To Manas, Anil and all: Vargottama: A Case Description: From Souvik

[Guest guest]

Hi Friends,

 

I have vargottam Rahu and Ketu.

In D-1:

7th.house: Rahu in Leo

1st.jouse: Ketu in Aqua

 

In D-9:

8th. house: Rahu in Leo

2nd.house: Ketu in Aqua

 

Well, I haven't yet thought about them in Vargottam prespective, so

let me see:

 

1986: Sun-Rahu: I went abroad with my parents for a world tour (UAE,

Europe, US, Cannada), really enjoyed myself.

1992: Mon-Rahu: I had chicken pox. I had my first crush and was a

mentally disturbing experience.

2001: Mars-Rahu: The disastrous period ever. Increase in popularity

and as well as in enemies. However, I defeated all my enemies and

emerged victorious but a mentally disturbing time.

 

I could conclude that sub-periods of Rahu has given me till date a

lot of activity. It has given me gains but a lot of mental

disturbance.

 

Rahu (Sinhika Putra) has the janma rashi as Leo. So does a Leon Rahu

depict Rahu in its truest form?

 

Regards,

 

Souvik

 

, "Manas Kumar"

<manaskumar@h...> wrote:

> Nothing like real life personal experience to test these things!

Can

> you say that what rahu represents in your chart (planet surrogate,

> house etc) has fructified strongly? Generally speaking or in its

> dasha/bhukti?

>

> Having been blessed with the combination, you should be in a better

> position to teach us through personal experience, hanh jee?

>

>

> , "OM" <explore_vulcan>

> wrote:

> > Hi Manas,

> >

> > I have Vargittam Rahu Ketu. I have one question:

> > Can rahu ketu be considered Vargottam?

> >

> > Regards

> > Souvik

> > , "Manas Kumar"

> > <manaskumar@h...> wrote:

> > > Shouldn't vargottama be of greater significance in the

> > dwadashamsha,

> > > where each segment is more related to the rashis, than navamsha

> > > which is connected to the quarters of asterisms? Just

curious ...

> > >

> > > Would be interesting to hear from individuals who actually have

> > > vargottamas in their horoscopes, rather than going by what dry

> > texts

> > > write (it never comes true or fits anyway ;-)

> > >

> > > M

> > >

> > > , Rajeev Tadepalli

> > > <Rajeev.Tadepalli@S...> wrote:

> > > > All,

> > > > I need a clarification. Going by the following

definition

> > > from

> > > > Raman, Say a planet, Mars in a rasi chart is in Cancer.

> > > > In navamsa also he's in cancer, How should we

intrepret this.

> > > >

> > > > The above case qualifies Mars to be a Vargottama. But

he is

> > > > debilitated.

> > > >

> > > > So on summation will he be strong or weak ?

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Souvik,

> > > > This is your sisters case. After going home i

was

> > > reflecting

> > > > on this placement.

> > > >

> > > > It is very subtly placed for ur sister. Mars

was in

> > > infancy

> > > > at 2.5 degrees in cancer.

> > > > We generally tend to miss out this point

unless we

> > > develop a

> > > > very keen eye to understand the degrees of placement

> > of a

> > > planet.

> > > >

> > > > But your observations should be true to word.

With

> > > out some

> > > > strenght to mars she would not have got a lovable

> > > brother like

> > > > you.

> > > >

> > > > Thanks & Regards

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Mon, 19 Apr 2004 14:28:15 -0700

> > > > "Calla, Raman" <rcalla@s...>

> > > > RE: To Souvik from raman

> > > >

> > > > That is defination I have found on VARGOTTAM

> > > >

> > > > VARGOTTAMA

> > > >

> > > > A planet occupying the same zodiacal sign in the Navamsa

> (q.v.)

> > as

> > > in the

> > > > natal chart. Such a planet becomes very powerful in bestowing

> its

> > > auspicious

> > > > results.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Thx

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Raman