The question of my marriage - non Astro Fraser

[Guest guest]

Fraser - walkingwihtwendy - or whoever:

 

Fraser,

 

Enough is enough, IS, enough.

 

Show your true face. Who are you?

 

And, why are your posts so acrimonious soul disdain?

 

Is it your goal to prove a point underhandedly OR are you a

legitimate soul sage knowledge that no one can dispute?

 

In the rhetoric that you dispel, I would welcome the 9 people who

wrote you privately to be exposed here openly, to refuterate any

position you have put forth in your soldidarity of own reality.

 

Publish outwardly your secrets and those that support you. I am

sure that those who wrote privately wish to be disguised, but if

your stance is to fortress your position with others - so be it.

 

Did it ever occur to you, that there are many who privately

discourse your position negatively, off list to others, or to its

owner or moderator?

 

Where is it that your Superior Arrogance lends you to this forum?

 

In addition, why do you take delight in this forum of respect and

deferment of subject that you feel it necessary to undermine the

authentic purist of intent and knowledge base?

 

Your showmanship of knowledge is sorely lacking and highly prejudice

of one.

 

I find you emails to be obtrusive, distracting from subject, and

sociopathic in characterization of superiology, thereby lacking any

respect of a person to another.

 

There are Fraser, many forums where your personal take on things are

widely acceptable. Please, find them and sit yourself in due

company.

 

Jyotish-vidya is NOT your forte of expression even if your

manipulate wording wishes so.

 

Finally, I find your coercive wording to be offensive at best. Mind

you, I am taking into consideration you sensitive points in your

Rashi.

 

Unless, you can prove your position on topics without distain

adjectives or personal judgment against another's person, then your

birth chart presents itself off the mark in emotional credulance

along with any analysis of the objective.

 

Uttara

 

jyotish-vidya, "walkingmisswendy"

<walkingmisswendy> wrote:

>

> Wendy,

> OK that's enough!!

> The 'other' purpose of this post is to see for myself, if you

allow

> it to be put up on the forum.

> I will first address your hysterics and then impart knowledge for

> whoever's benefit.

> //How can you possibly know the level of divinity(?) as it's

> manifested in this chart?//

>

> I have seen Deepak on TV on numerous occasions, and heard the man

> talk. Seen the man's condescending, supercilious, patronising

> attitude to the rest of the panel. His almost insulting ways and

tone

> to a catholic priest. His attitude during the war, when he spoke

of

> love conquering all. He spoke with that 'holier than thou'

attitude.

> I can go on about other and much 'authenticated' stuff, but I do

not

> want this to be on this forum, and it does not matter what you

think.

>

> //It is possible to be non-attached to success...or are you one

> who believes it's only possible to be non-attached to

poverty.//

>

> If you actually believe, that, that is what I suggested, then I

have

> nothing to say on that point at all. If you knew my background or

if

> you knew basic astrology, you would know better, having access to

my

> birth chart. But, never mind, I understand......

>

> //Yes, this would amaze me, Fraser! Although I do not consider

> myself a better(?) to anyone, I do find your new ID

> walkingmisswendy) totally disrespectful...and that was exactly

> what you intended!//

>

> The name I chose, was malicious. I take full reponsibility to

having

> an intent that was far from 'pure'. I do see that it was in bad

> taste, to say the least. It was a nasty temptation that I gave in

to.

> It was wrong. It is despicable. It carried with it, a twisted

sense

> of humour. It was the work of the lesser man in me. If you have

read

> so far and are waiting for that word, here it is: SORRY !!.

> Now Wendy, what did we learn here? GRACE. Yes, Grace. I have

the

> backbone to own up and admit, and receive, that rap on the wrist.

If

> only, you would take a lesson from me and stop getting hyper at

every

> turn.

> ALSO, -this I never thought, I would be forced to bring up, but I

> find it compelling now. In the last few days I have received more

> than 9 (yes more than 9 -its not a typo)private emails,

> from 'regulars' on this forum. If they are reading this, they know

> who they are. The contents of those emails is negative, and its

not

> directed towards me.

> The last time I asked you if you wanted me to leave and you

blocked

> me. I don't understand. Ask me to leave openly on the forum and I

> will leave. It's simple.

> No matter what you say and think, I do not have anything against

you.

> I do not send out malicious private emails. Thats not me. I prefer

to

> be outspoken and honest. Even after reading my birth chart, you

don't

> know me at all.

> I will be copy-pasting this post to all those who have mailed me

> privately, lest you delete it before the world sets eyes on it.

> I am sure a lot of them are still waiting for your definition of

> EXALTATION.

> Have a nice day, Wendy.

> Regards,

> Fraser

>

>

>

> jyotish-vidya, "Wendy Vasicek"

<jyotish@o...>

> wrote:

> >

> > Fraser,

> >

> > Why would you assume that the true(?) significations of Ketu are

> not

> > noteworthy(?) in Deepak's chart... Give me your reasons.

> >

> > How can you possibly know the level of divinity(?) as it's

> > manifested in this chart?

> >

> > Non-commercial spiritual attainment?? Perhaps you're confusing

> > success in career with attachment to career. It is possible to

be

> > non-attached to success...or are you one who believes it's only

> > possible to be non-attached to poverty. To see both success and

> > failure as the impostors they are is the mark of true

detachment,

> is

> > it not? If fate hands you success, you accept it; if fate hands

you

> > poverty, you accept it - this is detachment!

> >

> > Again, how can you possibly know the quality of transcendental

> > consciousness as it's manifested in this chart.

> >

> > I'll speak more on this chart when I have a bit more time to

spare

> > than I do at the moment.

> >

> > //and I have a very healthy attitude towards my betters. (this

> would

> > amaze you)//

> >

> > Yes, this would amaze me, Fraser! Although I do not consider

myself

> > a better(?) to anyone, I do find your new ID (walkingmisswendy)

> > totally disrespectful...and that was exactly what you intended!

> >

> > Best Wishes,

> > Mrs. Wendy

> > http://JyotishVidya.com

> > ______________________________

> >

> > -

> > "walkingmisswendy" <walkingmisswendy>

> > <jyotish-vidya>

> > Thursday, January 19, 2006 2:49 PM

> > Re: The question of my marriage

> >

> >

> > Wendy,

> > you have just said what I said--

> > good career !!

> > BUT the true significations of what really Ketu stands for:

> >

> > . The divinity of Ketu

> > . The non-commercial spiritual attainment and

> > . The transcedental conciousness

> >

> > are not "noteworthy" in Deepak's chart,

> > as one might expect to see, as a

> > case study chart to showcase the exaltation of Ketu in Scorpio.

> > and why would I have a 'biased' view of this?

> > If you make a valid point, I will be the first to accept (this

may

> > surprise you)but its true, and I have a very healthy attitude

> > towards

> > my betters. (this would amaze you)

> > Let us begin, with the basics. What do YOU say 'constitutes'

> > exaltation. Teach me, please !

> > Regards,

> > Fraser

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Hello Uttara,

Thank you for your post.

It will take time for what you have written to sink in.

It's profound.

Thanks Again,

Regards,

Fraser

 

 

jyotish-vidya, "muttaraphalguni"

<muttaraphalguni> wrote:

>

> Fraser - walkingwihtwendy - or whoever:

>

> Fraser,

>

> Enough is enough, IS, enough.

>

> Show your true face. Who are you?

>

> And, why are your posts so acrimonious soul disdain?

>

> Is it your goal to prove a point underhandedly OR are you a

> legitimate soul sage knowledge that no one can dispute?

>

> In the rhetoric that you dispel, I would welcome the 9 people who

> wrote you privately to be exposed here openly, to refuterate any

> position you have put forth in your soldidarity of own reality.

>

> Publish outwardly your secrets and those that support you. I am

> sure that those who wrote privately wish to be disguised, but if

> your stance is to fortress your position with others - so be it.

>

> Did it ever occur to you, that there are many who privately

> discourse your position negatively, off list to others, or to its

> owner or moderator?

>

> Where is it that your Superior Arrogance lends you to this forum?

>

> In addition, why do you take delight in this forum of respect and

> deferment of subject that you feel it necessary to undermine the

> authentic purist of intent and knowledge base?

>

> Your showmanship of knowledge is sorely lacking and highly

prejudice

> of one.

>

> I find you emails to be obtrusive, distracting from subject, and

> sociopathic in characterization of superiology, thereby lacking any

> respect of a person to another.

>

> There are Fraser, many forums where your personal take on things

are

> widely acceptable. Please, find them and sit yourself in due

> company.

>

> Jyotish-vidya is NOT your forte of expression even if your

> manipulate wording wishes so.

>

> Finally, I find your coercive wording to be offensive at best. Mind

> you, I am taking into consideration you sensitive points in your

> Rashi.

>

> Unless, you can prove your position on topics without distain

> adjectives or personal judgment against another's person, then your

> birth chart presents itself off the mark in emotional credulance

> along with any analysis of the objective.

>

> Uttara

>

> jyotish-vidya, "walkingmisswendy"

> <walkingmisswendy> wrote:

> >

> > Wendy,

> > OK that's enough!!

> > The 'other' purpose of this post is to see for myself, if you

> allow

> > it to be put up on the forum.

> > I will first address your hysterics and then impart knowledge for

> > whoever's benefit.

> > //How can you possibly know the level of divinity(?) as it's

> > manifested in this chart?//

> >

> > I have seen Deepak on TV on numerous occasions, and heard the man

> > talk. Seen the man's condescending, supercilious, patronising

> > attitude to the rest of the panel. His almost insulting ways and

> tone

> > to a catholic priest. His attitude during the war, when he spoke

> of

> > love conquering all. He spoke with that 'holier than thou'

> attitude.

> > I can go on about other and much 'authenticated' stuff, but I do

> not

> > want this to be on this forum, and it does not matter what you

> think.

> >

> > //It is possible to be non-attached to success...or are you

one

> > who believes it's only possible to be non-attached to

> poverty.//

> >

> > If you actually believe, that, that is what I suggested, then I

> have

> > nothing to say on that point at all. If you knew my background or

> if

> > you knew basic astrology, you would know better, having access to

> my

> > birth chart. But, never mind, I understand......

> >

> > //Yes, this would amaze me, Fraser! Although I do not consider

> > myself a better(?) to anyone, I do find your new ID

> > walkingmisswendy) totally disrespectful...and that was

exactly

> > what you intended!//

> >

> > The name I chose, was malicious. I take full reponsibility to

> having

> > an intent that was far from 'pure'. I do see that it was in bad

> > taste, to say the least. It was a nasty temptation that I gave in

> to.

> > It was wrong. It is despicable. It carried with it, a twisted

> sense

> > of humour. It was the work of the lesser man in me. If you have

> read

> > so far and are waiting for that word, here it is: SORRY !!.

> > Now Wendy, what did we learn here? GRACE. Yes, Grace. I have

> the

> > backbone to own up and admit, and receive, that rap on the wrist.

> If

> > only, you would take a lesson from me and stop getting hyper at

> every

> > turn.

> > ALSO, -this I never thought, I would be forced to bring up, but I

> > find it compelling now. In the last few days I have received more

> > than 9 (yes more than 9 -its not a typo)private emails,

> > from 'regulars' on this forum. If they are reading this, they

know

> > who they are. The contents of those emails is negative, and its

> not

> > directed towards me.

> > The last time I asked you if you wanted me to leave and you

> blocked

> > me. I don't understand. Ask me to leave openly on the forum and I

> > will leave. It's simple.

> > No matter what you say and think, I do not have anything against

> you.

> > I do not send out malicious private emails. Thats not me. I

prefer

> to

> > be outspoken and honest. Even after reading my birth chart, you

> don't

> > know me at all.

> > I will be copy-pasting this post to all those who have mailed me

> > privately, lest you delete it before the world sets eyes on it.

> > I am sure a lot of them are still waiting for your definition of

> > EXALTATION.

> > Have a nice day, Wendy.

> > Regards,

> > Fraser

> >

> >

> >

> > jyotish-vidya, "Wendy Vasicek"

> <jyotish@o...>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Fraser,

> > >

> > > Why would you assume that the true(?) significations of Ketu

are

> > not

> > > noteworthy(?) in Deepak's chart... Give me your reasons.

> > >

> > > How can you possibly know the level of divinity(?) as it's

> > > manifested in this chart?

> > >

> > > Non-commercial spiritual attainment?? Perhaps you're confusing

> > > success in career with attachment to career. It is possible to

> be

> > > non-attached to success...or are you one who believes it's only

> > > possible to be non-attached to poverty. To see both success and

> > > failure as the impostors they are is the mark of true

> detachment,

> > is

> > > it not? If fate hands you success, you accept it; if fate hands

> you

> > > poverty, you accept it - this is detachment!

> > >

> > > Again, how can you possibly know the quality of transcendental

> > > consciousness as it's manifested in this chart.

> > >

> > > I'll speak more on this chart when I have a bit more time to

> spare

> > > than I do at the moment.

> > >

> > > //and I have a very healthy attitude towards my betters. (this

> > would

> > > amaze you)//

> > >

> > > Yes, this would amaze me, Fraser! Although I do not consider

> myself

> > > a better(?) to anyone, I do find your new ID (walkingmisswendy)

> > > totally disrespectful...and that was exactly what you intended!

> > >

> > > Best Wishes,

> > > Mrs. Wendy

> > > http://JyotishVidya.com

> > > ______________________________

> > >

> > > -

> > > "walkingmisswendy" <walkingmisswendy>

> > > <jyotish-vidya>

> > > Thursday, January 19, 2006 2:49 PM

> > > Re: The question of my marriage

> > >

> > >

> > > Wendy,

> > > you have just said what I said--

> > > good career !!

> > > BUT the true significations of what really Ketu stands for:

> > >

> > > . The divinity of Ketu

> > > . The non-commercial spiritual attainment and

> > > . The transcedental conciousness

> > >

> > > are not "noteworthy" in Deepak's chart,

> > > as one might expect to see, as a

> > > case study chart to showcase the exaltation of Ketu in Scorpio.

> > > and why would I have a 'biased' view of this?

> > > If you make a valid point, I will be the first to accept (this

> may

> > > surprise you)but its true, and I have a very healthy attitude

> > > towards

> > > my betters. (this would amaze you)

> > > Let us begin, with the basics. What do YOU say 'constitutes'

> > > exaltation. Teach me, please !

> > > Regards,

> > > Fraser

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Uttara,

 

Please don't let it bother you too much...everything happens for a

reason :-))

 

Best Wishes,

Mrs. Wendy

http://JyotishVidya.com

______________________________

 

-

"muttaraphalguni" <muttaraphalguni

<jyotish-vidya>

Friday, January 20, 2006 2:17 PM

Re: The question of my marriage - non Astro

Fraser

 

 

Fraser - walkingwihtwendy - or whoever:

 

Fraser,

 

Enough is enough, IS, enough.

 

Show your true face. Who are you?

 

And, why are your posts so acrimonious soul disdain?

 

Is it your goal to prove a point underhandedly OR are you a

legitimate soul sage knowledge that no one can dispute?

 

In the rhetoric that you dispel, I would welcome the 9 people who

wrote you privately to be exposed here openly, to refuterate any

position you have put forth in your soldidarity of own reality.

 

Publish outwardly your secrets and those that support you. I am

sure that those who wrote privately wish to be disguised, but if

your stance is to fortress your position with others - so be it.

 

Did it ever occur to you, that there are many who privately

discourse your position negatively, off list to others, or to its

owner or moderator?

 

Where is it that your Superior Arrogance lends you to this forum?

 

In addition, why do you take delight in this forum of respect and

deferment of subject that you feel it necessary to undermine the

authentic purist of intent and knowledge base?

 

Your showmanship of knowledge is sorely lacking and highly prejudice

of one.

 

I find you emails to be obtrusive, distracting from subject, and

sociopathic in characterization of superiology, thereby lacking any

respect of a person to another.

 

There are Fraser, many forums where your personal take on things are

widely acceptable. Please, find them and sit yourself in due

company.

 

Jyotish-vidya is NOT your forte of expression even if your

manipulate wording wishes so.

 

Finally, I find your coercive wording to be offensive at best. Mind

you, I am taking into consideration you sensitive points in your

Rashi.

 

Unless, you can prove your position on topics without distain

adjectives or personal judgment against another's person, then your

birth chart presents itself off the mark in emotional credulance

along with any analysis of the objective.

 

Uttara