|Sri Varaha| Appointment of new Gurus and Administra.../for Brendan/

[Guest guest]

Dear Brendan,

 

Thank you for your message, I appreciate what you said. I cannot/and will not

say that I agree with curriculum proposal, either, but at least there is a

recognition of more relevant issue. If your reason for provoking reaction on

this major issue /and request for personal response, name calling alike, that I

am strongly opposed to- I am always ready to apologize if I make mistake and am

not patient enough allowing myself to slip down on that level- I do that by

responding to your friendly message/, so if you wanted to call for opinions

this way, I must admit that's very original approach.

 

Honestly, other than pointing to potential harm from what I've considered

thoughtless organizational move, I've never had neither illusion nor intention

'to save the world'. I feel that everyone should contribute to organization he

belongs to, even temporary, and I thought I did just that- out of 1000's on the

lists, only 2 had different opinion, so 'who cares'? Majority is not necessarily

right, though, but that's unimportant topic in this thread.

 

Thank you for your message again, I share good will with you, and I am sending

my sincere best wishes to you,

 

Anna

-

Bpfeeley (AT) AOL (DOT) COM

varahamihira ;

Saturday, July 12, 2003 11:01 PM

Re: |Sri Varaha| Appointment of new Gurus and Administra...

In a message dated 7/12/2003 1:55:38 PM Eastern Standard Time,

anmar (AT) attcanada (DOT) ca writes:Jaya JagannathaDear Anna,Now we have become too

complex and the name calling has started. You are a good person and we do not

need to go there. My remark 'who cares' was too frivolous and I apologize. I

have never been a rebel in this life but have a passion for reform and change

and my work with authority has always been in that area. The same applies to my

views on politics, religion, education, medicine, war and especially Bush. Why

shouldn't we express our views?Sanjay has spoken and has clarified his vision

for all of us. We are all here together as souls trying to understand ourselves

and it is our destiny to be together. If his vision grows, and it will, it can

only help people and the world. This is novel in our present age. But as he

says, the age has changed and my bhakti Guru has been saying this since the

early 1970's... re the growth of Vedic knowledge and the authentic form of

Sanatan Dharma (the eternal Divine religion) in the world after the turn of the

century.I know your intentions are good and all communication leads to a better

understanding eventhough we have both faltered in our words and shown our

weakness and ignorance. This way we learn a deeper respect for each other as

long as we don't construct inpenetrable walls and distance.Warm Regards,Brendan

Dear Brendan, I think I said what I thought I should 'and saved my soul'. So,

go ahead with Jyotish Ministers, Semi-Gods maybe you achieve the goal in making

SJC a reputable institution.But this Maya World unfortunately has to agree with

that it IS real, otherwise, why bother with anything, But who cares? you

said- making everything so 'relative' and unimportant, which are synonyms in

this case, until the light of value disappears, fight for title goasts and

ego-goasts, and other irrelevancies, that's the surest way to loose the sense

of 'What our goal has been once upon a time, if it lives that long. To "educate

masses' as you said is TOTALL contradiction to 'Who cares' ? If you don't see

that, I'm afraid that our dialog would be impossible, and IMHO would mean that

MONOLOG with vivid, colourful, utopistic, contradictory, virtual reality is

your chosen way of dealing with this issue. I didn't say you are one who

flatters the Guru, I just listed potential evils, and since you asked me,

without looking at your chart, just your posts, you are too 'young and

rebellious to be Team worker, poor communicator and with problem dealing with

any authority so pronounced, that I am sure, no you are definitely not one who

flatters, but neither one who is able to clear /his/ foggy/ illusions...I hate

giving opinion of this kind, but remember, YOU asked me to, and to please you I

am writing this. I don't have any problem with this, I was just concerned if

this 'wonderful science' as you said, which is still in it's 'infancy' state in

the world, could survive your type of care. Again, I said what I thought was my

obligation, in a best way my humble abilities allowed, and this is over for me.

I am fully aware of the fact that I cannot do more in this matter, and I am not

there any longer. That also means that I won't be responding to any further

discussion on this issue. Last thing I want to say is that I do like you,

for the same qualities I consider inadequate for achieving the goal so dear to

me, you, others, and that is JYOTISH for Life. Warmest regards,Anna |Om Tat

Sat|http://www.varahamihira Your use of is

subject to the