Dasha Chhidra- A Debate..... Sri RR

[Guest guest]

Dear Sri RR,

 

May be bench marking any principle may be wrong in a dynamic science

like astrology.

Point about FAMILY SECRETS is well noted. It reminds this one of your

brush with such a Family secrets group. lol

 

Tatvam-Asi

[Guest guest]

Dynamic or whatever you think of it as, a principle unless

applicable in a reproducible manner, hence static (as in not

changing its tune for whatever reason) is not very useful for

astrologers who are for the most part bridging the interface:

applying some principles operating in or borrowing from the

spiritual realm and then applying it to the material world and its

problems. That function of astrology has not changed from

Parashara's times. Examine how many of the slokas pertain to

religious spirituality etc and how many more are mundane and the

same is true for other books classics or otherwise.

 

It is one thing to sound all ethereal and esoteric and all that, but

for most astrologers, it is about reproducibility and

predictability. People come with real problems --- maybe not real

for some hairy fairy sadhu wannabe, but those are rare thankfully in

the world and on internet! For the remaining practical and down to

earth astrologers, the less dynamic and more predictable astrology --

lofty and god-given even if it may be, the better.

 

If you meant dynamic science as in one that is still growing, then I

am with you. This is why I wrote "astrotreasures that survived time"

and that is why I take and hurl abuse on internet where I see

hypocrisy. And we all know there is a lot of that all over the place!

 

Rohiniranjan

 

 

, "om_tatsat_om"

<om_tatsat_om> wrote:

>

>

>

> Dear Sri RR,

>

> May be bench marking any principle may be wrong in a dynamic

science

> like astrology.

> Point about FAMILY SECRETS is well noted. It reminds this one of

your

> brush with such a Family secrets group. lol

>

> Tatvam-Asi