Guest guest Posted October 14, 2002 Report Share Posted October 14, 2002 Hi, I have one query after working my way through lessons 2 and 3. === Query: The Kendras in various sources have been representative of four goals of existence (Dharma, Artha, Kama and Moksha) or the four ashramas (brahmacharya, grahasta, vanaprastha and sanyasa) or the four varnas (Brahmin, Kshatriya, Vaishya or Sudra). Which of these are the closest to the division that Sri Parashara meant when he segmented the Narayana into four kendras? === I would love to get feedback on this as well as on the answers. Respectfully yours, ss SJVC Lesson 2 Answers ===================== 1. Role of God in my life: To me he is the shelter to seek from all storms. Storms are created when the balance of Tatwas in my self creates a state of imbalance - Rajasic and Tamasic gunas dominate. At such times, reaching out to the Atma (part of the Param-atma) within me and using it as an anchor to shelter myself helps me regain the balance towards a sattvic existence. It puts a perspective to all my senses and provides me with a meaning to life. 2. Activities in past year to get closer to God: In essence to get closer to God, I have been attempting to connect with my Atma through a better understanding and control of my 'Mana'. As part of this process, I regularly say my prayers to RadhaKrishna and to Sadashiva, hopefully overcome the tamasic nature along the way as a first step to connect with my atma. I am in the process of regularising prayers in the morning after my morning baths and learning our samskaras. Have focused on learning Jyotish and the fundamentals of Hinduism - getting closer to my roots. I am trying to lead a more sattvic life by ensuring that I am always truthful, peaceful even under stress and actively seeking God. I have some way to go, but believe that am on the right path... 3. God is all or All is God. God is All is more to the point since he is omnipresent though through his presence as atma in all beings, all is god as well. 4. Difference of Jyotisha to a priest For me the Jyotisha is the marg-darshak - one who shows the way to god while the priest is the channel, a proxy who helps those who cannot perceive god themselves to connect with him. They both have a role to play in getting people closer to god and themselves. SJVC Lesson 3 Answers ====================== 1. Which Graha should have overlordship of the twelve signs of the Zodiac? The two major components driving the division of the zodiac into the 12 signs include the division of the Narayana into four parts represented by the 'kendras' and the division into 'trikonas' representing the three gunas. As the aim of every individual is to lead a sattvic life. The Sun, Moon and Jupiter being the three planets representing Sattvic characteristics could be lords. I interpret the four kendras as representing the four key goals of life on earth - Dharma, Artha, Kama and Moksha. The lord of dharma is Sun. I believe that therefore Sun is the right overlord for the zodiac providing the focus on existence on sattvic qualities and the execution of ones Dharma. 2, Schematic representation of Earth, Bha-chakra, Nara and Narayana. Difficult to draw this in text, but I think of this as a geocentric circle with Earth at the centre and the Bha-chakra being a large circle of infinite radius delineated at 12, 30 degree points on its circumference by the zodiac signs. Nara is the bounded circle (is it really a circle?) described by the outermost planet Saturn within which the influence of the five tatwas i.e. Agni, Jala, Vayu, Prithvi and Akash abound and therefore drives life on this earth. Narayana is the space beyond this bounded circle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.