Lesson-3.

[Guest guest]

JAI GURUDEV.

Guruji,

Ref.: Lesson-3.

I beg an appology, being late in submission of answers. I was facing technical

snags in operation of PC and hence could not get connected for more than a

week.

Q.1: Which planet can be given over lordiship of 12 zodiac signs?

Ravi is the Atmakaraka. He is the breeder of the light for the all grahas. He is

around whom all the planets elliptically rotate and are bound by his pull of

force and have got existance only because of Ravi's presence. Obviously he

stands as the main contendar for the post. But as a personal view, still I have

got few doubts though not reservations, how come despite of all these qualities

why Ravi has been termed as malefic in nature by the Maharishis in Jyotish

shastra? Is it because all other planets loose its strengths in vicinity of

him? It is evident that in any charts, only position of Ravi not decides

indication of Moksha, on the other hand his influence on the 12th house may

negate from its real fruits! Unvariably, one can observe in Hindu astrology

that, more importance has been given to Chandra than to Ravi as far as

predictive part is concerned. Maharishi Parasara has clearly stated that

position of Chandra should be treated as Lagna for all purposes once the native

reaches the age of 32. Atma is pure benign but then why company of Ravi (who is

naisargika Atmakaraka) makes the other planets to suffer from its good

qualities? Atma do not have any ahams (ego) but Ravi is also believed to be

karaka for Aham! Knowing all the even bad qualities attributed to Ravi, making

him the King of planets or imparting him the power of lordship is debatable in

my opinion. Q.2: I will post it once I get success in working on this with my

PC. At present with my limited knowledge not able to do the same.

With Pranamas.

Namra Shishya,

Mohan hegde.