Guest guest Posted May 30, 2005 Report Share Posted May 30, 2005 Dear Ashutosh and Juliana: Why not try John Edwards and Hilary as VP running mate? Remember the moral majority that elected Bush & Co has a "stand by your man" mentality and Hilary is no Indira Gandhi (I'm quite relieved and intuitively concur that she would not be elected as a US President). Janna valist, "Astrologer Ashutosh" < astrologerashutosh> wrote: > Dear Juliana, > Hillary Clinton's given birth data results in a gemini > ascendent. The venus mahadasha is ending in dec'06 and the mahadasha for sun > is beginning. Venus is yogakarak here and in its own sign. Sun is in > debiliation with no neechbhanga in effect either from lagna or moon. Sun > does not have any functional beneficial status also. To my best judgement, > Hillary Rodham Clinton's fortunate period ends in dec'06. After that she > will have nothing but downfall in her career and personal life too. No > presidential win for her is possible. The sun period will also see her > facing litigations and ill health. > She has the ability to be a kingmaker but not a ruler herself. > > Ashutosh. > > > > - > Juliana Swanson <omhamsa> > <valist> > Monday, May 30, 2005 17:59 > Re: John Edwards- > > > > Hi Ashutosh and List Members, > > > > Following your conversation about John Edwards and the > > next election, I have read reports that certain > > high-ranking Republicans in the US Congress believe > > that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York is an > > absolute lock for the 2008 Democratic presidential > > nomination and will not be easy to defeat in the > > general election. Astrodatatbank does not have an > > accurate birth time for her but this is what I have > > used: (Rodden rating DD) at 10/26/47 20:00 CST > > Chicago, IL. > > > > Does anyone have another time that works better? I > > have also seen some astrologers use either 8 AM or > > 10:45 AM. > > > > Best, > > Juliana S. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________ _________________ > Découvrez le nouveau Mail : 1 Go d'espace de stockage pour vos mails, photos et vidéos ! > Créez votre Mail sur http://fr.mail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2005 Report Share Posted May 30, 2005 Dear Janna, When Hillary's sun period begins, she will not be even a VP running mate. Venus and sun have contrasting effects. Sun will take whatever venus has given. Ashutosh. - Janna Lynn <jnanalynn <valist> Monday, May 30, 2005 21:32 Re: John & Hillary Dear Ashutosh and Juliana: Why not try John Edwards and Hilary as VP running mate? Remember the moral majority that elected Bush & Co has a "stand by your man" mentality and Hilary is no Indira Gandhi (I'm quite relieved and intuitively concur that she would not be elected as a US President). Janna valist, "Astrologer Ashutosh" < astrologerashutosh> wrote: > Dear Juliana, > Hillary Clinton's given birth data results in a gemini > ascendent. The venus mahadasha is ending in dec'06 and the mahadasha for sun > is beginning. Venus is yogakarak here and in its own sign. Sun is in > debiliation with no neechbhanga in effect either from lagna or moon. Sun > does not have any functional beneficial status also. To my best judgement, > Hillary Rodham Clinton's fortunate period ends in dec'06. After that she > will have nothing but downfall in her career and personal life too. No > presidential win for her is possible. The sun period will also see her > facing litigations and ill health. > She has the ability to be a kingmaker but not a ruler herself. > > Ashutosh. > > > > - > Juliana Swanson <omhamsa> > <valist> > Monday, May 30, 2005 17:59 > Re: John Edwards- > > > > Hi Ashutosh and List Members, > > > > Following your conversation about John Edwards and the > > next election, I have read reports that certain > > high-ranking Republicans in the US Congress believe > > that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York is an > > absolute lock for the 2008 Democratic presidential > > nomination and will not be easy to defeat in the > > general election. Astrodatatbank does not have an > > accurate birth time for her but this is what I have > > used: (Rodden rating DD) at 10/26/47 20:00 CST > > Chicago, IL. > > > > Does anyone have another time that works better? I > > have also seen some astrologers use either 8 AM or > > 10:45 AM. > > > > Best, > > Juliana S. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________ _________________ > Découvrez le nouveau Mail : 1 Go d'espace de stockage pour vos mails, photos et vidéos ! > Créez votre Mail sur http://fr.mail. ___________________________ Découvrez le nouveau Mail : 1 Go d'espace de stockage pour vos mails, photos et vidéos ! Créez votre Mail sur http://fr.mail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.