sunsign, moonsign, starsign astrology -- broad-sweep astrology!

[Guest guest]

Reposting this since the first one got posted with missing words!

Maybe the time is not ripe yet to awaken the populace!

 

While pooh-poohing sunsign astrology, Raman's intellectual

masterpiece, The Astrological Magaxine, started by his esteemed

Grandfather always carried a monthly column on moonsign astrology!

Nearly as ineffective and as non-specific as the sunsign astrology

his magazine mocked about when it managed to find time to take a

break from beating up on scientists and what they thought of

astrology. Hardly any scientists who were not astrologers read his

magazine, so really he was beating up on his own kind (scientists

but also astrologers!). Over time, I have seen this tendency amongst

astrologers to beat up on their own kind, and this posting is no

variation from that cultural norm amongst astrologers!

 

There are 6.3 billion beings, individuals in this world at this

time. It has been shown that unless you are born in the very north

(leo, virgo, libra ascendants rising more frequently), you are

likely to be born in a given sunsign or moonsign in a 1/12

frequency. So 6.3B/12 = 525000000 individuals per sun sign or per

moon sign!

 

Yet the mind-numbing, mindless trend to peddle sunsign reports,

moonsign reports, starreports continues, in railway stations,

airports (remember the flower in the ear guys selling their guru

books) and in bus stations and HORRORS, in serious astrology groups

and newslists!

 

Can any such peddlar come forward and demonstrate that any of these

readings were actually useful to a significant number of readers? Or

the basis of such a vague and broad-catchment reading being even

useful or worth the time spent reading?

 

RR

[Guest guest]

Hi Rohiniji : do you have a personal id ? the sprint mail boomeranged !

i need to write a mail to you please.

 

rgds

Manju

 

 

rohiniranjan [rrgb]

Thursday, June 17, 2004 8:19 AM

 

sunsign, moonsign, starsign astrology -- broad-sweep

astrology!

 

 

Reposting this since the first one got posted with missing words!

Maybe the time is not ripe yet to awaken the populace!

 

While pooh-poohing sunsign astrology, Raman's intellectual

masterpiece, The Astrological Magaxine, started by his esteemed

Grandfather always carried a monthly column on moonsign astrology!

Nearly as ineffective and as non-specific as the sunsign astrology

his magazine mocked about when it managed to find time to take a

break from beating up on scientists and what they thought of

astrology. Hardly any scientists who were not astrologers read his

magazine, so really he was beating up on his own kind (scientists

but also astrologers!). Over time, I have seen this tendency amongst

astrologers to beat up on their own kind, and this posting is no

variation from that cultural norm amongst astrologers!

 

There are 6.3 billion beings, individuals in this world at this

time. It has been shown that unless you are born in the very north

(leo, virgo, libra ascendants rising more frequently), you are

likely to be born in a given sunsign or moonsign in a 1/12

frequency. So 6.3B/12 = 525000000 individuals per sun sign or per

moon sign!

 

Yet the mind-numbing, mindless trend to peddle sunsign reports,

moonsign reports, starreports continues, in railway stations,

airports (remember the flower in the ear guys selling their guru

books) and in bus stations and HORRORS, in serious astrology groups

and newslists!

 

Can any such peddlar come forward and demonstrate that any of these

readings were actually useful to a significant number of readers? Or

the basis of such a vague and broad-catchment reading being even

useful or worth the time spent reading?

 

RR

 

 

 

 

~! LIFE MEANS STRUGGLE, THE FITTEST WINS SURVIVAL !~

Links

[Guest guest]

clarity2020

, "Manjunath, T \(MED\)"

<T.Manjunath@g...> wrote:

>

> Hi Rohiniji : do you have a personal id ? the sprint mail

boomeranged !

> i need to write a mail to you please.

>

> rgds

> Manju

>

>

> rohiniranjan [rrgb@s...]

> Thursday, June 17, 2004 8:19 AM

>

> sunsign, moonsign, starsign astrology -- broad-sweep

> astrology!

>

>

> Reposting this since the first one got posted with missing words!

> Maybe the time is not ripe yet to awaken the populace!

>

> While pooh-poohing sunsign astrology, Raman's intellectual

> masterpiece, The Astrological Magaxine, started by his esteemed

> Grandfather always carried a monthly column on moonsign astrology!

> Nearly as ineffective and as non-specific as the sunsign astrology

> his magazine mocked about when it managed to find time to take a

> break from beating up on scientists and what they thought of

> astrology. Hardly any scientists who were not astrologers read his

> magazine, so really he was beating up on his own kind (scientists

> but also astrologers!). Over time, I have seen this tendency

amongst

> astrologers to beat up on their own kind, and this posting is no

> variation from that cultural norm amongst astrologers!

>

> There are 6.3 billion beings, individuals in this world at this

> time. It has been shown that unless you are born in the very north

> (leo, virgo, libra ascendants rising more frequently), you are

> likely to be born in a given sunsign or moonsign in a 1/12

> frequency. So 6.3B/12 = 525000000 individuals per sun sign or per

> moon sign!

>

> Yet the mind-numbing, mindless trend to peddle sunsign reports,

> moonsign reports, starreports continues, in railway stations,

> airports (remember the flower in the ear guys selling their guru

> books) and in bus stations and HORRORS, in serious astrology

groups

> and newslists!

>

> Can any such peddlar come forward and demonstrate that any of

these

> readings were actually useful to a significant number of readers?

Or

> the basis of such a vague and broad-catchment reading being even

> useful or worth the time spent reading?

>

> RR

>

>

>

>

> ~! LIFE MEANS STRUGGLE, THE FITTEST WINS SURVIVAL !~

> Links