Subject -Brotthers Sisters

[Guest guest]

Dear members,

Does any body Know the full proof method to declare the No's of Brother sisters,

or the No's of Children one may have.I do know some rules but I never though of

researching and establishing those rules.

If some rule is not unioversaly applicable then it has no authinticity.?

Does the chart of Indira Gandhi shows that she was the only daughter of her

father?

 

Persons on the list with no siblings , kindly mail their data for research,

others having only one child may also mail the data of the child.

I need to confirm some of the findings. In reward to your sending me the data

you may ask me one point regarding your horoscope, I will answer through KP and

Nadi technique.

With Best Wishes,

Inder

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Dear Inderjit,

I have not heard of any foolproof method to declare no of brothers/sisters.There

could be of course -- my knowledge of jyotish is limited.

There are many factors here.Would you include half-brother and half-sister

having only one parent common?

What about terminated pregnancies/abortions where the sibling should have been

but is terminated before birth?

What about an adopted sibling?

Best regards,

vivek.

 

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 Inder Jit Sahni wrote :

>Dear members,

>Does any body Know the full proof method to declare the No's of Brother

sisters, or the No's of Children one may have.I do know some rules but I never

though of researching and establishing those rules.

>If some rule is not unioversaly applicable then it has no authinticity.?

> Does the chart of Indira Gandhi shows that she was the only daughter of her

father?

>

>Persons on the list with no siblings , kindly mail their data for research,

others having only one child may also mail the data of the child.

>I need to confirm some of the findings. In reward to your sending me the data

you may ask me one point regarding your horoscope, I will answer through KP and

Nadi technique.

>With Best Wishes,

>Inder

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya; Hare Krishna; Om Tat Sat

>: gjlist-

>

>

>

>Your use of is subject to

>

>

 

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

I have heard from time to time that a Jyotishi got it right- the exact

number of children somebody has, and their genders, in proper order, and so

on.

 

I don't know the rules, tricks, or whatever, to do that.

 

I have 10 brothers and sisters, all from same natural parents. My mother

was Irish Catholic and my Dad was willing to go along with it, for awhile.

 

Anyway...

 

Perhaps this thing, number of children, number of siblings, is easier to

read in some charts, and the same rules then might fail in other charts

because they are too fragmented karmicly.

 

That's a concept I've come to believe in- that some charts work better with

the rules, the Vedic concepts, than others, because the various souls have

either clear, vedic-compatible karma, and less clear more complex, more

"changed" from Vedic standards.

 

Like these days there is a very high amount of people born outside their

country of racial origin. So for example that's a mixup, so to speak,

karmicly. Then if one is homosexual, that's another, and so on.

 

But good luck anyway of course.

 

 

Das Goravani, President

 

2852 Willamette St, #353

Eugene, OR, 97405, USA-America

Voice: or in America

 

 

http://www.DancingMoonInc.com

[Guest guest]

Dear Inder,

 

About 8 years ago, I too got interested in whether

information about children and siblings (such as

number, gender, birth order, career, etc) could be

seen in one's chart. I also gathered charts of people

to study. I was interested in people who were the

second of two children and had an older sibling of a

different gender. I was also interested in people who

had only two natural born children of different

genders. I avoided the very valid issue brought up by

Vivek on the half-siblings, terminated pregnancies

(whether voluntary or not), and adopted children. I

then gathered charts that didn't fit what I was

looking for to prove the rules would be different for

them.

 

I wasted great amounts of time on this. I wish you far

better luck. What I discovered is that although you

might get one rule to show you that a person has two

children you wouldn't be able to show how many

siblings. Etc. Basically, I'd get one, maybe two

details to work, but not the rest. Granted, all my

work was tropical. So it might be moot here. But when

I dabbled in Vedic for a while, the only information I

was able to get to work for my own chart was from a

James Braha book about some planet (which I can no

longer remember) placed in some sign or house (yep,

memory like a sieve) frequently shows an older sibling

who goes into medicine. I happen to have an older

sibling who is a medical doctor. That's it. It was the

only "rule" that worked regarding siblings. And I've

got to think there are millions of people out there

with that same planet in that same sign or house that

don't have an older sibling in medicine.

 

I think the operative word is "frequently". There may

be rules which have had enough success to be mentioned

but never enough to be foolproof. I don't think there

are foolproof rules on anything. In scanning over old

posts for this list, I've noticed that people have

frequently gone looking for the "rule" on finding

particular diseases, or baldness, or whatever, and no

one ever seems to find it.

 

That's not to say you shouldn't look. But be aware of

how unlikely it is to find a "rule". We often jump

into a job thinking it won't take long or can be done.

Years later you wonder if you would have done it if

you'd known. Then again, the impossible is done by

those who don't know it's impossible. And being an

"impossible chaser" myself, I don't want to discourage

you.

 

To answer your other question, I don't think a rule

has no authenticity if it is not universally

applicable. If that were true most of astrology would

have no authenticity. Okay, I'll leave that statement

alone before it blows up in my face.

 

Anyway, you may be able to find what "frequently"

shows no siblings, but you may not be able to find all

the data you are looking for in one chart. That

doesn't make the rules invalid. I think part of the

problem is we use the word "rule" which implies

universal applicablity when nothing is universally

applicable in anything. I guess instead of "rules"

they should be "tendencies" maybe?

 

 

 

New Photos - easier uploading and sharing.

 

[Guest guest]

> I have 10 brothers and sisters, all from same natural parents. My mother

> was Irish Catholic and my Dad was willing to go along with it, for awhile.

 

HELLO DAS,

Though telling no's and brothers only impress to the consultant and does not

solve any major purpose in today world . It only matters when a sibling is

involved in making or marring your future. But the same rules are applicable

to children and as such they help to many for looking at the chances of

children one may have.

While looking at your horoscope , I can assess you that you are not the

eldest .

One count speaks to me that you may have 6 brothers and 4 sisters but what

is your exact no' in the 11 counts , one method speaks that you are 7th

another 9th among 11 no's. total brother and sisters. Even if it is 6th then

too I will feel that I have some success. And will you please post serial

wise that is brother, sister etc and your no. in them.

I count it like eldest two brothers then two sisters and brother , I may be

wrong over here , but I will check if the no's and sex has the relations.

With Best Wishes,

Inder Jit Sahni

[Guest guest]

The brothers/sisters situation of Rich MacKai

 

Thomas Vurst and Joan MacKai married just after WWII in which both served,

and had 11 children before Thomas went up to a Veterans Home for R&R, after

which, Mom raised us all alone. I was around 10 or so at the time. We were

all raised Catholic. We are all still alive and friendly to each other, very

much so. I am one of the most colorful for my strange deviations from the

norm. Everyone of us has wavy thick brown to black hair and in general we're

all tall/stocky like your archetypical celt. Everyone is more or less alive

and well. There's very little serious disease in all of us. When you get

beyond the 4th one, Thomas, the personality and mental problems begin to

increase reflecting the decreasing ability of the parents to show personal

affection to each child. I was caught in the middle of that neglect wave, my

mother even told me that.

 

The birth order was as follows

 

3 girls

4 boys

4 girls

 

I am the youngest boy, or the 7th one. I get along best with Margaret,

Thomas and Donald was close to me when we were young. Everyone is "nice".

This entire family, and the nature and lives of our parents, all of

everything about this family, would and should be a wonderful book someday.

 

My father won almost all the medals you can win in the Navy. He was at Pearl

Harbor and served the whole war as an officer.

 

My mother worked for the Navy in San Francisco during WWII

 

Here's the names and occupations:

 

 

Regina-Jewish Rabbi/Mother

Margaret-Nurse/Mary Kay super rep

Joan-Accountant/Mother

Thomas-Realtor/Father

Donald-Gardener/ultra unique character

Paul-woodworker/Lakota Shaman/Druid/Father

Richard-you know me

Rosemary-Journalist/Mother

Maureen-Clothier/Mother

Grace-Nurse/Mother

Adrienne-wife/speech therapist

 

 

 

peace

 

 

R