Guest guest Posted January 13, 2005 Report Share Posted January 13, 2005 Members, now I really find this confusing any individual born could have any 12 of the signs as the asc, now I can t understand why having some asc is more disadv compared to other signs should.nt it be more ballancing for eg a every sign may have equal no of malefics or benefics it it isnt having a particular sign as asc may not be balanced if one has say 5 malefics and just a benefic, now I find particulary the case with asc virgo, gemini, pisces,sag. only these asc suffer kendradhipatu doshas, as these are dual signs the 7th house lord becomes a badhaka. Isnt it biased? Thanks. Raghu University of California. Los Angeles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2005 Report Share Posted January 13, 2005 anyone everywhere cannot have any of all 12 ascendants,Raghu. Please do an experiment, pick a date and time and change the latitude (keeping longitude same). You will find what they mean by 'intercepted' signs. RR , "Raghu" <raghu_tillu> wrote: > > Members, > > now I really find this confusing any individual born could have any > 12 of the signs as the asc, now I can t understand why having some > asc is more disadv compared to other signs should.nt it be more > ballancing for eg a every sign may have equal no of malefics or > benefics it it isnt having a particular sign as asc may not be > balanced if one has say 5 malefics and just a benefic, now I find > particulary the case with asc virgo, gemini, pisces,sag. only these > asc suffer kendradhipatu doshas, as these are dual signs the 7th > house lord becomes a badhaka. > > Isnt it biased? > > Thanks. > Raghu > University of California. > Los Angeles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2005 Report Share Posted January 13, 2005 Dear Raghu, There is no bias in Zodiac and all signs/Rashis are provided with different characters, like human RACE on the Earth. There is no better auspicious sign nor worse sign in Zodiac, since they are perfectly balanced with advantages and disadvantages. As I understand from your post, you seem to have a wrong notion of Kendradhipatya Dosha and are really 'worried' about the NUMBER of benefics and malefics per Lagna. Every Lagna has three Trines(Trikona) and four Quadrants(Kendra), of which Lagna is common to them. General rule says that trine lords are always functional benefics and also Kendra lords - if they are natural malefics. SO there is no lagna with ONLY ONE SINGLE BENEFIC as you wrote. There are so many 'books' giving you different LISTs of benefic/malefic/neutral/badhaka/sadhaka/shatru/mitra...etc perhaps with/without reason or with author's own reason/feeling. Try to find out WHY a planet is malefic/benefic/neutral for a LAGNA, of course with the help of classical works and your confusion will be clarified. The problem in astrology is to judge WHEN a planet turns its other face, in many cases! Do well to read about Kendradhipatya Dosha since they exist for other Lagnas too. yours KAD , "Raghu" <raghu_tillu> wrote: > > Members, > > now I really find this confusing any individual born could have any > 12 of the signs as the asc, now I can t understand why having some > asc is more disadv compared to other signs should.nt it be more > ballancing for eg a every sign may have equal no of malefics or > benefics it it isnt having a particular sign as asc may not be > balanced if one has say 5 malefics and just a benefic, now I find > particulary the case with asc virgo, gemini, pisces,sag. only these > asc suffer kendradhipatu doshas, as these are dual signs the 7th > house lord becomes a badhaka. > > Isnt it biased? > > Thanks. > Raghu > University of California. > Los Angeles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2005 Report Share Posted January 13, 2005 Dear Members, All yogarak planets as well maraks with reference to lagna and placements leading to kendradhipatya doshs are only indicative features.still these influences when considered and viewd from all the perspectives of Sudarshan chakra these indications change.Any rush to conclude only on the basis of lagna alone may not lead us anywhere.Our theoriticians have amply reiterated and in this regard uttara kalamrita(of kalidasa) is worth for reference. krishnan kadrudra <kadrudra wrote: Dear Raghu, There is no bias in Zodiac and all signs/Rashis are provided with different characters, like human RACE on the Earth. There is no better auspicious sign nor worse sign in Zodiac, since they are perfectly balanced with advantages and disadvantages. As I understand from your post, you seem to have a wrong notion of Kendradhipatya Dosha and are really 'worried' about the NUMBER of benefics and malefics per Lagna. Every Lagna has three Trines(Trikona) and four Quadrants(Kendra), of which Lagna is common to them. General rule says that trine lords are always functional benefics and also Kendra lords - if they are natural malefics. SO there is no lagna with ONLY ONE SINGLE BENEFIC as you wrote. There are so many 'books' giving you different LISTs of benefic/malefic/neutral/badhaka/sadhaka/shatru/mitra...etc perhaps with/without reason or with author's own reason/feeling. Try to find out WHY a planet is malefic/benefic/neutral for a LAGNA, of course with the help of classical works and your confusion will be clarified. The problem in astrology is to judge WHEN a planet turns its other face, in many cases! Do well to read about Kendradhipatya Dosha since they exist for other Lagnas too. yours KAD , "Raghu" <raghu_tillu> wrote: > > Members, > > now I really find this confusing any individual born could have any > 12 of the signs as the asc, now I can t understand why having some > asc is more disadv compared to other signs should.nt it be more > ballancing for eg a every sign may have equal no of malefics or > benefics it it isnt having a particular sign as asc may not be > balanced if one has say 5 malefics and just a benefic, now I find > particulary the case with asc virgo, gemini, pisces,sag. only these > asc suffer kendradhipatu doshas, as these are dual signs the 7th > house lord becomes a badhaka. > > Isnt it biased? > > Thanks. > Raghu > University of California. > Los Angeles ~! LIFE MEANS STRUGGLE, THE FITTEST WINS SURVIVAL !~ / Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2005 Report Share Posted January 14, 2005 Dear Mr Raghu, Instead of intepreting as"having some asc is more disadv compared to other signs to"let us not take threads and read much from them .Astrology is a holistic approach and it is an integrating science.The field so vast we need as persons of acumen in this field have to delve in to it and get some cream.It is beyond us to go in to designing the horoscope as the ascendent is based on birth time(lagna).so we can not stand as referees and make any jugements and say as above. let's accept the principle of destiny and find from the chart what could be the future with what could have happened? In our field good and bad go together.This is what vimsottari dasa system conveys in the life of any native(120 yrs of life cycle) krishnan Raghu <raghu_tillu wrote: Members, now I really find this confusing any individual born could have any 12 of the signs as the asc, now I can t understand why having some asc is more disadv compared to other signs should.nt it be more ballancing for eg a every sign may have equal no of malefics or benefics it it isnt having a particular sign as asc may not be balanced if one has say 5 malefics and just a benefic, now I find particulary the case with asc virgo, gemini, pisces,sag. only these asc suffer kendradhipatu doshas, as these are dual signs the 7th house lord becomes a badhaka. Isnt it biased? Thanks. Raghu University of California. Los Angeles ~! LIFE MEANS STRUGGLE, THE FITTEST WINS SURVIVAL !~ / Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.