Guest guest Posted October 9, 2005 Report Share Posted October 9, 2005 namstey rohiniji/RR well "saheb" is a big word,anyway i accept anything from astro savants like u as obedience, i got exposed to ur depth at astroexpert to the subject RR ji,yes truely you are right there are so many parametre we can not club all, we dont know what to omit or include. let me share how i come out with these,or what i fallow. 1. basic natal analysis. giving importence to lagna 5th 9th and 11th. 2. dasha analysis, sign( chara sthirs ,sirsodaya pristodhay,in navamsha,+number of navamsha and placement concern divisinal chart) 3.same with antardasha 4. placement of bhava lord dasha lord and antar lord in dchart 5.I always ignore prtyantara, if use prtyantar i ignore transit completely transist, any transit or aspect over lagna chandra dasha lord or antardasha lord. i dont give importence to jupiter in 4th to dasha lord or 8th to antardasha lord. just stick to lagna chandra dasha lord and antardasha lord. concern bhava lord in transit from lagna and chanda speacially if in 6 8 12 not whether it is 6 8 12 from dasha lord or antardasha lord. dasha antardasha lord in transit from lagna and chandra only not from bhava lord. placement of varsesha and muntha ..if by chances any of dasha antardasha lord or lord of bhava in question happens to be munthesh or varsesh( we can not ignore then but can ignore if not varsesh or munthesh) well i dont use narayani dasha or kaalchakra or yogini dasha, if i use narayani i ignore vimshotary completely. if i use transit to aruda lagna ,karakamsha lagna i ignore lagna and chandra transit. normally i dont mix 2 different dasha or system to my luck what ever i used i had 70 to 75% result. sometime to avoid negetive and sadditive prediction i answer in general way where i lose some accurecy.but these 70% accurecy has paid me well in life speacially in stock market. concludingly in my view what ever system we adopt or what ever technique we fallow ..any inclusion or omission does not play any great role. uttermost importence is depth or mastery in natal astrology, pattern of chart planatory position, aspect conjunction yoga etc if delt well then timing with any one dasha is more than sufficient even in absence of transist or vice versa. advantage of using different method is u can have idea about how native is feeling(chandra) how people are feeling about him( aruda lagna) how is truely current situation irespective of natives persnal feeling and people around him ( lagna) and any hindrences or advantage from dasha lord ( long term ) antardasha (short term) which may help us to fabricate our prediction based on liking disliking of native such that he is not more hurted and he leaves ur chamber with not rays of hope but enitre sun. giving completely false hope may be sin but magnyfing for someone's betterment may be better. i dont use graha aruda which further can be extended to dasha lord graha aruda or antardasha lord graha aruda..likewise i dont use chandra aruda or surya aruda lagna. well i may be very wrong in my practise ..it is just my way..i dont sugest or recmend this is the best or the worst. but admit that i got tuned to this and happy with results as on time rohiniji we can select some chart honestely shud not be of own or near relative, let it be of a normal lay man and start working based on pre set principle not for past but for the future.let few work on parashari, some on jaiminy and few more on both. after a week or month. verify. with best regard suresh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 9, 2005 Report Share Posted October 9, 2005 Suresh ji, I did not use 'saheb' to overwhelm or distance you (we all know what 'saheb' really means and how 'distancing' it literally means -- certainly was not using in that sense trust me! Let us just go with the 'ji' suffix out of respect and a degree of formality that internet can benefit from :-) Your kind words are appreciated, as is your candour and refreshing sharing of your methodology. We all have, whether we admit it or not, whether we learned jyotish at the feet of a human guru or Ma Saraswati who speaks through Her human servants who write what words She so nimbly sends down to their consciousness. Due to certain personal reasons, I arrived at the awareness very early on that it is not a good idea to study one's chart or those of one's close loved ones. Only in extreme emergency situations have I attempted to look at charts in that category and thankfully, our Source gave me the right directions in that matter for which I am really grateful. Most of us probably have similar approaches though details might vary and I personally do not necessarily use a fixed schedule in terms of this or that technique. A superficial reader might wonder at that because it could be misunderstood or misconstrued as somewhat haphazard and not 'consistent' but to me it does make sense that different individuals might actually respond to different sets of techniques, some responding more to the sign reality, others to the star reality and so on. Before I stop talking about this and boring the mahapandits and paramgurus on this forum, the hint to do so (different cohorts different sensitivities) came from what is known as conditional dashas as described by Sage Parashara where different conditions in chart configurations are described as indicator of choosing different dashas. RR , "bskjain369" <bskjain369> wrote: > > namstey rohiniji/RR > well "saheb" is a big word,anyway i accept anything from astro > savants like u as obedience, i got exposed to ur depth at astroexpert > > to the subject > RR ji,yes truely you are right there are so many parametre we can not > club all, we dont know what to omit or include. > > > let me share how i come out with these,or what i fallow. > > 1. basic natal analysis. giving importence to lagna 5th 9th and 11th. > 2. dasha analysis, sign( chara sthirs ,sirsodaya pristodhay,in > navamsha,+number of navamsha and placement concern divisinal chart) > 3.same with antardasha > 4. placement of bhava lord dasha lord and antar lord in dchart > 5.I always ignore prtyantara, if use prtyantar i ignore transit > completely > > transist, any transit or aspect over lagna chandra dasha lord or > antardasha lord. i dont give importence to jupiter in 4th to dasha > lord or 8th to antardasha lord. just stick to lagna chandra dasha > lord and antardasha lord. > > concern bhava lord in transit from lagna and chanda speacially if in > 6 8 12 not whether it is 6 8 12 from dasha lord or antardasha lord. > > dasha antardasha lord in transit from lagna and chandra only not from > bhava lord. > > placement of varsesha and muntha ..if by chances any of dasha > antardasha lord or lord of bhava in question happens to be munthesh > or varsesh( we can not ignore then but can ignore if not varsesh or > munthesh) > > > well i dont use narayani dasha or kaalchakra or yogini dasha, if i > use narayani i ignore vimshotary completely. > > if i use transit to aruda lagna ,karakamsha lagna i ignore lagna and > chandra transit. normally i dont mix 2 different dasha or system > > > to my luck what ever i used i had 70 to 75% result. sometime to avoid > negetive and sadditive prediction i answer in general way where i > lose some accurecy.but these 70% accurecy has paid me well in life > speacially in stock market. > > concludingly in my view what ever system we adopt or what ever > technique we fallow ..any inclusion or omission does not play any > great role. uttermost importence is depth or mastery in natal > astrology, pattern of chart planatory position, aspect conjunction > yoga etc if delt well then timing with any one dasha is more than > sufficient even in absence of transist or vice versa. > > advantage of using different method is u can have idea about how > native is feeling(chandra) how people are feeling about him( aruda > lagna) how is truely current situation irespective of natives persnal > feeling and people around him ( lagna) and any hindrences or > advantage from dasha lord ( long term ) antardasha (short term) which > may help us to fabricate our prediction based on liking disliking of > native such that he is not more hurted and he leaves ur chamber with > not rays of hope but enitre sun. giving completely false hope may be > sin but magnyfing for someone's betterment may be better. > > i dont use graha aruda which further can be extended to dasha lord > graha aruda or antardasha lord graha aruda..likewise i dont use > chandra aruda or surya aruda lagna. > > well i may be very wrong in my practise ..it is just my way..i dont > sugest or recmend this is the best or the worst. but admit that i got > tuned to this and happy with results as on time > > rohiniji we can select some chart honestely shud not be of own or > near relative, let it be of a normal lay man and start working based > on pre set principle not for past but for the future.let few work on > parashari, some on jaiminy and few more on both. after a week or > month. verify. > > with best regard > suresh > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.