RE: Shri KN Rao's prediction... CRYPTIC CLUES !!!

[Guest guest]

I agree 100%. Apart from astrology, moral uprightness is of very high value

and we should respect such persons, always. I too know Shri K.N.Rao

personally, follow him astrologically and respect him for his ethically high

values.

 

P.Kumar (Mumbai)

 

-

"sreeram srinivas" <sreeram64 (AT) satyam (DOT) net.in>

<vedic astrology>

Cc: "'Noname Noname'" <nameisego >; "Renuka Prematillake"

<renunw (AT) (DOT) co.uk>

Friday, May 12, 2006 2:12 PM

[vedic astrology] RE: Shri KN Rao's prediction... CRYPTIC CLUES !!!

 

 

> Sri K.N.Rao is a person from whom I learnt the holy subject and respect

> him. Having interacted with him for long, I am sure that the telecast

that

> you referred in your mail - which I did not see ( but cannot comment

much ),

> one thing is sure, that the words spoken by Sri K.N. Rao would not be in

> terms of any "fatalist" tone. He is the person who has excellent

command

> either hindi or english and knows the use of language- he picks his words

> carefully. This is my own assessement as an individual. He never sought

> publicity himself - other than promoting astrology. For the "clout" he

has

> with either politicians or businessmen or even normal public, had he any

> intentions of such "going public", he would not living in a small single

> room, living on his own monies & ethics,...etc..

>

> While I say this, let me submit, being in a industry - where

"organizations"

> base their decisions of our(my) reports either verbal or written, we are

> not carried away in supporting someone blindly without a valid reason.

It

> is the media responsible for painting astrology black, while they earn

> monies, by publishing weekly forecasts for public consumption !!! every

> weekend. Sri K.N. Rao despite his health constraints, did take time to

> fight cases in Indian Courts including Supreme Court in favor of

astrology -

> is it public stunt ??? When no other "Titled" astrologer worth his name,

> engaged in selling his knowledge has time or energy to defend it when it

> needed most - or is this a public stunt ???

>

> I think it is time that we need to base our opinions not on single words

or

> sentences of a person, but take a holistic view of everything and then

> conclude. I am sure you will agree with me on this !!

>

> Reproducing the article published on Sri K.N. Rao's website for ready

> reference.

>

> with regards,

>

> sreeram srinivas

>

> sreeram64 (AT) satyam (DOT) net.in

>

>

>

>

>

> Kunjilal the astrologer

>

> who predicted his own death but failed

>

> K.N.Rao.

>

>

>

> On 20 October some private television channels covered extensively a

> peculiar news item. An astrologer of Madhya Pradesh by the name Kunjilal

had

> predicted that he would die on 20 October 2005 between 3 and 4 pm. TV

> cameras were showing him, his family members and the crowds that had

> gathered to see it near a temple inside which Kunjilal was shown

meditating

> with his eyes closed.

>

> I was asked by India's number one television channel, AAJ TAK, to

> participate in a live coverage along with a psychologist and a

"rationalist"

> participating from Calcutta.

>

> I said that I wanted some details about the horoscope of Kunjilal which

> could not be got . The only information available was that he was born on

20

> October 1930 at Betul with Tula lagna. The approximate horoscope cast on

> this basis was as follows.

>

>

> Why the "rationalist "?

>

> I asked privately why had they invited a so called "rationalist" when

these

> fellows and physical scientists who had been shouting against astrology,

> dominating the English newspapers of India and the television channels

with

> their irrational attacks on astrology since ages had lost three legal

> battles in the last three years.

>

> Madras High Court

>

> First they filed a case against the introduction astrology as a subject of

> study in Madras High Court where they had all the opportunity to argue

> against astrology. IT IS ALSO A DISGRACE

>

>

>

> <http://journalofastrology.com/images/kunjilal.gif>

>

> THAT NO HINDU ASTROLOGER WHO SWEARS BY EIGHTEEN RISHIS EVEN APPEARED AS A

> PETITIONER IN PERSON TO DEFEND ASTROLOGY.

>

> But astrology won the case in Madras High Court.

>

>

> Andhra High Court

>

> Then the case came up in the Andhra High Court where again astrologers won

> the case. IT IS ALSO A DISGRACE THAT NO HINDU ASTROLOGER WHO SWEARS BY

> EIGHTEEN RISHIS EVEN APPEARED AS A PETITIONER IN PERSON TO DEFEND

ASTROLOGY.

>

> The Supreme Court of India

>

> The case came up in the Supreme Court of India where it was admitted to be

> heard on merits which was good for astrology as, if we won it, the

> controversy would be over for ever. I was ailing then and was not sure if

I

> could sit in the Supreme Court for three hours at a stretch and could walk

> comfortably in the premises of the Supreme Court.

>

> Many astrologers can speak and write in English and could have filed

> petitions in the Supreme Court. NONE DID IT. I WAS THE ONLY ASTROLOGER

> FIGHTING THE CASE WITH MY AILING CONDITION.

>

>

> I argued the case effectively and astrology won the case.

>

> Why are the so called "rationalists" shouting now when the physical

> scientists have been lying low, having been beaten hollow three times now?

>

> What have these so called "rationalists" to say now except mouthing their

> ignorance which have been rejected by the courts thrice ? It was time for

us

> 11 astrologers to laugh at and ridicule those communists, physical

> scientists and the "rationalists" who in collusion with fellow travellers

> and

> pseudo intellectuals in English journalism , for full four years between

> 2000 and 2004, wrote and said on television that introduction of astrology

> would amount to encouraging superstition. These denationalised and

> despiritualised Indians were those dangerous apes who for the time being

> seemed to be winning the debate and the battle till three courts dealt

them

> mortal blows one after another and showed them their place. Now when they

> see some cultural-religious-spirtual-astrological themes dominating some

> television programmes, they feel helpless and ex-press their impotent

rage.

> While physical scientists have to be on their guard because they think

that

> they have a "prestige" to guard, the "rationalists" can afford to behave

> buffoonishly.

>

> But television channels want some sensation and they gave chance to so

> called "rationalist" who at no stage had anything intelligent to say. I

knew

> that I had to suffer it and tolerate only so long as my patience would

hold

> out.

>

> What I said

>

> 1) I started by saying that it was unethical to do what Kunjilal was

doing,

> creating so much tension for his family, particularly for his wife who was

> shown in her semi-rustic dress praying to Lord Hanuman, as she said, on

> Karuva Chauth which fell on 20 October 2005. For those who do not know it,

> Karuva Chauth is observed by married women in northern India for the long

> life of their husbands. These women fast whole of the day, pray, and break

> their fast only after seeing the Moon after sunset.

>

>

> It was an ironical situation now. If Kunjilal died, his astrology would

> triumph.If he survived, people would say that his wife's Karva Chauth

saved

> her husband !!!

>

> 2) I said that there were instances of such advance predictions made by

> astrologers about their own death. But they had foretold about the bad

years

> and months of their lives at most and not the precise day and hour as

> Kunjilal was doing.

>

> 3) Kunjilal may have made his own calculations and could be running the

> dasha of Mercury which being the seventh dasha could be a maraka.

Television

> channels were saying that he had predicted correctly the time of the death

> of many persons including his own father's who was also an astrologer.

>

> PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT

>

> 4) Towards the end when the "rationalist" uttered something irrational

half

> of which I could hear feebly because of some technical fault, and would

not

> have known if the anchor had not repeated it, I said , rather harshly,

that

> those who, without studying astrology scientifically, criticise it, should

> get themselves examined by pychiaritsts.

>

>

> The last remark of mine must have irritated all those who had carried on a

> vigorous campaign against astrology particularly in the English print

media

> of India between 2000 and 2004 May after which the Supreme Court finally

> gave its verdict in favour of astrology. But one journalist did misquote

me

> and said that I had felt strongly that it was possible. I heard two times

> the CD of that telecast. I never said that.

>

> The last laugh was mine, this time in a live television show watched by

> millions in India. I had asked critics of astrology to get themselves

> treated mentally.

>

> Kunjilal did not die and has done some damage to the cause of astrology by

> miscalculating the time of his own death and making such a big show of it.

> He did not at all appear to be a gimmick maker but a genuine, gentle and

> successful astrologer dreading death by misapplying his own astrology to

> himself. He started perspiring when it was nearing 4.pm which means that

he

> had believed that he would die that day.

>

> But he was a relieved man later when he survived his own bad prediction ,

> but had done damage to his own reputation and to astrology.

>

> That does not matter. All of us have some failed predictions. Astrology is

a

> super science and astrologers are ill trained because of which instead of

> concentrating on good researches they play God and prescribe remedies as

> though they can perform plastic surgery on human fate.

>

>

>

>

>

> _____

>

> vedic astrology

> [vedic astrology] On Behalf Of Tatvam-Asi

> Friday, May 12, 2006 12:21 AM

> vedic astrology

> Re: [vedic astrology] Re: Shri KN Rao's prediction... CRYPTIC

CLUES

> !!!

>

>

> Dear Arjun Ji,

> Are you, by any chance ,refering to my earthquake predictions?

> A bit curious.

>

> K.N Rao ji, was sitting in the TV Channel's studio discussing the

> astrologer's chart.

> And he catagorically said that this person has Mrityu Yog and may die at

> predicted time.

>

> Now who was seeking free publicity and who did not ? I have no answer to

> this question.

>

> Tatvam-Asi

>

> By the way, Yoga Teacher Ramadasji himself is one such publicity seeker

> IMHO.

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

>

>

> Links

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

 

 

 

------------------------ Sponsor --------------------~-->

You can search right from your browser? It's easy and it's free. See how.

http://us.click./_7bhrC/NGxNAA/yQLSAA/.8XolB/TM

--~->

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

<*>

vedic astrology/

 

<*>

vedic astrology

 

<*> Your