Achyuta Gurukul] Classics: Astrological challange beyond your wildest fantasy

[Guest guest]

Dear Nitin,

 

I have the same "why's" and as I wrote earlier, there must be more to it as

the entire stanza is "lose" (in my opinion), which is beyond me.

 

regards

/Jay Weiss

 

 

 

-

"Nitin Khanna" <sjvc

<>

Friday, February 06, 2004 2:45 AM

[sJC: Achyuta Gurukul] Classics: Astrological challange beyond your

wildest fantasy

 

 

> ||Namah Shivaaya||

>

> Dear Jay,

>

> I'm jumpiing in a little late, but the Classics on the light of the Stars

also reveal more....

>

>

> ================================

> Brihat Jataka:

>

> CHAPTER IV

> Stanza 22:

> If Makara or Kumbha navamsa rises at the time of conception, aspected by

Sani, the child will be born after 4 years.

>

> If Katakamsa rises at the time of conception, aspected by Chandra, then

the birth occurs after 12 years of pregnancy.

>

> ================================

>

> Why Makar or Kumbh alone?

>

> Why the aspects of Shani?

>

> Why 4 years?

>

> Why Chandra?

>

> Why 12 years?

>

> There is much more said here, than what the Maharishis revealed to us. I

do not have the reasons for this, but am reflective, as are many...

>

> Hope that this helps.

> Nitin.

> :>

>

> ||Namah Shivaaya||

>

> --

> "dhamakesin" <dhamakesin

>

> Thu, 05 Feb 2004 06:48:08 -0000

>

> >Dear J,

> >

> >Each moment and location is significant, as the birth of something.

> >Such as a prasna chart, which is cast for the moment the astrologer

> >answers the question at his location. So a birth is a question of a

> >sort too, for which the time (and location) of emergence from the

> >womb is significant. All things have different gestation periods and

> >we have a very difficult time determining the actual first cause.

> >But the moment of birth is identifiable. Measurements are always

> >variable however, such as the time of sunrise for example, which may

> >vary based upon the definition of the sunrise (first ray, middle,

> >completely free of the horizon) or the observation techniques. It

> >doesn't seem to me that this is a new issue at all.

> >

> >, "J.Weiss" <jayhw@t...> wrote:

> >> Hi all,

> >>

> >> We have seen various astrological dilemmas in the past, some of

> >which remain a future challenge.

> >> If the surrogate mother issue confused you in the past, this one

> >will blow your mind out as it is beyond anything known so far,

> >breaking every rule in the book(s)!

> >>

> >> Imagine that a woman's eggs are fertilized outside the womb.

> >Nothing new about that, right ?

> >> That was back in 1990.

> >> As a result of this process 12 embryos were 'created' of which 4

> >were returned to the mothers womb, 2 were accepted, resulting in the

> >birth of 2 healthy girls (now about 11 years old).

> >> The other 8 embryos were FROZEN and stored in the hospital!

> >>

> >> Two years ago the couple decided to have more children and the

> >hospital defrosted 4 of the frozen embryos, which were placed in the

> >mothers womb, three were accepted, one removed AND 2 developed

> >normaly into a boy and a girl that were born about 9 month ago.

> >> That is 12 years (!!!) AFTER 'creation'.

> >> The doctors say that the now 9 month old twins develop normally.

> >>

> >> The above true event happened in Jerusalem's (Israel) Hadasa

> >hospital and the entire story appears in the February issue of "The

> >Reproduction Journal" and I assume will be available on the net in a

> >couple of month (http://www.reproduction-online.org/).

> >>

> >> This event is a historical and as such it is in a complete

> >opposition to any theory of a conception chart in relation with a

> >birth chart.

> >>

> >> Instead of writing tons of astrological and moral issues here I

> >leave the rest to your vivid imagination.

> >>

> >> What does any learned astrologer have to say about such a

> >challenge ?

> >>

> >> Blessings

> >> /Jay Weiss

> >> http://www.alvicomm.com

> >> http://www.alvicomm.com/privat.htm

>

>

> [Om Kleem Krishnaaya Jagannathaaya namah]

> Send a blank mail

> To : -

> To :

> Links

>

>

>

>

>