TRUE FACE OF SANJAY RATH - WRONG OR RIGHT -DECIDE

[Guest guest]

Dear Astrologers

what is truth-decide and take decision where our ancient great science is

going?

 

Sanjay Rath's hard to digest Jyotish dealings

 

 

Dear visitor,

 

Below is the brief summary of the events that led Mr. Srinivas Raju and

Mr. Vijay Deep (both residents of New Delhi) to file official police complaint

with the D.C.P - Economics Offences Wing (Department of New Delhi Police) for

"Fraud, Cheating and Misappropriation" against U.K. Rath (father of Sanjay Rath)

and Sanjay Rath himself.

 

Letter to Sanjay Rath by Srinivas Raju (written in November 2000):

The letter below explains how on the pretext of building SJVC (Sri

Jagannatha Vedic Center) Sanjay Rath wanted to use profits from his finance

business to start SJVC in a big way, but as you'll be able to see from Raju's

letter below, that has changed before it even started. Srinivas Raju initially

approached Sanjay Rath for astrological consultation and on that occasion Sanjay

Rath told him that because he has Jupiter in 8th house (8th house is

significator/karaka for loans and Jupiter is significator/karaka for wealth)

that Raju's wealth will come through loans and Sanjay Rath immediately offered

help to Raju to get loan for his company and at the same time he encouraged Raju

to study Jyotish under his guidance. (click on thumbnails to see full size

image)

 

 

raju_letter1.jpg

raju_letter2.jpg

raju_letter3.jpg

Srinivas Raju's official police complaint against Sanjay Rath and

his father

 

(scans of original documents filed with New Delhi Police - Economics

Offences Wing, click on thumbnails to see full size image):

 

 

raju1.jpg

raju2.jpg

raju3.jpg

Vijay Deep's official police complaint against Sanjay Rath and his

father

 

(scans of original documents filed with New Delhi Police - Economics

Offences Wing, click on thumbnails to see full size image):

 

 

vijaydeep1.jpg

vijaydeep2.jpg

vijaydeep3.jpg

 

vijaydeep4.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

Detailed explanation of events:

 

Coming to the crux of the matter, without wasting your precious time, things in

Delhi were apparently fine until Sanjay's father came into the scene in early

2000 (when he came over from Bhubaneshwar) and got Sanjay into the ECB (External

Commercial Borrowing) business, which is all about borrowing money from foreign

lenders at soft rates of interest and using the gap (between the foreign and

Indian rates of interest) for commercial benefit in India. It sounded a good

project with the promise (as made by Sanjay's father) of attractive rates of

interest and bulk amounts coming in for betterment of business ventures.

Sanjay, on behalf of his father, had told Raju that one company in Calcutta was

already being benefited from this scheme on the basis of loans arranged by his

father and that Raju (who had wanted to open up a small hotel/resort project for

naturopathy, yogic healing etc. as the USP) should revise his project proposals

to a larger size so that appropriate levels of funds could be arranged through

this scheme for his benefit and completion of his dream project. Raju, along

with his partner, floated a Public Limited Company for this purpose (as

suggested to him) spending over 6 lakh rupees for registration of the company

with the government under the relevant rules. He had spent another 35 lakhs for

the purchase of land (for the project in Himachal Pradesh). And, another amount

of 5.5 lakhs was given to Sanjay's father (through Sanjay) as refundable

security deposit as part of the agreement to conclude the contract of obtaining

the loan/ECB. The situation today is that Raju (and his partner) is down by

close to 50 lakhs (including the miscellaneous expenses borne by him during the

trips to Bombay etc. made by Raju, Sanjay and his father) as the amount paid to

the Govt. of India for the registration of the firm is gone as it is

non-refundable. Since the loan has not materialised, Raju is in no position to

complete the project which had a two year time frame (as required under the laws

of the Himachal Pradesh Government) for completion and that land is likely to be

taken over by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh. That is also going. The

refundable security deposit of 5.5 lakhs is yet to be returned to Raju despite

the fact that Raju has been pursuing its return since 2000. He has written

three personal notes/letters to Sanjay ever since and has also met him

personally on several occasions. No formal agreements/papers were made in the

case of Raju as all the transaction was done on faith reposed on the words of

Sanjay. The only thing is payment of the 5.5 lakhs (security deposit) was made

through the Bank.

 

While Raju's case was being handled thus in 2000, Sanjay had also got Vijay Deep

involved in a similar proposal for his construction company and formal

agreements were drawn up. Since nothing came up ever since on this front too,

Vijay Deep also began pressing for the return of the Security Deposit of Rs.4

lakhs taken from him. Nothing has happened as yet.

 

The so called lender (Gresham Lane Party) of Australia has no business

transaction in Australia since 1995 and it is a Two Australian Dollars holding

company (One AUD each in the name of Ravi Veeramantry and his wife - a husband

and wife holding company). The Govt. of India obviously does not recognize this

company to be an approved/credible lender. The whole thing has now fallen of.

 

Immediately after above police complaints were filed with D.C.P - Economics

Offences Wing (Department of New Delhi Police) Sanjay fled from Delhi and after

Hyderabad conference he is still absconding at his father's house in Bhuvaneswar

because he knows that as soon as he returns to Delhi he is going to jail.

 

 

To be continued...

 

 

 

 

--

ALL-NEW Messenger - all new features - even more fun!