Guest guest Posted April 10, 2005 Report Share Posted April 10, 2005 Jaya Jagananth As some new paper have disclosed this fact that this tsunami was man made and USA has generated this tsunami disaster. Mean to say is there any fact in this statement as the Hon able group members already work on natural disaster but as this statement make me confuse. bcoz USA has a ability to produce this and some fact has been given in support of this statement that USA has some army base in that area but evacuated that time but didn't disclose it to other countries . If it was natural and they come to know about this by there technology then why they didn't disclose it to other countries. it clear show that USA has some part in this. Can any member co-relate or clear this point from Indian Chart of USA chart. Regards Trikal Pashupatti Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2005 Report Share Posted April 12, 2005 Om Namo Bhagawate Vasudevay Dear friends, Namaste. This was one of the probable causes that I had thought of immediately after the incident. The reason for this thought was the plot in "Hammer of Eden", a bestseller, I do not remember the name of autho but most likely it was Irwing Wallace (or may be Alistair Mac.). However, the issue here is to discuss astrologically whether it was man-made or natural. Gurus may kindly enlighten with principles of mundane astrology. Om Shri Krishnarpanamastu. Radhe-Krishna, Himanshu Mohan , "pashupatti" <pashupatti> wrote: > > > Jaya Jagananth > > As some new paper have disclosed this fact that this tsunami was man > made and USA has generated this tsunami disaster. Mean to say is there > any fact in this statement as the Hon able group members already work > on natural disaster but as this statement make me confuse. bcoz USA has > a ability to produce this and some fact has been given in support of > this statement that USA has some army base in that area but evacuated > that time but didn't disclose it to other countries . If it was natural > and they come to know about this by there technology then why they > didn't disclose it to other countries. it clear show that USA has some > part in this. Can any member co-relate or clear this point from Indian > Chart of USA chart. > > > Regards > Trikal Pashupatti Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2005 Report Share Posted April 13, 2005 || Om Namah Shivaaya || Namaskar, Could you share a credible source for these allegations? It would be prudent here to remember that not everything that is reported in the electronic media is necessarily the truth. Consider how much energy would be needed to artificially produce such an earthquake. Frankly, the notion is absurd. May I suggest that we put the divine science of astrology to better (humanitarian) use. With reverence to the Gurus, Samir "Himanshu Mohan" <himanshu_mohan Wed Apr 13, 2005 6:02 am Re: Man made Tsunami Om Namo Bhagawate Vasudevay Dear friends, Namaste. This was one of the probable causes that I had thought of immediately after the incident. The reason for this thought was the plot in "Hammer of Eden", a bestseller, I do not remember the name of autho but most likely it was Irwing Wallace (or may be Alistair Mac.). However, the issue here is to discuss astrologically whether it was man-made or natural. Gurus may kindly enlighten with principles of mundane astrology. Om Shri Krishnarpanamastu. Radhe-Krishna, Himanshu Mohan --- In , "pashupatti" <pashupatti> wrote: > > > Jaya Jagananth > > As some new paper have disclosed this fact that this tsunami was man > made and USA has generated this tsunami disaster. Mean to say is there > any fact in this statement as the Hon able group members already work > on natural disaster but as this statement make me confuse. bcoz USA has > a ability to produce this and some fact has been given in support of > this statement that USA has some army base in that area but evacuated > that time but didn't disclose it to other countries . If it was natural > and they come to know about this by there technology then why they > didn't disclose it to other countries. it clear show that USA has some > part in this. Can any member co-relate or clear this point from Indian > Chart of USA chart. > > > Regards > Trikal Pashupatti Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2005 Report Share Posted April 13, 2005 || Hare Rama Krishna || Dear Samir, Namaskar. Triggering an earthquake or a volcanic eruption is possible humanly. Once triggered, the process can overtaken by natural energy. As an astrology student, I would be very interested to know how to decipher any human involvement in a natural (?) disaster. For example, nuclear explosions are purely human made. If we make an chart for such an explosion event, is there some way to show exclusively from the chart that humans are involved ? I am just trying to learn. Regards, Sourav =================================================================== , Samir Shah <a48919062> wrote: > || Om Namah Shivaaya || > > Namaskar, > > Could you share a credible source for these allegations? > > It would be prudent here to remember that not everything that is reported > in the electronic media is necessarily the truth. Consider how much energy > would be needed to artificially produce such an earthquake. Frankly, the > notion is absurd. > > May I suggest that we put the divine science of astrology to better > (humanitarian) use. > > With reverence to the Gurus, > > Samir > > > ---------- > "Himanshu Mohan" <himanshu_mohan@> > Wed Apr 13, 2005 6:02 am > Re: Man made Tsunami > > > Om Namo Bhagawate Vasudevay > > Dear friends, > Namaste. > This was one of the probable causes that I had thought of immediately > after the incident. The reason for this thought was the plot > in "Hammer of Eden", a bestseller, I do not remember the name of > autho but most likely it was Irwing Wallace (or may be Alistair Mac.). > > However, the issue here is to discuss astrologically whether it was > man-made or natural. Gurus may kindly enlighten with principles of > mundane astrology. > > Om Shri Krishnarpanamastu. > > Radhe-Krishna, > Himanshu Mohan > > --- In > </message/srijaganna th/post?postID=xVjJ8_DgYXMCFs3cGQLq_5FtqQNGa6HzifFw9mvl7qfYd1- I03HVj3YLFlKZ7yBELeNwXZQvYAUrY7DdLUVEQ1YAhXI>@ ..com, > "pashupatti" <pashupatti> > wrote: > > > > > > Jaya Jagananth > > > > As some new paper have disclosed this fact that this tsunami was > man > > made and USA has generated this tsunami disaster. Mean to say is > there > > any fact in this statement as the Hon able group members already > work > > on natural disaster but as this statement make me confuse. bcoz USA > has > > a ability to produce this and some fact has been given in support > of > > this statement that USA has some army base in that area but > evacuated > > that time but didn't disclose it to other countries . If it was > natural > > and they come to know about this by there technology then why they > > didn't disclose it to other countries. it clear show that USA has > some > > part in this. Can any member co-relate or clear this point from > Indian > > Chart of USA chart. > > > > > > Regards > > Trikal Pashupatti Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2005 Report Share Posted April 13, 2005 Om Namo Bhagawate Vasudevay Dear friends, Namaste. Samir's suggestion is well received. The curiosity regarding astrologically discriminating between man-made & natural disaster, however, remains; with a human benefit angle. Om Shri Krishnarpanamastu. Radhe Krishna, Himanshu Mohan --- In , Samir Shah <a48919062> wrote: > || Om Namah Shivaaya || > > Namaskar, > > Could you share a credible source for these allegations? > > It would be prudent here to remember that not everything that is reported > in the electronic media is necessarily the truth. Consider how much energy > would be needed to artificially produce such an earthquake. Frankly, the > notion is absurd. > > May I suggest that we put the divine science of astrology to better > (humanitarian) use. > > With reverence to the Gurus, > > Samir > > > ---------- > "Himanshu Mohan" <himanshu_mohan@> > Wed Apr 13, 2005 6:02 am > Re: Man made Tsunami > > > Om Namo Bhagawate Vasudevay > > Dear friends, > Namaste. > This was one of the probable causes that I had thought of immediately > after the incident. The reason for this thought was the plot > in "Hammer of Eden", a bestseller, I do not remember the name of > autho but most likely it was Irwing Wallace (or may be Alistair Mac.). > > However, the issue here is to discuss astrologically whether it was > man-made or natural. Gurus may kindly enlighten with principles of > mundane astrology. > > Om Shri Krishnarpanamastu. > > Radhe-Krishna, > Himanshu Mohan > > --- In > </message//post?pos\ tID=xVjJ8_DgYXMCFs3cGQLq_5FtqQNGa6HzifFw9mvl7qfYd1- I03HVj3YLFlKZ7yBELeNwXZQvYAUrY7DdLUVEQ1YAhXI>, > "pashupatti" <pashupatti> > wrote: > > > > > > Jaya Jagananth > > > > As some new paper have disclosed this fact that this tsunami was > man > > made and USA has generated this tsunami disaster. Mean to say is > there > > any fact in this statement as the Hon able group members already > work > > on natural disaster but as this statement make me confuse. bcoz USA > has > > a ability to produce this and some fact has been given in support > of > > this statement that USA has some army base in that area but > evacuated > > that time but didn't disclose it to other countries . If it was > natural > > and they come to know about this by there technology then why they > > didn't disclose it to other countries. it clear show that USA has > some > > part in this. Can any member co-relate or clear this point from > Indian > > Chart of USA chart. > > > > > > Regards > > Trikal Pashupatti Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 14, 2005 Report Share Posted April 14, 2005 || Om Namah Shivaaya || Dear Sourav and Himanshu, Namaskar, I accept the astrological nature of the query. So leaving allegations aside, it's an interesting question... I've not enough experience with mundane astrology to attempt an answer though. Perhaps we could start by looking at the charts of some obviously man-made events - the Hiroshima bombing for example. It could be tricky defining 'human involvement', however. We're to some extent responsible for a large number of natural disasters (especially those related to flooding/landslide etc.) because of our activities on the planet over an extended period. Perhaps the learned members have something to add... Best wishes, Samir ______________________ Message: 10 Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:40:43 -0000 "feynman_8" <feynman_8 > Re: Man made Tsunami || Hare Rama Krishna || Dear Samir, Namaskar. Triggering an earthquake or a volcanic eruption is possible humanly. Once triggered, the process can overtaken by natural energy. As an astrology student, I would be very interested to know how to decipher any human involvement in a natural (?) disaster. For example, nuclear explosions are purely human made. If we make an chart for such an explosion event, is there some way to show exclusively from the chart that humans are involved ? I am just trying to learn. Regards, Sourav Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 14, 2005 Report Share Posted April 14, 2005 Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevay Dear friends, Namaste. The principle idea for anything posted here, I think is always the astrological angle involved. I saw the issue therefore only as an astrological question. The bottom-line, put first in view of its importance is that I am not much into mundane astrology. The ideas given below are loud thinking only. Second, It is my view that for the catastrophies affecting some city or country at most, may be identified as man-made event; but probably such events having vast global effect, involving more than one continent and more than one country, affecting in more than one direction, should be comparable to a Daiveeya happening and therefore it may not be possible to detect the same as artificial, EVEN IF TRIGGERED BY MAN! Now, I think - Anything human should be considered as not equal to Daiveeya. Now this should indicate that such man-made events should have no connection with Jupiter, Sun or Moon. Man-made should involve some motive behind any action and/ or perverted mind, therefore Moon should be afflicted by Rahu or Shani; but most probably not by Ketu. Shani may also be not involved in the sense that the Air involvement in such events is minimal. For incidents related to Earth Mars should be involved and being an underwater incident involvement of Venus is imperative. Signs involved must be Earthy and Watery. Fiery signs may be seen affecting the inner crode of the Earth i.e. the heart or stomach of earth which indicates the fourth or fifth house. Any such event that affects masses should have fourth house lord or Moon involved or whatever be the appropriate karakas of Janata or Masses. Since most of the deaths indicated shaould have been due to suffocating, indications of the same should be there. So much for loud thinking. Om Shri Krishnarpanamastu. Radhe Krishna! Himanshu Mohan , Samir Shah <a48919062> wrote: > || Om Namah Shivaaya || > > Dear Sourav and Himanshu, Namaskar, > > I accept the astrological nature of the query. So leaving allegations > aside, it's an interesting question... I've not enough experience with > mundane astrology to attempt an answer though. Perhaps we could start by > looking at the charts of some obviously man-made events - the Hiroshima > bombing for example. > > It could be tricky defining 'human involvement', however. We're to some > extent responsible for a large number of natural disasters (especially > those related to flooding/landslide etc.) because of our activities on the > planet over an extended period. > > Perhaps the learned members have something to add... > > Best wishes, > > Samir > > > > >___________________ ___ > > > >Message: 10 > > Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:40:43 -0000 > > "feynman_8" <feynman_8> > >Re: Man made Tsunami > > > > > >|| Hare Rama Krishna || > > > >Dear Samir, > > Namaskar. Triggering an earthquake or a volcanic eruption > >is possible humanly. Once triggered, the process can overtaken by > >natural energy. As an astrology student, I would be very interested > >to know how to decipher any human involvement in a natural (?) > >disaster. For example, nuclear explosions are purely human made. If > >we make an chart for such an explosion event, is there some way to > >show exclusively from the chart that humans are involved ? I am just > >trying to learn. > > > >Regards, > > > >Sourav Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 14, 2005 Report Share Posted April 14, 2005 || Om Namah Shivaaya || Dear Himanshu, Namaskar, Forgive me if I sounded like I was criticising the topic. Perhaps I wrongly took the start of this thread as an allegation rather than a point of study. Allow me to contribute a thought from the philosophical perspective. You wrote: Second, It is my view that for the catastrophies affecting some city or country at most, may be identified as man-made event; but probably such events having vast global effect, involving more than one continent and more than one country, affecting in more than one direction, should be comparable to a Daiveeya happening and therefore it may not be possible to detect the same as artificial, EVEN IF TRIGGERED BY MAN! Are not all happenings, whether influenced by man or otherwise, the will and act of God? If this is true, then we cannot separate large-scale happenings from smaller-scale ones. The borders of countries are mere socio-political ones. They do not separate us as human beings, and to that end they are illusory. Therefore one cannot say that a disaster happening in one country (or any other geographical division) was man-made, while a disaster affecting an entire continent was God-made. The point I'm trying to make is that we cannot separate events based on magnitude. If there is a rule, it must apply everywhere. Regarding the astrological combinations required to show human involvement, I think I have more fundamental principles to understand before I attempt a plunge. I still suggest looking at charts where the case is clear. With reverence to the Gurus, Samir "Himanshu Mohan" <himanshu_mohan Thu Apr 14, 2005 12:07 pm Re: Man made Tsunami Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevay Dear friends, Namaste. The principle idea for anything posted here, I think is always the astrological angle involved. I saw the issue therefore only as an astrological question. The bottom-line, put first in view of its importance is that I am not much into mundane astrology. The ideas given below are loud thinking only. Second, It is my view that for the catastrophies affecting some city or country at most, may be identified as man-made event; but probably such events having vast global effect, involving more than one continent and more than one country, affecting in more than one direction, should be comparable to a Daiveeya happening and therefore it may not be possible to detect the same as artificial, EVEN IF TRIGGERED BY MAN! Now, I think - Anything human should be considered as not equal to Daiveeya. Now this should indicate that such man-made events should have no connection with Jupiter, Sun or Moon. Man-made should involve some motive behind any action and/ or perverted mind, therefore Moon should be afflicted by Rahu or Shani; but most probably not by Ketu. Shani may also be not involved in the sense that the Air involvement in such events is minimal. For incidents related to Earth Mars should be involved and being an underwater incident involvement of Venus is imperative. Signs involved must be Earthy and Watery. Fiery signs may be seen affecting the inner crode of the Earth i.e. the heart or stomach of earth which indicates the fourth or fifth house. Any such event that affects masses should have fourth house lord or Moon involved or whatever be the appropriate karakas of Janata or Masses. Since most of the deaths indicated shaould have been due to suffocating, indications of the same should be there. So much for loud thinking. Om Shri Krishnarpanamastu. Radhe Krishna! Himanshu Mohan --- In , Samir Shah <a48919062> wrote: > || Om Namah Shivaaya || > > Dear Sourav and Himanshu, Namaskar, > > I accept the astrological nature of the query. So leaving allegations > aside, it's an interesting question... I've not enough experience with > mundane astrology to attempt an answer though. Perhaps we could start by > looking at the charts of some obviously man-made events - the Hiroshima > bombing for example. > > It could be tricky defining 'human involvement', however. We're to some > extent responsible for a large number of natural disasters (especially > those related to flooding/landslide etc.) because of our activities on the > planet over an extended period. > > Perhaps the learned members have something to add... > > Best wishes, > > Samir > > > > >___________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 14, 2005 Report Share Posted April 14, 2005 Om Namo Bhagawate Vasudevay Dear Samir, Namaste. I certainly agree with you that differentiation between man-made and natural can not be made on the basis of magnitude. However, I just id loud thinking because there does not seem to be enough awareness among us learners about mundane astrology; and to brainstorm you need to share your ideas so that they are either agreed or critisised by other members. Either way it breeds knowledge; just in line with Group discussion principles. I thought of intercontinental scope to be differentiated from smaller scope on the grounds that so far, known events of man-made nature have been limited to a smaller geographic area in that sense. The mention of coubtries is not in strict sense of political boundaries, but geographic locations rather. I agree that chart analysis of known natural and man-made events may prove beneficial, but I do not have any such details. Of course it can be collected and I shall be doing that within a few days. As regards misunderstanding the original message from some member regarding the news, I also initially reacted the same way - thinking of fiction-news being brought on the wrong list; I even thought to mention that this is not the place to discuss non-astrological issues! Then I asked myself : Can there be some event in this world which does not have an astrological angle? That happens! I understand your comments fully well. Om Shri krishnarpanamastu. regards, Radhe Krishna. Himanshu Mohan P.S. BTW, In most of the water related incidents, Sun and Moon should be mutually square, from physical sciences also, right? HM , Samir Shah <a48919062> wrote: > || Om Namah Shivaaya || > > Dear Himanshu, Namaskar, > > Forgive me if I sounded like I was criticising the topic. Perhaps I > wrongly took the start of this thread as an allegation rather than a point > of study. > > Allow me to contribute a thought from the philosophical perspective. > > You wrote: > Second, It is my view that for the catastrophies affecting some city > or country at most, may be identified as man-made event; but probably > such events having vast global effect, involving more than one > continent and more than one country, affecting in more than one > direction, should be comparable to a Daiveeya happening and therefore > it may not be possible to detect the same as artificial, EVEN IF > TRIGGERED BY MAN! > > Are not all happenings, whether influenced by man or otherwise, the will > and act of God? > > If this is true, then we cannot separate large-scale happenings from > smaller-scale ones. The borders of countries are mere socio- political > ones. They do not separate us as human beings, and to that end they are > illusory. Therefore one cannot say that a disaster happening in one > country (or any other geographical division) was man-made, while a disaster > affecting an entire continent was God-made. > > The point I'm trying to make is that we cannot separate events based on > magnitude. If there is a rule, it must apply everywhere. > > Regarding the astrological combinations required to show human involvement, > I think I have more fundamental principles to understand before I attempt a > plunge. I still suggest looking at charts where the case is clear. > > With reverence to the Gurus, > > Samir > > > ---------- > "Himanshu Mohan" <himanshu_mohan@> > Thu Apr 14, 2005 12:07 pm > Re: Man made Tsunami > > Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevay > Dear friends, > Namaste. > The principle idea for anything posted here, I think is always the > astrological angle involved. I saw the issue therefore only as an > astrological question. > > The bottom-line, put first in view of its importance is that I am not > much into mundane astrology. The ideas given below are loud thinking > only. > > Second, It is my view that for the catastrophies affecting some city > or country at most, may be identified as man-made event; but probably > such events having vast global effect, involving more than one > continent and more than one country, affecting in more than one > direction, should be comparable to a Daiveeya happening and therefore > it may not be possible to detect the same as artificial, EVEN IF > TRIGGERED BY MAN! > > Now, I think - > Anything human should be considered as not equal to Daiveeya. Now > this should indicate that such man-made events should have no > connection with Jupiter, Sun or Moon. > Man-made should involve some motive behind any action and/ or > perverted mind, therefore Moon should be afflicted by Rahu or Shani; > but most probably not by Ketu. > > Shani may also be not involved in the sense that the Air involvement > in such events is minimal. For incidents related to Earth Mars should > be involved and being an underwater incident involvement of Venus is > imperative. Signs involved must be Earthy and Watery. Fiery signs may > be seen affecting the inner crode of the Earth i.e. the heart or > stomach of earth which indicates the fourth or fifth house. > > Any such event that affects masses should have fourth house lord or > Moon involved or whatever be the appropriate karakas of Janata or > Masses. > > Since most of the deaths indicated shaould have been due to > suffocating, indications of the same should be there. So much for > loud thinking. > > Om Shri Krishnarpanamastu. > Radhe Krishna! > Himanshu Mohan > > --- In > </message/srijagannat h/post?postID=1W3NVrrcbAgxyAlp8FnQDLSQjQkaBGpUOXVq79Oh7odBsMrc- syVyoH2_01xrGAF6eQBB_U5q9xGiN9qdb32YbEr>, > Samir Shah <a48919062> > wrote: > > || Om Namah Shivaaya || > > > > Dear Sourav and Himanshu, Namaskar, > > > > I accept the astrological nature of the query. So leaving > allegations > > aside, it's an interesting question... I've not enough experience > with > > mundane astrology to attempt an answer though. Perhaps we could > start by > > looking at the charts of some obviously man-made events - the > Hiroshima > > bombing for example. > > > > It could be tricky defining 'human involvement', however. We're to > some > > extent responsible for a large number of natural disasters > (especially > > those related to flooding/landslide etc.) because of our > activities on the > > planet over an extended period. > > > > Perhaps the learned members have something to add... > > > > Best wishes, > > > > Samir > > > > > > > > > >___________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 15, 2005 Report Share Posted April 15, 2005 Dear Sourav, Hare Rama Krsna! >If we make an chart for such an explosion event, is there some way to >show exclusively from the chart that humans are involved ? I am just >trying to learn. Yes, this sounds interesting to me too. Let's try to take the data of the nuclear bomb explosions of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Then we could also see Tchernobyl explosion. I remember having seen these data some time ago on one of the lists. Someone else remembers or has them? Yours, Dhira Krsna dasa, http://www.geocities.com/dvdd1008/Jyotisha.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 15, 2005 Report Share Posted April 15, 2005 || Hare Rama Krishna || Dear Dhira-ji, Namaskar. Thank you for your interest and for giving me an opportunity to learn. Here are the times you needed. 1. Hiroshima Aug 6, 1945 between 8:15 and 8:16 AM (23:15 to 23:16 GMT) the atomic bomb named "Little Boy" exploded. 2. Nagasaki August 9, 1945 between 11:02 and 11:03 AM (02:02 to 02:03 GMT) the atomic bomb "Fat Man" exploded. 3. Los Alamos July 16, 1945 at 5:29:45 AM (local time) the first ever nuclear bomb exploded on the earth. This was a test explosion. Hope this helps. Let me know what you find interesting. Regards, Sourav ================================================================== , "Dhira Krsna BCS" <Dhira.Krsna.BCS@p...> wrote: > Dear Sourav, > > Hare Rama Krsna! > > >If we make an chart for such an explosion event, is there some way to > >show exclusively from the chart that humans are involved ? I am just > >trying to learn. > > Yes, this sounds interesting to me too. Let's try to take the data of the > nuclear bomb explosions of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Then we could also see > Tchernobyl explosion. I remember having seen these data some time ago on > one of the lists. Someone else remembers or has them? > > Yours, > Dhira Krsna dasa, > http://www.geocities.com/dvdd1008/Jyotisha.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 16, 2005 Report Share Posted April 16, 2005 Om Namo Bhagawate Vasudevay Dear Sourav, Namaste. Thanx. I expect that with gurukripa we may infer something. Om Shri Krishnarpanamastu. Radhe Krishna! HM --- In , "feynman_8" <feynman_8> wrote: > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > Dear Dhira-ji, > Namaskar. Thank you for your interest and for giving > me an opportunity to learn. Here are the times you needed. > > 1. Hiroshima Aug 6, 1945 between 8:15 and 8:16 AM (23:15 to 23:16 > GMT) the atomic bomb named "Little Boy" exploded. > > 2. Nagasaki August 9, 1945 between 11:02 and 11:03 AM (02:02 to > 02:03 GMT) the atomic bomb "Fat Man" exploded. > > 3. Los Alamos July 16, 1945 at 5:29:45 AM (local time) the first > ever nuclear bomb exploded on the earth. This was a test explosion. > > Hope this helps. Let me know what you find interesting. > > Regards, > > Sourav > ================================================================== > > > > --- In , "Dhira Krsna BCS" > <Dhira.Krsna.BCS@p...> wrote: > > Dear Sourav, > > > > Hare Rama Krsna! > > > > >If we make an chart for such an explosion event, is there some > way to > > >show exclusively from the chart that humans are involved ? I am > just > > >trying to learn. > > > > Yes, this sounds interesting to me too. Let's try to take the data > of the > > nuclear bomb explosions of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Then we could > also see > > Tchernobyl explosion. I remember having seen these data some time > ago on > > one of the lists. Someone else remembers or has them? > > > > Yours, > > Dhira Krsna dasa, > > http://www.geocities.com/dvdd1008/Jyotisha.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.