Vargottam Planet--divisional charts--Lata, RR and all

[Guest guest]

Dear lata,

 

I fully agree to all your views including Yakshi...:-) and the

vargottam part.I hope RR would not mind clarifying about the

drekkanna and navamsa's role in vargottam. your second para is

exactly what I had gathered but yesterday's RR's mail gave me

another view. Would like to get some more clarification.

 

--Manoshi

 

, "Venkatarama Sreelatha"

<venkatarama_sastry> wrote:

> OK, let's get back to astrology. Anil and RR, I value both your

> contributions, please continue to post your thoughts. As to Mr./Ms

> yakshi_yakshi, how about posting more of your

> views/experience/expertise re. astrology rather than re. the

> astrologers?

>

> Someone (Manoshi?) posted a question earlier in this thread re.

> vargottama in just the navamsa or in hte other divisional charts

> too. From what I've read, the concept exists in all the divisional

> charts. However, if someone says "vargottama planet/lagna" without

> further qualifying which divisional chart it is vargottama in,

then

> by default it is assumed to be the navamsa. Also, from what I've

> read, it "intensifies" the effect, whether positive or negative.

> Note that I have no practical experience here :-), I'm just

quoting

> the texts. I do have vargottama lagna in my chart, however I

haven't

> seen any of the great benefits that this promises :-). As in

> everything else in astrology, it is the sum total of all the

factors

> that matters.

>

> Just my humble opinions as always.

> -S

>

> , "yakshi_yakshi"

> <yakshi_yakshi> wrote:

> >

> > > Your language is arrogant , adhoc and arbitrary. Please take

> care.

> >

> > I agree. Behaves like a diva, in ASCII.

> >

> > Y

[Guest guest]

Nadi System of Prediction, by Rattan Lal :-)

Like that golf commercial you must have seen, "But you got to read

it!". I am sure you say that to your students all the time, Manoshi!

 

RR

 

, "Manoshi Chatterjee"

<khallopapa> wrote:

> Dear lata,

>

> I fully agree to all your views including Yakshi...:-) and the

> vargottam part.I hope RR would not mind clarifying about the

> drekkanna and navamsa's role in vargottam. your second para is

> exactly what I had gathered but yesterday's RR's mail gave me

> another view. Would like to get some more clarification.

>

> --Manoshi

>

> , "Venkatarama Sreelatha"

> <venkatarama_sastry> wrote:

> > OK, let's get back to astrology. Anil and RR, I value both your

> > contributions, please continue to post your thoughts. As to

Mr./Ms

> > yakshi_yakshi, how about posting more of your

> > views/experience/expertise re. astrology rather than re. the

> > astrologers?

> >

> > Someone (Manoshi?) posted a question earlier in this thread re.

> > vargottama in just the navamsa or in hte other divisional charts

> > too. From what I've read, the concept exists in all the

divisional

> > charts. However, if someone says "vargottama planet/lagna"

without

> > further qualifying which divisional chart it is vargottama in,

> then

> > by default it is assumed to be the navamsa. Also, from what I've

> > read, it "intensifies" the effect, whether positive or negative.

> > Note that I have no practical experience here :-), I'm just

> quoting

> > the texts. I do have vargottama lagna in my chart, however I

> haven't

> > seen any of the great benefits that this promises :-). As in

> > everything else in astrology, it is the sum total of all the

> factors

> > that matters.

> >

> > Just my humble opinions as always.

> > -S

> >

> > , "yakshi_yakshi"

> > <yakshi_yakshi> wrote:

> > >

> > > > Your language is arrogant , adhoc and arbitrary. Please take

> > care.

> > >

> > > I agree. Behaves like a diva, in ASCII.

> > >

> > > Y

[Guest guest]

ok I got your message. The book you mentioned I

have to get. Swami internetananda can help me there too in buying

the book.:-)

 

--Manoshi

 

, "rohiniranjan" <rrgb@s...>

wrote:

> Nadi System of Prediction, by Rattan Lal :-)

> Like that golf commercial you must have seen, "But you got to read

> it!". I am sure you say that to your students all the time,

Manoshi!

>

> RR

>

> , "Manoshi Chatterjee"

> <khallopapa> wrote:

> > Dear lata,

> >

> > I fully agree to all your views including Yakshi...:-) and the

> > vargottam part.I hope RR would not mind clarifying about the

> > drekkanna and navamsa's role in vargottam. your second para is

> > exactly what I had gathered but yesterday's RR's mail gave me

> > another view. Would like to get some more clarification.

> >

> > --Manoshi

> >

> > , "Venkatarama Sreelatha"

> > <venkatarama_sastry> wrote:

> > > OK, let's get back to astrology. Anil and RR, I value both

your

> > > contributions, please continue to post your thoughts. As to

> Mr./Ms

> > > yakshi_yakshi, how about posting more of your

> > > views/experience/expertise re. astrology rather than re. the

> > > astrologers?

> > >

> > > Someone (Manoshi?) posted a question earlier in this thread

re.

> > > vargottama in just the navamsa or in hte other divisional

charts

> > > too. From what I've read, the concept exists in all the

> divisional

> > > charts. However, if someone says "vargottama planet/lagna"

> without

> > > further qualifying which divisional chart it is vargottama in,

> > then

> > > by default it is assumed to be the navamsa. Also, from what

I've

> > > read, it "intensifies" the effect, whether positive or

negative.

> > > Note that I have no practical experience here :-), I'm just

> > quoting

> > > the texts. I do have vargottama lagna in my chart, however I

> > haven't

> > > seen any of the great benefits that this promises :-). As in

> > > everything else in astrology, it is the sum total of all the

> > factors

> > > that matters.

> > >

> > > Just my humble opinions as always.

> > > -S

> > >

> > > , "yakshi_yakshi"

> > > <yakshi_yakshi> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > > Your language is arrogant , adhoc and arbitrary. Please

take

> > > care.

> > > >

> > > > I agree. Behaves like a diva, in ASCII.

> > > >

> > > > Y

[Guest guest]

En fin! Diu est Grand(e)!

 

RR

 

 

, "Manoshi Chatterjee"

<khallopapa> wrote:

> ok I got your message. The book you mentioned I

> have to get. Swami internetananda can help me there too in buying

> the book.:-)

>

> --Manoshi

>

> , "rohiniranjan"

<rrgb@s...>

> wrote:

> > Nadi System of Prediction, by Rattan Lal :-)

> > Like that golf commercial you must have seen, "But you got to

read

> > it!". I am sure you say that to your students all the time,

> Manoshi!

> >

> > RR

> >

> > , "Manoshi Chatterjee"

> > <khallopapa> wrote:

> > > Dear lata,

> > >

> > > I fully agree to all your views including Yakshi...:-) and the

> > > vargottam part.I hope RR would not mind clarifying about the

> > > drekkanna and navamsa's role in vargottam. your second para is

> > > exactly what I had gathered but yesterday's RR's mail gave me

> > > another view. Would like to get some more clarification.

> > >

> > > --Manoshi

> > >

> > > , "Venkatarama

Sreelatha"

> > > <venkatarama_sastry> wrote:

> > > > OK, let's get back to astrology. Anil and RR, I value both

> your

> > > > contributions, please continue to post your thoughts. As to

> > Mr./Ms

> > > > yakshi_yakshi, how about posting more of your

> > > > views/experience/expertise re. astrology rather than re. the

> > > > astrologers?

> > > >

> > > > Someone (Manoshi?) posted a question earlier in this thread

> re.

> > > > vargottama in just the navamsa or in hte other divisional

> charts

> > > > too. From what I've read, the concept exists in all the

> > divisional

> > > > charts. However, if someone says "vargottama planet/lagna"

> > without

> > > > further qualifying which divisional chart it is vargottama

in,

> > > then

> > > > by default it is assumed to be the navamsa. Also, from what

> I've

> > > > read, it "intensifies" the effect, whether positive or

> negative.

> > > > Note that I have no practical experience here :-), I'm just

> > > quoting

> > > > the texts. I do have vargottama lagna in my chart, however I

> > > haven't

> > > > seen any of the great benefits that this promises :-). As in

> > > > everything else in astrology, it is the sum total of all the

> > > factors

> > > > that matters.

> > > >

> > > > Just my humble opinions as always.

> > > > -S

> > > >

> > > > , "yakshi_yakshi"

> > > > <yakshi_yakshi> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > > Your language is arrogant , adhoc and arbitrary. Please

> take

> > > > care.

> > > > >

> > > > > I agree. Behaves like a diva, in ASCII.

> > > > >

> > > > > Y