#4 (Imagery) - to Nitin

[Guest guest]

Dear Nitin,

 

Shure it's pure beauty to dive in with minds to those measurless

worlds surronuding our dear Mother Earth.

Above all I loved since childhood explanations on cosmos rising up

from music-sphere.Imagine if we could translate charts to music

notes-how would we sound?

 

Best wishes

Maja

 

 

, "Nitin" <sjvc@j...> wrote:

> ||| Hare Rama Krishna ||

>

> Dear Maja,

>

> Well, I'm glad your imagination is just as strong as mine, if not

stronger.

> :>

>

> Ever pictured yourself in space? Both -- as being above the Sun's

orbit, as well as below?

>

> I use the -30 rule for the Nodes when understanding the Chara

Karaka scheme as given. Astronomically, they leave an imprint along

with the other planets having a fixed point at a given moment of

time.

>

> Happy New Year everyone.

>

> Nitin.

>

> || Namah Shivaaya ||

>

> --

> "Maja" <vakelim>

>

> Fri, 31 Dec 2004 11:30:13 -0000

>

> >

> >

> > Dear Nitin,

> >

> >Allow mine small intrude about that picturing/looking at skies

with

> >Kaala Amrita/sarpa-if we would like to actually see it,then it

must

> >be totaly in visible part of zodiac(horison-1-7H)but what when

many

> >of charts have part of KA under horison,so-imagination should be

> >stronger than view then?

> >

> >Best wishes

> >Maja

> >

> >, "Nitin" <sjvc@j...> wrote:

> >> ||| Hare Rama Krishna |||

> >>

> >> Dear Arvind and list members, Namaskaar.

> >>

> >> Allow me to share some of my understanding.

> >>

> >> Pick any chart having Kaala Sarpa or Kaala Amrita and picture

> >this -- go out one evening, and look to the skies, picturing the

> >chart...

> >>

> >> Are the planets not all aligned one after the other...?

> >>

> >> Best wishes,

> >> Nitin.

> >>

> >> || Namah Shivaaya ||

> >>

> >>

> >> ArvindRaj <rajendracholan4u>

> >>

> >> Thu, 30 Dec 2004 00:46:35 -0800 (PST)

> >>

> >> >

> >> >Dear Visti Ji,

> >> >

> >> > For KSY / KAY, how should we consider Rahu or Ketu

> >> >degreee - since these planets are in retrograde,

> >> >should we consider the "30-degree of rahu/ketu" or as

> >> >it is ?

> >> >

> >> >Regards

> >> >Arvind