Guest guest Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 Hi all, We have seen various astrological dilemmas in the past, some of which remain a future challenge. If the surrogate mother issue confused you in the past, this one will blow your mind out as it is beyond anything known so far, breaking every rule in the book(s)! Imagine that a woman's eggs are fertilized outside the womb. Nothing new about that, right ? That was back in 1990. As a result of this process 12 embryos were 'created' of which 4 were returned to the mothers womb, 2 were accepted, resulting in the birth of 2 healthy girls (now about 11 years old). The other 8 embryos were FROZEN and stored in the hospital! Two years ago the couple decided to have more children and the hospital defrosted 4 of the frozen embryos, which were placed in the mothers womb, three were accepted, one removed AND 2 developed normaly into a boy and a girl that were born about 9 month ago. That is 12 years (!!!) AFTER 'creation'. The doctors say that the now 9 month old twins develop normally. The above true event happened in Jerusalem's (Israel) Hadasa hospital and the entire story appears in the February issue of "The Reproduction Journal" and I assume will be available on the net in a couple of month (http://www.reproduction-online.org/). This event is a historical and as such it is in a complete opposition to any theory of a conception chart in relation with a birth chart. Instead of writing tons of astrological and moral issues here I leave the rest to your vivid imagination. What does any learned astrologer have to say about such a challenge ? Blessings/Jay Weisshttp://www.alvicomm.comhttp://www.alvicomm.com/privat.htm Attachment: (image/jpeg) white.jpg [not stored] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 4, 2004 Report Share Posted February 4, 2004 Dear J, Each moment and location is significant, as the birth of something. Such as a prasna chart, which is cast for the moment the astrologer answers the question at his location. So a birth is a question of a sort too, for which the time (and location) of emergence from the womb is significant. All things have different gestation periods and we have a very difficult time determining the actual first cause. But the moment of birth is identifiable. Measurements are always variable however, such as the time of sunrise for example, which may vary based upon the definition of the sunrise (first ray, middle, completely free of the horizon) or the observation techniques. It doesn't seem to me that this is a new issue at all. , "J.Weiss" <jayhw@t...> wrote: > Hi all, > > We have seen various astrological dilemmas in the past, some of which remain a future challenge. > If the surrogate mother issue confused you in the past, this one will blow your mind out as it is beyond anything known so far, breaking every rule in the book(s)! > > Imagine that a woman's eggs are fertilized outside the womb. Nothing new about that, right ? > That was back in 1990. > As a result of this process 12 embryos were 'created' of which 4 were returned to the mothers womb, 2 were accepted, resulting in the birth of 2 healthy girls (now about 11 years old). > The other 8 embryos were FROZEN and stored in the hospital! > > Two years ago the couple decided to have more children and the hospital defrosted 4 of the frozen embryos, which were placed in the mothers womb, three were accepted, one removed AND 2 developed normaly into a boy and a girl that were born about 9 month ago. > That is 12 years (!!!) AFTER 'creation'. > The doctors say that the now 9 month old twins develop normally. > > The above true event happened in Jerusalem's (Israel) Hadasa hospital and the entire story appears in the February issue of "The Reproduction Journal" and I assume will be available on the net in a couple of month (http://www.reproduction-online.org/). > > This event is a historical and as such it is in a complete opposition to any theory of a conception chart in relation with a birth chart. > > Instead of writing tons of astrological and moral issues here I leave the rest to your vivid imagination. > > What does any learned astrologer have to say about such a challenge ? > > Blessings > /Jay Weiss > http://www.alvicomm.com > http://www.alvicomm.com/privat.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.