Guest guest Posted January 13, 2003 Report Share Posted January 13, 2003 I know there must be numerous erroneous ways to predict the sex of an unborn child, but I have come across one way that has worked for me in certain circumstances and I would like to know if it works for anyone else. If the moon in a woman's chart is increasing in light, then her first conception (if not lost by miscarriage or abortion) will result in the birth of a son. If the moon is decreasing in light, her first conception will result in the birth of a girl. I have checked this against every woman's chart where I can be certain of no miscarriage or abortion. It has worked. In the cases of miscarriage/abortion, the second conception has sometimes been a boy, sometimes a girl. Therefore this does not predict any other than the first conception. I am trying to rectify a chart where the day is in question and this information would be a tremendous help. Thanks! -Mary Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2003 Report Share Posted January 13, 2003 Hello Mary, I don't know how you arrived at an ad hoc rule like this. It never works consistently according to my view. I know of a woman who has Sun in Leo and Moon in gemini, and her first born child was male. I can come up with many instances like this I hope. What are the opinions of the other people of the group? It looks like an interesting discussion. Thanks, Krishna Seetharaman. --- Mary Quinn <mary1quinn wrote: > > Dear All, > > I know there must be numerous erroneous ways to > predict the sex of an unborn child, but I have come > across one way that has worked for me in certain > circumstances and I would like to know if it works > for anyone else. > > If the moon in a woman's chart is increasing in > light, then her first conception (if not lost by > miscarriage or abortion) will result in the birth of > a son. If the moon is decreasing in light, her first > conception will result in the birth of a girl. > > I have checked this against every woman's chart > where I can be certain of no miscarriage or > abortion. It has worked. In the cases of > miscarriage/abortion, the second conception has > sometimes been a boy, sometimes a girl. Therefore > this does not predict any other than the first > conception. > > I am trying to rectify a chart where the day is in > question and this information would be a tremendous > help. > > Thanks! > > -Mary > > > > > > Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2003 Report Share Posted January 14, 2003 This is something I learned from two different teachers (of tropical astrology). It cannot be applied to every chart though, because the first conception can be voluntarily or involuntarily aborted - then the "rule" no longer applies. One can only know for sure with your own chart (if you are a woman) and those women closest to you whom you can trust to tell you the truth regarding their first conception. Do you KNOW this boy was the first conception of the woman with Leo Sun/Gemini Moon? If this WAS her first conception, and not just her first child, then the "rule" is shot out of the water. Please let me know. -Mary Krishna Seetharaman <sita_krish (AT) (DOT) co.uk> wrote: Hello Mary,I don't know how you arrived at an ad hoc rulelike this. It never works consistently according tomy view. I know of a woman who has Sun in Leo andMoon in gemini, and her first born child was male. Ican come up with many instances like this I hope. What are the opinions of the other people of thegroup?It looks like an interesting discussion.Thanks,Krishna Seetharaman.--- Mary Quinn wrote:> > Dear All,> > I know there must be numerous erroneous ways to> predict the sex of an unborn child, but I have come> across one way that has worked for me in certain> circumstances and I would like to know if it works> for anyone else.> > If the moon in a woman's chart is increasing in> light, then her first conception (if not lost by> miscarriage or abortion) will result in the birth of> a son. If the moon is decreasing in light, her first> conception will result in the birth of a girl.> > I have checked this against every woman's chart> where I can be certain of no miscarriage or> abortion. It has worked. In the cases of> miscarriage/abortion, the second conception has> sometimes been a boy, sometimes a girl. Therefore> this does not predict any other than the first> conception.> > I am trying to rectify a chart where the day is in> question and this information would be a tremendous> help.> > Thanks!> > -Mary> > > > > > Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.http://mailplus.Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya; Hare Krishna; Om Tat Sat: gjlist-http://www.goravani.comYour use of is subject to Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2003 Report Share Posted January 14, 2003 HI Mary, Thanks for your reply. First of all I dont clearly understand how we can find the first conception. Also what is the difference between first conception and first child? Whichever child is conceived, is the first child also. Or do you mean we should immediately find the sex of the child after conception, before it gets aborted? If so I am not sure how we do this. Also in the case which I know is her first child. Second child is a female. I dont know about the conception matter in the case of that woman. Even that woman might not know I guess? Am I right? Regards, Krishna Seetharaman. --- Mary Quinn <mary1quinn wrote: > > Dear Krishna, > This is something I learned from two different > teachers (of tropical astrology). It cannot be > applied to every chart though, because the first > conception can be voluntarily or involuntarily > aborted - then the "rule" no longer applies. One can > only know for sure with your own chart (if you are a > woman) and those women closest to you whom you can > trust to tell you the truth regarding their first > conception. > Do you KNOW this boy was the first conception of the > woman with Leo Sun/Gemini Moon? If this WAS her > first conception, and not just her first child, then > the "rule" is shot out of the water. > Please let me know. > -Mary > Krishna Seetharaman <sita_krish > wrote:Hello Mary, > I don't know how you arrived at an ad hoc rule > like this. It never works consistently according to > my view. I know of a woman who has Sun in Leo and > Moon in gemini, and her first born child was male. I > can come up with many instances like this I hope. > > What are the opinions of the other people of the > group? > > It looks like an interesting discussion. > > Thanks, > Krishna Seetharaman. > > > --- Mary Quinn wrote: > > > > Dear All, > > > > I know there must be numerous erroneous ways to > > predict the sex of an unborn child, but I have > come > > across one way that has worked for me in certain > > circumstances and I would like to know if it works > > for anyone else. > > > > If the moon in a woman's chart is increasing in > > light, then her first conception (if not lost by > > miscarriage or abortion) will result in the birth > of > > a son. If the moon is decreasing in light, her > first > > conception will result in the birth of a girl. > > > > I have checked this against every woman's chart > > where I can be certain of no miscarriage or > > abortion. It has worked. In the cases of > > miscarriage/abortion, the second conception has > > sometimes been a boy, sometimes a girl. Therefore > > this does not predict any other than the first > > conception. > > > > I am trying to rectify a chart where the day is in > > question and this information would be a > tremendous > > help. > > > > Thanks! > > > > -Mary > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up > now > > > > > Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up > now. > http://mailplus. > > > > Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya; Hare Krishna; Om Tat > Sat > : > gjlist- > > > > Your use of is subject to > > > > > > > > Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2003 Report Share Posted January 18, 2003 Dear Mary, I came to know from that aunt which I mentioned that she had a miscarriage before giving birth to her first born male. Therefore what you said can be considered as true or atleast could not be refuted yet. So I think the principle which you mentioned holds weight, the certainty of which could be ascertained with more research. Hope this helps, Sincerely, Krishna Seetharaman. --- Mary Quinn <mary1quinn wrote: > > Dear Krishna, > This is something I learned from two different > teachers (of tropical astrology). It cannot be > applied to every chart though, because the first > conception can be voluntarily or involuntarily > aborted - then the "rule" no longer applies. One can > only know for sure with your own chart (if you are a > woman) and those women closest to you whom you can > trust to tell you the truth regarding their first > conception. > Do you KNOW this boy was the first conception of the > woman with Leo Sun/Gemini Moon? If this WAS her > first conception, and not just her first child, then > the "rule" is shot out of the water. > Please let me know. > -Mary Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 27, 2003 Report Share Posted January 27, 2003 Thank you so much for taking the trouble to ask your aunt, and thank you to your aunt for sharing this information. This is what is so great about a group like this one. If we all contribute information and ask about we can really learn something we wouldn't be able to learn on our own. True, more research is needed. It's an interesting possibility though, isn't it? Does anyone out there know of a case that would conclusively refute this "rule"? Thanks! _Mary Krishna Seetharaman <sita_krish (AT) (DOT) co.uk> wrote: Dear Mary,I came to know from that aunt which I mentionedthat she had a miscarriage before giving birth to herfirst born male. Therefore what you said can beconsidered as true or atleast could not be refutedyet. So I think the principle which you mentioned holdsweight, the certainty of which could be ascertainedwith more research. Hope this helps,Sincerely,Krishna Seetharaman. --- Mary Quinn wrote:> > Dear Krishna,> This is something I learned from two different> teachers (of tropical astrology). It cannot be> applied to every chart though, because the first> conception can be voluntarily or involuntarily> aborted - then the "rule" no longer applies. One can> only know for sure with your own chart (if you are a> woman) and those women closest to you whom you can> trust to tell you the truth regarding their first> conception.> Do you KNOW this boy was the first conception of the> woman with Leo Sun/Gemini Moon? If this WAS her> first conception, and not just her first child, then> the "rule" is shot out of the water.> Please let me know.> -Mary Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.http://mailplus.Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya; Hare Krishna; Om Tat Sat: gjlist-http://www.goravani.comYour use of is subject to Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.