Achyuta Gurukul] Achyuta Gurukul] Classics: Astrological challange beyond your wildest fantasy

[Guest guest]

Dear Jay and all,

May I add something?

Lots of Qs have to be answered-

If egg was fertilized- let's say that's "initiation"

Than it's planted /20yrs later/ in 'mother's /or surrogate mother's????/

womb for 'sustenance

 

'Normally' the two go together simultaneously- but not here!- Is adhana

lagna decided 20 years in advance? For all fertilized eggs same Lagna? I am

not getting this, really..

Any clarifications?

Anna

-

"J.Weiss" <jayhw

<>

Friday, February 06, 2004 1:50 AM

[sJC: Achyuta Gurukul] Re: Achyuta Gurukul] Classics: Astrological

challange beyond your wildest fantasy

 

 

> Dear Nitin,

>

> I have the same "why's" and as I wrote earlier, there must be more to it

as

> the entire stanza is "lose" (in my opinion), which is beyond me.

>

> regards

> /Jay Weiss

>

>

>

> -

> "Nitin Khanna" <sjvc

> <>

> Friday, February 06, 2004 2:45 AM

> [sJC: Achyuta Gurukul] Classics: Astrological challange beyond

your

> wildest fantasy

>

>

> > ||Namah Shivaaya||

> >

> > Dear Jay,

> >

> > I'm jumpiing in a little late, but the Classics on the light of the

Stars

> also reveal more....

> >

> >

> > ================================

> > Brihat Jataka:

> >

> > CHAPTER IV

> > Stanza 22:

> > If Makara or Kumbha navamsa rises at the time of conception, aspected by

> Sani, the child will be born after 4 years.

> >

> > If Katakamsa rises at the time of conception, aspected by Chandra, then

> the birth occurs after 12 years of pregnancy.

> >

> > ================================

> >

> > Why Makar or Kumbh alone?

> >

> > Why the aspects of Shani?

> >

> > Why 4 years?

> >

> > Why Chandra?

> >

> > Why 12 years?

> >

> > There is much more said here, than what the Maharishis revealed to us. I

> do not have the reasons for this, but am reflective, as are many...

> >

> > Hope that this helps.

> > Nitin.

> > :>

> >

> > ||Namah Shivaaya||

> >

> > --

> > "dhamakesin" <dhamakesin

> >

> > Thu, 05 Feb 2004 06:48:08 -0000

> >

> > >Dear J,

> > >

> > >Each moment and location is significant, as the birth of something.

> > >Such as a prasna chart, which is cast for the moment the astrologer

> > >answers the question at his location. So a birth is a question of a

> > >sort too, for which the time (and location) of emergence from the

> > >womb is significant. All things have different gestation periods and

> > >we have a very difficult time determining the actual first cause.

> > >But the moment of birth is identifiable. Measurements are always

> > >variable however, such as the time of sunrise for example, which may

> > >vary based upon the definition of the sunrise (first ray, middle,

> > >completely free of the horizon) or the observation techniques. It

> > >doesn't seem to me that this is a new issue at all.

> > >

> > >, "J.Weiss" <jayhw@t...> wrote:

> > >> Hi all,

> > >>

> > >> We have seen various astrological dilemmas in the past, some of

> > >which remain a future challenge.

> > >> If the surrogate mother issue confused you in the past, this one

> > >will blow your mind out as it is beyond anything known so far,

> > >breaking every rule in the book(s)!

> > >>

> > >> Imagine that a woman's eggs are fertilized outside the womb.

> > >Nothing new about that, right ?

> > >> That was back in 1990.

> > >> As a result of this process 12 embryos were 'created' of which 4

> > >were returned to the mothers womb, 2 were accepted, resulting in the

> > >birth of 2 healthy girls (now about 11 years old).

> > >> The other 8 embryos were FROZEN and stored in the hospital!

> > >>

> > >> Two years ago the couple decided to have more children and the

> > >hospital defrosted 4 of the frozen embryos, which were placed in the

> > >mothers womb, three were accepted, one removed AND 2 developed

> > >normaly into a boy and a girl that were born about 9 month ago.

> > >> That is 12 years (!!!) AFTER 'creation'.

> > >> The doctors say that the now 9 month old twins develop normally.

> > >>

> > >> The above true event happened in Jerusalem's (Israel) Hadasa

> > >hospital and the entire story appears in the February issue of "The

> > >Reproduction Journal" and I assume will be available on the net in a

> > >couple of month (http://www.reproduction-online.org/).

> > >>

> > >> This event is a historical and as such it is in a complete

> > >opposition to any theory of a conception chart in relation with a

> > >birth chart.

> > >>

> > >> Instead of writing tons of astrological and moral issues here I

> > >leave the rest to your vivid imagination.

> > >>

> > >> What does any learned astrologer have to say about such a

> > >challenge ?

> > >>

> > >> Blessings

> > >> /Jay Weiss

> > >> http://www.alvicomm.com

> > >> http://www.alvicomm.com/privat.htm

> >

> >

> > [Om Kleem Krishnaaya Jagannathaaya namah]

> > Send a blank mail

> > To : -

> > To :

> > Links

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>

>

>

> [Om Kleem Krishnaaya Jagannathaaya namah]

> Send a blank mail

> To : -

> To :

> Links

>

>

>

>

>

>