Guest guest Posted October 17, 2002 Report Share Posted October 17, 2002 Dear learned members, Apologies for jumping into your well researched views. For me these mails are the best learning sources. Just trying to put my novice perspective on your mail. I hope learned Gurus would forgive me for my mistakes. I would also like learned members to clarify my view points. The USA East Coast, in their observation focused on charts having ketu in lagna. With their inspiration, I too managed to get some of the concerned charts. One chart is attached herewith. I tried to place VK rules but failed to do so. To start with, this person is 3 brothers and 4 sisters. In context to VK, I couldn’t get those numbers of siblings in D-1 (If we take 3rd from AL as scorpio) but could easily see the same with normal rules (3rd from AL in Pisces). Am I making some mistake here? Also, this person seems to have (as I have not yet read anything about curses) some sort of curse …. may be mother’s curse as moon is afflicted (Gurus may plz guide). Not settled, no monetary stability and not married yet. According to VK rule, his UL would be in 8H. Does this show denial of marriage or loss of partner? At present, he is running Ven major and Leo ND. So, while reckoning dasha analysis do we have to interpret using VK rule? Like, ND shall be of 12H or 2H? Similarly in vimshottari too, how to analyze? Regards, Nisha Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos, &; more faith. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2002 Report Share Posted October 17, 2002 Om Namo Bhagavate Vaasudevaaya Namah! Dear Nisha, "Vipareetam Ketu", as discussed by us at east coast study circle is not approved or accepted by our GuruDeva. we all are eagerly waiting for Sanjay Guruji's, Narasimha ji's and/or other Guru's opinion and guidance on the same. It may be totally wrong and misleading to do this. But, based on my understanding on VK, as it stands now, my comments are given below. Please remember i am a "learning member" , Nisha <nishu_indiia> wrote: I tried to place VK rules but failed to do so. To start with, this person is 3 brothers and 4 sisters. In context to VK, I couldn't get those numbers of siblings in D-1 (If we take 3rd from AL as scorpio) but could easily see the same with normal rules (3rd from AL in Pisces). Am I making some mistake here? Suresh: If you take VK, you would reverse reckoning houses from ASC *only*. From AL reckoning should be in regular order (BTW AL will change is ASC lord is posited in 1,4,7 10). So you would still consider Pices as 3rd from AL in your case. Also, this person seems to have (as I have not yet read anything about curses) some sort of curse …. may be mother's curse as moon is afflicted (Gurus may plz guide). Not settled, no monetary stability and not married yet. Suresh: There seem to be three curses in the chart (in addition to possible KSY). "Matru Shapa" indicated by Moon's afliction by Rh, Sa and Ma. "Brahman/Guru Shapa" indicated by Jupiter's affliction by Ma,Rh and Sa and "Sthree Shapa" indicated by Venus's affliction by Ma and Sa. All curses seems to be complete as 4th and 7th lord Jupiter and 9th lord Venus are afflicted and 4th, 7th and 9th (Sa's 3rd aspect)houses are also afflicted. According to VK rule, his UL would be in 8H. Suresh: Again, my understanding is, by VK Libra becomes 12th house (what would have been 2nd house, had VK not been there). Just look where A2 is, which would become UL. In this case UL will be in Aquarious. Does this show denial of marriage or loss of partner? At present, he is running Ven major and Leo ND. So, while reckoning dasha analysis do we have to interpret using VK rule? Like, ND shall be of 12H or 2H? Similarly in vimshottari too, how to analyze? Suresh: When you look for Lordships, you would reckon houses in reverse. In your example, Venus may be considered as 5th and 12th lord posited in 10th. And LEO may be considered as 2nd house from Lagna. Suresh: Again, this is just an observation from few curious students, who tried to extend a well known principle. Especially after Sanjay Guruji explained a case based on this principle. This could all be totally wrong. Suresh: Also, Jupiter's presense in the ASC is assumed to negate VK. So in the example you have given VK may not apply, after all :-). Hope this helps. Regards, -Suresh. > > Regards, > > Nisha > > > > > > > Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos, & more > faith. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.