The benefic and malefic planets in India’s natal chart

[Guest guest]

Dear fellow astrology scholars,

 

This report, to determine the benefic and malefic

planets in India’s natal chart, has been prepared

after taking into consideration several principles for

determining the functional benefics and malefics, as

told by sage Parashara, and the principles told in

various streams of Vedic Jyotish to measure the exact

benefic or malefic nature of the planets in a natal

chart. The importance of various astrological

parameters has been calibrated very carefully - as

told in ancient Vedic Jyotish texts. This calibrated

scale will be referred as 'Vjyotish beneficence scale'

hereinafter.

 

At times, some special Jyotish principles may

over-shadow the net result obtained through the

normally used Parashari principles to determine the

beneficence of a planet. In such cases, these special

principles will prevail and may reduce (or enhance)

beneficence of a planet considerably. This report

considers these special principles also.

 

The following birth-data has been used to compute

these values:

India Independence

August 15, 1947 at 00:34 hrs.

DELHI, India (077E13, 028N40)

Time zone: 05:30 hrs. ahead of GMT

 

On 'Vjyotish beneficence scale', Rahu stands out as

the best planet for India. It's Vimsottari-periods

will generally be the excellent periods for the

country. Specially those periods - where Rahu

simultaneously holds portfolios of Mahadasa Lord,

Antardasa Lord and Pratyantar dasa lord (i.e., when it

is running under 'Rahu-Rahu-Rahu' dasa, or atleast,

Rahu is the 'Antardasa lord'[AD Lord] ).

 

On the same 'Vjyotish beneficence scale', Ketu has

been determined as the most damaging planet in

country’s chart. It's Vimsottari-periods will

generally be the trying periods for the country,

specially when country is under Vimsottari dasa of

'Ketu-Ketu-Ketu' or when Ketu is the 'Antardasa

lord'[AD Lord].

 

Normally, the values around zero should be considered

as average beneficence while increasing negative

values here denote increasing malefic nature of the

concerned planets in a chart due to various

astrological parameters. Same way, higher positive

values indicate higher benefic nature of the planets

concerned.

 

However, we have to remember that the terms 'Good',

'Poor' etc. are comparative. Planet-A might be

negative but much less negative than Planet-B. Thus,

when a comparison will be made between Planet-A and

Planet-B, the planet-A will be called 'Good' than

planet-B. In the table below, same concept has been

used. Whatever the maximum and minimum beneficence (or

maleficence) values have been obtained between the 9

planets, a comparative categorization, like

'Excellent', 'Good', 'Worst' etc., has been done

between the available value ranges. Thus, though a

planet might be showing negative value in the table

below, but it may still be far better than some other

planets (with higher negative values) and thus may

have been assigned the category of 'Good' or

'Average'.

 

In India’s natal chart, the maximum beneficence value

is 60.00 and the minimum beneficence is -202.36.

 

Sun : 57.87 Excellent (Very positive)

Moon : 2.43 Good (Positive)

Mars : -169.76 Worst (Very negative)

Mercury: -61.60 Average (Mixed results)

Jupiter: -88.66 Average (Mixed results)

Venus : 37.88 Excellent (Very positive)

Saturn : -11.37 Good (Positive)

Rahu : 60.00 Excellent (Very positive)

Ketu : -202.36 Worst (Very negative)

 

The 'Vjyotish beneficence scale' has been found

working excellently, by me and by several of my

friends, on hundreds of personal horoscopes. The

results are better when Chitrapakshiya (Lahiri’s)

ayanamsa is used. This is my first attempt to use it

on a mundane horoscope. I’m not very conversant with

date wise Indian history thus unable to test this

report on India’s chart. Can any body help?

 

With best regards,

 

Shyaam Sunder Kansal

System developer of 'Vjyotish'

http://www.vjyotish.com

email: shyaamkansal @ vjyotish.com

Telephones: [+91 5732] 310171, 255400, 256777

 

 

 

 

Find out what made the Top Searches of 2003

http://search./top2003

[Guest guest]

Dear Shyamsundar Kansal,

Why is the time taken to be 0.34 hr.s when it is recorded to be at the

stroke of midnight? Is it possible to come to a correct conclusion with

wrong data, in vijyotish?

Regards,

Chandrashekhar.

Shyaam Sunder Kansal wrote:

 

>Dear fellow astrology scholars,

>

>This report, to determine the benefic and malefic

>planets in India’s natal chart, has been prepared

>after taking into consideration several principles for

>determining the functional benefics and malefics, as

>told by sage Parashara, and the principles told in

>various streams of Vedic Jyotish to measure the exact

>benefic or malefic nature of the planets in a natal

>chart. The importance of various astrological

>parameters has been calibrated very carefully - as

>told in ancient Vedic Jyotish texts. This calibrated

>scale will be referred as 'Vjyotish beneficence scale'

>hereinafter.

>

>At times, some special Jyotish principles may

>over-shadow the net result obtained through the

>normally used Parashari principles to determine the

>beneficence of a planet. In such cases, these special

>principles will prevail and may reduce (or enhance)

>beneficence of a planet considerably. This report

>considers these special principles also.

>

>The following birth-data has been used to compute

>these values:

>India Independence

>August 15, 1947 at 00:34 hrs.

>DELHI, India (077E13, 028N40)

>Time zone: 05:30 hrs. ahead of GMT

>

>On 'Vjyotish beneficence scale', Rahu stands out as

>the best planet for India. It's Vimsottari-periods

>will generally be the excellent periods for the

>country. Specially those periods - where Rahu

>simultaneously holds portfolios of Mahadasa Lord,

>Antardasa Lord and Pratyantar dasa lord (i.e., when it

>is running under 'Rahu-Rahu-Rahu' dasa, or atleast,

>Rahu is the 'Antardasa lord'[AD Lord] ).

>

>On the same 'Vjyotish beneficence scale', Ketu has

>been determined as the most damaging planet in

>country’s chart. It's Vimsottari-periods will

>generally be the trying periods for the country,

>specially when country is under Vimsottari dasa of

>'Ketu-Ketu-Ketu' or when Ketu is the 'Antardasa

>lord'[AD Lord].

>

>Normally, the values around zero should be considered

>as average beneficence while increasing negative

>values here denote increasing malefic nature of the

>concerned planets in a chart due to various

>astrological parameters. Same way, higher positive

>values indicate higher benefic nature of the planets

>concerned.

>

>However, we have to remember that the terms 'Good',

>'Poor' etc. are comparative. Planet-A might be

>negative but much less negative than Planet-B. Thus,

>when a comparison will be made between Planet-A and

>Planet-B, the planet-A will be called 'Good' than

>planet-B. In the table below, same concept has been

>used. Whatever the maximum and minimum beneficence (or

>maleficence) values have been obtained between the 9

>planets, a comparative categorization, like

>'Excellent', 'Good', 'Worst' etc., has been done

>between the available value ranges. Thus, though a

>planet might be showing negative value in the table

>below, but it may still be far better than some other

>planets (with higher negative values) and thus may

>have been assigned the category of 'Good' or

>'Average'.

>

>In India’s natal chart, the maximum beneficence value

>is 60.00 and the minimum beneficence is -202.36.

>

>Sun : 57.87 Excellent (Very positive)

>Moon : 2.43 Good (Positive)

>Mars : -169.76 Worst (Very negative)

>Mercury: -61.60 Average (Mixed results)

>Jupiter: -88.66 Average (Mixed results)

>Venus : 37.88 Excellent (Very positive)

>Saturn : -11.37 Good (Positive)

>Rahu : 60.00 Excellent (Very positive)

>Ketu : -202.36 Worst (Very negative)

>

>The 'Vjyotish beneficence scale' has been found

>working excellently, by me and by several of my

>friends, on hundreds of personal horoscopes. The

>results are better when Chitrapakshiya (Lahiri’s)

>ayanamsa is used. This is my first attempt to use it

>on a mundane horoscope. I’m not very conversant with

>date wise Indian history thus unable to test this

>report on India’s chart. Can any body help?

>

>With best regards,

>

>Shyaam Sunder Kansal

>System developer of 'Vjyotish'

>http://www.vjyotish.com

>email: shyaamkansal @ vjyotish.com

>Telephones: [+91 5732] 310171, 255400, 256777

>

>

>

>

>Find out what made the Top Searches of 2003

>http://search./top2003

>

>

>

>

>