two cents on research and response to it ... abt Meena

[Guest guest]

Gopal Krishna Rao AKA Meena was a regular contributor to Astrological magazine.

KP is believed to have derived his INSPIRATION from Meena and propounded KP

theory.

 

 

rohiniranjan <rrgb wrote:

 

 

Tanvir,

 

If you get a chance and if possible please read the cyclostyled

readers on nakshatra astrology written by Shri Gopal Krishna

Rao 'Meena'. These predate KP by a few decades if I am not mistaken.

You may be surprised by what Meena revealed!

 

RR

 

 

 

, "Tanvir"

wrote:

> You are right in Jyotish we use the term 'research' in a lose way.

But it is for the *nature of Jyotish* itself, where it is

*IMPOSSIBLE* to derive *straight forward theories* like a standard

science - physics, chemistry etc. That is why it really is not

possible to do *that kind of research* like in other scientific

fields.

>

> IN REAL, it is the WILL OF NATURE not to disclose this science with

100% straight forward rules. Indeed it wants some of it, some of the

predictions to be kept in dark. Foolish astrologers become arrogant

and claim 100% accuracy.

>

> KP is good. Still it does have limitations. In one KP book, I have

read four fold theories of planetary behaviour. I have to say, this

is both GREAT and BAD. Even before buying a single book of KP I was

aware of those 4 fold behaviour rules, from my very experience, I do

not know if you will believe me or not. When I read the KP book, I

was a bit amazed of it, since it was mentioned there, and I did not

see much people using those theories before I bought the book. But I

was frustrated to see HOW it was mentioned, in an ORDER in those four

theories, that "First a planet will behave in such such way, then in

second order he will offer result of such such house, then thirdly he

will do this" This is the total destruction of the knowledge. The

four fold theory works, but not *ALL* planet behave in all those 4

ways, and not even the *ORDER* mentioned there.

>

> From my life I have seen those 4 kinds of behaviours work, [even

before I bought the books] but when I read the book I knew the

*order* concept is not true and not *ALWAYS* a planet will have all

those four source of attributes. This is WRONG in my experience.

>

> The KP students will apply those theories in the magical *order*

and sometimes it will work, sometimes it will not.

>

> At last, the book was not written by Mr Krishnamurti himself, so I

do not know if *he* taught this order or not. The book is something

called "astro secrets and KP". I have read a few first pages of it.

>

> And finally this is again showing that we have no ways than using

the term *research* in the way we are using. God has been kind to get

us a way to know the TRENDS of our future. We should not really be

dissatisfied with what we already got, and disrespect it by saying

that it is a lose example of research. The scientists conducting the

*HARD RESEARCH* themselves are doing all the things as per their

charts and might be suffering even in their personal life and may be

coming up as a pretty failure in their personal lives. That is why

the knowledge of Jyotish is the ultimate knowledge and most

valueable, whatever we have is very enough for me.

>

> Regs

> Tan

>

>

>

> What can not happen, can never happen.

> Which is mine, is forever mine.

>

> http://www.jyotish-remedies.com - Vedic Astrology (Jyotish)

> Predictive astrology with incredibly powerful problem solving

remedies

>

> -

> Inder

>

> Thursday, October 14, 2004 5:45 PM

> Re: two cents on research and response to it

>

>

>

>

> Dear friends,

> In my humble opinion the word research is vey loosely used in

> astrology world.

>

> So many people who have not understood the basic concepts even

say

> that they are doing some research on astrology.

>

> For research, we must first fix the area/field of research.

Define

> the broad parametres and domains. Find out in details the

existing

> knowledge alraedy existing, and collect the correct data to

proceed

> in the fixed direction.

>

> Here the difficulty may arise as there are several different

> systems, ayanmsas and existing theories. So one would easily get

> lost in first finding out what to chose from where.

>

> For serious researchers, another sort of difficulties as

mentioned

> by members above arises ie regarding pulling down or

discouragements.

>

> Shri KS Krishnamurthy who researched and developed KP system also

> had to face similar discouragements and ridicules by so called

great

> pundits/ savants of astrology.

>

> In fact Indian astrology suffers from 4th house and 9th house

> fixation. We are so fixed to our old texts/wisdom/religiousity of

> astrology that we donot want to move to 5th house

> developement/expansion or 10th house professionlism. One

astrologer

> wants to outsmart other astrologer by showing his knowledge of

old

> texts [4th house] only, not by showing any traits of client

> satisfaction or any fresh learning or wisdom.

>

> All the fields of knowledge gets advanced and moves forward. But

our

> astrological gurus are not ready to move forward.

>

> Frankly speaking I have not much knowledge of astro research.

> Some people working in astrological institutes may have something

> different to say in the matter. We should listen to them.

>

> Inder

>

> Inder

>

>

>

 

 

 

 

 

 

~! LIFE MEANS STRUGGLE, THE FITTEST WINS SURVIVAL !~