neither alone is complete. > > The truth hurts, to those who are it's enemies. > > By one half of reality alone you will not know your current > self, but only your self in relation to leaving this world > or staying in it, which may be not in your present reality, > which may be the mix, or gradual progress. Patriarchy is > perhaps, the dark night of the soul. For the night isn't > dark to those one with mothers dark half. > > Some say, "Western is better for personality". This is a > dumbed-down-over-time way of saying what is perhaps quite > true, and better said as "Western shows you your position in > the current relative living world of perception with peer > humans", and Vedic shows you "You position in relationship > to the absolute and eternal non perceived reality". > > These statements could of couse be improved finer, more > educated thinking. > > I find this realization quite scientific, though such > support I'm not going into much here. I find this > realization quite significant because of science as well as > mystical reasons and rationale. > > I am "tripping on" the play of these two halves of the > whole. I am trying these days to see the basic Hora > division, night and day, male and female, in things, so > excuse the focus there, it's my current study. > > I do think, Western Zodiac is more "Mother" and Eastern, > Sidereal, more "Father". They spawn the likened two kinds of > ways of thinking- perilistic, ominous, verse malable, > mutable, relative to us now here. Water, is adjusting, more > related to mother, and there's more water up North. The > Earth is drier, harder, more deserts exist, where the Sun, > the Patriarchy, originates from and is still stronger today. > The wet and emotional "new age" movement does not arise in > Lahore, or Delhi, or Cairo, or Israel's old guard. No, it > arises in Wet Eugene, with little hippies in dreadlocks. I > have always been a child of the Green, the Water, the wet. I > have always taken to this stuff. The way Krishna is, so > covered with flowers, girlfriends, music, passion, cows, > love and abilities chivalrously splendid, is all very > Celtic, and wet, and covered with turns and twists, dirt > between toes, not straight roman roads. To "Preach" for > Krishna is just about a perfect oximoron. These splits of > the two halves living in me have split me in two, but that's > OK, it's all good learning. > > The earliest authors of our time, Greek historians, wrote of > Celts "they are tall, very white and wet skinned". > > Things are white and wet where there is no Sun (ie, ocean > bottom) > > Celts do not digest fat properly, they need certain fish or > the oil from certain seeds, otherwise, they actually feel > bad. A developed genetic disposition to a certain diet, > showing certain karmic alignments for those with eyes. > > And from where and whom do Celts trace their ancestry? > > The Sun, one day, met the Moon, and after subjegating it, > retired in exaustion. The moon, not caring that it was > subjegated, such being it's normal state, cared for the Sun > while he slept. > > > > > > Hope this is interesting. I think so. > > By the way, according to most calculations, there was an > "alignment" around 300 AD say. This is a very key time in > history. I suggest everyone look into what was going on on > an emotional level for all of the Western world at that > time, all of Europe. Very very interesting. That was when > the great Patriarch fell out of control of the West, Europe > that is, and the "Natives" began again their old ways, > without Romans, but in the wake of their total dominance and > presence. It was a time when "Mother" got ahold again of all > her Western Children, without "Father" around, but all his > forts, roads, and systems were in place, never to again go > away. It was a balance point folks. Quite significant one. > You and I are literally living in the wake of those events > of those days. They were VERY Pivotal. > > For example, that IS when Germany took over England. It did > happen. Germans took over, and to this day, that's who's > there, and that's who conquered India, and the world, the > British, are essentially predominantly Germanic people. The > Celts however did at that time gain and have remained since, > confined in a way to the Western edges, in all ways, > cultural, blood, art, etc. That is when Saxxons and Celts > began to really intermingle heavily, for better or worse, in > Europe, and they worked out their stuff slowly to this day. > They are the two halves of the West, the brethren of magic, > the Celts, and the brethren of control, the Saxxons. They > are the male and female half of the West whereas India and > other are the male and female halves of the east perhaps. I > am trying to see this broad divisions at this time, it's > generalization, but it's helpful for understanding basic > directional impulses in ourselves always. > > It is VERY significant what happened when the two zodiacs > aligned. Study it. VERY interesting. I'm hinting at a > possible ocean of understanding for us here, I think, maybe? > > Note that Germany hit the Celts "From the East". Note that > Ireland, the most protected by distance, a sanctuary, was > the least and last hit, and the last to hold a strong > ancient blood line and culture which shows how Eastern the > West used to be, how Matriarchal, how mystical, how > feminine, which is why the dominant masculine cultures > letters, musical systems, thought systems, dominate here > today, because we were actually originally too weak, too > feminine, and both the Germans and Romans could have there > ways with us, so Rome jumped in, and Germany took it later, > showing that Rome had the Mars, of the two, and Germany the > Saturn, of the two, who are both otherwise dominant and > strong in nature originally, or solar. > > Of the two Irelands, Scotland and Ireland, Scotland is more > dominant, and thus, we see, Hilly, whereas Ireland is flat > to the point of ridiculed and jest. Do you see the omens? > They teach, instruct, they are real. > > In America, thousands of years ago, a Native stood on the > shore in Washington state, and looked out across the > Pacific, and saw thus: Over there, in the East, they have > huge palaces and highly organized religious and materially > successful societies, but they are all part of, and > development of personal strengths and virtues, relationship > with mother Earth, are less. Conformity is more. Down South > of me, our brothers, also are like that, they build alot, in > square arrangements, and they have centralization thus, > whereas here in the North, we do not. We struggle more with > nature, and know her better, for we must work with her, and > always have. But a new time has come, after so long, the two > halves will now meet. Something that is happening now > starting as always in the East, will soon reach us here in > the West, and for a long time, it shall have to be sorted > out in all of us, the contact, the balance, the aligning of > the two halves of ourselves, the circle, and square, mother, > father, male, female, dominating, dominated. > > Likewise, Druids in France studied the phenom, and saw it > coming, and predicted what has happened, and is happening. > > We have realized: We came from father, but we are on > mother, and on her we depend. Father continues to provide, > but mother is our home, the breast we suckle. We have both > sides in ourselves, and must honor both. We must straighten > our matters each day, and then mix them up again, when the > Sun sets. Brush and clean your hair, then tie it in knots > with sticks and other things mixed in. Know your blade, and > put it away. Count your money, and forget about it. > > BOTH. > > > > -- > > > Das Goravani > Roik Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2002 Report Share Posted September 4, 2002 With all due respect, Sir: I believe it is foolish to ignore the viewpoint of others, though that viewpoint may seem to be misguided in your eyes. I study martial arts - these days concentrating on Aikido. But there was a time when I studied only Tae Kwon Do; later it was Hapkido; and so on... Too often, we close our minds to the wisdom of others in the mistaken belief that the way WE learned is the only correct way. Each of the above martial arts has it's own philosophy and approach - it's own viewpoint. As I mentioned yesterday, I find that each other Zodiacal systems has a different viewpoint, and hence, shows different aspects of our "destiny". And I should point out also that as scientists have proven in recent years, the galaxy IS, in fact, CHANGING - the stars themselves, the Zodiac is changing - albeit slowly...just one more lesson on the falseness of "absolutes"... Best Regards, Martin Michaels Venkateswara Reddy [venkateshwara_reddy] Tuesday, September 03, 2002 8:37 PM gjlist Cc: vedic astrology [GJ] RE: Two Zodiacs? Perhaps it's Ma and Pa, Again! Appended is the post borrowed from another egroup: ---------------- On the calendar issue, I feel the word "tropical zodiac" is a misnomer. Tropical (i.e., seasonal) calendar originated in Greece is a primitive notion of keeping track of days wrt seasons only. Hence primitive notions such as "zodiac" moves, and so on. Even in modern astronomy, or Inertial reference frames, these notions are JOKES, but the primitive MacCaulay west clings to its Greek wisdom. Let it be so, we need not even address it...Just ignore it as some child's prank... There is only one zodiac. Zodiac, i.e., stars in the sky are "relatively" fixed wrt earth and aaditya mandala. That it is the other way around is the Ptolemy mind of Greece. We must use this "fixed" star base as the definition of the term "zodiac". Then the misnomer goes away. The Greek & western error is to see the seasonal framework as "fixed". ------------------- gjlist, Das Goravani <das@g...> wrote: > > > > It struct me now: The Vedic Zodiac, based in stars, > insensitive to, and thus needing adjustment to, the tilt of > the Earth which causes a new "perceived and moveable" Zodiac > to be around us always, the perceived Zodiac, the Western > Zodiac, where Matriarchy, the circle, ruled, the tilt, is a > circular wobble, causing seasons, changes, motion, movement, > precession backwards the Patriarchy feels, movement forward > the world feels. > > What is an equinox? It's a perception, which happens at the > whim of the circular wobble, do you see? > > Our "real" living life we perceive NOW is based on Western > Zodiac. > > The karmic original powerful and dominant Zodiac is yet > another thing. > > By the one we know our father, by the other, our mother. > > This is very significant. Neither alone is complete. > > The truth hurts, to those who are it's enemies. > > By one half of reality alone you will not know your current > self, but only your self in relation to leaving this world > or staying in it, which may be not in your present reality, > which may be the mix, or gradual progress. Patriarchy is > perhaps, the dark night of the soul. For the night isn't > dark to those one with mothers dark half. > > Some say, "Western is better for personality". This is a > dumbed-down-over-time way of saying what is perhaps quite > true, and better said as "Western shows you your position in > the current relative living world of perception with peer > humans", and Vedic shows you "You position in relationship > to the absolute and eternal non perceived reality". > > These statements could of couse be improved finer, more > educated thinking. > > I find this realization quite scientific, though such > support I'm not going into much here. I find this > realization quite significant because of science as well as > mystical reasons and rationale. > > I am "tripping on" the play of these two halves of the > whole. I am trying these days to see the basic Hora > division, night and day, male and female, in things, so > excuse the focus there, it's my current study. > > I do think, Western Zodiac is more "Mother" and Eastern, > Sidereal, more "Father". They spawn the likened two kinds of > ways of thinking- perilistic, ominous, verse malable, > mutable, relative to us now here. Water, is adjusting, more > related to mother, and there's more water up North. The > Earth is drier, harder, more deserts exist, where the Sun, > the Patriarchy, originates from and is still stronger today. > The wet and emotional "new age" movement does not arise in > Lahore, or Delhi, or Cairo, or Israel's old guard. No, it > arises in Wet Eugene, with little hippies in dreadlocks. I > have always been a child of the Green, the Water, the wet. I > have always taken to this stuff. The way Krishna is, so > covered with flowers, girlfriends, music, passion, cows, > love and abilities chivalrously splendid, is all very > Celtic, and wet, and covered with turns and twists, dirt > between toes, not straight roman roads. To "Preach" for > Krishna is just about a perfect oximoron. These splits of > the two halves living in me have split me in two, but that's > OK, it's all good learning. > > The earliest authors of our time, Greek historians, wrote of > Celts "they are tall, very white and wet skinned". > > Things are white and wet where there is no Sun (ie, ocean > bottom) > > Celts do not digest fat properly, they need certain fish or > the oil from certain seeds, otherwise, they actually feel > bad. A developed genetic disposition to a certain diet, > showing certain karmic alignments for those with eyes. > > And from where and whom do Celts trace their ancestry? > > The Sun, one day, met the Moon, and after subjegating it, > retired in exaustion. The moon, not caring that it was > subjegated, such being it's normal state, cared for the Sun > while he slept. > > > > > > Hope this is interesting. I think so. > > By the way, according to most calculations, there was an > "alignment" around 300 AD say. This is a very key time in > history. I suggest everyone look into what was going on on > an emotional level for all of the Western world at that > time, all of Europe. Very very interesting. That was when > the great Patriarch fell out of control of the West, Europe > that is, and the "Natives" began again their old ways, > without Romans, but in the wake of their total dominance and > presence. It was a time when "Mother" got ahold again of all > her Western Children, without "Father" around, but all his > forts, roads, and systems were in place, never to again go > away. It was a balance point folks. Quite significant one. > You and I are literally living in the wake of those events > of those days. They were VERY Pivotal. > > For example, that IS when Germany took over England. It did > happen. Germans took over, and to this day, that's who's > there, and that's who conquered India, and the world, the > British, are essentially predominantly Germanic people. The > Celts however did at that time gain and have remained since, > confined in a way to the Western edges, in all ways, > cultural, blood, art, etc. That is when Saxxons and Celts > began to really intermingle heavily, for better or worse, in > Europe, and they worked out their stuff slowly to this day. > They are the two halves of the West, the brethren of magic, > the Celts, and the brethren of control, the Saxxons. They > are the male and female half of the West whereas India and > other are the male and female halves of the east perhaps. I > am trying to see this broad divisions at this time, it's > generalization, but it's helpful for understanding basic > directional impulses in ourselves always. > > It is VERY significant what happened when the two zodiacs > aligned. Study it. VERY interesting. I'm hinting at a > possible ocean of understanding for us here, I think, maybe? > > Note that Germany hit the Celts "From the East". Note that > Ireland, the most protected by distance, a sanctuary, was > the least and last hit, and the last to hold a strong > ancient blood line and culture which shows how Eastern the > West used to be, how Matriarchal, how mystical, how > feminine, which is why the dominant masculine cultures > letters, musical systems, thought systems, dominate here > today, because we were actually originally too weak, too > feminine, and both the Germans and Romans could have there > ways with us, so Rome jumped in, and Germany took it later, > showing that Rome had the Mars, of the two, and Germany the > Saturn, of the two, who are both otherwise dominant and > strong in nature originally, or solar. > > Of the two Irelands, Scotland and Ireland, Scotland is more > dominant, and thus, we see, Hilly, whereas Ireland is flat > to the point of ridiculed and jest. Do you see the omens? > They teach, instruct, they are real. > > In America, thousands of years ago, a Native stood on the > shore in Washington state, and looked out across the > Pacific, and saw thus: Over there, in the East, they have > huge palaces and highly organized religious and materially > successful societies, but they are all part of, and > development of personal strengths and virtues, relationship > with mother Earth, are less. Conformity is more. Down South > of me, our brothers, also are like that, they build alot, in > square arrangements, and they have centralization thus, > whereas here in the North, we do not. We struggle more with > nature, and know her better, for we must work with her, and > always have. But a new time has come, after so long, the two > halves will now meet. Something that is happening now > starting as always in the East, will soon reach us here in > the West, and for a long time, it shall have to be sorted > out in all of us, the contact, the balance, the aligning of > the two halves of ourselves, the circle, and square, mother, > father, male, female, dominating, dominated. > > Likewise, Druids in France studied the phenom, and saw it > coming, and predicted what has happened, and is happening. > > We have realized: We came from father, but we are on > mother, and on her we depend. Father continues to provide, > but mother is our home, the breast we suckle. We have both > sides in ourselves, and must honor both. We must straighten > our matters each day, and then mix them up again, when the > Sun sets. Brush and clean your hair, then tie it in knots > with sticks and other things mixed in. Know your blade, and > put it away. Count your money, and forget about it. > > BOTH. > > > > -- > > > Das Goravani > Roik Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance. Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya; Hare Krishna; Om Tat Sat : gjlist- Your use of is subject to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2002 Report Share Posted September 4, 2002 > As I mentioned yesterday, I find that each other Zodiacal systems > has a different viewpoint, and hence, shows different aspects of our > "destiny". And I should point out also that as scientists have proven > in recent years, the galaxy IS, in fact, CHANGING - the stars Dont you see the word "relatively" fixed wrt earth and solar system in the post I appended on yesterday. Well, Vedic Cosomology declares that the universe(brahmaanda) is dynamic and is spinning around immobile axis(hiranyagarbha). One spin of our universe is called parivatsara. Temples were built on this very universe model(vyakta and avyakta universe). Our solar system, galaxy, galaxy cluster, super galaxy, galaxy super clusters are spinning and also orbiting around higher centre, as per Vedic Cosmology. For those geo-centric guys, seasonal calender become tropical zodiac, and it moves. Ah. Solar system also spinning? How much time it take for one spin? Do these so called scientists measure this, other than providing some scanty figure. The question here, geo-centric vs helio/galaxy/hiranyagarbha centric issur. Without this, we will end up in so called STATIC universe, thus bigbang singulary to expanding universe. Well, these constellations of stars are also part of some of the galaxy clusters? What are they?. This question leads to so called precession issues? What is the tropical precession of equinoxes? What is the sidereal precession of equinoxes? What are the measurements. Why dont these SO CALLED people in these lists probe sidereal, tropical durations of various cycles in this universe(day, year, axis precession, orbital precession, various ahOrAtri-s, varSa-s). Who is FOOLISH. Regards, VR themselves, > the Zodiac is changing - albeit slowly...just one more lesson on the > falseness of "absolutes"... > > Best Regards, > Martin Michaels > > > Venkateswara Reddy [venkateshwara_reddy] > Tuesday, September 03, 2002 8:37 PM > gjlist > Cc: vedic astrology > [GJ] RE: Two Zodiacs? Perhaps it's Ma and Pa, Again! > > > > > Appended is the post borrowed from another egroup: > > ---------------- > On the calendar issue, I feel the word "tropical > zodiac" is a misnomer. Tropical (i.e., seasonal) > calendar originated in Greece is a primitive notion of > keeping track of days wrt seasons only. Hence > primitive notions such as "zodiac" moves, and so on. > Even in modern astronomy, or Inertial reference > frames, these notions are JOKES, but the primitive > MacCaulay west clings to its Greek wisdom. Let it be > so, we need not even address it...Just ignore it as > some child's prank... > > There is only one zodiac. > > Zodiac, i.e., stars in the sky are "relatively" fixed > wrt earth and aaditya mandala. That it is the other > way around is the Ptolemy mind of Greece. We must use > this "fixed" star base as the definition of the term > "zodiac". Then the misnomer goes away. The Greek & > western error is to see the seasonal framework as > "fixed". > > ------------------- > > > > gjlist, Das Goravani <das@g...> wrote: > > > > > > > > It struct me now: The Vedic Zodiac, based in stars, > > > insensitive to, and thus needing adjustment to, the > tilt of > > the Earth which causes a new "perceived and > moveable" Zodiac > > to be around us always, the perceived Zodiac, the > Western > > Zodiac, where Matriarchy, the circle, ruled, the > tilt, is a > > circular wobble, causing seasons, changes, motion, > movement, > > precession backwards the Patriarchy feels, movement > forward > > the world feels. > > > > What is an equinox? It's a perception, which > happens at the > > whim of the circular wobble, do you see? > > > > Our "real" living life we perceive NOW is based on > Western > > Zodiac. > > > > The karmic original powerful and dominant Zodiac is > yet > > another thing. > > > > By the one we know our father, by the other, our > mother. > > > > This is very significant. Neither alone is complete. > > > > The truth hurts, to those who are it's enemies. > > > > By one half of reality alone you will not know your > current > > self, but only your self in relation to leaving this > world > > or staying in it, which may be not in your present > reality, > > which may be the mix, or gradual progress. > Patriarchy is > > perhaps, the dark night of the soul. For the night > isn't > > dark to those one with mothers dark half. > > > > Some say, "Western is better for personality". This > is a > > dumbed-down-over-time way of saying what is perhaps > quite > > true, and better said as "Western shows you your > position in > > the current relative living world of perception with > peer > > humans", and Vedic shows you "You position in > relationship > > to the absolute and eternal non perceived reality". > > > > These statements could of couse be improved finer, > more > > educated thinking. > > > > I find this realization quite scientific, though > such > > support I'm not going into much here. I find this > > realization quite significant because of science as > well as > > mystical reasons and rationale. > > > > I am "tripping on" the play of these two halves of > the > > whole. I am trying these days to see the basic Hora > > division, night and day, male and female, in things, > so > > excuse the focus there, it's my current study. > > > > I do think, Western Zodiac is more "Mother" and > Eastern, > > Sidereal, more "Father". They spawn the likened two > kinds of > > ways of thinking- perilistic, ominous, verse > malable, > > mutable, relative to us now here. Water, is > adjusting, more > > related to mother, and there's more water up North. > The > > Earth is drier, harder, more deserts exist, where > the Sun, > > the Patriarchy, originates from and is still > stronger today. > > The wet and emotional "new age" movement does not > arise in > > Lahore, or Delhi, or Cairo, or Israel's old guard. > No, it > > arises in Wet Eugene, with little hippies in > dreadlocks. I > > have always been a child of the Green, the Water, > the wet. I > > have always taken to this stuff. The way Krishna is, > so > > covered with flowers, girlfriends, music, passion, > cows, > > love and abilities chivalrously splendid, is all > very > > Celtic, and wet, and covered with turns and twists, > dirt > > between toes, not straight roman roads. To "Preach" > for > > Krishna is just about a perfect oximoron. These > splits of > > the two halves living in me have split me in two, > but that's > > OK, it's all good learning. > > > > The earliest authors of our time, Greek historians, > wrote of > > Celts "they are tall, very white and wet skinned". > > > > Things are white and wet where there is no Sun (ie, > ocean > > bottom) > > > > Celts do not digest fat properly, they need certain > fish or > > the oil from certain seeds, otherwise, they actually > feel > > bad. A developed genetic disposition to a certain > diet, > > showing certain karmic alignments for those with > eyes. > > > > And from where and whom do Celts trace their > ancestry? > > > > The Sun, one day, met the Moon, and after > subjegating it, > > retired in exaustion. The moon, not caring that it > was > > subjegated, such being it's normal state, cared for > the Sun > > while he slept. > > > > > > > > > > > > Hope this is interesting. I think so. > > > > By the way, according to most calculations, there > was an > > "alignment" around 300 AD say. This is a very key > time in > > history. I suggest everyone look into what was going > on on > > an emotional level for all of the Western world at > that > > time, all of Europe. Very very interesting. That was > when > > the great Patriarch fell out of control of the West, > Europe > > that is, and the "Natives" began again their old > ways, > > without Romans, but in the wake of their total > dominance and > > presence. It was a time when "Mother" got ahold > again of all > > her Western Children, without "Father" around, but > all his > > forts, roads, and systems were in place, never to > again go > > away. It was a balance point folks. Quite > significant one. > > You and I are literally living in the wake of those > events > > of those days. They were VERY Pivotal. > > > > For example, that IS when Germany took over England. > It did > > happen. Germans took over, and to this day, that's > who's > > there, and that's who conquered India, and the > world, the > > British, are essentially predominantly Germanic > people. The > > Celts however did at that time gain and have > remained since, > > confined in a way to the Western edges, in all ways, > > > cultural, blood, art, etc. That is when Saxxons and > Celts > > began to really intermingle heavily, for better or > worse, in > > Europe, and they worked out their stuff slowly to > this day. > > They are the two halves of the West, the brethren of > magic, > > the Celts, and the brethren of control, the Saxxons. > They > > are the male and female half of the West whereas > India and > > other are the male and female halves of the east > perhaps. I > > am trying to see this broad divisions at this time, > it's > > generalization, but it's helpful for understanding > basic > > directional impulses in ourselves always. > > > > It is VERY significant what happened when the two > zodiacs > > aligned. Study it. VERY interesting. I'm hinting at > a > > possible ocean of understanding for us here, I > think, maybe? > > > > Note that Germany hit the Celts "From the East". > Note that > > Ireland, the most protected by distance, a > sanctuary, was > > the least and last hit, and the last to hold a > strong > > ancient blood line and culture which shows how > Eastern the > > West used to be, how Matriarchal, how mystical, how > > feminine, which is why the dominant masculine > cultures > > letters, musical systems, thought systems, dominate > here > > today, because we were actually originally too weak, > too > > feminine, and both the Germans and Romans could have > there > > ways with us, so Rome jumped in, and Germany took it > later, > > showing that Rome had the Mars, of the two, and > Germany the > > Saturn, of the two, who are both otherwise dominant > and > > strong in nature originally, or solar. > > > > Of the two Irelands, Scotland and Ireland, Scotland > is more > > dominant, and thus, we see, Hilly, whereas Ireland > is flat > > to the point of ridiculed and jest. Do you see the > omens? > > They teach, instruct, they are real. > > > > In America, thousands of years ago, a Native stood > on the > > shore in Washington state, and looked out across the > > > Pacific, and saw thus: Over there, in the East, > they have > > huge palaces and highly organized religious and > materially > > successful societies, but they are all part of, and > > development of personal strengths and virtues, > relationship > > with mother Earth, are less. Conformity is more. > Down South > > of me, our brothers, also are like that, they build > alot, in > > square arrangements, and they have centralization > thus, > > whereas here in the North, we do not. We struggle > more with > > nature, and know her better, for we must work with > her, and > > always have. But a new time has come, after so long, > the two > > halves will now meet. Something that is happening > now > > starting as always in the East, will soon reach us > here in > > the West, and for a long time, it shall have to be > sorted > > out in all of us, the contact, the balance, the > aligning of > > the two halves of ourselves, the circle, and square, > mother, > > father, male, female, dominating, dominated. > > > > Likewise, Druids in France studied the phenom, and > saw it > > coming, and predicted what has happened, and is > happening. > > > > We have realized: We came from father, but we are > on > > mother, and on her we depend. Father continues to > provide, > > but mother is our home, the breast we suckle. We > have both > > sides in ourselves, and must honor both. We must > straighten > > our matters each day, and then mix them up again, > when the > > Sun sets. Brush and clean your hair, then tie it in > knots > > with sticks and other things mixed in. Know your > blade, and > > put it away. Count your money, and forget about it. > > > > BOTH. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Das Goravani > > Roik > > > > > Finance - Get real-time stock quotes > http://finance. > > > > Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya; Hare Krishna; Om Tat Sat > : gjlist-@e... > > > > Your use of is subject to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2002 Report Share Posted September 4, 2002 Venkat - I am sorry, but I find a great deal of difference in the inference between a sentence that states something '...is "relatively" fixed...', and one (mine) which mentions the very essence of change. Perhaps I misread your meaning. But, I also felt you were being somewhat aggressive (Hence, I felt the need to ... well, step in...) towards the previous poster, and more than a bit presumtive in general, when you stated that "there is only one zodiac." Your supposition that Vedic astrology declares that the universe is dynamic is at odds with the thesis that our destinies are "locked." This, in fact, was my point - I don't believe this to be true. NONE-THE-LESS, I DO lend credence to the things I see from studying Vedic, as well as Chinese and Western astrology. I simply see different aspects, as I said, looking at each of them in turn. >From the Western, I see indications of "state-of-mind" and the like; from the Chinese, I see "tendencies and inclinations"; and from the Vedic, I see indications of (from my perspective) POTENTIAL "events". As far as measurements are concerned - many of these things HAVE been, and ARE being measured. I suggest you locate and read a couple of articles on a fairly recent modification to the "Big Bang" theory called "Inflation." They are in the April 2002 issues of "Discover" and "Astronomy" magazines. The theory these articles discuss posits that the "universe" came from quite literally - "nothing". This actually fits quite well with the stories of creation from Christianity and a number of other religions while maintaining a "scientific" ring of truth. For instance, in Christianity, we are told that God is "everywhere", meaning that He sees and knows everything. My own belief is that God IS everywhere, meaning that He literally IS everything that exists. This would explain, at least partially, how something so vast could come into existance from "nothing" (i.,e. - pure thought) and still have such magnificent "order". This also fits quite well with Mr. Goravani's note from several days ago - the one that started this discussion... And as far as your last question - well, I don't wish to fan flames... Best Regards, Martin Michaels ----------------------- Sr. Systems Analyst Nirvana Consulting 317-902-9432 gadgetcoder 'This work we do, It's not "rocket science"... It's much, MUCH harder.' venkateshwara_reddy [venkateshwara_reddy] Wednesday, September 04, 2002 3:57 PM gjlist Re: [GJ] RE: Two Zodiacs? Perhaps it's Ma and Pa, Again! > As I mentioned yesterday, I find that each other Zodiacal systems > has a different viewpoint, and hence, shows different aspects of our > "destiny". And I should point out also that as scientists have proven > in recent years, the galaxy IS, in fact, CHANGING - the stars Dont you see the word "relatively" fixed wrt earth and solar system in the post I appended on yesterday. Well, Vedic Cosomology declares that the universe(brahmaanda) is dynamic and is spinning around immobile axis(hiranyagarbha). One spin of our universe is called parivatsara. Temples were built on this very universe model(vyakta and avyakta universe). Our solar system, galaxy, galaxy cluster, super galaxy, galaxy super clusters are spinning and also orbiting around higher centre, as per Vedic Cosmology. For those geo-centric guys, seasonal calender become tropical zodiac, and it moves. Ah. Solar system also spinning? How much time it take for one spin? Do these so called scientists measure this, other than providing some scanty figure. The question here, geo-centric vs helio/galaxy/hiranyagarbha centric issur. Without this, we will end up in so called STATIC universe, thus bigbang singulary to expanding universe. Well, these constellations of stars are also part of some of the galaxy clusters? What are they?. This question leads to so called precession issues? What is the tropical precession of equinoxes? What is the sidereal precession of equinoxes? What are the measurements. Why dont these SO CALLED people in these lists probe sidereal, tropical durations of various cycles in this universe(day, year, axis precession, orbital precession, various ahOrAtri-s, varSa-s). Who is FOOLISH. Regards, VR themselves, > the Zodiac is changing - albeit slowly...just one more lesson on the > falseness of "absolutes"... > > Best Regards, > Martin Michaels > > > Venkateswara Reddy [venkateshwara_reddy] > Tuesday, September 03, 2002 8:37 PM > gjlist > Cc: vedic astrology > [GJ] RE: Two Zodiacs? Perhaps it's Ma and Pa, Again! > > > > > Appended is the post borrowed from another egroup: > > ---------------- > On the calendar issue, I feel the word "tropical > zodiac" is a misnomer. Tropical (i.e., seasonal) > calendar originated in Greece is a primitive notion of > keeping track of days wrt seasons only. Hence > primitive notions such as "zodiac" moves, and so on. > Even in modern astronomy, or Inertial reference > frames, these notions are JOKES, but the primitive > MacCaulay west clings to its Greek wisdom. Let it be > so, we need not even address it...Just ignore it as > some child's prank... > > There is only one zodiac. > > Zodiac, i.e., stars in the sky are "relatively" fixed > wrt earth and aaditya mandala. That it is the other > way around is the Ptolemy mind of Greece. We must use > this "fixed" star base as the definition of the term > "zodiac". Then the misnomer goes away. The Greek & > western error is to see the seasonal framework as > "fixed". > > ------------------- > > > > gjlist, Das Goravani <das@g...> wrote: > > > > > > > > It struct me now: The Vedic Zodiac, based in stars, > > > insensitive to, and thus needing adjustment to, the > tilt of > > the Earth which causes a new "perceived and > moveable" Zodiac > > to be around us always, the perceived Zodiac, the > Western > > Zodiac, where Matriarchy, the circle, ruled, the > tilt, is a > > circular wobble, causing seasons, changes, motion, > movement, > > precession backwards the Patriarchy feels, movement > forward > > the world feels. > > > > What is an equinox? It's a perception, which > happens at the > > whim of the circular wobble, do you see? > > > > Our "real" living life we perceive NOW is based on > Western > > Zodiac. > > > > The karmic original powerful and dominant Zodiac is > yet > > another thing. > > > > By the one we know our father, by the other, our > mother. > > > > This is very significant. Neither alone is complete. > > > > The truth hurts, to those who are it's enemies. > > > > By one half of reality alone you will not know your > current > > self, but only your self in relation to leaving this > world > > or staying in it, which may be not in your present > reality, > > which may be the mix, or gradual progress. > Patriarchy is > > perhaps, the dark night of the soul. For the night > isn't > > dark to those one with mothers dark half. > > > > Some say, "Western is better for personality". This > is a > > dumbed-down-over-time way of saying what is perhaps > quite > > true, and better said as "Western shows you your > position in > > the current relative living world of perception with > peer > > humans", and Vedic shows you "You position in > relationship > > to the absolute and eternal non perceived reality". > > > > These statements could of couse be improved finer, > more > > educated thinking. > > > > I find this realization quite scientific, though > such > > support I'm not going into much here. I find this > > realization quite significant because of science as > well as > > mystical reasons and rationale. > > > > I am "tripping on" the play of these two halves of > the > > whole. I am trying these days to see the basic Hora > > division, night and day, male and female, in things, > so > > excuse the focus there, it's my current study. > > > > I do think, Western Zodiac is more "Mother" and > Eastern, > > Sidereal, more "Father". They spawn the likened two > kinds of > > ways of thinking- perilistic, ominous, verse > malable, > > mutable, relative to us now here. Water, is > adjusting, more > > related to mother, and there's more water up North. > The > > Earth is drier, harder, more deserts exist, where > the Sun, > > the Patriarchy, originates from and is still > stronger today. > > The wet and emotional "new age" movement does not > arise in > > Lahore, or Delhi, or Cairo, or Israel's old guard. > No, it > > arises in Wet Eugene, with little hippies in > dreadlocks. I > > have always been a child of the Green, the Water, > the wet. I > > have always taken to this stuff. The way Krishna is, > so > > covered with flowers, girlfriends, music, passion, > cows, > > love and abilities chivalrously splendid, is all > very > > Celtic, and wet, and covered with turns and twists, > dirt > > between toes, not straight roman roads. To "Preach" > for > > Krishna is just about a perfect oximoron. These > splits of > > the two halves living in me have split me in two, > but that's > > OK, it's all good learning. > > > > The earliest authors of our time, Greek historians, > wrote of > > Celts "they are tall, very white and wet skinned". > > > > Things are white and wet where there is no Sun (ie, > ocean > > bottom) > > > > Celts do not digest fat properly, they need certain > fish or > > the oil from certain seeds, otherwise, they actually > feel > > bad. A developed genetic disposition to a certain > diet, > > showing certain karmic alignments for those with > eyes. > > > > And from where and whom do Celts trace their > ancestry? > > > > The Sun, one day, met the Moon, and after > subjegating it, > > retired in exaustion. The moon, not caring that it > was > > subjegated, such being it's normal state, cared for > the Sun > > while he slept. > > > > > > > > > > > > Hope this is interesting. I think so. > > > > By the way, according to most calculations, there > was an > > "alignment" around 300 AD say. This is a very key > time in > > history. I suggest everyone look into what was going > on on > > an emotional level for all of the Western world at > that > > time, all of Europe. Very very interesting. That was > when > > the great Patriarch fell out of control of the West, > Europe > > that is, and the "Natives" began again their old > ways, > > without Romans, but in the wake of their total > dominance and > > presence. It was a time when "Mother" got ahold > again of all > > her Western Children, without "Father" around, but > all his > > forts, roads, and systems were in place, never to > again go > > away. It was a balance point folks. Quite > significant one. > > You and I are literally living in the wake of those > events > > of those days. They were VERY Pivotal. > > > > For example, that IS when Germany took over England. > It did > > happen. Germans took over, and to this day, that's > who's > > there, and that's who conquered India, and the > world, the > > British, are essentially predominantly Germanic > people. The > > Celts however did at that time gain and have > remained since, > > confined in a way to the Western edges, in all ways, > > > cultural, blood, art, etc. That is when Saxxons and > Celts > > began to really intermingle heavily, for better or > worse, in > > Europe, and they worked out their stuff slowly to > this day. > > They are the two halves of the West, the brethren of > magic, > > the Celts, and the brethren of control, the Saxxons. > They > > are the male and female half of the West whereas > India and > > other are the male and female halves of the east > perhaps. I > > am trying to see this broad divisions at this time, > it's > > generalization, but it's helpful for understanding > basic > > directional impulses in ourselves always. > > > > It is VERY significant what happened when the two > zodiacs > > aligned. Study it. VERY interesting. I'm hinting at > a > > possible ocean of understanding for us here, I > think, maybe? > > > > Note that Germany hit the Celts "From the East". > Note that > > Ireland, the most protected by distance, a > sanctuary, was > > the least and last hit, and the last to hold a > strong > > ancient blood line and culture which shows how > Eastern the > > West used to be, how Matriarchal, how mystical, how > > feminine, which is why the dominant masculine > cultures > > letters, musical systems, thought systems, dominate > here > > today, because we were actually originally too weak, > too > > feminine, and both the Germans and Romans could have > there > > ways with us, so Rome jumped in, and Germany took it > later, > > showing that Rome had the Mars, of the two, and > Germany the > > Saturn, of the two, who are both otherwise dominant > and > > strong in nature originally, or solar. > > > > Of the two Irelands, Scotland and Ireland, Scotland > is more > > dominant, and thus, we see, Hilly, whereas Ireland > is flat > > to the point of ridiculed and jest. Do you see the > omens? > > They teach, instruct, they are real. > > > > In America, thousands of years ago, a Native stood > on the > > shore in Washington state, and looked out across the > > > Pacific, and saw thus: Over there, in the East, > they have > > huge palaces and highly organized religious and > materially > > successful societies, but they are all part of, and > > development of personal strengths and virtues, > relationship > > with mother Earth, are less. Conformity is more. > Down South > > of me, our brothers, also are like that, they build > alot, in > > square arrangements, and they have centralization > thus, > > whereas here in the North, we do not. We struggle > more with > > nature, and know her better, for we must work with > her, and > > always have. But a new time has come, after so long, > the two > > halves will now meet. Something that is happening > now > > starting as always in the East, will soon reach us > here in > > the West, and for a long time, it shall have to be > sorted > > out in all of us, the contact, the balance, the > aligning of > > the two halves of ourselves, the circle, and square, > mother, > > father, male, female, dominating, dominated. > > > > Likewise, Druids in France studied the phenom, and > saw it > > coming, and predicted what has happened, and is > happening. > > > > We have realized: We came from father, but we are > on > > mother, and on her we depend. Father continues to > provide, > > but mother is our home, the breast we suckle. We > have both > > sides in ourselves, and must honor both. We must > straighten > > our matters each day, and then mix them up again, > when the > > Sun sets. Brush and clean your hair, then tie it in > knots > > with sticks and other things mixed in. Know your > blade, and > > put it away. Count your money, and forget about it. > > > > BOTH. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Das Goravani > > Roik > > > > > Finance - Get real-time stock quotes > http://finance. > > > > Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya; Hare Krishna; Om Tat Sat > : gjlist-@e... > > > > Your use of is subject to Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya; Hare Krishna; Om Tat Sat : gjlist- Your use of is subject to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 5, 2002 Report Share Posted September 5, 2002 Dear All I was a full-time professional astrologer using western astrology when I encountered the Vedic model. The Dasha periods offered something no other astrology did and I took the plunge right into the ACVA certification program. What I have sen by walking in both of these worlds is mild to extreme self-protectionism. It seems that each group has its reasons for why the other form of astrology is invalid or culturally skewed <perhaps I should say culturally screwed!> What Vedic astrologers cling to and rightly so is the astronomical accuracy of the sidereal zodiac. But what you may not know if you have not studied it is that western or tropical astrology may be astronomically accurate but it offers the most beautiful personality model that I've ever seen. Western astrology has been used as a psychological tool since Carl Jung and has developed in that light. It has also been developed as a trans-personal spiritual model. I like to take these approaches and apply them to my astrology practice. If I merely used Vedic as it is taught, I would only have a tool for timing. When I combine the others and use the rich symbolism of the nakshatras and the outer planets I have a life evolution model. To my mind, an astrologer who does not want to see the virtues of both will for ever be left with one empty pocket. I know I'll take some flack for that, but hear me out. I love Vedic astrology and 90-95% of my sessions are on Vedic. But it does not make sense to a client who has all his life seen himself as an Aries and does indeed have all those traits to suddenly tell him he is a Pisces! If on the other hand he can identify the dynamic action oriented personality he has with the deep Utar Bhadrapadapa or Revati qualities, well that is offering him a deeper understanding of who he is. It is true that the "signs" are much more important in Western than Vedic and that is for good reason. They have been developed over years of study and experience. When you cross over and use the signs the same way in Vedic it does not work. Likewise, Vedic is much better at timing, but without including the outer planets with their rich and often powerful life lessons you are again with one empty pocket. Often a Pluto, Uranu or Neptune transit will be so powerful that it skews the whole experience and expression of a dasha. I guess it all comes down to whether the astrologer wants to work with personality or timing events or spirituality or all of the above. To my mind it is best to keep open. If I said: Oh, I have a good practice why bother to learn something that is so old I would have one very empty pocket today. Likewise, it is worthy to open yourself to something that is new. rambling c Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 5, 2002 Report Share Posted September 5, 2002 Cynthia! (and all else...) You have just stated (much more articulately) what I was trying to say -- I am merely a "hobbyist" at best - albeit a studied one. My main expertise, outside of the astrological calculations (I was a Math major), is in the philosophical connections (my minor). cynthia novak [c.a.novak] Thursday, September 05, 2002 9:11 AM gjlist Re: [GJ] RE: Two Zodiacs? Perhaps it's Ma and Pa, Again! Dear All I was a full-time professional astrologer using western astrology when I encountered the Vedic model. The Dasha periods offered something no other astrology did and I took the plunge right into the ACVA certification program. What I have seen by walking in both of these worlds is mild to extreme self-protectionism. It seems that each group has its reasons for why the other form of astrology is invalid or culturally skewed <perhaps I should say culturally screwed!> I have found with rare exceptions, that this is the case. We often limit ourselves by ignoring or even shunning the knowledge to be gained by studying the methods of others. I found the same thing to be true in martial arts...and religion...and... What Vedic astrologers cling to and rightly so is the astronomical accuracy of the sidereal zodiac. But what you may not know if you have not studied it is that western or tropical astrology may be astronomically accurate but it offers the most beautiful personality model that I've ever seen. Western astrology has been used as a psychological tool since Carl Jung and has developed in that light. It has also been developed as a trans-personal spiritual model. He did so by borrowing (liberally!) from the Chinese astrological studies (i-ching, in particular)...and in my personal opinion, the insights he gained from his studies in this area are what made him the better between himself and Freud. I like to take these approaches and apply them to my astrology practice. If I merely used Vedic as it is taught, I would only have a tool for timing. When I combine the others and use the rich symbolism of the nakshatras and the outer planets I have a life evolution model. I have found exactly the same thing - this is what I was trying (probably failing) to say over the past few days. To my mind, an astrologer who does not want to see the virtues of both will for ever be left with one empty pocket. I know I'll take some flack for that, but hear me out. I love Vedic astrology and 90-95% of my sessions are on Vedic. But it does not make sense to a client who has all his life seen himself as an Aries and does indeed have all those traits to suddenly tell him he is a Pisces! If on the other hand he can identify the dynamic action oriented personality he has with the deep Utar Bhadrapadapa or Revati qualities, well that is offering him a deeper understanding of who he is. It is true that the "signs" are much more important in Western than Vedic and that is for good reason. They have been developed over years of study and experience. When you cross over and use the signs the same way in Vedic it does not work. Likewise, Vedic is much better at timing, but without including the outer planets with their rich and often powerful life lessons you are again with one empty pocket. Often a Pluto, Uranus or Neptune transit will be so powerful that it skews the whole experience and expression of a dasha. After reading your notes here, it should be obvious to expert and novice alike the benefit of studying both (or even all three) techniques... I guess it all comes down to whether the astrologer wants to work with personality or timing events or spirituality or all of the above. To my mind it is best to keep open. If I said: Oh, I have a good practice why bother to learn something that is so old I would have one very empty pocket today. Likewise, it is worthy to open yourself to something that is new. ....And it is ALWAYS good to know more. rambling c Not at all - Thank you for your insight... Best Regards, Martin Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya; Hare Krishna; Om Tat Sat : gjlist- Your use of is subject to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 5, 2002 Report Share Posted September 5, 2002 Michaels, > I am sorry, No need to say sorry. You are not lower, I am no higher. > but I find a great deal of difference in > the inference between a sentence that states >something '...is "relatively" fixed...' This "realatively" fixed nakshatra reference frame fails, if you go beyond aadhitya mandala LAYER. THis reference frame is alright for any solar system(sahasraadhityaH of shruti--countless, but finite in this universe--dont mix up with Cantor's transfinite). Why it fails, when you go to higher layer, that means, galaxy, galaxy clusters, super galaxy et al?. This is because these nakshatra-s(of course, black holes too) are spinning albeit slowly wrt some axis. One spin of galaxy is O(10^[13+k] years). What is our life span, How far our secular history textbooks(except puraana-s)talk about history. They talk since greeko-roman wisdom. That means, a couple of thousand years. Biblical certainities think that creation started in 4004 BC. That means, just we are in O(10^3). Where is O(10^3), when you compare O(1O^[13+k]). Now these stars seems to be fixed when we talk about these few thousand years history. Why dont these history books talk about pre-early glacier history? We talk about fixed nakshatra-s in jyotisha and astronomy. That means they are relatively fixed. , > and one (mine) which mentions the very essence of > change. I was pointing to solar systems, and graha-s in the same. Thus, nakshatra-s are relatively fixed wrt this solar system. > But, I also felt you were being somewhat aggressive > (Hence, I felt the need to ... well, step in...) >towards the previous poster, and more than > a bit presumtive in general, when you stated that Whatever I posted in the first message, is mere a copied extract from one gentleman's posting re: Rigveda in cosomolgy by Patrizia in THE HINDU, a marxist daily in India, where patrizia is confused about zodiac. > "there is only one zodiac." Let us discuss in scientific temper about this- As every member in these assume that there are two reference frames(viz tropical, sidereal). NO jyotisa book aired any special zodiac, such as SIDEREAl Zodiac. They just say BhA chakra/Zodiac. Assume that Tropical zodiac is another reference frame, here are my questions? What is the length of -Tropical day -Tropical month -Tropical year(define the same) -Tropical precession of equinoxes -Tropical yuga-s, manvantara-s, kalpa-s -Tropical day of various graha-s in our solar system. -Tropical years of various graha-s in our solar system A scientific examination into this with physics(a basic insight into reference frames)/astronomy would reveal as to what is tropical zodiac. > Your supposition that Vedic astrology declares that >the universe is dynamic is at odds with the thesis Fortunately, vedic astrology is a mis-nomer. veda less vedic astrology(vedic astrology - veda) is what we see. >that our destinies are "locked." puruSa sUktam declares that universe is dynamic(cf:saptAsyAsan pariDhayaH). When the knowledge of 7 pariDhis were mistaken to 7 darBhA sticks around homakunda, these cosmological notions were probably lost, and pandita-s coined the currently prevalent meanings to "explain" the Vedic terms. Time is cyclic, thus universe is dynamic. No indefinite locking thus. > This, in fact, was my point - I don't believe this > to be true. Using Monte-Carlo tests, given enough parameters, tuning procedures can successfully match data to an incorrect model, resulting in an inaccurate time scale as well as in a false validation of that model. Whatever the evidence these so-called scientists collected for Big bang is using for inflation. A simple analogy: Let us consider a linear diaphantine equation L:ax+by = c, and this equation has many intger solutions. A subset of this solution set is also a solution of another equation M: lx+my = n, where L and M are not parallel. This means that it is very easy to tune the data as scanty evidence to the present day cosmological problems. Acceptance/Rejection of certain theory is another issue. > NONE-THE-LESS, I DO lend credence to the things I >see from studying Vedic, as well as Chinese and >Western astrology. Vedaless vedic astrology and Indology veda-s + vedic astrology take us to nowhere. > I simply see different aspects, as I said, > looking at each of them in turn. I am not talking about astrological interpreations based on seasons, or based on fixed nakshatra-s. I am not a practising astrologer. Just I can understand the analysis(like a elementary school student cross check the integer solutions of a second degree diaphontine eqn). jyOtiSa also falls under para vidya category. Some people, they dont cast horoscope(western/eastern), they are experts at predicting accurately. I was raising "tropical vs sidereal issue in terms of measuments", but not the interpretations, because of para-apara vidya categories. > ARE being measured. I suggest you locate and read a > couple of articles on a fairly recent modification > to the "Big Bang" theory called "Inflation." As I already stated in earlier post "bigbang singularity to expanding universe". The so called inflation theory is marriage of the best features of big bang and the steady state scenarios. Again, this inflation theory is also static, thus expanding universe. > They are in the April 2002 issues of "Discover" and > "Astronomy" magazines. The theory these articles > discuss posits that the "universe" came > from quite literally - "nothing". What is there beyond of these Universe(dark matter + galaxy clusters + planets et al). A well known science writer in USA has written that our scientific model of the present universe may be just as "faulty" as Columbus's map of earth. And between modern cosmology and Vedic view, while there are some similarities, there are great differences too. Some examples: Cosmologist's universe is static; Vedic brahmAnda (that contains the whole universe) spins around a central axis through 'hiraNyagarBha'. Cosmologist's universe arose from an indescribable singularity; Vedic universe from an Indescribable, permanent, pure. That One as Indescribable beyond words such as sat, asat, raja, vyOma, mR`tyu, amR`tam, etc.; from such Indescribable state came tama, then salilam (not water, but primordial matter! What does modern cosmology say? - some indescribable uniform fundamental matter sea from a mathematical singularity, it it not? Read the most respected cosmologist in CalTech groping just as R`shi-s did); then aekam mahimAn, desire, multiplicity, universe, etc.) cf: nasadiya suktam. The most fundamental particle, parent of all fundamental particle we know today, arose in a uniform sea from the singularity under tremendous heat (big bang); Vedic image is of a sea of salila -> Apa -> ka -> ma -> la (not water of earth) with no such intense heat, etc. The notion of mandala-s and pariDhi-s is Vedic: sapta pariDhi-s, agni-s, jihvA-s, R`Si-s, DhAma-s, Aditya-sOma-vahni mandala-s, etc. That all celestial bodies (not just this earth we live on) are mostly spherical was known to mankind extremely long time before Aristotle. > Christianity, we are told that God >is "everywhere", meaning that He sees and knows >everything. How do this church centric mindset justifies when they wiped out over 100 million human beings/native americans in the span of 50 years in-out of hatred and biblical beliefs of racial supremacy. Were not these religions see God in those 100 million human beings? Here are more examples: Here are the examples: Greeks during Alexander rampaged and murdered millions in the present Middle East, Africa and Mediterrainean. Then the Roman vs.Barbarian wars in Europe wiped out and/or enslaved some more millions. There were famines too. In China and India too there were ongoing turmoils but relatively less than that in Europe. In the Americas there were bloody quarrels (Maya-s, Inca-s, native Indian intra-tribal wars, etc.). After the onset of Christianity in Jerusalem, a new fight started - between the followers of this new faith and the older pagans, and millions of pagans were killed. >From 5th century onwards it only got worse. After Islam's entry in 7th century, all hell broke loose - there were continuous crusades, tyranny slavery, famines, and harm to every life element in nature. By 15th century, Eurpoe's new barbarians were going on their ships (target: the rich and world famous Indica) and looting, raping, enslaving, murdering wherever they set foot (Americas, Africa, Asia). Several millions of native American Indians were wiped out. Ditto in Africa. In India Muslim armies killed over 5 million Hindus and destroyed over 10,000 temples just as Christians had done in Europe during their crusades and Muslims had avenged it in Middle East and Spain. Yet it continued through World War II when a few millions of Jews were done with by the nazis. Read Timur biography, you will notice more about killings of humans in the name of abrahamic religions. Thus crux of the difference between East and West today is due to the Aristotelian logic of "no God here in this universe, but God is outside of this matter-energy ensembled universe and controls it". There is no other fundamental difference. > My own belief is that God IS everywhere, meaning >that He literally IS everything that exists. GOOD With Regards, VR > This would explain, at least > partially, how something > so vast > could come into existance from "nothing" (i.,e. - > pure thought) and > still > have > such magnificent "order". This also fits quite well > with Mr. > Goravani's > note > from several days ago - the one that started this > discussion... > > And as far as your last question - well, I don't > wish to fan flames... > > Best Regards, > Martin Michaels > ----------------------- > Sr. Systems Analyst > Nirvana Consulting > 317-902-9432 > gadgetcoder > > 'This work we do, > It's not "rocket science"... > It's much, MUCH harder.' > > > > > > venkateshwara_reddy > [venkateshwara_reddy] > Wednesday, September 04, 2002 3:57 PM > gjlist > Re: [GJ] RE: Two Zodiacs? Perhaps it's Ma > and Pa, Again! > > > > > As I mentioned yesterday, I find that each other > Zodiacal systems > > has a different viewpoint, and hence, shows > different aspects of > our > > "destiny". And I should point out also that as > scientists have > proven > > in recent years, the galaxy IS, in fact, CHANGING > - the stars > > > Dont you see the word "relatively" fixed wrt earth > and solar system > in the post I appended on yesterday. > > Well, Vedic Cosomology declares that the > universe(brahmaanda) is > dynamic and is spinning around immobile > axis(hiranyagarbha). One spin > of our universe is called parivatsara. > > Temples were built on this very universe > model(vyakta and avyakta > universe). > > Our solar system, galaxy, galaxy cluster, super > galaxy, galaxy super > clusters are spinning and also orbiting around > higher centre, as per > Vedic Cosmology. For those geo-centric guys, > seasonal calender become > tropical zodiac, and it moves. Ah. > > > Solar system also spinning? How much time it take > for one spin? Do > these so called scientists measure this, other than > providing some > scanty figure. > > > The question here, geo-centric vs > helio/galaxy/hiranyagarbha centric > issur. Without this, we will end up in so called > STATIC universe, > thus bigbang singulary to expanding universe. > > > Well, these constellations of stars are also part of > some of the > galaxy clusters? What are they?. > > This question leads to so called precession issues? > > What is the tropical precession of equinoxes? What > is the sidereal > precession of equinoxes? What are the measurements. > Why dont these SO > CALLED people in these lists probe sidereal, > tropical durations of > various cycles in this universe(day, year, axis > precession, orbital > precession, various ahOrAtri-s, varSa-s). > > Who is FOOLISH. > > > Regards, > VR > > themselves, > > the Zodiac is changing - albeit slowly...just one > more lesson on > the > > falseness of "absolutes"... > > > > Best Regards, > > Martin Michaels > > > > > > Venkateswara Reddy > [venkateshwara_reddy] > > Tuesday, September 03, 2002 8:37 PM > > gjlist > > Cc: vedic astrology > > [GJ] RE: Two Zodiacs? Perhaps it's Ma and > Pa, Again! > > > > > > > > > > Appended is the post borrowed from another egroup: > > > > ---------------- > > On the calendar issue, I feel the word "tropical > > zodiac" is a misnomer. Tropical (i.e., seasonal) > > calendar originated in Greece is a primitive > notion of > > keeping track of days wrt seasons only. Hence > > primitive notions such as "zodiac" moves, and so > on. > > Even in modern astronomy, or Inertial reference > > frames, these notions are JOKES, but the primitive > > MacCaulay west clings to its Greek wisdom. Let it > be > > so, we need not even address it...Just ignore it > as > > some child's prank... > > > > There is only one zodiac. > > > > Zodiac, i.e., stars in the sky are "relatively" > fixed > > wrt earth and aaditya mandala. That it is the > other > > way around is the Ptolemy mind of Greece. We must > use > > this "fixed" star base as the definition of the > term > > "zodiac". Then the misnomer goes away. The Greek & > > western error is to see the seasonal framework as > > "fixed". > > > > > ------------------- > > > > > > > > gjlist, Das Goravani <das@g...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > It struct me now: The Vedic Zodiac, based in > stars, > > > > > insensitive to, and thus needing adjustment to, > the > > tilt of > > > the Earth which causes a new "perceived and > > moveable" Zodiac > > > to be around us always, the perceived Zodiac, > the > > Western > > > Zodiac, where Matriarchy, the circle, ruled, the > > tilt, is a > > > circular wobble, causing seasons, changes, > motion, > > movement, > > > precession backwards the Patriarchy feels, > movement > > forward > > > the world feels. > > > > > > What is an equinox? It's a perception, which > > happens at the > > > whim of the circular wobble, do you see? > > > > > > Our "real" living life we perceive NOW is based > on > > Western > > > Zodiac. > > > > > > The karmic original powerful and dominant Zodiac > is > > yet > > > another thing. > > > > > > By the one we know our father, by the other, our > > mother. > > > > > > This is very significant. Neither alone is > complete. > > > > > > The truth hurts, to those who are it's enemies. > > > > > > By one half of reality alone you will not know > your > > current > > > self, but only your self in relation to leaving > this > > world > > > or staying in it, which may be not in your > present > > reality, > > > which may be the mix, or gradual progress. > > Patriarchy is > > > perhaps, the dark night of the soul. For the > night > > isn't > > > dark to those one with mothers dark half. > > > > > > Some say, "Western is better for personality". > This > > is a > > > dumbed-down-over-time way of saying what is > perhaps > > quite > > > true, and better said as "Western shows you your > > position in > > > the current relative living world of perception > with > > peer > > > humans", and Vedic shows you "You position in > > relationship > > > to the absolute and eternal non perceived > reality". > > > > > > These statements could of couse be improved > finer, > > more > > > educated thinking. > > > > > > I find this realization quite scientific, though > > such > > > support I'm not going into much here. I find > this > > > realization quite significant because of science > as > > well as > > > mystical reasons and rationale. > > > > > > I am "tripping on" the play of these two halves > of > > the > > > whole. I am trying these days to see the basic > Hora > > > division, night and day, male and female, in > things, > > so > > > excuse the focus there, it's my current study. > > > > > > I do think, Western Zodiac is more "Mother" and > > Eastern, > > > Sidereal, more "Father". They spawn the likened > two > > kinds of > > > ways of thinking- perilistic, ominous, verse > > malable, > > > mutable, relative to us now here. Water, is > > adjusting, more > > > related to mother, and there's more water up > North. > > The > > > Earth is drier, harder, more deserts exist, > where > > the Sun, > > > the Patriarchy, originates from and is still > > stronger today. > > > The wet and emotional "new age" movement does > not > > arise in > > > Lahore, or Delhi, or Cairo, or Israel's old > guard. > > No, it > > > arises in Wet Eugene, with little hippies in > > dreadlocks. I > > > have always been a child of the Green, the > Water, > > the wet. I > > > have always taken to this stuff. The way Krishna > is, > > so > > > covered with flowers, girlfriends, music, > passion, > > cows, > > > love and abilities chivalrously splendid, is all > > very > > > Celtic, and wet, and covered with turns and > twists, > > dirt > > > between toes, not straight roman roads. To > "Preach" > > for > > > Krishna is just about a perfect oximoron. These > > splits of > > > the two halves living in me have split me in > two, > > but that's > > > OK, it's all good learning. > > > > > > The earliest authors of our time, Greek > historians, > > wrote of > > > Celts "they are tall, very white and wet > skinned". > > > > > > Things are white and wet where there is no Sun > (ie, > > ocean > > > bottom) > > > > > > Celts do not digest fat properly, they need > certain > > fish or > > > the oil from certain seeds, otherwise, they > actually > > feel > > > bad. A developed genetic disposition to a > certain > > diet, > > > showing certain karmic alignments for those with > > eyes. > > > > > > And from where and whom do Celts trace their > > ancestry? > > > > > > The Sun, one day, met the Moon, and after > > subjegating it, > > > retired in exaustion. The moon, not caring that > it > > was > > > subjegated, such being it's normal state, cared > for > > the Sun > > > while he slept. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hope this is interesting. I think so. > > > > > > By the way, according to most calculations, > there > > was an > > > "alignment" around 300 AD say. This is a very > key > > time in > > > history. I suggest everyone look into what was > going > > on on > > > an emotional level for all of the Western world > at > > that > > > time, all of Europe. Very very interesting. That > was > > when > > > the great Patriarch fell out of control of the > West, > > Europe > > > that is, and the "Natives" began again their old > > ways, > > > without Romans, but in the wake of their total > > dominance and > > > presence. It was a time when "Mother" got ahold > > again of all > > > her Western Children, without "Father" around, > but > > all his > > > forts, roads, and systems were in place, never > to > > again go > > > away. It was a balance point folks. Quite > > significant one. > > > You and I are literally living in the wake of > those > > events > > > of those days. They were VERY Pivotal. > > > > > > For example, that IS when Germany took over > England. > > It did > > > happen. Germans took over, and to this day, > that's > > who's > > > there, and that's who conquered India, and the > > world, the > > > British, are essentially predominantly Germanic > > people. The > > > Celts however did at that time gain and have > > remained since, > > > confined in a way to the Western edges, in all > ways, > > > > > cultural, blood, art, etc. That is when Saxxons > and > > Celts > > > began to really intermingle heavily, for better > or > > worse, in > > > Europe, and they worked out their stuff slowly > to > > this day. > > > They are the two halves of the West, the > brethren of > > magic, > > > the Celts, and the brethren of control, the > Saxxons. > > They > > > are the male and female half of the West whereas > > India and > > > other are the male and female halves of the east > > perhaps. I > > > am trying to see this broad divisions at this > time, > > it's > > > generalization, but it's helpful for > understanding > > basic > > > directional impulses in ourselves always. > > > > > > It is VERY significant what happened when the > two > > zodiacs > > > aligned. Study it. VERY interesting. I'm hinting > at > > a > > > possible ocean of understanding for us here, I > > think, maybe? > > > > > > Note that Germany hit the Celts "From the East". > > > Note that > > > Ireland, the most protected by distance, a > > sanctuary, was > > > the least and last hit, and the last to hold a > > strong > > > ancient blood line and culture which shows how > > Eastern the > > > West used to be, how Matriarchal, how mystical, > how > > > feminine, which is why the dominant masculine > > cultures > > > letters, musical systems, thought systems, > dominate > > here > > > today, because we were actually originally too > weak, > > too > > > feminine, and both the Germans and Romans could > have > > there > > > ways with us, so Rome jumped in, and Germany > took it > > later, > > > showing that Rome had the Mars, of the two, and > > Germany the > > > Saturn, of the two, who are both otherwise > dominant > > and > > > strong in nature originally, or solar. > > > > > > Of the two Irelands, Scotland and Ireland, > Scotland > > is more > > > dominant, and thus, we see, Hilly, whereas > Ireland > > is flat > > > to the point of ridiculed and jest. Do you see > the > > omens? > > > They teach, instruct, they are real. > > > > > > In America, thousands of years ago, a Native > stood > > on the > > > shore in Washington state, and looked out across > the > > > > > Pacific, and saw thus: Over there, in the East, > > they have > > > huge palaces and highly organized religious and > > materially > > > successful societies, but they are all part of, > and > > > development of personal strengths and virtues, > > relationship > > > with mother Earth, are less. Conformity is more. > > > Down South > > > of me, our brothers, also are like that, they > build > > alot, in > > > square arrangements, and they have > centralization > > thus, > > > whereas here in the North, we do not. We > struggle > > more with > > > nature, and know her better, for we must work > with > > her, and > > > always have. But a new time has come, after so > long, > > the two > > > halves will now meet. Something that is > happening > > now > > > starting as always in the East, will soon reach > us > > here in > > > the West, and for a long time, it shall have to > be > > sorted > > > out in all of us, the contact, the balance, the > > aligning of > > > the two halves of ourselves, the circle, and > square, > > mother, > > > father, male, female, dominating, dominated. > > > > > > Likewise, Druids in France studied the phenom, > and > > saw it > > > coming, and predicted what has happened, and is > > happening. > > > > > > We have realized: We came from father, but we > are > > on > > > mother, and on her we depend. Father continues > to > > provide, > > > but mother is our home, the breast we suckle. We > > have both > > > sides in ourselves, and must honor both. We must > > straighten > > > our matters each day, and then mix them up > again, > > when the > > > Sun sets. Brush and clean your hair, then tie > it in > > knots > > > with sticks and other things mixed in. Know your > > blade, and > > > put it away. Count your money, and forget about > it. > > > > > > BOTH. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Das Goravani > > > Roik > > > > > > > > > > Finance - Get real-time stock quotes > > http://finance. > > > > > > > > Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya; Hare Krishna; Om Tat > Sat > > : > gjlist-@e... > > > > > > > > Your use of is subject to > > > > > > Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya; Hare Krishna; Om Tat > Sat > : > gjlist-@e... > > > > Your use of is subject to > > --- End forwarded message --- > > Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 2002 Report Share Posted September 6, 2002 Venkat - (Forgive me shortening your name. We have a "Venkat" here where I work, he tells me it is acceptable.) Let us simply agree to disagree... Neither of us can truly "prove" our beliefs, which are the products of both our individual studies and cultural backgrounds. In any case, I now see that you did not intend to be rude to the original post. Probably a language thing... But, I DO enjoy a good debate. Good day... Martin Venkateswara Reddy [venkateshwara_reddy] Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:16 PM gjlist Cc: vedic astrology RE: [GJ] Two Zodiacs? Perhaps it's Ma and Pa, Again! Michaels, > I am sorry, No need to say sorry. You are not lower, I am no higher. > but I find a great deal of difference in > the inference between a sentence that states >something '...is "relatively" fixed...' This "realatively" fixed nakshatra reference frame fails, if you go beyond aadhitya mandala LAYER. THis reference frame is alright for any solar system(sahasraadhityaH of shruti--countless, but finite in this universe--dont mix up with Cantor's transfinite). Why it fails, when you go to higher layer, that means, galaxy, galaxy clusters, super galaxy et al?. This is because these nakshatra-s(of course, black holes too) are spinning albeit slowly wrt some axis. One spin of galaxy is O(10^[13+k] years). What is our life span, How far our secular history textbooks(except puraana-s)talk about history. They talk since greeko-roman wisdom. That means, a couple of thousand years. Biblical certainities think that creation started in 4004 BC. That means, just we are in O(10^3). Where is O(10^3), when you compare O(1O^[13+k]). Now these stars seems to be fixed when we talk about these few thousand years history. Why dont these history books talk about pre-early glacier history? We talk about fixed nakshatra-s in jyotisha and astronomy. That means they are relatively fixed. , > and one (mine) which mentions the very essence of > change. I was pointing to solar systems, and graha-s in the same. Thus, nakshatra-s are relatively fixed wrt this solar system. > But, I also felt you were being somewhat aggressive > (Hence, I felt the need to ... well, step in...) >towards the previous poster, and more than > a bit presumtive in general, when you stated that Whatever I posted in the first message, is mere a copied extract from one gentleman's posting re: Rigveda in cosomolgy by Patrizia in THE HINDU, a marxist daily in India, where patrizia is confused about zodiac. > "there is only one zodiac." Let us discuss in scientific temper about this- As every member in these assume that there are two reference frames(viz tropical, sidereal). NO jyotisa book aired any special zodiac, such as SIDEREAl Zodiac. They just say BhA chakra/Zodiac. Assume that Tropical zodiac is another reference frame, here are my questions? What is the length of -Tropical day -Tropical month -Tropical year(define the same) -Tropical precession of equinoxes -Tropical yuga-s, manvantara-s, kalpa-s -Tropical day of various graha-s in our solar system. -Tropical years of various graha-s in our solar system A scientific examination into this with physics(a basic insight into reference frames)/astronomy would reveal as to what is tropical zodiac. > Your supposition that Vedic astrology declares that >the universe is dynamic is at odds with the thesis Fortunately, vedic astrology is a mis-nomer. veda less vedic astrology(vedic astrology - veda) is what we see. >that our destinies are "locked." puruSa sUktam declares that universe is dynamic(cf:saptAsyAsan pariDhayaH). When the knowledge of 7 pariDhis were mistaken to 7 darBhA sticks around homakunda, these cosmological notions were probably lost, and pandita-s coined the currently prevalent meanings to "explain" the Vedic terms. Time is cyclic, thus universe is dynamic. No indefinite locking thus. > This, in fact, was my point - I don't believe this > to be true. Using Monte-Carlo tests, given enough parameters, tuning procedures can successfully match data to an incorrect model, resulting in an inaccurate time scale as well as in a false validation of that model. Whatever the evidence these so-called scientists collected for Big bang is using for inflation. A simple analogy: Let us consider a linear diaphantine equation L:ax+by = c, and this equation has many intger solutions. A subset of this solution set is also a solution of another equation M: lx+my = n, where L and M are not parallel. This means that it is very easy to tune the data as scanty evidence to the present day cosmological problems. Acceptance/Rejection of certain theory is another issue. > NONE-THE-LESS, I DO lend credence to the things I >see from studying Vedic, as well as Chinese and >Western astrology. Vedaless vedic astrology and Indology veda-s + vedic astrology take us to nowhere. > I simply see different aspects, as I said, > looking at each of them in turn. I am not talking about astrological interpreations based on seasons, or based on fixed nakshatra-s. I am not a practising astrologer. Just I can understand the analysis(like a elementary school student cross check the integer solutions of a second degree diaphontine eqn). jyOtiSa also falls under para vidya category. Some people, they dont cast horoscope(western/eastern), they are experts at predicting accurately. I was raising "tropical vs sidereal issue in terms of measuments", but not the interpretations, because of para-apara vidya categories. > ARE being measured. I suggest you locate and read a > couple of articles on a fairly recent modification > to the "Big Bang" theory called "Inflation." As I already stated in earlier post "bigbang singularity to expanding universe". The so called inflation theory is marriage of the best features of big bang and the steady state scenarios. Again, this inflation theory is also static, thus expanding universe. > They are in the April 2002 issues of "Discover" and > "Astronomy" magazines. The theory these articles > discuss posits that the "universe" came > from quite literally - "nothing". What is there beyond of these Universe(dark matter + galaxy clusters + planets et al). A well known science writer in USA has written that our scientific model of the present universe may be just as "faulty" as Columbus's map of earth. And between modern cosmology and Vedic view, while there are some similarities, there are great differences too. Some examples: Cosmologist's universe is static; Vedic brahmAnda (that contains the whole universe) spins around a central axis through 'hiraNyagarBha'. Cosmologist's universe arose from an indescribable singularity; Vedic universe from an Indescribable, permanent, pure. That One as Indescribable beyond words such as sat, asat, raja, vyOma, mR`tyu, amR`tam, etc.; from such Indescribable state came tama, then salilam (not water, but primordial matter! What does modern cosmology say? - some indescribable uniform fundamental matter sea from a mathematical singularity, it it not? Read the most respected cosmologist in CalTech groping just as R`shi-s did); then aekam mahimAn, desire, multiplicity, universe, etc.) cf: nasadiya suktam. The most fundamental particle, parent of all fundamental particle we know today, arose in a uniform sea from the singularity under tremendous heat (big bang); Vedic image is of a sea of salila -> Apa -> ka -> ma -> la (not water of earth) with no such intense heat, etc. The notion of mandala-s and pariDhi-s is Vedic: sapta pariDhi-s, agni-s, jihvA-s, R`Si-s, DhAma-s, Aditya-sOma-vahni mandala-s, etc. That all celestial bodies (not just this earth we live on) are mostly spherical was known to mankind extremely long time before Aristotle. > Christianity, we are told that God >is "everywhere", meaning that He sees and knows >everything. How do this church centric mindset justifies when they wiped out over 100 million human beings/native americans in the span of 50 years in-out of hatred and biblical beliefs of racial supremacy. Were not these religions see God in those 100 million human beings? Here are more examples: Here are the examples: Greeks during Alexander rampaged and murdered millions in the present Middle East, Africa and Mediterrainean. Then the Roman vs.Barbarian wars in Europe wiped out and/or enslaved some more millions. There were famines too. In China and India too there were ongoing turmoils but relatively less than that in Europe. In the Americas there were bloody quarrels (Maya-s, Inca-s, native Indian intra-tribal wars, etc.). After the onset of Christianity in Jerusalem, a new fight started - between the followers of this new faith and the older pagans, and millions of pagans were killed. >From 5th century onwards it only got worse. After Islam's entry in 7th century, all hell broke loose - there were continuous crusades, tyranny slavery, famines, and harm to every life element in nature. By 15th century, Eurpoe's new barbarians were going on their ships (target: the rich and world famous Indica) and looting, raping, enslaving, murdering wherever they set foot (Americas, Africa, Asia). Several millions of native American Indians were wiped out. Ditto in Africa. In India Muslim armies killed over 5 million Hindus and destroyed over 10,000 temples just as Christians had done in Europe during their crusades and Muslims had avenged it in Middle East and Spain. Yet it continued through World War II when a few millions of Jews were done with by the nazis. Read Timur biography, you will notice more about killings of humans in the name of abrahamic religions. Thus crux of the difference between East and West today is due to the Aristotelian logic of "no God here in this universe, but God is outside of this matter-energy ensembled universe and controls it". There is no other fundamental difference. > My own belief is that God IS everywhere, meaning >that He literally IS everything that exists. GOOD With Regards, VR > This would explain, at least > partially, how something > so vast > could come into existance from "nothing" (i.,e. - > pure thought) and > still > have > such magnificent "order". This also fits quite well > with Mr. > Goravani's > note > from several days ago - the one that started this > discussion... > > And as far as your last question - well, I don't > wish to fan flames... > > Best Regards, > Martin Michaels > ----------------------- > Sr. Systems Analyst > Nirvana Consulting > 317-902-9432 > gadgetcoder > > 'This work we do, > It's not "rocket science"... > It's much, MUCH harder.' > > > > > > venkateshwara_reddy > [venkateshwara_reddy] > Wednesday, September 04, 2002 3:57 PM > gjlist > Re: [GJ] RE: Two Zodiacs? Perhaps it's Ma > and Pa, Again! > > > > > As I mentioned yesterday, I find that each other > Zodiacal systems > > has a different viewpoint, and hence, shows > different aspects of > our > > "destiny". And I should point out also that as > scientists have > proven > > in recent years, the galaxy IS, in fact, CHANGING > - the stars > > > Dont you see the word "relatively" fixed wrt earth > and solar system > in the post I appended on yesterday. > > Well, Vedic Cosomology declares that the > universe(brahmaanda) is > dynamic and is spinning around immobile > axis(hiranyagarbha). One spin > of our universe is called parivatsara. > > Temples were built on this very universe > model(vyakta and avyakta > universe). > > Our solar system, galaxy, galaxy cluster, super > galaxy, galaxy super > clusters are spinning and also orbiting around > higher centre, as per > Vedic Cosmology. For those geo-centric guys, > seasonal calender become > tropical zodiac, and it moves. Ah. > > > Solar system also spinning? How much time it take > for one spin? Do > these so called scientists measure this, other than > providing some > scanty figure. > > > The question here, geo-centric vs > helio/galaxy/hiranyagarbha centric > issur. Without this, we will end up in so called > STATIC universe, > thus bigbang singulary to expanding universe. > > > Well, these constellations of stars are also part of > some of the > galaxy clusters? What are they?. > > This question leads to so called precession issues? > > What is the tropical precession of equinoxes? What > is the sidereal > precession of equinoxes? What are the measurements. > Why dont these SO > CALLED people in these lists probe sidereal, > tropical durations of > various cycles in this universe(day, year, axis > precession, orbital > precession, various ahOrAtri-s, varSa-s). > > Who is FOOLISH. > > > Regards, > VR > > themselves, > > the Zodiac is changing - albeit slowly...just one > more lesson on > the > > falseness of "absolutes"... > > > > Best Regards, > > Martin Michaels > > > > > > Venkateswara Reddy > [venkateshwara_reddy] > > Tuesday, September 03, 2002 8:37 PM > > gjlist > > Cc: vedic astrology > > [GJ] RE: Two Zodiacs? Perhaps it's Ma and > Pa, Again! > > > > > > > > > > Appended is the post borrowed from another egroup: > > > > ---------------- > > On the calendar issue, I feel the word "tropical > > zodiac" is a misnomer. Tropical (i.e., seasonal) > > calendar originated in Greece is a primitive > notion of > > keeping track of days wrt seasons only. Hence > > primitive notions such as "zodiac" moves, and so > on. > > Even in modern astronomy, or Inertial reference > > frames, these notions are JOKES, but the primitive > > MacCaulay west clings to its Greek wisdom. Let it > be > > so, we need not even address it...Just ignore it > as > > some child's prank... > > > > There is only one zodiac. > > > > Zodiac, i.e., stars in the sky are "relatively" > fixed > > wrt earth and aaditya mandala. That it is the > other > > way around is the Ptolemy mind of Greece. We must > use > > this "fixed" star base as the definition of the > term > > "zodiac". Then the misnomer goes away. The Greek & > > western error is to see the seasonal framework as > > "fixed". > > > > > ------------------- > > > > > > > > gjlist, Das Goravani <das@g...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > It struct me now: The Vedic Zodiac, based in > stars, > > > > > insensitive to, and thus needing adjustment to, > the > > tilt of > > > the Earth which causes a new "perceived and > > moveable" Zodiac > > > to be around us always, the perceived Zodiac, > the > > Western > > > Zodiac, where Matriarchy, the circle, ruled, the > > tilt, is a > > > circular wobble, causing seasons, changes, > motion, > > movement, > > > precession backwards the Patriarchy feels, > movement > > forward > > > the world feels. > > > > > > What is an equinox? It's a perception, which > > happens at the > > > whim of the circular wobble, do you see? > > > > > > Our "real" living life we perceive NOW is based > on > > Western > > > Zodiac. > > > > > > The karmic original powerful and dominant Zodiac > is > > yet > > > another thing. > > > > > > By the one we know our father, by the other, our > > mother. > > > > > > This is very significant. Neither alone is > complete. > > > > > > The truth hurts, to those who are it's enemies. > > > > > > By one half of reality alone you will not know > your > > current > > > self, but only your self in relation to leaving > this > > world > > > or staying in it, which may be not in your > present > > reality, > > > which may be the mix, or gradual progress. > > Patriarchy is > > > perhaps, the dark night of the soul. For the > night > > isn't > > > dark to those one with mothers dark half. > > > > > > Some say, "Western is better for personality". > This > > is a > > > dumbed-down-over-time way of saying what is > perhaps > > quite > > > true, and better said as "Western shows you your > > position in > > > the current relative living world of perception > with > > peer > > > humans", and Vedic shows you "You position in > > relationship > > > to the absolute and eternal non perceived > reality". > > > > > > These statements could of couse be improved > finer, > > more > > > educated thinking. > > > > > > I find this realization quite scientific, though > > such > > > support I'm not going into much here. I find > this > > > realization quite significant because of science > as > > well as > > > mystical reasons and rationale. > > > > > > I am "tripping on" the play of these two halves > of > > the > > > whole. I am trying these days to see the basic > Hora > > > division, night and day, male and female, in > things, > > so > > > excuse the focus there, it's my current study. > > > > > > I do think, Western Zodiac is more "Mother" and > > Eastern, > > > Sidereal, more "Father". They spawn the likened > two > > kinds of > > > ways of thinking- perilistic, ominous, verse > > malable, > > > mutable, relative to us now here. Water, is > > adjusting, more > > > related to mother, and there's more water up > North. > > The > > > Earth is drier, harder, more deserts exist, > where > > the Sun, > > > the Patriarchy, originates from and is still > > stronger today. > > > The wet and emotional "new age" movement does > not > > arise in > > > Lahore, or Delhi, or Cairo, or Israel's old > guard. > > No, it > > > arises in Wet Eugene, with little hippies in > > dreadlocks. I > > > have always been a child of the Green, the > Water, > > the wet. I > > > have always taken to this stuff. The way Krishna > is, > > so > > > covered with flowers, girlfriends, music, > passion, > > cows, > > > love and abilities chivalrously splendid, is all > > very > > > Celtic, and wet, and covered with turns and > twists, > > dirt > > > between toes, not straight roman roads. To > "Preach" > > for > > > Krishna is just about a perfect oximoron. These > > splits of > > > the two halves living in me have split me in > two, > > but that's > > > OK, it's all good learning. > > > > > > The earliest authors of our time, Greek > historians, > > wrote of > > > Celts "they are tall, very white and wet > skinned". > > > > > > Things are white and wet where there is no Sun > (ie, > > ocean > > > bottom) > > > > > > Celts do not digest fat properly, they need > certain > > fish or > > > the oil from certain seeds, otherwise, they > actually > > feel > > > bad. A developed genetic disposition to a > certain > > diet, > > > showing certain karmic alignments for those with > > eyes. > > > > > > And from where and whom do Celts trace their > > ancestry? > > > > > > The Sun, one day, met the Moon, and after > > subjegating it, > > > retired in exaustion. The moon, not caring that > it > > was > > > subjegated, such being it's normal state, cared > for > > the Sun > > > while he slept. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hope this is interesting. I think so. > > > > > > By the way, according to most calculations, > there > > was an > > > "alignment" around 300 AD say. This is a very > key > > time in > > > history. I suggest everyone look into what was > going > > on on > > > an emotional level for all of the Western world > at > > that > > > time, all of Europe. Very very interesting. That > was > > when > > > the great Patriarch fell out of control of the > West, > > Europe > > > that is, and the "Natives" began again their old > > ways, > > > without Romans, but in the wake of their total > > dominance and > > > presence. It was a time when "Mother" got ahold > > again of all > > > her Western Children, without "Father" around, > but > > all his > > > forts, roads, and systems were in place, never > to > > again go > > > away. It was a balance point folks. Quite > > significant one. > > > You and I are literally living in the wake of > those > > events > > > of those days. They were VERY Pivotal. > > > > > > For example, that IS when Germany took over > England. > > It did > > > happen. Germans took over, and to this day, > that's > > who's > > > there, and that's who conquered India, and the > > world, the > > > British, are essentially predominantly Germanic > > people. The > > > Celts however did at that time gain and have > > remained since, > > > confined in a way to the Western edges, in all > ways, > > > > > cultural, blood, art, etc. That is when Saxxons > and > > Celts > > > began to really intermingle heavily, for better > or > > worse, in > > > Europe, and they worked out their stuff slowly > to > > this day. > > > They are the two halves of the West, the > brethren of > > magic, > > > the Celts, and the brethren of control, the > Saxxons. > > They > > > are the male and female half of the West whereas > > India and > > > other are the male and female halves of the east > > perhaps. I > > > am trying to see this broad divisions at this > time, > > it's > > > generalization, but it's helpful for > understanding > > basic > > > directional impulses in ourselves always. > > > > > > It is VERY significant what happened when the > two > > zodiacs > > > aligned. Study it. VERY interesting. I'm hinting > at > > a > > > possible ocean of understanding for us here, I > > think, maybe? > > > > > > Note that Germany hit the Celts "From the East". > > > Note that > > > Ireland, the most protected by distance, a > > sanctuary, was > > > the least and last hit, and the last to hold a > > strong > > > ancient blood line and culture which shows how > > Eastern the > > > West used to be, how Matriarchal, how mystical, > how > > > feminine, which is why the dominant masculine > > cultures > > > letters, musical systems, thought systems, > dominate > > here > > > today, because we were actually originally too > weak, > > too > > > feminine, and both the Germans and Romans could > have > > there > > > ways with us, so Rome jumped in, and Germany > took it > > later, > > > showing that Rome had the Mars, of the two, and > > Germany the > > > Saturn, of the two, who are both otherwise > dominant > > and > > > strong in nature originally, or solar. > > > > > > Of the two Irelands, Scotland and Ireland, > Scotland > > is more > > > dominant, and thus, we see, Hilly, whereas > Ireland > > is flat > > > to the point of ridiculed and jest. Do you see > the > > omens? > > > They teach, instruct, they are real. > > > > > > In America, thousands of years ago, a Native > stood > > on the > > > shore in Washington state, and looked out across > the > > > > > Pacific, and saw thus: Over there, in the East, > > they have > > > huge palaces and highly organized religious and > > materially > > > successful societies, but they are all part of, > and > > > development of personal strengths and virtues, > > relationship > > > with mother Earth, are less. Conformity is more. > > > Down South > > > of me, our brothers, also are like that, they > build > > alot, in > > > square arrangements, and they have > centralization > > thus, > > > whereas here in the North, we do not. We > struggle > > more with > > > nature, and know her better, for we must work > with > > her, and > > > always have. But a new time has come, after so > long, > > the two > > > halves will now meet. Something that is > happening > > now > > > starting as always in the East, will soon reach > us > > here in > > > the West, and for a long time, it shall have to > be > > sorted > > > out in all of us, the contact, the balance, the > > aligning of > > > the two halves of ourselves, the circle, and > square, > > mother, > > > father, male, female, dominating, dominated. > > > > > > Likewise, Druids in France studied the phenom, > and > > saw it > > > coming, and predicted what has happened, and is > > happening. > > > > > > We have realized: We came from father, but we > are > > on > > > mother, and on her we depend. Father continues > to > > provide, > > > but mother is our home, the breast we suckle. We > > have both > > > sides in ourselves, and must honor both. We must > > straighten > > > our matters each day, and then mix them up > again, > > when the > > > Sun sets. Brush and clean your hair, then tie > it in > > knots > > > with sticks and other things mixed in. Know your > > blade, and > > > put it away. Count your money, and forget about > it. > > > > > > BOTH. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Das Goravani > > > Roik > > > > > > > > > > Finance - Get real-time stock quotes > > http://finance. > > > > > > > > Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya; Hare Krishna; Om Tat > Sat > > : > gjlist-@e... > > > > > > > > Your use of is subject to > > > > > > Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya; Hare Krishna; Om Tat > Sat > : > gjlist-@e... > > > > Your use of is subject to > > --- End forwarded message --- > > Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance. Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya; Hare Krishna; Om Tat Sat : gjlist- Your use of is subject to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 7, 2002 Report Share Posted September 7, 2002 > gjlist, "MICHAELS, MARTIN (AIT)" > <mm6365@s...> wrote: > Let us simply agree to disagree... Neither of us > can truly "prove" our beliefs, which are the > products of both our individual studies and > cultural backgrounds Of course, each of us is entitled to his own beliefs, imageries, biases, or limited exposure. Let us keep aside static(expanding) vs dynamic(hiranyagarbha centric) issue. This thread started with tropical zodiac vs. sidereal zodiac. Let these egroup members measure various cycles, I mentioned in earlier post(I appended again) using this very tropical zodiac(another reference frame). A basic relativity thought experiment would be enough to understand "what is reference frame". ----------------- > Assume that Tropical zodiac is another reference > frame, here are my questions? > > What is the length of > -Tropical day > -Tropical month > -Tropical year(define the same) > -Tropical precession of equinoxes > -Tropical yuga-s, manvantara-s, kalpa-s > -Tropical day of various graha-s in our solar > system. > -Tropical years of various graha-s in our solar > system > > A scientific examination into this with physics(a > basic insight into reference frames)/astronomy would > reveal as to what is tropical zodiac. > _-------- Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2002 Report Share Posted September 9, 2002 How can you equate "static" with "expanding?" These are not at all the same. Martin Venkateswara Reddy [venkateshwara_reddy] Saturday, September 07, 2002 1:35 PM gjlist RE: [GJ] Two Zodiacs? Perhaps it's Ma and Pa, Again! > gjlist, "MICHAELS, MARTIN (AIT)" > <mm6365@s...> wrote: > Let us simply agree to disagree... Neither of us > can truly "prove" our beliefs, which are the > products of both our individual studies and > cultural backgrounds Of course, each of us is entitled to his own beliefs, imageries, biases, or limited exposure. Let us keep aside static(expanding) vs dynamic(hiranyagarbha centric) issue. This thread started with tropical zodiac vs. sidereal zodiac. Let these egroup members measure various cycles, I mentioned in earlier post(I appended again) using this very tropical zodiac(another reference frame). A basic relativity thought experiment would be enough to understand "what is reference frame". ----------------- > Assume that Tropical zodiac is another reference > frame, here are my questions? > > What is the length of > -Tropical day > -Tropical month > -Tropical year(define the same) > -Tropical precession of equinoxes > -Tropical yuga-s, manvantara-s, kalpa-s > -Tropical day of various graha-s in our solar > system. > -Tropical years of various graha-s in our solar > system > > A scientific examination into this with physics(a > basic insight into reference frames)/astronomy would > reveal as to what is tropical zodiac. > _-------- Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance. Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya; Hare Krishna; Om Tat Sat : gjlist- Your use of is subject to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.