wish a learned Astrologer try my Ayanamsha

January 24, 2006

Thanks Tarunji, and may I rightly presume that the annual rate of

precessional difference followed by your good self is close to what

has been given by Usha Shashi in their manual?

Sri Yukteshwar has been quoted (misquoted)for decades now (including

in jyotish software) as having proposed a constant rate of 54" per

year which most astronomers do not accept since the earth does not

wobble at a constant rate.

Please comment, since this is important as it does affect ayanamsha.

, Tarun Chopra

<occultwizard.tarun@g...> wrote:

>

> The value for 1 january 1900 is 10:24:12

>

> Tarun chopra

>

> On 1/25/06, rohiniranjan <rrgb@s...> wrote:

> >

> > please post the value for 1 January 1900. Thanks

> >

> > , "occult_wizard"

> > <occultwizard.tarun@g...> wrote:

> > >

> > > I wish that who is good at astrology with ten to fifteen year

> > > Experience, try my Ayanamsha on his or her clients horoscope

and see

> > > if it goes or not.

> > >

> > > Visit this page for a reference for my Ayanamsha

> > > http://www.occultwizard.com/calculate.doc

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > >

> > > Tarun Chopra

> > >

> >

> > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE DIVINITY AND

RELISH THE

> > TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS.

> >

> > Hindu astrology</gads?

t=ms&k=Hindu+astrology&w1=Hindu+astrology&w2=Vedic+astrology&w3=Free+v

edic+astrology&c=3&s=68&.sig=bdDKnP969_07StwlxlkL8A> Vedic

> > astrology</gads?

t=ms&k=Vedic+astrology&w1=Hindu+astrology&w2=Vedic+astrology&w3=Free+v

edic+astrology&c=3&s=68&.sig=6CvdGjws89AZzFCGpUmcyw> Free

> > vedic astrology</gads?

t=ms&k=Free+vedic+astrology&w1=Hindu+astrology&w2=Vedic+astrology&w3=F

ree+vedic+astrology&c=3&s=68&.sig=_Pgnvwt9u5jYYXS-kYhH7w>

> > ------------------------------

> >

> > - Visit your

group "<

>"

> > on the web.

> >

> > -

> > <-

?subject=Un>

> >

> > - Terms of

> > Service <>.

> >

> > ------------------------------

> >

>

> --

http://www.occultwizard.com/calculate.doc

>

January 24, 2006

Dear Members/rohiniranjan

My Ayanamsha i.e. the date of date of coincidences of two Zodiacs was

1 January 1155 and the precession's rate per second is the same which

lahiri's have 50.2719. As you can see that it is very important to

have the exact planetary positions in respect to degrees, minutes and

seconds at the starting date as at that time we consider that both

zodiacs fixed and movable/tropical were same, whchi are not similar

in all ayanamsha's including Lahiri, that i have shown in the file

We can see that no one's ayanamsha's is coming exact in respect of

minutes and seconds. Please note i have consider each precession's

rate of ayanamsha according to them only. like lahiri's use 50.2719,

and krishnamurthi used 50.2388475. Kindly note all the precession's

rate are not exeding from 50 seconds per year.

Regards

Tarun Chopra

On 1/25/06, rohiniranjan <rrgb wrote:

> Thanks Tarunji, and may I rightly presume that the annual rate of

> precessional difference followed by your good self is close to what

> has been given by Usha Shashi in their manual?

>

> Sri Yukteshwar has been quoted (misquoted)for decades now (including

> in jyotish software) as having proposed a constant rate of 54" per

> year which most astronomers do not accept since the earth does not

> wobble at a constant rate.

>

> Please comment, since this is important as it does affect ayanamsha.

>

> , Tarun Chopra

> <occultwizard.tarun@g...> wrote:

> >

> > The value for 1 january 1900 is 10:24:12

> >

> > Tarun chopra

> >

> > On 1/25/06, rohiniranjan <rrgb@s...> wrote:

> > >

> > > please post the value for 1 January 1900. Thanks

> > >

> > > , "occult_wizard"

> > > <occultwizard.tarun@g...> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > I wish that who is good at astrology with ten to fifteen year

> > > > Experience, try my Ayanamsha on his or her clients horoscope

> and see

> > > > if it goes or not.

> > > >

> > > > Visit this page for a reference for my Ayanamsha

> > > > http://www.occultwizard.com/calculate.doc

> > > >

> > > > Regards,

> > > >

> > > > Tarun Chopra

> > > >

> > >

> > > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE DIVINITY AND

> RELISH THE

> > > TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS.

> > >

> > > Hindu astrology</gads?

> t=ms&k=Hindu+astrology&w1=Hindu+astrology&w2=Vedic+astrology&w3=Free+v

> edic+astrology&c=3&s=68&.sig=bdDKnP969_07StwlxlkL8A> Vedic

> > > astrology</gads?

> t=ms&k=Vedic+astrology&w1=Hindu+astrology&w2=Vedic+astrology&w3=Free+v

> edic+astrology&c=3&s=68&.sig=6CvdGjws89AZzFCGpUmcyw> Free

> > > vedic astrology</gads?

> t=ms&k=Free+vedic+astrology&w1=Hindu+astrology&w2=Vedic+astrology&w3=F

> ree+vedic+astrology&c=3&s=68&.sig=_Pgnvwt9u5jYYXS-kYhH7w>

> > > ------------------------------

> > >

> > > - Visit your

> group "<

> >"

> > > on the web.

> > >

> > > -

> > > <-

> ?subject=Un>

> > >

> > > - Terms of

> > > Service <>.

> > >

> > > ------------------------------

> > >

> >

> > --

> >

>

SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE DIVINITY AND RELISH THE TASTE

OF ABSOLUTE BLISS.

>

> ________________________________

>

> Visit your group "" on the web.

>

> ________________________________

--

> http://www.occultwizard.com/calculate.doc

January 24, 2006

On 1/25/06, Tarun Chopra <occultwizard.tarun wrote:

> Dear Members/rohiniranjan

>

> My Ayanamsha i.e. the date of date of coincidences of two Zodiacs was

> 1 January 1155 and the precession's rate per second is the same which

> lahiri's have 50.2719. As you can see that it is very important to

> have the exact planetary positions in respect to degrees, minutes and

> seconds at the starting date as at that time we consider that both

> zodiacs fixed and movable/tropical were same, which are not similar

> in all ayanamsha's including Lahiri, that i have shown in the file

>

> We can see that no one's ayanamsha's is coming exact in respect of

> minutes and seconds. Please note i have consider each precession's

> rate of ayanamsha according to them only. like lahiri's use 50.2719,

> and krishnamurthi used 50.2388475. Kindly note all the precession's

> rate are not exeding from 50 seconds per year. sorry i left this Yuketeshwar

predession's rate is 53.9906

>

> Regards

> Tarun Chopra

>

> On 1/25/06, rohiniranjan <rrgb wrote:

> > Thanks Tarunji, and may I rightly presume that the annual rate of

> > precessional difference followed by your good self is close to what

> > has been given by Usha Shashi in their manual?

> >

> > Sri Yukteshwar has been quoted (misquoted)for decades now (including

> > in jyotish software) as having proposed a constant rate of 54" per

> > year which most astronomers do not accept since the earth does not

> > wobble at a constant rate.

> >

> > Please comment, since this is important as it does affect ayanamsha.

> >

> > , Tarun Chopra

> > <occultwizard.tarun@g...> wrote:

> > >

> > > The value for 1 january 1900 is 10:24:12

> > >

> > > Tarun chopra

> > >

> > > On 1/25/06, rohiniranjan <rrgb@s...> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > please post the value for 1 January 1900. Thanks

> > > >

> > > > , "occult_wizard"

> > > > <occultwizard.tarun@g...> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > I wish that who is good at astrology with ten to fifteen year

> > > > > Experience, try my Ayanamsha on his or her clients horoscope

> > and see

> > > > > if it goes or not.

> > > > >

> > > > > Visit this page for a reference for my Ayanamsha

> > > > > http://www.occultwizard.com/calculate.doc

> > > > >

> > > > > Regards,

> > > > >

> > > > > Tarun Chopra

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE DIVINITY AND

> > RELISH THE

> > > > TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS.

> > > >

> > > > Hindu astrology</gads?

> > t=ms&k=Hindu+astrology&w1=Hindu+astrology&w2=Vedic+astrology&w3=Free+v

> > edic+astrology&c=3&s=68&.sig=bdDKnP969_07StwlxlkL8A> Vedic

> > > > astrology</gads?

> > t=ms&k=Vedic+astrology&w1=Hindu+astrology&w2=Vedic+astrology&w3=Free+v

> > edic+astrology&c=3&s=68&.sig=6CvdGjws89AZzFCGpUmcyw> Free

> > > > vedic astrology</gads?

> > t=ms&k=Free+vedic+astrology&w1=Hindu+astrology&w2=Vedic+astrology&w3=F

> > ree+vedic+astrology&c=3&s=68&.sig=_Pgnvwt9u5jYYXS-kYhH7w>

> > > > ------------------------------

> > > >

> > > > - Visit your

> > group "<

> > >"

> > > > on the web.

> > > >

> > > > -

> > > > <-

> > ?subject=Un>

> > > >

> > > > - Terms of

> > > > Service <>.

> > > >

> > > > ------------------------------

> > > >

> > >

> > > --

> > >

> >

> > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE DIVINITY AND RELISH THE TASTE

OF ABSOLUTE BLISS.

> >

> > ________________________________

>

> >

> > Visit your group "" on the web.

> >

> > ________________________________

>

> --

>

--

> > http://www.occultwizard.com/calculate.doc

January 24, 2006

The few years that I had been blessed to devote passionately to

astrology and particularly jyotish and writing about it all over the

place, AYANAMSHA had been a big thing, because individuals, some

individuals anyway, have made it a big deal and others are simply

noncommital!

Regardless of all the scholarly and at times simply superiorly

imaginative discourses emanating from Pingree and 'latter day

scholars' in contemporary jyotish -- what matters in the end is what

the one and only TRUE Messiah of contemporary Jyotish, Dr. B.V. Raman

penned, again and again -- THE PROOF OF THE PUDDING IS IN THE EATING!

In simple words, claims can be impressive, but what sticks in the

mind of general public is proof and demonstrations.

Demonstrate and not simply claim -- and without desire for fame, as

Geeta recommends.

Ranjan

, Tarun Chopra

<occultwizard.tarun@g...> wrote:

>

> On 1/25/06, Tarun Chopra <occultwizard.tarun@g...> wrote:

> > Dear Members/rohiniranjan

> >

> > My Ayanamsha i.e. the date of date of coincidences of two Zodiacs

was

> > 1 January 1155 and the precession's rate per second is the same

which

> > lahiri's have 50.2719. As you can see that it is very important to

> > have the exact planetary positions in respect to degrees, minutes

and

> > seconds at the starting date as at that time we consider that both

> > zodiacs fixed and movable/tropical were same, which are not

similar

> > in all ayanamsha's including Lahiri, that i have shown in the

file

> >

> > We can see that no one's ayanamsha's is coming exact in respect of

> > minutes and seconds. Please note i have consider each

precession's

> > rate of ayanamsha according to them only. like lahiri's use

50.2719,

> > and krishnamurthi used 50.2388475. Kindly note all the

precession's

> > rate are not exeding from 50 seconds per year. sorry i left this

Yuketeshwar predession's rate is 53.9906

> >

> > Regards

> > Tarun Chopra

> >

> > On 1/25/06, rohiniranjan <rrgb@s...> wrote:

> > > Thanks Tarunji, and may I rightly presume that the annual rate

of

> > > precessional difference followed by your good self is close to

what

> > > has been given by Usha Shashi in their manual?

> > >

> > > Sri Yukteshwar has been quoted (misquoted)for decades now

(including

> > > in jyotish software) as having proposed a constant rate of 54"

per

> > > year which most astronomers do not accept since the earth does

not

> > > wobble at a constant rate.

> > >

> > > Please comment, since this is important as it does affect

ayanamsha.

> > >

> > > , Tarun Chopra

> > > <occultwizard.tarun@g...> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > The value for 1 january 1900 is 10:24:12

> > > >

> > > > Tarun chopra

> > > >

> > > > On 1/25/06, rohiniranjan <rrgb@s...> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > please post the value for 1 January 1900. Thanks

> > > > >

> > > > > , "occult_wizard"

> > > > > <occultwizard.tarun@g...> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I wish that who is good at astrology with ten to fifteen

year

> > > > > > Experience, try my Ayanamsha on his or her clients

horoscope

> > > and see

> > > > > > if it goes or not.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Visit this page for a reference for my Ayanamsha

> > > > > > http://www.occultwizard.com/calculate.doc

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Tarun Chopra

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE DIVINITY AND

> > > RELISH THE

> > > > > TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS.

> > > > >

> > > > > Hindu astrology</gads?

> > >

t=ms&k=Hindu+astrology&w1=Hindu+astrology&w2=Vedic+astrology&w3=Free+v

> > > edic+astrology&c=3&s=68&.sig=bdDKnP969_07StwlxlkL8A> Vedic

> > > > > astrology</gads?

> > >

t=ms&k=Vedic+astrology&w1=Hindu+astrology&w2=Vedic+astrology&w3=Free+v

> > > edic+astrology&c=3&s=68&.sig=6CvdGjws89AZzFCGpUmcyw> Free

> > > > > vedic astrology</gads?

> > >

t=ms&k=Free+vedic+astrology&w1=Hindu+astrology&w2=Vedic+astrology&w3=F

> > > ree+vedic+astrology&c=3&s=68&.sig=_Pgnvwt9u5jYYXS-kYhH7w>

> > > > > ------------------------------

> > > > >

> > > > > - Visit your

> > >

group "<

> > > >"

> > > > > on the web.

> > > > >

> > > > > -

<-

> > > ?subject=Un>

> > > > >

> > > > > -

Terms of

> > > > > Service <>.

> > > > >

> > > > > ------------------------------

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > --

> > > > www.occultwizard.com

> > > >

> > >

> > > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE DIVINITY AND

RELISH THE TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS.

> > >

> > > ________________________________

> >

> > >

> > > Visit your group "" on the web.

> > >

> > > Terms of

Service.

> > >

> > > Terms of

Service.

> > > Terms of

Service.

> > >

> > > ________________________________

> >

> > --

> >

>

> --

>

January 24, 2006

THE PROOF OF THE PUDDING IS IN THE EATING

well all prepare the things differently you will not get the same

taste universal taste and we are all use to our own taste if we go to

some one other place and eat what they prepare, i am talking about

food. We will find the taste different for example many people like to

have tea with much sugar in it some like very less and some like not

at all and if they happen to come together they will say i am right

and i am right and your preparation is wrong they will give a full

length lecture why my taste is good than others.

so this same happens with astrology we are so accustom with the method

we are following so we cannot change our habits

Regards

Tarun Chopra

On 1/25/06, rohiniranjan <rrgb wrote:

> The few years that I had been blessed to devote passionately to

> astrology and particularly jyotish and writing about it all over the

> place, AYANAMSHA had been a big thing, because individuals, some

> individuals anyway, have made it a big deal and others are simply

> noncommital!

>

> Regardless of all the scholarly and at times simply superiorly

> imaginative discourses emanating from Pingree and 'latter day

> scholars' in contemporary jyotish -- what matters in the end is what

> the one and only TRUE Messiah of contemporary Jyotish, Dr. B.V. Raman

> penned, again and again -- THE PROOF OF THE PUDDING IS IN THE EATING!

>

> In simple words, claims can be impressive, but what sticks in the

> mind of general public is proof and demonstrations.

>

> Demonstrate and not simply claim -- and without desire for fame, as

> Geeta recommends.

>

> Ranjan

>

> , Tarun Chopra

> <occultwizard.tarun@g...> wrote:

> >

> > On 1/25/06, Tarun Chopra <occultwizard.tarun@g...> wrote:

> > > Dear Members/rohiniranjan

> > >

> > > My Ayanamsha i.e. the date of date of coincidences of two Zodiacs

> was

> > > 1 January 1155 and the precession's rate per second is the same

> which

> > > lahiri's have 50.2719. As you can see that it is very important to

> > > have the exact planetary positions in respect to degrees, minutes

> and

> > > seconds at the starting date as at that time we consider that both

> > > zodiacs fixed and movable/tropical were same, which are not

> similar

> > > in all ayanamsha's including Lahiri, that i have shown in the

> file

> > > http://www.occultwizard.com/calculate.doc

> > >

> > > We can see that no one's ayanamsha's is coming exact in respect of

> > > minutes and seconds. Please note i have consider each

> precession's

> > > rate of ayanamsha according to them only. like lahiri's use

> 50.2719,

> > > and krishnamurthi used 50.2388475. Kindly note all the

> precession's

> > > rate are not exeding from 50 seconds per year. sorry i left this

> Yuketeshwar predession's rate is 53.9906

> > >

> > > Regards

> > > Tarun Chopra

> > >

> > > On 1/25/06, rohiniranjan <rrgb@s...> wrote:

> > > > Thanks Tarunji, and may I rightly presume that the annual rate

> of

> > > > precessional difference followed by your good self is close to

> what

> > > > has been given by Usha Shashi in their manual?

> > > >

> > > > Sri Yukteshwar has been quoted (misquoted)for decades now

> (including

> > > > in jyotish software) as having proposed a constant rate of 54"

> per

> > > > year which most astronomers do not accept since the earth does

> not

> > > > wobble at a constant rate.

> > > >

> > > > Please comment, since this is important as it does affect

> ayanamsha.

> > > >

> > > > , Tarun Chopra

> > > > <occultwizard.tarun@g...> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > The value for 1 january 1900 is 10:24:12

> > > > >

> > > > > Tarun chopra

> > > > >

> > > > > On 1/25/06, rohiniranjan <rrgb@s...> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > please post the value for 1 January 1900. Thanks

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ,

> "occult_wizard"

> > > > > > <occultwizard.tarun@g...> wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I wish that who is good at astrology with ten to fifteen

> year

> > > > > > > Experience, try my Ayanamsha on his or her clients

> horoscope

> > > > and see

> > > > > > > if it goes or not.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Visit this page for a reference for my Ayanamsha

> > > > > > > http://www.occultwizard.com/calculate.doc

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Tarun Chopra

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE DIVINITY AND

> > > > RELISH THE

> > > > > > TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Hindu astrology</gads?

> > > >

> t=ms&k=Hindu+astrology&w1=Hindu+astrology&w2=Vedic+astrology&w3=Free+v

> > > > edic+astrology&c=3&s=68&.sig=bdDKnP969_07StwlxlkL8A>

> Vedic

> > > > > > astrology</gads?

> > > >

> t=ms&k=Vedic+astrology&w1=Hindu+astrology&w2=Vedic+astrology&w3=Free+v

> > > > edic+astrology&c=3&s=68&.sig=6CvdGjws89AZzFCGpUmcyw>

> Free

> > > > > > vedic astrology</gads?

> > > >

> t=ms&k=Free+vedic+astrology&w1=Hindu+astrology&w2=Vedic+astrology&w3=F

> > > >

> ree+vedic+astrology&c=3&s=68&.sig=_Pgnvwt9u5jYYXS-kYhH7w>

> > > > > > ------------------------------

> > > > > >

> > > > > > - Visit your

> > > >

> group

> "<

> > > > >"

> > > > > > on the web.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > -

> <-

> > > > ?subject=Un>

> > > > > >

> > > > > > -

> Terms of

> > > > > > Service <>.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ------------------------------

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > --

> > > > > www.occultwizard.com

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE DIVINITY AND

> RELISH THE TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS.

> > > >

> > > > ________________________________

> > >

> > > >

> > > > Visit your group "" on the web.

> > > >

> > > > Terms of

> Service.

> > > >

> > > > Terms of

> Service.

> > > > Terms of

> Service.

> > > >

> > > > ________________________________

> > >

> > > --

> > >

> >

> > --

> >

>

SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE DIVINITY AND RELISH THE TASTE

> OF ABSOLUTE BLISS.

>

> ________________________________

>

> Visit your group "" on the web.

>

> ________________________________

>

--

January 24, 2006

so astrology is all about how one chooses to "COOK" it, eh?

As long as we all understand that!

That does make it easier!!

Ranjan

, Tarun Chopra

<occultwizard.tarun@g...> wrote:

>

> THE PROOF OF THE PUDDING IS IN THE EATING

>

> well all prepare the things differently you will not get the same

> taste universal taste and we are all use to our own taste if we go

to

> some one other place and eat what they prepare, i am talking about

> food. We will find the taste different for example many people like

to

> have tea with much sugar in it some like very less and some like not

> at all and if they happen to come together they will say i am right

> and i am right and your preparation is wrong they will give a full

> length lecture why my taste is good than others.

>

> so this same happens with astrology we are so accustom with the

method

> we are following so we cannot change our habits

>

> Regards

>

> Tarun Chopra

>

> On 1/25/06, rohiniranjan <rrgb@s...> wrote:

> > The few years that I had been blessed to devote passionately to

> > astrology and particularly jyotish and writing about it all over

the

> > place, AYANAMSHA had been a big thing, because individuals, some

> > individuals anyway, have made it a big deal and others are simply

> > noncommital!

> >

> > Regardless of all the scholarly and at times simply superiorly

> > imaginative discourses emanating from Pingree and 'latter day

> > scholars' in contemporary jyotish -- what matters in the end is

what

> > the one and only TRUE Messiah of contemporary Jyotish, Dr. B.V.

Raman

> > penned, again and again -- THE PROOF OF THE PUDDING IS IN THE

EATING!

> >

> > In simple words, claims can be impressive, but what sticks in the

> > mind of general public is proof and demonstrations.

> >

> > Demonstrate and not simply claim -- and without desire for fame,

as

> > Geeta recommends.

> >

> > Ranjan

> >

> > , Tarun Chopra

> > <occultwizard.tarun@g...> wrote:

> > >

> > > On 1/25/06, Tarun Chopra <occultwizard.tarun@g...> wrote:

> > > > Dear Members/rohiniranjan

> > > >

> > > > My Ayanamsha i.e. the date of date of coincidences of two

Zodiacs

> > was

> > > > 1 January 1155 and the precession's rate per second is the

same

> > which

> > > > lahiri's have 50.2719. As you can see that it is very

important to

> > > > have the exact planetary positions in respect to degrees,

minutes

> > and

> > > > seconds at the starting date as at that time we consider that

both

> > > > zodiacs fixed and movable/tropical were same, which are not

> > similar

> > > > in all ayanamsha's including Lahiri, that i have shown in the

> > file

> > > > http://www.occultwizard.com/calculate.doc

> > > >

> > > > We can see that no one's ayanamsha's is coming exact in

respect of

> > > > minutes and seconds. Please note i have consider each

> > precession's

> > > > rate of ayanamsha according to them only. like lahiri's use

> > 50.2719,

> > > > and krishnamurthi used 50.2388475. Kindly note all the

> > precession's

> > > > rate are not exeding from 50 seconds per year. sorry i left

this

> > Yuketeshwar predession's rate is 53.9906

> > > >

> > > > Regards

> > > > Tarun Chopra

> > > > www.occultwizard.com

> > > >

> > > > On 1/25/06, rohiniranjan <rrgb@s...> wrote:

> > > > > Thanks Tarunji, and may I rightly presume that the annual

rate

> > of

> > > > > precessional difference followed by your good self is close

to

> > what

> > > > > has been given by Usha Shashi in their manual?

> > > > >

> > > > > Sri Yukteshwar has been quoted (misquoted)for decades now

> > (including

> > > > > in jyotish software) as having proposed a constant rate of

54"

> > per

> > > > > year which most astronomers do not accept since the earth

does

> > not

> > > > > wobble at a constant rate.

> > > > >

> > > > > Please comment, since this is important as it does affect

> > ayanamsha.

> > > > >

> > > > > , Tarun Chopra

> > > > > <occultwizard.tarun@g...> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > The value for 1 january 1900 is 10:24:12

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Tarun chopra

> > > > > >

> > > > > > On 1/25/06, rohiniranjan <rrgb@s...> wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > please post the value for 1 January 1900. Thanks

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > ,

> > "occult_wizard"

> > > > > > > <occultwizard.tarun@g...> wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I wish that who is good at astrology with ten to

fifteen

> > year

> > > > > > > > Experience, try my Ayanamsha on his or her clients

> > horoscope

> > > > > and see

> > > > > > > > if it goes or not.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Visit this page for a reference for my Ayanamsha

> > > > > > > > http://www.occultwizard.com/calculate.doc

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Tarun Chopra

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE DIVINITY

AND

> > > > > RELISH THE

> > > > > > > TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Hindu astrology</gads?

> > > > >

> >

t=ms&k=Hindu+astrology&w1=Hindu+astrology&w2=Vedic+astrology&w3=Free+v

> > > > > edic+astrology&c=3&s=68&.sig=bdDKnP969_07StwlxlkL8A>

> > Vedic

> > > > > > > astrology</gads?

> > > > >

> >

t=ms&k=Vedic+astrology&w1=Hindu+astrology&w2=Vedic+astrology&w3=Free+v

> > > > > edic+astrology&c=3&s=68&.sig=6CvdGjws89AZzFCGpUmcyw>

> > Free

> > > > > > > vedic astrology</gads?

> > > > >

> >

t=ms&k=Free+vedic+astrology&w1=Hindu+astrology&w2=Vedic+astrology&w3=F

> > > > >

> > ree+vedic+astrology&c=3&s=68&.sig=_Pgnvwt9u5jYYXS-kYhH7w>

> > > > > > > ------------------------------

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > - Visit your

> > > > >

> > group

> > "<

> > > > > >"

> > > > > > > on the web.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > -

> > <-

> > > > > ?subject=Un>

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > -

> > Terms of

> > > > > > > Service <>.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > ------------------------------

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > --

> > > > > > www.occultwizard.com

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE DIVINITY AND

> > RELISH THE TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS.

> > > > >

> > > > > ________________________________

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Visit your group "" on the web.

> > > > >

> > > > > Terms of

> > Service.

> > > > >

> > > > > Terms of

> > Service.

> > > > > Terms of

> > Service.

> > > > >

> > > > > ________________________________

> > > >

> > > > --

> > > > www.occultwizard.com

> > > >

> > >

> > > --

> > >

> >

> > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE DIVINITY AND

RELISH THE TASTE

> > OF ABSOLUTE BLISS.

> >

> > ________________________________

> >

> > Visit your group "" on the web.

> >

> > Terms of

Service.

> >

> > Terms of

Service.

> > Terms of

Service.

> > ________________________________

> >

>

> --