Guest guest Posted April 18, 2004 Report Share Posted April 18, 2004 Hi Pankaj, My take below your queries... - "Mr Pankaj Sharma" <pankaj_astrology <> Saturday, April 17, 2004 1:19 PM [sJC: Achyuta Gurukul] Jaimini Sutra Querry: Chap1 part2 > ==> Do Ketu has an ASPECT? Yes, by rasi. > ==> What if Rahu is AtmaKarak, then Ketu is always 7th > from Karakamsh; and there is possibility of > emancipation too. Not really sure of the answer but since Ra is the karaka (for the want of a better term) for rebirths, Ra getting to be AK is symbolic that the native is quite distant from moksha. And if I'm not wrong, Ke being in 7th from the karakamsha is just one of the indicators of emancipation; it isn't a guarantee as such. Just as an aside, if I use true nodes, Ke gets to be 12th from the karakamsha in my chart :@) > ==> But How Ketu will aspect? It does not have a head. Yes, Ketu's a bit like me I'm quite certain, though, that Jaimini had rasi drishtis in his radar when penning the sutras. Cheers, Ramapriya ################################################################################\ ##### This e-mail and any attachments are confidential; they are for the use of the named recipient(s) only. If you have received this e-mail in error, do not copy or disclose its contents and please notify the sender immediately and then delete it. Email transmission is not a secure means of communication nor is it guaranteed to be error free; emails can be intercepted, lost, destroyed, corrupted or contain viruses. the sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission, nor does it accept liability for any loss or damage caused by viruses. Dodsal Pte Ltd. This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared by MailMarshal ################################################################################\ ##### Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 18, 2004 Report Share Posted April 18, 2004 |Hare Rama Krishna| Dear Ramapriya, Namaskar. Comments to your mail below. Best wishes, Visti. , "Ramapriya D" <hubli@h...> wrote: > > > > ==> Do Ketu has an ASPECT? > > Yes, by rasi. > > > ==> What if Rahu is AtmaKarak, then Ketu is always 7th > > from Karakamsh; and there is possibility of > > emancipation too. > > Not really sure of the answer but since Ra is the karaka (for the want of a > better term) for rebirths, Ra getting to be AK is symbolic that the native > is quite distant from moksha. And if I'm not wrong, Ke being in 7th from the > karakamsha is just one of the indicators of emancipation; it isn't a > guarantee as such. Just as an aside, if I use true nodes, Ke gets to be 12th > from the karakamsha in my chart :@) Visti: So i guess Paramahamsa Yogananda, Srila Prabhupada and another 1/8th of the world is distant from moksha. Why is it that people with Rahu as AK have a natural inclination towards spirituality? Ketu in 7th from Karakamsa is not an indication of emancipation. But Rahu as AK will naturally always have a graha dristi or desire for Ketu. > > > ==> But How Ketu will aspect? It does not have a head. > > Yes, Ketu's a bit like me > I'm quite certain, though, that Jaimini had rasi drishtis in his radar when > penning the sutras. Rasidrishtiadhyaaya - Brhat Parasara Hora Shastra. Ketu has no graha dristi as graha dristi is the grahas individual desire. Rasi Dristi has todo with circumstances not desires, hence it shows the mutual presence of planets towards each other. i.e. a person might be blind but it doesn't mean that (s)he cannot influence the lives of others. > > Cheers, > > Ramapriya > > > ###################################################################### ############### > This e-mail and any attachments are confidential; they are for the use of > > the named recipient(s) only. If you have received this e-mail in error, do > > not copy or disclose its contents and please notify the sender immediately > > and then delete it. Email transmission is not a secure means of > > communication nor is it guaranteed to be error free; emails can be > > intercepted, lost, destroyed, corrupted or contain viruses. the sender > > therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the > > contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission, nor > > does it accept liability for any loss or damage caused by viruses. > > Dodsal Pte Ltd. > > > This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared > by MailMarshal > ###################################################################### ############### Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 18, 2004 Report Share Posted April 18, 2004 Dear Visti What if a person is dead, can he still influence the circumstances best wishes partha , "Visti Larsen" <balabhadra@j...> wrote: > |Hare Rama Krishna| > Dear Ramapriya, Namaskar. > Comments to your mail below. > Best wishes, Visti. > > , "Ramapriya D" <hubli@h...> wrote: > > > > > > > ==> Do Ketu has an ASPECT? > > > > Yes, by rasi. > > > > > ==> What if Rahu is AtmaKarak, then Ketu is always 7th > > > from Karakamsh; and there is possibility of > > > emancipation too. > > > > Not really sure of the answer but since Ra is the karaka (for the > want of a > > better term) for rebirths, Ra getting to be AK is symbolic that the > native > > is quite distant from moksha. And if I'm not wrong, Ke being in 7th > from the > > karakamsha is just one of the indicators of emancipation; it isn't a > > guarantee as such. Just as an aside, if I use true nodes, Ke gets > to be 12th > > from the karakamsha in my chart :@) > > Visti: So i guess Paramahamsa Yogananda, Srila Prabhupada and another > 1/8th of the world is distant from moksha. Why is it that people with > Rahu as AK have a natural inclination towards spirituality? Ketu in > 7th from Karakamsa is not an indication of emancipation. But Rahu as > AK will naturally always have a graha dristi or desire for Ketu. > > > > > > ==> But How Ketu will aspect? It does not have a head. > > > > Yes, Ketu's a bit like me > > I'm quite certain, though, that Jaimini had rasi drishtis in his > radar when > > penning the sutras. > > Rasidrishtiadhyaaya - Brhat Parasara Hora Shastra. > Ketu has no graha dristi as graha dristi is the grahas individual > desire. Rasi Dristi has todo with circumstances not desires, hence it > shows the mutual presence of planets towards each other. i.e. a > person might be blind but it doesn't mean that (s)he cannot influence > the lives of others. > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Ramapriya > > > > > > > ###################################################################### > ############### > > This e-mail and any attachments are confidential; they are for the > use of > > > > the named recipient(s) only. If you have received this e-mail in > error, do > > > > not copy or disclose its contents and please notify the sender > immediately > > > > and then delete it. Email transmission is not a secure means of > > > > communication nor is it guaranteed to be error free; emails can be > > > > intercepted, lost, destroyed, corrupted or contain viruses. the > sender > > > > therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in > the > > > > contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail > transmission, nor > > > > does it accept liability for any loss or damage caused by viruses. > > > > Dodsal Pte Ltd. > > > > > > This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and > cleared > > by MailMarshal > > > ###################################################################### > ############### Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 18, 2004 Report Share Posted April 18, 2004 |Hare Rama Krishna| Dear Partha, Namaskar. Does that mean you don't believe in ghosts? The most scary ones come out during the New Moon and start writing mails on the lists . Best wishes, Visti. , "V.Partha sarathy" <partvinu5> wrote: > Dear Visti > > What if a person is dead, can he still influence the circumstances > best wishes > partha > > , "Visti Larsen" <balabhadra@j...> > wrote: > > |Hare Rama Krishna| > > Dear Ramapriya, Namaskar. > > Comments to your mail below. > > Best wishes, Visti. > > > > , "Ramapriya D" <hubli@h...> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > ==> Do Ketu has an ASPECT? > > > > > > Yes, by rasi. > > > > > > > ==> What if Rahu is AtmaKarak, then Ketu is always 7th > > > > from Karakamsh; and there is possibility of > > > > emancipation too. > > > > > > Not really sure of the answer but since Ra is the karaka (for the > > want of a > > > better term) for rebirths, Ra getting to be AK is symbolic that > the > > native > > > is quite distant from moksha. And if I'm not wrong, Ke being in > 7th > > from the > > > karakamsha is just one of the indicators of emancipation; it > isn't a > > > guarantee as such. Just as an aside, if I use true nodes, Ke gets > > to be 12th > > > from the karakamsha in my chart :@) > > > > Visti: So i guess Paramahamsa Yogananda, Srila Prabhupada and > another > > 1/8th of the world is distant from moksha. Why is it that people > with > > Rahu as AK have a natural inclination towards spirituality? Ketu in > > 7th from Karakamsa is not an indication of emancipation. But Rahu > as > > AK will naturally always have a graha dristi or desire for Ketu. > > > > > > > > > ==> But How Ketu will aspect? It does not have a head. > > > > > > Yes, Ketu's a bit like me > > > I'm quite certain, though, that Jaimini had rasi drishtis in his > > radar when > > > penning the sutras. > > > > Rasidrishtiadhyaaya - Brhat Parasara Hora Shastra. > > Ketu has no graha dristi as graha dristi is the grahas individual > > desire. Rasi Dristi has todo with circumstances not desires, hence > it > > shows the mutual presence of planets towards each other. i.e. a > > person might be blind but it doesn't mean that (s)he cannot > influence > > the lives of others. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Ramapriya > > > > > > > > > > > > ###################################################################### > > ############### > > > This e-mail and any attachments are confidential; they are for > the > > use of > > > > > > the named recipient(s) only. If you have received this e-mail in > > error, do > > > > > > not copy or disclose its contents and please notify the sender > > immediately > > > > > > and then delete it. Email transmission is not a secure means of > > > > > > communication nor is it guaranteed to be error free; emails can > be > > > > > > intercepted, lost, destroyed, corrupted or contain viruses. the > > sender > > > > > > therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions > in > > the > > > > > > contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail > > transmission, nor > > > > > > does it accept liability for any loss or damage caused by viruses. > > > > > > Dodsal Pte Ltd. > > > > > > > > > This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and > > cleared > > > by MailMarshal > > > > > > ###################################################################### > > ############### Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.