Females, Tanvir, etc (for Tanvir)

[Guest guest]

Tanvir,

 

You should just apologize and keep quiet. As the saying goes,

silence is golden.

 

Regards,

 

John R.

 

 

 

 

valist, "Tanvir" <ultimate@s...> wrote:

> Oh, Dear all... I see some misunderstandings here !

>

> Well I should have written it in a well, clear manner. I appologise

for not doing so. But many took the wrong meaning of my words, which

I did not want to mean. I was out of city and checking mails and

posts in a hurry from a shop. I did not write to my list all these

days, or no where else, but I wanted to reply Das since I felt a bit

sorry for him, so tried to help. The hurry up writing with no

revision made this confusion... :-)

>

> I did not mean that ladies are less intelligent. All I meant that

they are *generally* simple in thinking, less technical, less

practical. More emotion, more softness, more humanity in general.

That does not make them less than men. Both are different. Both have

some things others do not. Again, this is just the general trend of

behaviour. There are very good exceptions, we all know.

>

> By the way when I wrote-

>

> "They will not understand the SIMPLE things of karma, astrology,

hinduism etc. But they are easy to us, and simple"

>

> this *US* certainly does not mean MALE PEOPLE but means spiritual

people, people involved in Jyotish, Hinduism etc. Because the nest

sentence clarified it,

>

> "But ladies, and actually MOST of the PEOPLE and TEENS and YOUNG

PEOPLE will not understand them"

>

> So I wrote here that it is "Actually most of the PEOPLE" [sO not

ladies were targetted]

>

> Thanks to the kind hearts who took the right meaning of my words.

Thanks for understanding me. Yes it is only a general way / manner of

talking. Just as we say that guyz are wanering around, teasing girls,

etc etc... but not all of them !

>

> Women are *generally* naiver (THAN MEN). They are less rude. More

soft. More of humanity. Their weakness and naiveness is what is their

beauty. A woman is not as strong physically, or even mentally,

generally. That is what makes them beautiful, that is what makes

them "females". That is what is "feminity", femalness.

>

> A lady would not like male qualities in her.

>

> So it is not less, not more, but it is the difference.

>

> Guys do technical works. Ladies do too. But, generally they are

good in taking care of the kids, generally dads can not take as much

care, I repeat generally. A home without a lady / wife looks and

feels so different, so bad.

>

> Ladies need guys, guys need ladies. Combining both, it comes to

fullness.

>

> It is Shiva when united with Shakti does he have the power to

create.

>

> All the Goddess supply the powers to their Gods as well :-)

>

> If there is no Shakti, what the God would do?

>

> If there is no one to use the Shakti, what would it worth?

>

> I hope I am not again misunderstood :-)

>

> Thanks everyone.

>

>

>

> What can not happen, can never happen.

> Which is mine, is forever mine.

>

> http://www.jyotish-remedies.com - Vedic Astrology (Jyotish)

> Predictive astrology with incredibly powerful problem solving

remedies

> Where relief and solutions are found