two cents on research and response to it ... abt Meena

[Guest guest]

Wasn't Krishnamurthi a devotee of Uchchishta Ganapathi (I recall

reading that in his readers and in 'Astrology and Athrishta'

magazine) from whose blessings he claimed to have developed the KP?

 

RR

 

, tatvam asi

<om_tatsat_om> wrote:

> Gopal Krishna Rao AKA Meena was a regular contributor to

Astrological magazine.

> KP is believed to have derived his INSPIRATION from Meena and

propounded KP theory.

>

>

> rohiniranjan <rrgb@s...> wrote:

>

>

> Tanvir,

>

> If you get a chance and if possible please read the cyclostyled

> readers on nakshatra astrology written by Shri Gopal Krishna

> Rao 'Meena'. These predate KP by a few decades if I am not

mistaken.

> You may be surprised by what Meena revealed!

>

> RR

>

>

>

> , "Tanvir"

> wrote:

> > You are right in Jyotish we use the term 'research' in a lose

way.

> But it is for the *nature of Jyotish* itself, where it is

> *IMPOSSIBLE* to derive *straight forward theories* like a standard

> science - physics, chemistry etc. That is why it really is not

> possible to do *that kind of research* like in other scientific

> fields.

> >

> > IN REAL, it is the WILL OF NATURE not to disclose this science

with

> 100% straight forward rules. Indeed it wants some of it, some of

the

> predictions to be kept in dark. Foolish astrologers become arrogant

> and claim 100% accuracy.

> >

> > KP is good. Still it does have limitations. In one KP book, I

have

> read four fold theories of planetary behaviour. I have to say, this

> is both GREAT and BAD. Even before buying a single book of KP I was

> aware of those 4 fold behaviour rules, from my very experience, I

do

> not know if you will believe me or not. When I read the KP book, I

> was a bit amazed of it, since it was mentioned there, and I did not

> see much people using those theories before I bought the book. But

I

> was frustrated to see HOW it was mentioned, in an ORDER in those

four

> theories, that "First a planet will behave in such such way, then

in

> second order he will offer result of such such house, then thirdly

he

> will do this" This is the total destruction of the knowledge. The

> four fold theory works, but not *ALL* planet behave in all those 4

> ways, and not even the *ORDER* mentioned there.

> >

> > From my life I have seen those 4 kinds of behaviours work, [even

> before I bought the books] but when I read the book I knew the

> *order* concept is not true and not *ALWAYS* a planet will have all

> those four source of attributes. This is WRONG in my experience.

> >

> > The KP students will apply those theories in the magical *order*

> and sometimes it will work, sometimes it will not.

> >

> > At last, the book was not written by Mr Krishnamurti himself, so

I

> do not know if *he* taught this order or not. The book is something

> called "astro secrets and KP". I have read a few first pages of it.

> >

> > And finally this is again showing that we have no ways than using

> the term *research* in the way we are using. God has been kind to

get

> us a way to know the TRENDS of our future. We should not really be

> dissatisfied with what we already got, and disrespect it by saying

> that it is a lose example of research. The scientists conducting

the

> *HARD RESEARCH* themselves are doing all the things as per their

> charts and might be suffering even in their personal life and may

be

> coming up as a pretty failure in their personal lives. That is why

> the knowledge of Jyotish is the ultimate knowledge and most

> valueable, whatever we have is very enough for me.

> >

> > Regs

> > Tan

> >

> >

> >

> > What can not happen, can never happen.

> > Which is mine, is forever mine.

> >

> > http://www.jyotish-remedies.com - Vedic Astrology (Jyotish)

> > Predictive astrology with incredibly powerful problem solving

> remedies

> >

> > -

> > Inder

> >

> > Thursday, October 14, 2004 5:45 PM

> > Re: two cents on research and response to it

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Dear friends,

> > In my humble opinion the word research is vey loosely used in

> > astrology world.

> >

> > So many people who have not understood the basic concepts even

> say

> > that they are doing some research on astrology.

> >

> > For research, we must first fix the area/field of research.

> Define

> > the broad parametres and domains. Find out in details the

> existing

> > knowledge alraedy existing, and collect the correct data to

> proceed

> > in the fixed direction.

> >

> > Here the difficulty may arise as there are several different

> > systems, ayanmsas and existing theories. So one would easily get

> > lost in first finding out what to chose from where.

> >

> > For serious researchers, another sort of difficulties as

> mentioned

> > by members above arises ie regarding pulling down or

> discouragements.

> >

> > Shri KS Krishnamurthy who researched and developed KP system also

> > had to face similar discouragements and ridicules by so called

> great

> > pundits/ savants of astrology.

> >

> > In fact Indian astrology suffers from 4th house and 9th house

> > fixation. We are so fixed to our old texts/wisdom/religiousity of

> > astrology that we donot want to move to 5th house

> > developement/expansion or 10th house professionlism. One

> astrologer

> > wants to outsmart other astrologer by showing his knowledge of

> old

> > texts [4th house] only, not by showing any traits of client

> > satisfaction or any fresh learning or wisdom.

> >

> > All the fields of knowledge gets advanced and moves forward. But

> our

> > astrological gurus are not ready to move forward.

> >

> > Frankly speaking I have not much knowledge of astro research.

> > Some people working in astrological institutes may have something

> > different to say in the matter. We should listen to them.

> >

> > Inder

> >

> > Inder

> >

> >

> >

~! LIFE MEANS STRUGGLE, THE FITTEST WINS SURVIVAL !~

> Links

>

>

 

>

>

>

>

>