[SJC: Achyuta Gurukul] Vipareetam Ketoh

[Guest guest]

[MY RESPONSE IN CAPS]

"Vipareetam Ketu", as discussed by us at east coast study circle is not

approved or accepted by our GuruDeva. we all are eagerly waiting for Sanjay

Guruji's, Narasimha ji's and/or other Guru's opinion and guidance on the same.

It may be totally wrong and misleading to do this.

I DO UNDERSTAND THAT. I WAS JUST TRYING TO EXTEND IT TO SOME MORE CHARTS.Suresh:

If you take VK, you would reverse reckoning houses from ASC *only*. From AL

reckoning should be in regular order.

THIS MEANS SINCE ONLY LAGNA HAS KETU IN IT SO IT IS RECKONED IN REVERSE ORDER

AND NOT AL. CAN WE EXTEND THIS TO ARUDHAS LIKE IF ONLY AL HAS KETU BUT NOT IN

LAGNA? IN THAT CASE CAN WE REVERSE THE ORDER OF HOUSES WHILE JUDGING FROM FOCAL

POINT OF AL?

Suresh: Again, my understanding is, by VK Libra becomes 12th house (what would

have been 2nd house, had VK not been there). Just look where A2 is, which would

become UL. In this case UL will be in Aquarious.

THATS WHAT I ASSUMED. SO UL IN AQUA WILL BE 8H FROM LAGNA AS PER VK. AM I

RIGHT?Suresh: When you look for Lordships, you would reckon houses in reverse.

In your example, Venus may be considered as 5th and 12th lord posited in 10th.

And LEO may be considered as 2nd house from Lagna.

OK. Suresh: Also, Jupiter's presense in the ASC is assumed to negate VK. So in

the example you have given VK may not apply, after all :-).

OOPS. I TRIED TO PILE UP THE WORDS WITHOUT CARING FOR THE FUNDAMENTALS. :-) DOES

THAT MEAN KETU SHOULD BE ALONE IN LAGNA DEVOID OF ANY NATURAL BENEFIC? WHAT IF

IT IS JOINED WITH MALEFIC?

> Regards,> > Nisha>

Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos, &; more

faith.