Guest guest Posted October 13, 2004 Report Share Posted October 13, 2004 Dear Balaji Vimpsopaka bala shows the overall strength of a planet, his capacity to manage things. Vimsopaka bala again is derived from the strength of the various divisionals, and hence the dignity of planet is quite important in Shastiamsa, navamsa and Drekkana. Because if you closely observe vimpsopaka bala, the maximum weightage is given to these three apart from the rasi chart. points between 10 to 15 is inasupicious is debatable, as common sense suggests that as points tend to increase, the the overall strength also increases. Shadbala is used to assess the power of planet, when two or more planets are involved in a yoga. Thus the planet having higher shadbala would give the result. The core nature of a planet never changes. Thus when a planet is placed in an environment, it doesnot mean that he would behave like another person. There would be slight modifications based on the requriements. Even a beggar when sits on throne would think that he is the king, but would keep on doubting his ability to deliver. All these are based on the natural relationships. Thus saturn a servant would not be comfortable in Aries or Leo. Similarly sun would not be comfortable in capricorn and aquarius, thus when you read the classics, the results are mentioned based on the location and lordship. Bhava is very important, but then lordship cannot be discounted for. Dispositors show how effectively a planet can work. For example a planet may be exalted, but can not give the intended results, if the dispositor is neecha or afflicted. The reason is that dispistors give vitality and strength to a planet. If the Subject is weak, the King cannot do much, if the king inherits a kingdom after Kurukshetra, what is the use of such a kingdom. best wishes partha , Balaji Narasimhan <sherlockbalaji> wrote: > Tanvir ji, > > Great idea, uploading the regulations. I think that you should > configure to automatically forward the text to all > new members so that they know beforehand how to conduct > themselves on JR. > > BTW, I have two Astro questions: > > * What do you think of Vimshopak? I find it a little funny > because I usually know of figures where "higher is better" (like > the marks one gets in a Math test) or "lower is better" (like > the rank one gets in school). Vimshopak seems to swing both ways > - bad below 5, reasonably ok between 5 & 10, troublesome between > 10 & 15, and pretty good between 15 & 20. It seems to yo-yo! > Also, While BPHS mentions it, I have not found references in > Saravali, Brihat Jataka, Hora Sara, etc. Can you tell me what > you think of Vimshopak? > > * Have you read Bhasin's Dispositors in Astrology? It is in some > ways nice, but confusing. for example, Shri Basin talks of > aspects of Rahu and Ketu. Also, he says that if Guru is in > Surya's house, then Surya will behave like Guru! Have you seen > this in practice? I thought that if Guru was in Surya's house, > then Guru, by being disposited by Surya, might behave like > Surya! > > > ===== > Balaji Narasimhan * http://www.sherlock-holmes.com/balaji.htm > Author, Sherlock Holmes: Solutions from the Sussex Downs > Editor, The Partial Art of Detection > ===== > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 13, 2004 Report Share Posted October 13, 2004 Dear Partha Ji, Your posts are enlightening. Please educate us more. I am going to put this post in the articles page that links good posts in the archieve. Namaste, Tanvir. What can not happen, can never happen. Which is mine, is forever mine. http://www.jyotish-remedies.com - Vedic Astrology (Jyotish) Predictive astrology with incredibly powerful problem solving remedies - V.Partha sarathy Wednesday, October 13, 2004 1:08 PM Re: vimpsopak and Dispositors in astrology Dear Balaji Vimpsopaka bala shows the overall strength of a planet, his capacity to manage things. Vimsopaka bala again is derived from the strength of the various divisionals, and hence the dignity of planet is quite important in Shastiamsa, navamsa and Drekkana. Because if you closely observe vimpsopaka bala, the maximum weightage is given to these three apart from the rasi chart. points between 10 to 15 is inasupicious is debatable, as common sense suggests that as points tend to increase, the the overall strength also increases. Shadbala is used to assess the power of planet, when two or more planets are involved in a yoga. Thus the planet having higher shadbala would give the result. The core nature of a planet never changes. Thus when a planet is placed in an environment, it doesnot mean that he would behave like another person. There would be slight modifications based on the requriements. Even a beggar when sits on throne would think that he is the king, but would keep on doubting his ability to deliver. All these are based on the natural relationships. Thus saturn a servant would not be comfortable in Aries or Leo. Similarly sun would not be comfortable in capricorn and aquarius, thus when you read the classics, the results are mentioned based on the location and lordship. Bhava is very important, but then lordship cannot be discounted for. Dispositors show how effectively a planet can work. For example a planet may be exalted, but can not give the intended results, if the dispositor is neecha or afflicted. The reason is that dispistors give vitality and strength to a planet. If the Subject is weak, the King cannot do much, if the king inherits a kingdom after Kurukshetra, what is the use of such a kingdom. best wishes partha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 13, 2004 Report Share Posted October 13, 2004 Excellent! RR , "V.Partha sarathy" <partvinu5> wrote: > > Dear Balaji > > Vimpsopaka bala shows the overall strength of a planet, his capacity > to manage things. Vimsopaka bala again is derived from the strength > of the various divisionals, and hence the dignity of planet is quite > important in Shastiamsa, navamsa and Drekkana. Because if you > closely observe vimpsopaka bala, the maximum weightage is given to > these three apart from the rasi chart. > > points between 10 to 15 is inasupicious is debatable, as common sense > suggests that as points tend to increase, the the overall strength > also increases. > > Shadbala is used to assess the power of planet, when two or more > planets are involved in a yoga. Thus the planet having higher > shadbala would give the result. > > The core nature of a planet never changes. Thus when a planet is > placed in an environment, it doesnot mean that he would behave like > another person. There would be slight modifications based on the > requriements. Even a beggar when sits on throne would think that he > is the king, but would keep on doubting his ability to deliver. > All these are based on the natural relationships. Thus saturn a > servant would not be comfortable in Aries or Leo. > > Similarly sun would not be comfortable in capricorn and aquarius, > thus when you read the classics, the results are mentioned based on > the location and lordship. > > Bhava is very important, but then lordship cannot be discounted for. > Dispositors show how effectively a planet can work. > For example a planet may be exalted, but can not give the intended > results, if the dispositor is neecha or afflicted. The reason is that > dispistors give vitality and strength to a planet. If the Subject is > weak, the King cannot do much, if the king inherits a kingdom after > Kurukshetra, what is the use of such a kingdom. > > best wishes > partha > > > , Balaji Narasimhan > <sherlockbalaji> wrote: > > Tanvir ji, > > > > Great idea, uploading the regulations. I think that you should > > configure to automatically forward the text to all > > new members so that they know beforehand how to conduct > > themselves on JR. > > > > BTW, I have two Astro questions: > > > > * What do you think of Vimshopak? I find it a little funny > > because I usually know of figures where "higher is better" (like > > the marks one gets in a Math test) or "lower is better" (like > > the rank one gets in school). Vimshopak seems to swing both ways > > - bad below 5, reasonably ok between 5 & 10, troublesome between > > 10 & 15, and pretty good between 15 & 20. It seems to yo-yo! > > Also, While BPHS mentions it, I have not found references in > > Saravali, Brihat Jataka, Hora Sara, etc. Can you tell me what > > you think of Vimshopak? > > > > * Have you read Bhasin's Dispositors in Astrology? It is in some > > ways nice, but confusing. for example, Shri Basin talks of > > aspects of Rahu and Ketu. Also, he says that if Guru is in > > Surya's house, then Surya will behave like Guru! Have you seen > > this in practice? I thought that if Guru was in Surya's house, > > then Guru, by being disposited by Surya, might behave like > > Surya! > > > > > > ===== > > Balaji Narasimhan * http://www.sherlock-holmes.com/balaji.htm > > Author, Sherlock Holmes: Solutions from the Sussex Downs > > Editor, The Partial Art of Detection > > ===== > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 14, 2004 Report Share Posted October 14, 2004 Yes, excellant indeed!! Inder - In , "rohiniranjan" <rrgb@s...> wrote: > > Excellent! > > RR > > , "V.Partha sarathy" > <partvinu5> wrote: > > > > Dear Balaji > > > > Vimpsopaka bala shows the overall strength of a planet, his > capacity > > to manage things. Vimsopaka bala again is derived from the strength > > of the various divisionals, and hence the dignity of planet is > quite > > important in Shastiamsa, navamsa and Drekkana. Because if you > > closely observe vimpsopaka bala, the maximum weightage is given to > > these three apart from the rasi chart. > > > > points between 10 to 15 is inasupicious is debatable, as common > sense > > suggests that as points tend to increase, the the overall strength > > also increases. > > > > Shadbala is used to assess the power of planet, when two or more > > planets are involved in a yoga. Thus the planet having higher > > shadbala would give the result. > > > > The core nature of a planet never changes. Thus when a planet is > > placed in an environment, it doesnot mean that he would behave like > > another person. There would be slight modifications based on the > > requriements. Even a beggar when sits on throne would think that he > > is the king, but would keep on doubting his ability to deliver. > > All these are based on the natural relationships. Thus saturn a > > servant would not be comfortable in Aries or Leo. > > > > Similarly sun would not be comfortable in capricorn and aquarius, > > thus when you read the classics, the results are mentioned based on > > the location and lordship. > > > > Bhava is very important, but then lordship cannot be discounted for. > > Dispositors show how effectively a planet can work. > > For example a planet may be exalted, but can not give the intended > > results, if the dispositor is neecha or afflicted. The reason is > that > > dispistors give vitality and strength to a planet. If the Subject > is > > weak, the King cannot do much, if the king inherits a kingdom after > > Kurukshetra, what is the use of such a kingdom. > > > > best wishes > > partha > > > > > > , Balaji Narasimhan > > <sherlockbalaji> wrote: > > > Tanvir ji, > > > > > > Great idea, uploading the regulations. I think that you should > > > configure to automatically forward the text to all > > > new members so that they know beforehand how to conduct > > > themselves on JR. > > > > > > BTW, I have two Astro questions: > > > > > > * What do you think of Vimshopak? I find it a little funny > > > because I usually know of figures where "higher is better" (like > > > the marks one gets in a Math test) or "lower is better" (like > > > the rank one gets in school). Vimshopak seems to swing both ways > > > - bad below 5, reasonably ok between 5 & 10, troublesome between > > > 10 & 15, and pretty good between 15 & 20. It seems to yo-yo! > > > Also, While BPHS mentions it, I have not found references in > > > Saravali, Brihat Jataka, Hora Sara, etc. Can you tell me what > > > you think of Vimshopak? > > > > > > * Have you read Bhasin's Dispositors in Astrology? It is in some > > > ways nice, but confusing. for example, Shri Basin talks of > > > aspects of Rahu and Ketu. Also, he says that if Guru is in > > > Surya's house, then Surya will behave like Guru! Have you seen > > > this in practice? I thought that if Guru was in Surya's house, > > > then Guru, by being disposited by Surya, might behave like > > > Surya! > > > > > > > > > ===== > > > Balaji Narasimhan * http://www.sherlock-holmes.com/balaji.htm > > > Author, Sherlock Holmes: Solutions from the Sussex Downs > > > Editor, The Partial Art of Detection > > > ===== > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.