Guest guest Posted July 10, 2003 Report Share Posted July 10, 2003 Om Krishna Guru Dear Anna & Jay, Grandiosity is a wonderful thing and it always contains the seed for re-birth and the delivery of self to a more meaningful state of being. Titles don't matter at all and I personally refuse to use them. I prefer to be a fly on the wall than a professor in a big hall. I carried the title once in a real legitimate institution and it made no difference at all. It is all shadow. I have to say that many of those who do carry the title in the real world have little to teach and care less about real knowledge. Education, especially in the USA has become a production line and a very expensive one at that. And from what I see the rest of the world follows close behind. The soul is completely neglected and so is wisdom of any kind. Would any of us go to an academic for spiritual guidance? Unlikely. So why shouldn't Sanjay introduce a new type of Professor to this blind and thoughtless world if he so wishes? It may be a seed that will sprout wholesome food, something that will nourish the neglected soul of the cosmos, the world and the individual. The world suffers because of neglect and ignorance. And so does the cosmos and so does the individual. Where do we learn to neglect the soul? We learn it in those institutions and religions that teach us to ignore ourselves. Why do we automatically regard those soulless institutions to be the paragons in matters of knowledge and learning? Do they hold the template or standard for the true meaning of the title Professor? What does it mean to Profess what one knows? Education has become a barren land in many ways. Yes, good things happen and I don't mean to condemn all of it but I refuse to accept it as the golden standard and I hope you don't either. But we have to ask if all this education that is promoted as the standard is actually helping people, helping our world or is it leading to self destruction. I see more of the latter. When I did my undergraduate and graduate studies in Ireland in the late 1960's and early 1970's, if we reproduced in an examination what we read in a book we were failed. We had to come up with our own original ideas and apply the fundamental principles of the subject to justify our conclusions. It is called original thought. The examination was presented in such a manner that it demanded originality. When I came to the USA in the late 1970's and was teaching undergraduate work, the students freaked as I was teaching as I was taught. I set the examinations according to my own experiences. The department head had to have a little chat with me and I was asked to create a generous curve to ensure that everybody passed the test. Even in Ireland this has arrived to the world of "education" but not to the same extent. This kind of education and training breeds automatons and in this sense Aldous Huxley's world is in our neighbourhood. So I hail Sanjay for taking the bold step outside the square box. Academics & Professors have always been embarrassed by astrology. The intellect is generally embarrassed by anything that doesn't honor itself as the center of existence. This is the nature of the ego. Sanjay has now introduced a new type of Professor, one that honors the cosmos to be the center and the intellect is delegated to a lesser place. It is much more imaginative, more intelligent and carries more dignity for the soul and the Divine. Imagine the headlines! I always enjoy a good laugh and I like to watch the comedy of errors. What would the world be if we didn't have some deviation from the golden standard? That ball is meant to be broken and besides we are now in a new era and the old paradigm is wan. I congratulate Sanjay for his bold impulse and if these Professors are worth their salt, they will show the Ph.D.'s of the world the real nature of knowledge and learning. I encourage Sanjay to take on this glorious and worthy goal. Congratulations Sanjay! Take it all the way to the Chancellor and Vice Chancellor of SJC! It is a noble cause and it will bring the spark of the Atman back into the life of many who are fed up of the barren land of dry and meaningless learning. Warm Regards, Brendan Dear All, I hope everyone will recognize your good faith, Jay, and mine in this matter. SJC doesn't need this, let alone Jyotish- It can harm a lot, both. IMHO- it is a seed of self-destruction of SJC, and for that reason only, I feel bad about this. Do we need depreciative titles, that people ridicule for right reasons for a long time, likle Cold Water Managers and PhD Carpenters... We do not need artificial pumping for what already HAS REAL value, Jyotish and Silicon Breasts-how do that sound to you dear friends? What was definition of lack of vanity and other requirements of morality written by OLD sages, we all claim to accept as ULTIMATE AUTHORITY I do have interest of SJC and Jyotish in mind, and I hope you trust me. Really sad, Anna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.