The benefic and malefic planets in India’s natal chart

[Guest guest]

Dear Shyamsundar Kansal,

Why is the time taken to be 0.34 hr.s when it is recorded to be at the

stroke of midnight? Is it possible to come to a correct conclusion with

wrong data, in vijyotish?

Regards,

Chandrashekhar.

Shyaam Sunder Kansal wrote:

 

>Dear fellow astrology scholars,

>

>This report, to determine the benefic and malefic

>planets in India’s natal chart, has been prepared

>after taking into consideration several principles for

>determining the functional benefics and malefics, as

>told by sage Parashara, and the principles told in

>various streams of Vedic Jyotish to measure the exact

>benefic or malefic nature of the planets in a natal

>chart. The importance of various astrological

>parameters has been calibrated very carefully - as

>told in ancient Vedic Jyotish texts. This calibrated

>scale will be referred as 'Vjyotish beneficence scale'

>hereinafter.

>

>At times, some special Jyotish principles may

>over-shadow the net result obtained through the

>normally used Parashari principles to determine the

>beneficence of a planet. In such cases, these special

>principles will prevail and may reduce (or enhance)

>beneficence of a planet considerably. This report

>considers these special principles also.

>

>The following birth-data has been used to compute

>these values:

>India Independence

>August 15, 1947 at 00:34 hrs.

>DELHI, India (077E13, 028N40)

>Time zone: 05:30 hrs. ahead of GMT

>

>On 'Vjyotish beneficence scale', Rahu stands out as

>the best planet for India. It's Vimsottari-periods

>will generally be the excellent periods for the

>country. Specially those periods - where Rahu

>simultaneously holds portfolios of Mahadasa Lord,

>Antardasa Lord and Pratyantar dasa lord (i.e., when it

>is running under 'Rahu-Rahu-Rahu' dasa, or atleast,

>Rahu is the 'Antardasa lord'[AD Lord] ).

>

>On the same 'Vjyotish beneficence scale', Ketu has

>been determined as the most damaging planet in

>country’s chart. It's Vimsottari-periods will

>generally be the trying periods for the country,

>specially when country is under Vimsottari dasa of

>'Ketu-Ketu-Ketu' or when Ketu is the 'Antardasa

>lord'[AD Lord].

>

>Normally, the values around zero should be considered

>as average beneficence while increasing negative

>values here denote increasing malefic nature of the

>concerned planets in a chart due to various

>astrological parameters. Same way, higher positive

>values indicate higher benefic nature of the planets

>concerned.

>

>However, we have to remember that the terms 'Good',

>'Poor' etc. are comparative. Planet-A might be

>negative but much less negative than Planet-B. Thus,

>when a comparison will be made between Planet-A and

>Planet-B, the planet-A will be called 'Good' than

>planet-B. In the table below, same concept has been

>used. Whatever the maximum and minimum beneficence (or

>maleficence) values have been obtained between the 9

>planets, a comparative categorization, like

>'Excellent', 'Good', 'Worst' etc., has been done

>between the available value ranges. Thus, though a

>planet might be showing negative value in the table

>below, but it may still be far better than some other

>planets (with higher negative values) and thus may

>have been assigned the category of 'Good' or

>'Average'.

>

>In India’s natal chart, the maximum beneficence value

>is 60.00 and the minimum beneficence is -202.36.

>

>Sun : 57.87 Excellent (Very positive)

>Moon : 2.43 Good (Positive)

>Mars : -169.76 Worst (Very negative)

>Mercury: -61.60 Average (Mixed results)

>Jupiter: -88.66 Average (Mixed results)

>Venus : 37.88 Excellent (Very positive)

>Saturn : -11.37 Good (Positive)

>Rahu : 60.00 Excellent (Very positive)

>Ketu : -202.36 Worst (Very negative)

>

>The 'Vjyotish beneficence scale' has been found

>working excellently, by me and by several of my

>friends, on hundreds of personal horoscopes. The

>results are better when Chitrapakshiya (Lahiri’s)

>ayanamsa is used. This is my first attempt to use it

>on a mundane horoscope. I’m not very conversant with

>date wise Indian history thus unable to test this

>report on India’s chart. Can any body help?

>

>With best regards,

>

>Shyaam Sunder Kansal

>System developer of 'Vjyotish'

>http://www.vjyotish.com

>email: shyaamkansal @ vjyotish.com

>Telephones: [+91 5732] 310171, 255400, 256777

>

>

>

>

>Find out what made the Top Searches of 2003

>http://search./top2003

>

>

>

>

> Links

>

>

> /

>

>

>

>

>Your

>

>

>

>

>