Official Ramakanta vs. IRM discussion thread

[Guest guest]

Dear Yaduraja Prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP!

 

What you just wrote is not a proof of following assumption:

 

If in 1966 Srila Prabhupada made himself recognized and accepted as the sole

diksa guru for ISKCON, then in 1966 he wanted to be the sole diksa guru for

ISKCON.

 

But a proof of this assumption is required to complete your proof of your

claim that in 1966 Srila Prabhupada wanted to be the sole diksa guru for

ISKCON. So far you have only proven that in 1966 he made him recognized and

accepted as the sole diksa guru for ISKCON.

 

So please try again. But note that I will not accept a proof containing a

speculative phrase like "he must have", neither a proof where you claim that

you know Krishna's plan. Best you provide a sabda-pramana.

 

ys Ramakanta dasa