Guest guest Posted October 4, 2002 Report Share Posted October 4, 2002 Pranaams Robert, Though I tried to stay away from the debate, there is one point that must be made. Here's my 2 cents. > THREE KINDS OF GURUS > > 1. Siksha guru: It simply means a teacher - period -that's it. No > assumption of greatness, no power over the people, no mandate of service - > just a teacher. Get it? If I understand the meaning of Siksha guru, then > what's the problem whether someone has that after his name, or PhD, or MA, > or whatever. Within "siksha" (general learning), there are two divisions again. One is called Apara Vidya and it covers knowledge of material nature. The other is called Para Vidya and covers learning of higher subjects. One is shown by Cancer and the other by Leo (that is why D- 24 divisions in a sign start from Cn or Le!), one is ruled by Ganesha and the other by Saraswati. Jyotish has always been considered as Para Vidya. Though Jyotish teachers are still siksha gurus and not diksha gurus as you correctly point out, they teach para vidya and there IS sacredness associated with para vidya. It is not the same as teaching math or physics. Sanjay ji wisely said in gjlist/message/13463 that "It seems most logical from the western viewpoint for money for work. However, the teaching, if done in the Parampara implies a sacred transmission of knowledge called 'Paraa Vidya' which is different from Aparaa Vidya. The purity (Niranjana) is lost if there is any touch of rajas or tamas in this transmission and neither can the teacher teach properly nor is the sisya going to learn properly. Predictions will fail, understanding will be lacking, genuineness and compassion will be absent and the most holy relationship of Guru- Sisya shall be lost." For now, let us leave the topic of whether one can charge for teaching Para vidya (dear Satya ji, I am not talking about readings here. I am talking about teaching). Healthy disagreement is better than uncomfortable agreement. So let us leave the irksome issue for now. But I hope you concur that Jyotish IS a sacred subject and teaching it is NOT the same as siksha in other material subjects. Om Shaantih Shaantih Shaantih, Narasimha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.