Guest guest Posted November 29, 2001 Report Share Posted November 29, 2001 OHM SHRI RAGAVENDRAYA NAMAH JAYA JAGANNATHA Namaste Nandan and Lakshmi, Thanks and my appreciation for the quick and nice presentations from you. Lakshmi: You mentioned Sanjay-Narasimha, there is no doubt about Narasimha. But, why only Narasimha? Now you and Nandan have proved that you are becoming the great sisyas of Gurudeva. Narasimha is like Arjuna. Then, we cannot neglect Kuselar. The common factor for both of them is Pure Bakthi. Here you and Nandan have shown the similar dedication and sincerity and you are trying to execute the Gurudeva’s instructions. Arjuna asked questions to Krishna, representing the whole mankind. Maitreya asked questions to Parasara, representing the whole Jyotisha. Nandan: I was keep on thinking about the content of your mail ever since I read it yesterday. There are a lot of Jyotish informations hidden in it. I am not knowledgeable like Gurudeva to comment further on this subject. But, a small note on the Sun – Saturn. Sun as the signifactor of Atma gives the life to the living things. He is the origin and the end also should come from him only. Once a person is born, only one thing, which can be blindly predicted is his death, which is sure to occur. As Aditi wished the son of Death born out of Sun. How was he born? Through the chayya, the Maya. Truth is not involved in this. Martanda, can it mean the cosmic egg? One is beginning and other is end and all other planets Once, you both finish your presentation, I will compile them in a separate file and will upload in file section. Keep up this good work. One more small note to Nandan: I am sorry to keep pressing you on this. Your non-abbreviation is improved. Similarly, please fragment your sentence in a simple language, so that non-English speaking country people can understand it better. As you mentioned this will help all of us to understand the planetary characteristics and we need not memorise any thing further. Thanks Solai Kannan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 29, 2001 Report Share Posted November 29, 2001 Om Gurave Namah ---------------- Namaste Solai, If any one else is to be mentioned as worthy sishyas of Gurudeva, apart from Narasimha, I think, you, Zoran, Visti, Alex, Karu...all of you eminently qualify. Despite your kind words(THANKS!)I know that I am not in the same league....atleast not at present. Solai, Bhakti is more like an individual's personal approach to Bhagawan...whereas Gyaana is one that benefits the entire society, and sincerety alone without knowledge doth not make gyaana. And knowledge takes time! Regards, Lakshmi --- Solai Kannan <solai wrote: > OHM SHRI RAGAVENDRAYA NAMAH > JAYA JAGANNATHA > > Namaste Nandan and Lakshmi, > > Thanks and my appreciation for the quick and nice > presentations from you. > > Lakshmi: You mentioned Sanjay-Narasimha, there is no > doubt about Narasimha. > But, why only Narasimha? Now > you and Nandan have proved that you are becoming the > great sisyas of > Gurudeva. Narasimha is like Arjuna. > Then, we cannot neglect Kuselar. The common factor > for both of them is Pure > Bakthi. Here you and Nandan have > shown the similar dedication and sincerity and you > are trying to execute the > Gurudeva’s instructions. Arjuna asked questions to > Krishna, representing the > whole mankind. Maitreya asked questions to Parasara, > representing the whole > Jyotisha. > > Nandan: I was keep on thinking about the content of > your mail ever since I > read it yesterday. There are a lot of Jyotish > informations hidden in it. I > am not knowledgeable like Gurudeva to comment > further on this subject. But, > a small note on the Sun – Saturn. Sun > as the signifactor of Atma gives the life to the > living things. He is the > origin and the end also should come from him only. > Once a person is born, > only one thing, which can be blindly predicted is > his death, which is sure > to occur. As Aditi wished the son > of Death born out of Sun. How was he born? Through > the chayya, the Maya. > Truth is not involved in this. Martanda, can it mean > the cosmic egg? One is > beginning and other is end and all other planets > > Once, you both finish your presentation, I will > compile them in a separate > file and will upload in file section. Keep up this > good work. > > One more small note to Nandan: I am sorry to keep > pressing you on this. Your > non-abbreviation is improved. Similarly, please > fragment your sentence in a > simple language, so that non-English speaking > country people can understand > it better. As > you mentioned this will help all of us to understand > the planetary > characteristics and we need not memorise any thing > further. > > Thanks > Solai Kannan > > GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. http://geocities./ps/info1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 29, 2001 Report Share Posted November 29, 2001 Om Gurave Namah --------------- Namaste Solai, Further to my last email, I am sorely tempted to quote this lovely line from Milton, although it makes your case stronger! " They also serve who stand and wait" Regarding Nandan's Sun-Saturn (great info...thanks!), isn't Yama also a son of Surya? It is the aspect of "Karma-Sakshi/Dharma-devata" of Surya that's inherited by both Saturn and Yama, their mother(s) not withstanding. And I always considered Saturn to be a necessary complement to Sun. Both are incomplete without each other, and derive much of their identity and value from each other. Infact perhaps Saturn alone can show the way to Surya like nothing or nobody else can. He's the Darkness that makes us ache for Light, He 's the inner silence that makes us listen to "Pranava". I think I better stop here! Lots of work. Regards, Lakshmi --- Solai Kannan <solai wrote: > OHM SHRI RAGAVENDRAYA NAMAH > JAYA JAGANNATHA > > Namaste Nandan and Lakshmi, > > Thanks and my appreciation for the quick and nice > presentations from you. > > Lakshmi: You mentioned Sanjay-Narasimha, there is no > doubt about Narasimha. > But, why only Narasimha? Now > you and Nandan have proved that you are becoming the > great sisyas of > Gurudeva. Narasimha is like Arjuna. > Then, we cannot neglect Kuselar. The common factor > for both of them is Pure > Bakthi. Here you and Nandan have > shown the similar dedication and sincerity and you > are trying to execute the > Gurudeva’s instructions. Arjuna asked questions to > Krishna, representing the > whole mankind. Maitreya asked questions to Parasara, > representing the whole > Jyotisha. > > Nandan: I was keep on thinking about the content of > your mail ever since I > read it yesterday. There are a lot of Jyotish > informations hidden in it. I > am not knowledgeable like Gurudeva to comment > further on this subject. But, > a small note on the Sun – Saturn. Sun > as the signifactor of Atma gives the life to the > living things. He is the > origin and the end also should come from him only. > Once a person is born, > only one thing, which can be blindly predicted is > his death, which is sure > to occur. As Aditi wished the son > of Death born out of Sun. How was he born? Through > the chayya, the Maya. > Truth is not involved in this. Martanda, can it mean > the cosmic egg? One is > beginning and other is end and all other planets > > Once, you both finish your presentation, I will > compile them in a separate > file and will upload in file section. Keep up this > good work. > > One more small note to Nandan: I am sorry to keep > pressing you on this. Your > non-abbreviation is improved. Similarly, please > fragment your sentence in a > simple language, so that non-English speaking > country people can understand > it better. As > you mentioned this will help all of us to understand > the planetary > characteristics and we need not memorise any thing > further. > > Thanks > Solai Kannan > > GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. http://geocities./ps/info1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 1, 2001 Report Share Posted December 1, 2001 Dear Lakshmi, > If any one else is to be mentioned as worthy sishyas > of Gurudeva, apart from Narasimha, I think, you, > Zoran, Visti, Alex, Karu...all of you eminently > qualify. Despite your kind words(THANKS!)I know that I > am not in the same league....atleast not at present. Your original kind words on me (Parasara-Maitreya, Sanjay-me) made me feel ashamed, because I know that I am now worthy of such lofty praise. I wasn't really like the ideal sishya you described while quoting Sri Sai Baba. However, I will try my best to live upto your words and overcome my short-comings. > Solai, Bhakti is more like an individual's personal > approach to Bhagawan...whereas Gyaana is one that > benefits the entire society, and sincerety alone > without knowledge doth not make gyaana. And knowledge > takes time! Similarly, knowledge alone without sincerity will not benefit the society nor the person involved. Bhakti is incomplete without jnaana, but jnaana is incomplete without bhakti too. One needs both. However, the good thing is that both bhakti and jnaana come only to blessed souls and those who lack one of the two (due to bad karma from past lives) will eventually make up for their shortcomings. So one with bhakti will eventually get jnaana too. One with jnaana will eventually overcome his ego and get bhakti too. One's life will become complete only then. > Regards, > Lakshmi May Jupiter's light shine on us, Narasimha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.