Balaji: Need Your Help

[Guest guest]

Dear Balaji,

 

Thanks for your precious help.

 

I have another query.

I am sending you my horo details.

Can you pls go through it and tell me about my career.

and about the current period.

it is said about my horo that my Mars,Moon and

Mercury(combust) are not good.If it is so then what

are their mal-effects in my horo??

pls write me your opinion on this.

 

my birth details:

 

Birth 9th Jan 1975

Birth Time: 2:47 AM

Birth Place: Agra(India)

Longitude: 78E05

Latitude: 17N10

 

Waiting for your reply....

 

Regards,

Vinay

 

 

--- Balaji Narasimhan <sherlockbalaji

wrote:

> Dear Vinay,

>

> > So...above statement signifies that if saturn and

> mars

> > had come more closer to each other then there

> might

> > have been some problem. What is the min.

> > degree(saperation of saturn and mars) in that

> senario

> > or can you put some light on it???

>

> Saturn is a cold neuter and Mars ia a fiery male.

> They can't

> stand each other. The closer they are, the greater

> will be the

> problem to the native.

>

> I have a friend who has Rahu and Sun so close that

> the

> difference is not even one degree! He might face

> problems later

> in life, but if the seperation had been greater,

> they might have

> been lesser.

>

> Usually, conjunction is taken as 12 degrees (correct

> me if I'm

> wrong). In this case, it might be right to surmise

> that anything

> greater than this represents minimal harm.

>

> ***

>

> Dear Angel,

>

> > Even my younger brother has saturn and mars

> combined

> > together in 12th house

> > Asc/Lagna is :- LEO

> > 12th house contains :-

> > SA 07:26

> > MA 22:56

>

> > In this, the degree of separation between mars and

> saturn is

> 13

> > degrees appr.

>

> For Leo Lagna, this might be bad--Mars is fallen in

> Cancer in

> the 12th, and Saturn is in an enemy's house. They

> are closer

> than in the previous example.

>

> Mars, as lord of 4 & 9, is a Yoga Karaka for Leo

> Lagna, and as a

> fallen planet, he might be painful. Of course, if he

> gets neecha

> banga raja yoga, he could deliver great results!

>

> Saturn owns Dustana 6 and Kendra 7, so he is not too

> good, not

> too bad, though 12th is bad for any planet.

>

> Could you post the full chart details? Maybe then

> the other

> members too can comment on the full chart instead of

> just a part

> thereof.

>

> ***

>

> Dear Inder ji,

>

> Thanks a lot for the extensive analysis!

>

> > So he is predominently represented by Moon and say

> 30% by

> > Saturn.

>

> True. He changes his mind often and feels gloomy

> too.

>

> > Moon in Scorpio means he will unreliable in

> friendship,

> finacial

> > matters and sexual behaviour.

>

> Unfortunately, I can't verify this! We grew up in

> different

> cities, so I don't know all these details.

>

> > Moon in 11th alone, unsupported and in

> badhaksthana means

> health

> > problems during Moon's periods.

>

> That's when he is 38-48. I hope that they are not

> too bad.

>

> > Moon in Scorpio also means overdoing things. May

> be like

> > indulging in wines, pickles, chantni and

> watery/sour things

> and having

> > eyes on many females etc.

>

> He's a non smoker and teatotaller. Loves pickles,

> though.

> Females--no concrete idea, but I felt that there was

> something,

> and your analysis confirms my doubts about his love

> marriage!

>

> > Saturn is sub-lord of 5th house in Cancer in 7th

> house. He may

>

> > consider life without romance as life wasted.

>

> He is wondering about marriage and its benefits. Of

> course,

> looks like Gloomy Saturn and Wavering Moon again!

>

> > 7th house Sat means he will marry in Sat bhukti in

> the current

>

> > dasa, love marriage. Wife hardworking, timid also

> unpredictable.

>

> > Sun also in Leo is in

> > 7th house means Deepak will have some rise after

> marriage.

>

> Hope it is a good match for him.

>

> > Moon in star of Mer in 8th house Leo means that

> Deepak will

> have

> > unsatiable desire for name and fame.

>

> True, but only when he is not waxing and waning.

>

> > It appears I have written so much. ( overdoing?)

>

> Not at all, sir! Your analysis is wonderful!

>

>

> =====

> Balaji Narasimhan *

> http://www.sherlock-holmes.com/balaji.htm

> Author, Sherlock Holmes: Solutions from the Sussex

> Downs

> Editor, The Partial Art of Detection

> =====

>

>

>

> Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam

> protection around

>

>