RE: [SJC: Achyuta Gurukul] Classics: Astrological challange beyond your wildest fantasy

[Guest guest]

Good Job Niten, now we really have to work on getting that conception

data. How often do you get a case like this.

Namah Sivaya

 

 

Nitin Khanna [sjvc]

Friday, February 06, 2004 7:16 AM

 

[sJC: Achyuta Gurukul] Classics: Astrological challange beyond

your wildest fantasy

 

||Namah Shivaaya||

 

Dear Jay,

 

I'm jumpiing in a little late, but the Classics on the light of the

Stars also reveal more....

 

 

================================

Brihat Jataka:

 

CHAPTER IV

Stanza 22:

If Makara or Kumbha navamsa rises at the time of conception, aspected by

Sani, the child will be born after 4 years.

 

If Katakamsa rises at the time of conception, aspected by Chandra, then

the birth occurs after 12 years of pregnancy.

 

================================

 

Why Makar or Kumbh alone?

 

Why the aspects of Shani?

 

Why 4 years?

 

Why Chandra?

 

Why 12 years?

 

There is much more said here, than what the Maharishis revealed to us. I

do not have the reasons for this, but am reflective, as are many...

 

Hope that this helps.

Nitin.

:>

 

||Namah Shivaaya||

 

--

"dhamakesin" <dhamakesin

 

Thu, 05 Feb 2004 06:48:08 -0000

 

>Dear J,

>

>Each moment and location is significant, as the birth of something.

>Such as a prasna chart, which is cast for the moment the astrologer

>answers the question at his location. So a birth is a question of a

>sort too, for which the time (and location) of emergence from the

>womb is significant. All things have different gestation periods and

>we have a very difficult time determining the actual first cause.

>But the moment of birth is identifiable. Measurements are always

>variable however, such as the time of sunrise for example, which may

>vary based upon the definition of the sunrise (first ray, middle,

>completely free of the horizon) or the observation techniques. It

>doesn't seem to me that this is a new issue at all.

>

>, "J.Weiss" <jayhw@t...> wrote:

>> Hi all,

>>

>> We have seen various astrological dilemmas in the past, some of

>which remain a future challenge.

>> If the surrogate mother issue confused you in the past, this one

>will blow your mind out as it is beyond anything known so far,

>breaking every rule in the book(s)!

>>

>> Imagine that a woman's eggs are fertilized outside the womb.

>Nothing new about that, right ?

>> That was back in 1990.

>> As a result of this process 12 embryos were 'created' of which 4

>were returned to the mothers womb, 2 were accepted, resulting in the

>birth of 2 healthy girls (now about 11 years old).

>> The other 8 embryos were FROZEN and stored in the hospital!

>>

>> Two years ago the couple decided to have more children and the

>hospital defrosted 4 of the frozen embryos, which were placed in the

>mothers womb, three were accepted, one removed AND 2 developed

>normaly into a boy and a girl that were born about 9 month ago.

>> That is 12 years (!!!) AFTER 'creation'.

>> The doctors say that the now 9 month old twins develop normally.

>>

>> The above true event happened in Jerusalem's (Israel) Hadasa

>hospital and the entire story appears in the February issue of "The

>Reproduction Journal" and I assume will be available on the net in a

>couple of month (http://www.reproduction-online.org/).

>>

>> This event is a historical and as such it is in a complete

>opposition to any theory of a conception chart in relation with a

>birth chart.

>>

>> Instead of writing tons of astrological and moral issues here I

>leave the rest to your vivid imagination.

>>

>> What does any learned astrologer have to say about such a

>challenge ?

>>

>> Blessings

>> /Jay Weiss

>> http://www.alvicomm.com

>> http://www.alvicomm.com/privat.htm

 

 

[Om Kleem Krishnaaya Jagannathaaya namah]

Send a blank mail

To : -

To :

Links