Guest guest Posted March 3, 2006 Report Share Posted March 3, 2006 Tanvir, Neeraj, members -- Please respond publicly and explain to me why this sarcasm directed by member Mr. Arjun (which he claims is his penname in some message) is justified or allowed to be published on this forum? Have I claimed to be a leader here? DO I deserve this kind of insult?? Is this now the acceptable code of conduct by general spiritual acceptance on this forum, by vocal and silent members regardless of whether they love or hate what I feel I have the right to say? Rohiniranjan , "rohiniranjan" <rrgb wrote: > > Sorry if I hit some sensitive button Mr. Arjun! > > I am not and have never claimed to be the leader here, disputed or > otherwise. So please do not get personal for whatever personal > reasons and issues you have, which I am unaware of -- but I did not > fall off the turnip truck yesterday! > > I am pushing some buttons, obviously, some stale and antiquated ways > of thinking, but that does not mean that I will tolerate any > personal flings like this! > > Please keep your personal attributions and in that sense 'name- > callings' to yourself. This is not in keeping with your self- > proclaimed monastic, austere spiritual way that you have talked > about here earlier. > > Also, I do not want you to misuse your internet cafe time for > useless pursuits like trashing 'RRji' who has already admitted to > being this janitor at this high school and busy cleaning messes! > > Please do not take it personally, but since you pointed your laser > at me by name, I must respond, because that is my right! > > RR > > , "panditarjun2004" > <panditarjun2004@> wrote: > > > > dear friends > > > > in the last few mails, RR ji let his reliased thoughts flow in his > > own uninimitable style. needless to say RR is the (un)disputed > > leader of JR. > > > > let me share my own realisation experiences with the more > fortunate > > members of this group. > > > > gods and planets are like ATMs for an unrealised person and they > > exist somewhere else from where the native expects to receive > > something and lives in a permanent physchological order to believe > > that his wealth is somewhere else in these ATMs. Also these > > unrealised persons believe that god is somewhere in the higher > > altitudes or in the caves and in that process they keep going on > in > > circles to find god nowhere. all great realised people have > shared > > and penned these experiences in their autobiographies and i can > > quote many. these unrealised people keep marching untiringly in > > their bahar yatra forever endlessly changing their destinations > > continuously on a consistent basis. > > > > Gita (can give verse numbers) says that for a reliased person, > vedas > > and shastras are meaningless. also for a realised person god is > > within. all these realised persons speak truth and march inwards > > (antar yatra) and control their body, mind and soul with which > they > > realise their self and the invisible formless god within. once > > these realised persons realise the god and align with the god > within > > they are gods. these realised persons possess the power to do and > > undo things whether one believes them or not or whether science > > accepts them or not. > > > > what people like me does is a psychic job which is why i consider > > myself a healer first and an astrologer second. in healing when a > > native comes with a problem with a pre-mindset to diagnoise only > > through planets, we speak the native's language with empathy and > > give him or her the much needed healing and relieve him or her of > > the pain or suffering. > > > > once a customer who is a doctor mentioned that only a best lunatic > > can treat and cure the lunatics as he only knows and feel the > > problems of a lunatic. request more learnt members to correct > this > > doctor's observation if he is wrong. > > > > with best wishes > > arjun > > > > > > > > > > , Tatvamasi > > <om_tatsat_om@> wrote: > > > > > > Friends, > > > > > > A horoscope is true representation of a person's > > > chromosomal(genetic) structure. > > > Planets and their placements in different houses > > > indicate genes placement and they have specific > > > predefined course of actionwhich can be equated to > > > a genetic code of a plant which gives only specific > > > colour to a flower etc. You alter such properties by > > > sexual cross pollination/gene mutation. > > > > > > Speaking about freewill, may be it is also your fate > > > that you exercise freewill. God knows the truth. > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > --- rohiniranjan <rrgb@> wrote: > > > > > > > Through your statement below "Many people were led > > > > to belive that > > > > they were let down ..] I am getting the impression > > > > that you truly > > > > believe that planets make things happen, and hence > > > > humans have no > > > > free-will or freedom of choice and that we are > > > > subservient to > > > > astrological factors -- all of us. > > > > > > > > I disagree. We have only recently talked about > > > > Yogananda and his > > > > statements and how he overcame planetary restraints > > > > and of course > > > > this forum is about remedies, about changing fate > > > > and at least that > > > > belief operates here. > > > > > > > > My viewpoint indicates that this is not so. Not > > > > everyone is equally > > > > subservient to planets. Planets are just alphabets. > > > > > > > > To use a very graphic example. A HATE message > > > > written on your garage > > > > is ver hurtful, powerful, but it is not the letters > > > > (planets) that > > > > give that negative emotional impact to that hate > > > > message which > > > > brought about this transformational moment in your > > > > life when you > > > > came back home and saw the hate message! > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > , vattem > > > > krishnan > > > > <bursar_99@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > All 27 asterisms contribute to morality as well as > > > > leaders.Aslesha > > > > is no exceptio as world has seen what Mahatma > > > > Gandhi,Paul Macartney > > > > and oscar wilde. > > > > > The Stars certainly have say in all aspects and > > > > beyond doubt > > > > morality as an instinct too comes as a contribution. > > > > > If we do not really mix up and able to steer for > > > > clear > > > > views,Astrology as an assorted subjects has several > > > > parameters > > > > including signs,houses and bhavas and the > > > > interactions and > > > > conjunctions that gets imposed and influence life.Of > > > > these some have > > > > no issues with Mars in Cancer and other have no > > > > problems with 7th > > > > jupiter.If these for a moment are considered as some > > > > kind of > > > > exceptions,many people find that they were let down > > > > in lives by > > > > these conjunctions and aspects. > > > > > But a leader is one who is able to overcome and > > > > show his great > > > > and has a binding(at least the will to achieve).This > > > > issue of > > > > morality(commitment) has pronounced visibility that > > > > provides > > > > opportunity(considering as role model) to some thing > > > > to "do like > > > > that".Astrology in deep perspective could make > > > > revealations out of > > > > stars.The so called leaders where ever they have > > > > emerged and > > > > contributed for the goodwill of universe have base > > > > in their stars > > > > irrespective of Rahu,ketu and saturn etc which we > > > > often veer around > > > > and fail to appreciate the positive aspects of > > > > stars. > > > > > krishnan > > > > > > > > > > rohiniranjan <rrgb@> wrote: > > > > > Dear Ragaji, > > > > > > > > > > What I had to say about morality, I have already > > > > stated :-) > > > > > I have also repeatedly stated my views based on > > > > personal > > > > > observations that it is futile to begin to believe > > > > that in > > > > astrology > > > > > opinions like "what ashlesha represents or will do > > > > to morality or > > > > > mars in cancer would or jupiter in 7th would" are > > > > dangerous red > > > > > herrings. And these start a myth and a > > > > superstition (a belief > > > > which > > > > > is held without challenging it, without observing > > > > it critically > > > > and > > > > > often just basing judgment on hearsay and not even > > > > informed > > > > > anecdotal evidence). I am opposed to that and > > > > through data keep > > > > > demonstrating and challenging such myths, be they > > > > some yoga, KSY > > > > or > > > > > sadesati or whatever. And I am happy to note that > > > > I am not alone. > > > > > > > > > > I am waiting now for an informed astrological > > > > response from you in > > > > > this new leadership role you have volunteered for! > > > > > > > > > > Please lead us ... > > > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > > > , Ahir > > > > Bhairav > > > > > <aahir_bhairav@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > RR ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please continue your discussion on > > > > morality and moon's > > > > > nakshatra ? What is your observation about > > > > Aslesha, the clinging > > > > > star ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail > > > > > > Use Photomail to share photos without annoying > > > > attachments. > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE > > > > DIVINITY AND RELISH > > > > THE TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic astrology Astrology chart > > > > Astrology software > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Visit your group "" on the > > > > web. > > > > > > > > > > To from this group, send an email > > > > to: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your use of is subject to the > > > > Terms of > > > > Service. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail > > > > > Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing > > > > a breeze. > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection around > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2006 Report Share Posted March 3, 2006 Dear Shri Rohini ji When several views forth coming from a broad spectrum covering morality,astrology,psychology and even genitics,probably the issues of leaders and issue of leadership is only a passing reference.I do not think that needs to be taken personally and even I would like to initiate a kind of remorse for the unintentional inklings and reflections.In the spirit of forgive and forget let us forge a balanced view.if some kind of thoughts were made to feel you otherwise please forgive.I think Arjun ji has already come out by taking back his writings.probably it is nice if we can really switch over to very very interesting forth coming.No doubt all of us some how some times in our enethusiasm forget some basics.All these views may not be taken as very personal as none of us for that have anything in person against any one. May be we tend to go by the style of references and observe.Certainly some more restraint and patience is need when we really button back to reply. iam sure you are at ease to accept to the reformed views tenedered by Mr Arjun ji as in very certain terms he felt sotty and expressed krishnan rohiniranjan <rrgb wrote: Tanvir, Neeraj, members -- Please respond publicly and explain to me why this sarcasm directed by member Mr. Arjun (which he claims is his penname in some message) is justified or allowed to be published on this forum? Have I claimed to be a leader here? DO I deserve this kind of insult?? Is this now the acceptable code of conduct by general spiritual acceptance on this forum, by vocal and silent members regardless of whether they love or hate what I feel I have the right to say? Rohiniranjan , "rohiniranjan" <rrgb wrote: > > Sorry if I hit some sensitive button Mr. Arjun! > > I am not and have never claimed to be the leader here, disputed or > otherwise. So please do not get personal for whatever personal > reasons and issues you have, which I am unaware of -- but I did not > fall off the turnip truck yesterday! > > I am pushing some buttons, obviously, some stale and antiquated ways > of thinking, but that does not mean that I will tolerate any > personal flings like this! > > Please keep your personal attributions and in that sense 'name- > callings' to yourself. This is not in keeping with your self- > proclaimed monastic, austere spiritual way that you have talked > about here earlier. > > Also, I do not want you to misuse your internet cafe time for > useless pursuits like trashing 'RRji' who has already admitted to > being this janitor at this high school and busy cleaning messes! > > Please do not take it personally, but since you pointed your laser > at me by name, I must respond, because that is my right! > > RR > > , "panditarjun2004" > <panditarjun2004@> wrote: > > > > dear friends > > > > in the last few mails, RR ji let his reliased thoughts flow in his > > own uninimitable style. needless to say RR is the (un)disputed > > leader of JR. > > > > let me share my own realisation experiences with the more > fortunate > > members of this group. > > > > gods and planets are like ATMs for an unrealised person and they > > exist somewhere else from where the native expects to receive > > something and lives in a permanent physchological order to believe > > that his wealth is somewhere else in these ATMs. Also these > > unrealised persons believe that god is somewhere in the higher > > altitudes or in the caves and in that process they keep going on > in > > circles to find god nowhere. all great realised people have > shared > > and penned these experiences in their autobiographies and i can > > quote many. these unrealised people keep marching untiringly in > > their bahar yatra forever endlessly changing their destinations > > continuously on a consistent basis. > > > > Gita (can give verse numbers) says that for a reliased person, > vedas > > and shastras are meaningless. also for a realised person god is > > within. all these realised persons speak truth and march inwards > > (antar yatra) and control their body, mind and soul with which > they > > realise their self and the invisible formless god within. once > > these realised persons realise the god and align with the god > within > > they are gods. these realised persons possess the power to do and > > undo things whether one believes them or not or whether science > > accepts them or not. > > > > what people like me does is a psychic job which is why i consider > > myself a healer first and an astrologer second. in healing when a > > native comes with a problem with a pre-mindset to diagnoise only > > through planets, we speak the native's language with empathy and > > give him or her the much needed healing and relieve him or her of > > the pain or suffering. > > > > once a customer who is a doctor mentioned that only a best lunatic > > can treat and cure the lunatics as he only knows and feel the > > problems of a lunatic. request more learnt members to correct > this > > doctor's observation if he is wrong. > > > > with best wishes > > arjun > > > > > > > > > > , Tatvamasi > > <om_tatsat_om@> wrote: > > > > > > Friends, > > > > > > A horoscope is true representation of a person's > > > chromosomal(genetic) structure. > > > Planets and their placements in different houses > > > indicate genes placement and they have specific > > > predefined course of actionwhich can be equated to > > > a genetic code of a plant which gives only specific > > > colour to a flower etc. You alter such properties by > > > sexual cross pollination/gene mutation. > > > > > > Speaking about freewill, may be it is also your fate > > > that you exercise freewill. God knows the truth. > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > --- rohiniranjan <rrgb@> wrote: > > > > > > > Through your statement below "Many people were led > > > > to belive that > > > > they were let down ..] I am getting the impression > > > > that you truly > > > > believe that planets make things happen, and hence > > > > humans have no > > > > free-will or freedom of choice and that we are > > > > subservient to > > > > astrological factors -- all of us. > > > > > > > > I disagree. We have only recently talked about > > > > Yogananda and his > > > > statements and how he overcame planetary restraints > > > > and of course > > > > this forum is about remedies, about changing fate > > > > and at least that > > > > belief operates here. > > > > > > > > My viewpoint indicates that this is not so. Not > > > > everyone is equally > > > > subservient to planets. Planets are just alphabets. > > > > > > > > To use a very graphic example. A HATE message > > > > written on your garage > > > > is ver hurtful, powerful, but it is not the letters > > > > (planets) that > > > > give that negative emotional impact to that hate > > > > message which > > > > brought about this transformational moment in your > > > > life when you > > > > came back home and saw the hate message! > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > , vattem > > > > krishnan > > > > <bursar_99@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > All 27 asterisms contribute to morality as well as > > > > leaders.Aslesha > > > > is no exceptio as world has seen what Mahatma > > > > Gandhi,Paul Macartney > > > > and oscar wilde. > > > > > The Stars certainly have say in all aspects and > > > > beyond doubt > > > > morality as an instinct too comes as a contribution. > > > > > If we do not really mix up and able to steer for > > > > clear > > > > views,Astrology as an assorted subjects has several > > > > parameters > > > > including signs,houses and bhavas and the > > > > interactions and > > > > conjunctions that gets imposed and influence life.Of > > > > these some have > > > > no issues with Mars in Cancer and other have no > > > > problems with 7th > > > > jupiter.If these for a moment are considered as some > > > > kind of > > > > exceptions,many people find that they were let down > > > > in lives by > > > > these conjunctions and aspects. > > > > > But a leader is one who is able to overcome and > > > > show his great > > > > and has a binding(at least the will to achieve).This > > > > issue of > > > > morality(commitment) has pronounced visibility that > > > > provides > > > > opportunity(considering as role model) to some thing > > > > to "do like > > > > that".Astrology in deep perspective could make > > > > revealations out of > > > > stars.The so called leaders where ever they have > > > > emerged and > > > > contributed for the goodwill of universe have base > > > > in their stars > > > > irrespective of Rahu,ketu and saturn etc which we > > > > often veer around > > > > and fail to appreciate the positive aspects of > > > > stars. > > > > > krishnan > > > > > > > > > > rohiniranjan <rrgb@> wrote: > > > > > Dear Ragaji, > > > > > > > > > > What I had to say about morality, I have already > > > > stated :-) > > > > > I have also repeatedly stated my views based on > > > > personal > > > > > observations that it is futile to begin to believe > > > > that in > > > > astrology > > > > > opinions like "what ashlesha represents or will do > > > > to morality or > > > > > mars in cancer would or jupiter in 7th would" are > > > > dangerous red > > > > > herrings. And these start a myth and a > > > > superstition (a belief > > > > which > > > > > is held without challenging it, without observing > > > > it critically > > > > and > > > > > often just basing judgment on hearsay and not even > > > > informed > > > > > anecdotal evidence). I am opposed to that and > > > > through data keep > > > > > demonstrating and challenging such myths, be they > > > > some yoga, KSY > > > > or > > > > > sadesati or whatever. And I am happy to note that > > > > I am not alone. > > > > > > > > > > I am waiting now for an informed astrological > > > > response from you in > > > > > this new leadership role you have volunteered for! > > > > > > > > > > Please lead us ... > > > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > > > , Ahir > > > > Bhairav > > > > > <aahir_bhairav@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > RR ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please continue your discussion on > > > > morality and moon's > > > > > nakshatra ? What is your observation about > > > > Aslesha, the clinging > > > > > star ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail > > > > > > Use Photomail to share photos without annoying > > > > attachments. > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE > > > > DIVINITY AND RELISH > > > > THE TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic astrology Astrology chart > > > > Astrology software > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Visit your group "" on the > > > > web. > > > > > > > > > > To from this group, send an email > > > > to: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your use of is subject to the > > > > Terms of > > > > Service. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail > > > > > Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing > > > > a breeze. > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection around > > > > > > > > > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE DIVINITY AND RELISH THE TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS. Vedic astrology Astrology chart Astrology software Visit your group "" on the web. Mail Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2006 Report Share Posted March 3, 2006 Respected Gurujan, I do not know if I speak for the entire group or not, over a year or so , I have realized that four respected gurus of this group are shri Ranjan ji , Krishnan ji , Ashutosh ji , and Arjun ji , not necessarily in that order. These four stalwarts are the pillars of this group. We feel hurt when any body shows disrespect to any of these luminaries. It becomes all the more painful if any of these stalwarts feels hurt and says so. With naman to all gurujan, Varun Trivedi , vattem krishnan <bursar_99 wrote: > > Dear Shri Rohini ji > When several views forth coming from a broad spectrum covering morality,astrology,psychology and even genitics,probably the issues of leaders and issue of leadership is only a passing reference.I do not think that needs to be taken personally and even I would like to initiate a kind of remorse for the unintentional inklings and reflections.In the spirit of forgive and forget let us forge a balanced view.if some kind of thoughts were made to feel you otherwise please forgive.I think Arjun ji has already come out by taking back his writings.probably it is nice if we can really switch over to very very interesting forth coming.No doubt all of us some how some times in our enethusiasm forget some basics.All these views may not be taken as very personal as none of us for that have anything in person against any one. > May be we tend to go by the style of references and observe.Certainly some more restraint and patience is need when we really button back to reply. > iam sure you are at ease to accept to the reformed views tenedered by Mr Arjun ji as in very certain terms he felt sotty and expressed > krishnan > > rohiniranjan <rrgb wrote: > Tanvir, Neeraj, members -- > > Please respond publicly and explain to me why this sarcasm directed > by member Mr. Arjun (which he claims is his penname in some message) > is justified or allowed to be published on this forum? > > Have I claimed to be a leader here? > DO I deserve this kind of insult?? > > Is this now the acceptable code of conduct by general spiritual > acceptance on this forum, by vocal and silent members regardless of > whether they love or hate what I feel I have the right to say? > > Rohiniranjan > > > , "rohiniranjan" <rrgb@> > wrote: > > > > Sorry if I hit some sensitive button Mr. Arjun! > > > > I am not and have never claimed to be the leader here, disputed or > > otherwise. So please do not get personal for whatever personal > > reasons and issues you have, which I am unaware of -- but I did > not > > fall off the turnip truck yesterday! > > > > I am pushing some buttons, obviously, some stale and antiquated > ways > > of thinking, but that does not mean that I will tolerate any > > personal flings like this! > > > > Please keep your personal attributions and in that sense 'name- > > callings' to yourself. This is not in keeping with your self- > > proclaimed monastic, austere spiritual way that you have talked > > about here earlier. > > > > Also, I do not want you to misuse your internet cafe time for > > useless pursuits like trashing 'RRji' who has already admitted to > > being this janitor at this high school and busy cleaning messes! > > > > Please do not take it personally, but since you pointed your laser > > at me by name, I must respond, because that is my right! > > > > RR > > > > , "panditarjun2004" > > <panditarjun2004@> wrote: > > > > > > dear friends > > > > > > in the last few mails, RR ji let his reliased thoughts flow in > his > > > own uninimitable style. needless to say RR is the (un) disputed > > > leader of JR. > > > > > > let me share my own realisation experiences with the more > > fortunate > > > members of this group. > > > > > > gods and planets are like ATMs for an unrealised person and they > > > exist somewhere else from where the native expects to receive > > > something and lives in a permanent physchological order to > believe > > > that his wealth is somewhere else in these ATMs. Also these > > > unrealised persons believe that god is somewhere in the higher > > > altitudes or in the caves and in that process they keep going on > > in > > > circles to find god nowhere. all great realised people have > > shared > > > and penned these experiences in their autobiographies and i can > > > quote many. these unrealised people keep marching untiringly in > > > their bahar yatra forever endlessly changing their destinations > > > continuously on a consistent basis. > > > > > > Gita (can give verse numbers) says that for a reliased person, > > vedas > > > and shastras are meaningless. also for a realised person god is > > > within. all these realised persons speak truth and march > inwards > > > (antar yatra) and control their body, mind and soul with which > > they > > > realise their self and the invisible formless god within. once > > > these realised persons realise the god and align with the god > > within > > > they are gods. these realised persons possess the power to do > and > > > undo things whether one believes them or not or whether science > > > accepts them or not. > > > > > > what people like me does is a psychic job which is why i > consider > > > myself a healer first and an astrologer second. in healing when > a > > > native comes with a problem with a pre-mindset to diagnoise only > > > through planets, we speak the native's language with empathy and > > > give him or her the much needed healing and relieve him or her > of > > > the pain or suffering. > > > > > > once a customer who is a doctor mentioned that only a best > lunatic > > > can treat and cure the lunatics as he only knows and feel the > > > problems of a lunatic. request more learnt members to correct > > this > > > doctor's observation if he is wrong. > > > > > > with best wishes > > > arjun > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Tatvamasi > > > <om_tatsat_om@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Friends, > > > > > > > > A horoscope is true representation of a person's > > > > chromosomal(genetic) structure. > > > > Planets and their placements in different houses > > > > indicate genes placement and they have specific > > > > predefined course of actionwhich can be equated to > > > > a genetic code of a plant which gives only specific > > > > colour to a flower etc. You alter such properties by > > > > sexual cross pollination/gene mutation. > > > > > > > > Speaking about freewill, may be it is also your fate > > > > that you exercise freewill. God knows the truth. > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > --- rohiniranjan <rrgb@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Through your statement below "Many people were led > > > > > to belive that > > > > > they were let down ..] I am getting the impression > > > > > that you truly > > > > > believe that planets make things happen, and hence > > > > > humans have no > > > > > free-will or freedom of choice and that we are > > > > > subservient to > > > > > astrological factors -- all of us. > > > > > > > > > > I disagree. We have only recently talked about > > > > > Yogananda and his > > > > > statements and how he overcame planetary restraints > > > > > and of course > > > > > this forum is about remedies, about changing fate > > > > > and at least that > > > > > belief operates here. > > > > > > > > > > My viewpoint indicates that this is not so. Not > > > > > everyone is equally > > > > > subservient to planets. Planets are just alphabets. > > > > > > > > > > To use a very graphic example. A HATE message > > > > > written on your garage > > > > > is ver hurtful, powerful, but it is not the letters > > > > > (planets) that > > > > > give that negative emotional impact to that hate > > > > > message which > > > > > brought about this transformational moment in your > > > > > life when you > > > > > came back home and saw the hate message! > > > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > > > , vattem > > > > > krishnan > > > > > <bursar_99@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > All 27 asterisms contribute to morality as well as > > > > > leaders.Aslesha > > > > > is no exceptio as world has seen what Mahatma > > > > > Gandhi,Paul Macartney > > > > > and oscar wilde. > > > > > > The Stars certainly have say in all aspects and > > > > > beyond doubt > > > > > morality as an instinct too comes as a contribution. > > > > > > If we do not really mix up and able to steer for > > > > > clear > > > > > views,Astrology as an assorted subjects has several > > > > > parameters > > > > > including signs,houses and bhavas and the > > > > > interactions and > > > > > conjunctions that gets imposed and influence life.Of > > > > > these some have > > > > > no issues with Mars in Cancer and other have no > > > > > problems with 7th > > > > > jupiter.If these for a moment are considered as some > > > > > kind of > > > > > exceptions,many people find that they were let down > > > > > in lives by > > > > > these conjunctions and aspects. > > > > > > But a leader is one who is able to overcome and > > > > > show his great > > > > > and has a binding(at least the will to achieve).This > > > > > issue of > > > > > morality(commitment) has pronounced visibility that > > > > > provides > > > > > opportunity(considering as role model) to some thing > > > > > to "do like > > > > > that".Astrology in deep perspective could make > > > > > revealations out of > > > > > stars.The so called leaders where ever they have > > > > > emerged and > > > > > contributed for the goodwill of universe have base > > > > > in their stars > > > > > irrespective of Rahu,ketu and saturn etc which we > > > > > often veer around > > > > > and fail to appreciate the positive aspects of > > > > > stars. > > > > > > krishnan > > > > > > > > > > > > rohiniranjan <rrgb@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Ragaji, > > > > > > > > > > > > What I had to say about morality, I have already > > > > > stated :-) > > > > > > I have also repeatedly stated my views based on > > > > > personal > > > > > > observations that it is futile to begin to believe > > > > > that in > > > > > astrology > > > > > > opinions like "what ashlesha represents or will do > > > > > to morality or > > > > > > mars in cancer would or jupiter in 7th would" are > > > > > dangerous red > > > > > > herrings. And these start a myth and a > > > > > superstition (a belief > > > > > which > > > > > > is held without challenging it, without observing > > > > > it critically > > > > > and > > > > > > often just basing judgment on hearsay and not even > > > > > informed > > > > > > anecdotal evidence). I am opposed to that and > > > > > through data keep > > > > > > demonstrating and challenging such myths, be they > > > > > some yoga, KSY > > > > > or > > > > > > sadesati or whatever. And I am happy to note that > > > > > I am not alone. > > > > > > > > > > > > I am waiting now for an informed astrological > > > > > response from you in > > > > > > this new leadership role you have volunteered for! > > > > > > > > > > > > Please lead us ... > > > > > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > > > > > , Ahir > > > > > Bhairav > > > > > > <aahir_bhairav@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > RR ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please continue your discussion on > > > > > morality and moon's > > > > > > nakshatra ? What is your observation about > > > > > Aslesha, the clinging > > > > > > star ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail > > > > > > > Use Photomail to share photos without annoying > > > > > attachments. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE > > > > > DIVINITY AND RELISH > > > > > THE TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic astrology Astrology chart > > > > > Astrology software > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Visit your group "" on the > > > > > web. > > > > > > > > > > > > To from this group, send an email > > > > > to: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your use of is subject to the > > > > > Terms of > > > > > Service. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail > > > > > > Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing > > > > > a breeze. > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection > around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE DIVINITY AND RELISH THE TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS. > > > > > > > Vedic astrology Astrology chart Astrology software > > > > > > Visit your group "" on the web. > > > > > Terms of Service. > > > > > > > > > > Mail > Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2006 Report Share Posted March 3, 2006 Mr. Krishnan, I appreciate your coming so quickly to respond and to defend Mr. Arjun. I fully understand! Thanks for taking the time to write!! RR , vattem krishnan <bursar_99 wrote: > > Dear Shri Rohini ji > When several views forth coming from a broad spectrum covering morality,astrology,psychology and even genitics,probably the issues of leaders and issue of leadership is only a passing reference.I do not think that needs to be taken personally and even I would like to initiate a kind of remorse for the unintentional inklings and reflections.In the spirit of forgive and forget let us forge a balanced view.if some kind of thoughts were made to feel you otherwise please forgive.I think Arjun ji has already come out by taking back his writings.probably it is nice if we can really switch over to very very interesting forth coming.No doubt all of us some how some times in our enethusiasm forget some basics.All these views may not be taken as very personal as none of us for that have anything in person against any one. > May be we tend to go by the style of references and observe.Certainly some more restraint and patience is need when we really button back to reply. > iam sure you are at ease to accept to the reformed views tenedered by Mr Arjun ji as in very certain terms he felt sotty and expressed > krishnan > > rohiniranjan <rrgb wrote: > Tanvir, Neeraj, members -- > > Please respond publicly and explain to me why this sarcasm directed > by member Mr. Arjun (which he claims is his penname in some message) > is justified or allowed to be published on this forum? > > Have I claimed to be a leader here? > DO I deserve this kind of insult?? > > Is this now the acceptable code of conduct by general spiritual > acceptance on this forum, by vocal and silent members regardless of > whether they love or hate what I feel I have the right to say? > > Rohiniranjan > > > , "rohiniranjan" <rrgb@> > wrote: > > > > Sorry if I hit some sensitive button Mr. Arjun! > > > > I am not and have never claimed to be the leader here, disputed or > > otherwise. So please do not get personal for whatever personal > > reasons and issues you have, which I am unaware of -- but I did > not > > fall off the turnip truck yesterday! > > > > I am pushing some buttons, obviously, some stale and antiquated > ways > > of thinking, but that does not mean that I will tolerate any > > personal flings like this! > > > > Please keep your personal attributions and in that sense 'name- > > callings' to yourself. This is not in keeping with your self- > > proclaimed monastic, austere spiritual way that you have talked > > about here earlier. > > > > Also, I do not want you to misuse your internet cafe time for > > useless pursuits like trashing 'RRji' who has already admitted to > > being this janitor at this high school and busy cleaning messes! > > > > Please do not take it personally, but since you pointed your laser > > at me by name, I must respond, because that is my right! > > > > RR > > > > , "panditarjun2004" > > <panditarjun2004@> wrote: > > > > > > dear friends > > > > > > in the last few mails, RR ji let his reliased thoughts flow in > his > > > own uninimitable style. needless to say RR is the (un) disputed > > > leader of JR. > > > > > > let me share my own realisation experiences with the more > > fortunate > > > members of this group. > > > > > > gods and planets are like ATMs for an unrealised person and they > > > exist somewhere else from where the native expects to receive > > > something and lives in a permanent physchological order to > believe > > > that his wealth is somewhere else in these ATMs. Also these > > > unrealised persons believe that god is somewhere in the higher > > > altitudes or in the caves and in that process they keep going on > > in > > > circles to find god nowhere. all great realised people have > > shared > > > and penned these experiences in their autobiographies and i can > > > quote many. these unrealised people keep marching untiringly in > > > their bahar yatra forever endlessly changing their destinations > > > continuously on a consistent basis. > > > > > > Gita (can give verse numbers) says that for a reliased person, > > vedas > > > and shastras are meaningless. also for a realised person god is > > > within. all these realised persons speak truth and march > inwards > > > (antar yatra) and control their body, mind and soul with which > > they > > > realise their self and the invisible formless god within. once > > > these realised persons realise the god and align with the god > > within > > > they are gods. these realised persons possess the power to do > and > > > undo things whether one believes them or not or whether science > > > accepts them or not. > > > > > > what people like me does is a psychic job which is why i > consider > > > myself a healer first and an astrologer second. in healing when > a > > > native comes with a problem with a pre-mindset to diagnoise only > > > through planets, we speak the native's language with empathy and > > > give him or her the much needed healing and relieve him or her > of > > > the pain or suffering. > > > > > > once a customer who is a doctor mentioned that only a best > lunatic > > > can treat and cure the lunatics as he only knows and feel the > > > problems of a lunatic. request more learnt members to correct > > this > > > doctor's observation if he is wrong. > > > > > > with best wishes > > > arjun > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Tatvamasi > > > <om_tatsat_om@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Friends, > > > > > > > > A horoscope is true representation of a person's > > > > chromosomal(genetic) structure. > > > > Planets and their placements in different houses > > > > indicate genes placement and they have specific > > > > predefined course of actionwhich can be equated to > > > > a genetic code of a plant which gives only specific > > > > colour to a flower etc. You alter such properties by > > > > sexual cross pollination/gene mutation. > > > > > > > > Speaking about freewill, may be it is also your fate > > > > that you exercise freewill. God knows the truth. > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > --- rohiniranjan <rrgb@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Through your statement below "Many people were led > > > > > to belive that > > > > > they were let down ..] I am getting the impression > > > > > that you truly > > > > > believe that planets make things happen, and hence > > > > > humans have no > > > > > free-will or freedom of choice and that we are > > > > > subservient to > > > > > astrological factors -- all of us. > > > > > > > > > > I disagree. We have only recently talked about > > > > > Yogananda and his > > > > > statements and how he overcame planetary restraints > > > > > and of course > > > > > this forum is about remedies, about changing fate > > > > > and at least that > > > > > belief operates here. > > > > > > > > > > My viewpoint indicates that this is not so. Not > > > > > everyone is equally > > > > > subservient to planets. Planets are just alphabets. > > > > > > > > > > To use a very graphic example. A HATE message > > > > > written on your garage > > > > > is ver hurtful, powerful, but it is not the letters > > > > > (planets) that > > > > > give that negative emotional impact to that hate > > > > > message which > > > > > brought about this transformational moment in your > > > > > life when you > > > > > came back home and saw the hate message! > > > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > > > , vattem > > > > > krishnan > > > > > <bursar_99@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > All 27 asterisms contribute to morality as well as > > > > > leaders.Aslesha > > > > > is no exceptio as world has seen what Mahatma > > > > > Gandhi,Paul Macartney > > > > > and oscar wilde. > > > > > > The Stars certainly have say in all aspects and > > > > > beyond doubt > > > > > morality as an instinct too comes as a contribution. > > > > > > If we do not really mix up and able to steer for > > > > > clear > > > > > views,Astrology as an assorted subjects has several > > > > > parameters > > > > > including signs,houses and bhavas and the > > > > > interactions and > > > > > conjunctions that gets imposed and influence life.Of > > > > > these some have > > > > > no issues with Mars in Cancer and other have no > > > > > problems with 7th > > > > > jupiter.If these for a moment are considered as some > > > > > kind of > > > > > exceptions,many people find that they were let down > > > > > in lives by > > > > > these conjunctions and aspects. > > > > > > But a leader is one who is able to overcome and > > > > > show his great > > > > > and has a binding(at least the will to achieve).This > > > > > issue of > > > > > morality(commitment) has pronounced visibility that > > > > > provides > > > > > opportunity(considering as role model) to some thing > > > > > to "do like > > > > > that".Astrology in deep perspective could make > > > > > revealations out of > > > > > stars.The so called leaders where ever they have > > > > > emerged and > > > > > contributed for the goodwill of universe have base > > > > > in their stars > > > > > irrespective of Rahu,ketu and saturn etc which we > > > > > often veer around > > > > > and fail to appreciate the positive aspects of > > > > > stars. > > > > > > krishnan > > > > > > > > > > > > rohiniranjan <rrgb@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Ragaji, > > > > > > > > > > > > What I had to say about morality, I have already > > > > > stated :-) > > > > > > I have also repeatedly stated my views based on > > > > > personal > > > > > > observations that it is futile to begin to believe > > > > > that in > > > > > astrology > > > > > > opinions like "what ashlesha represents or will do > > > > > to morality or > > > > > > mars in cancer would or jupiter in 7th would" are > > > > > dangerous red > > > > > > herrings. And these start a myth and a > > > > > superstition (a belief > > > > > which > > > > > > is held without challenging it, without observing > > > > > it critically > > > > > and > > > > > > often just basing judgment on hearsay and not even > > > > > informed > > > > > > anecdotal evidence). I am opposed to that and > > > > > through data keep > > > > > > demonstrating and challenging such myths, be they > > > > > some yoga, KSY > > > > > or > > > > > > sadesati or whatever. And I am happy to note that > > > > > I am not alone. > > > > > > > > > > > > I am waiting now for an informed astrological > > > > > response from you in > > > > > > this new leadership role you have volunteered for! > > > > > > > > > > > > Please lead us ... > > > > > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > > > > > , Ahir > > > > > Bhairav > > > > > > <aahir_bhairav@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > RR ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please continue your discussion on > > > > > morality and moon's > > > > > > nakshatra ? What is your observation about > > > > > Aslesha, the clinging > > > > > > star ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail > > > > > > > Use Photomail to share photos without annoying > > > > > attachments. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE > > > > > DIVINITY AND RELISH > > > > > THE TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic astrology Astrology chart > > > > > Astrology software > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Visit your group "" on the > > > > > web. > > > > > > > > > > > > To from this group, send an email > > > > > to: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your use of is subject to the > > > > > Terms of > > > > > Service. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail > > > > > > Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing > > > > > a breeze. > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection > around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE DIVINITY AND RELISH THE TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS. > > > > > > > Vedic astrology Astrology chart Astrology software > > > > > > Visit your group "" on the web. > > > > > Terms of Service. > > > > > > > > > > Mail > Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2006 Report Share Posted March 3, 2006 Dear Varunji, I am truly touched by your taking the time to respond. One humble request to you and all. I have never and will not like to be so lightly called 'Guru' or 'teacher' in this forum or elsewhere or be listed with those who you think are teachers or gurus here or elsewhere. The more loosely and callously we use the term Guru and Teacher, in some way our personal learning suffers! I have not spoken so harshly before but I ask you to please be very sensitive to my absolute abhorrance to the loose and reckless use of these terms because that does disservice to Jyotish and to some of the truly fine individuals who are working hard and trying to serve it, here and elsewhere. To all -- we do not need or care for your respect -- but please keep your disrespect and complexes to yourself! Enough said -- More cleaning to be done for the poor janitor in this high school of Jyotish (not meaning this forum alone, by the way!) RR , "varun_trvd" <varun_trvd wrote: > > Respected Gurujan, > > I do not know if I speak for the entire group or not, over a year or > so , I have realized that four respected gurus of this group are > shri Ranjan ji , Krishnan ji , Ashutosh ji , and Arjun ji , not > necessarily in that order. > > These four stalwarts are the pillars of this group. We feel hurt > when any body shows disrespect to any of these luminaries. > It becomes all the more painful if any of these stalwarts feels hurt > and says so. > > With naman to all gurujan, > > Varun Trivedi > > > > > , vattem krishnan > <bursar_99@> wrote: > > > > Dear Shri Rohini ji > > When several views forth coming from a broad spectrum covering > morality,astrology,psychology and even genitics,probably the issues > of leaders and issue of leadership is only a passing reference.I do > not think that needs to be taken personally and even I would like to > initiate a kind of remorse for the unintentional inklings and > reflections.In the spirit of forgive and forget let us forge a > balanced view.if some kind of thoughts were made to feel you > otherwise please forgive.I think Arjun ji has already come out by > taking back his writings.probably it is nice if we can really switch > over to very very interesting forth coming.No doubt all of us some > how some times in our enethusiasm forget some basics.All these views > may not be taken as very personal as none of us for that have > anything in person against any one. > > May be we tend to go by the style of references and > observe.Certainly some more restraint and patience is need when we > really button back to reply. > > iam sure you are at ease to accept to the reformed views > tenedered by Mr Arjun ji as in very certain terms he felt sotty and > expressed > > krishnan > > > > rohiniranjan <rrgb@> wrote: > > Tanvir, Neeraj, members -- > > > > Please respond publicly and explain to me why this sarcasm > directed > > by member Mr. Arjun (which he claims is his penname in some > message) > > is justified or allowed to be published on this forum? > > > > Have I claimed to be a leader here? > > DO I deserve this kind of insult?? > > > > Is this now the acceptable code of conduct by general spiritual > > acceptance on this forum, by vocal and silent members regardless > of > > whether they love or hate what I feel I have the right to say? > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > , "rohiniranjan" <rrgb@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Sorry if I hit some sensitive button Mr. Arjun! > > > > > > I am not and have never claimed to be the leader here, disputed > or > > > otherwise. So please do not get personal for whatever personal > > > reasons and issues you have, which I am unaware of -- but I did > > not > > > fall off the turnip truck yesterday! > > > > > > I am pushing some buttons, obviously, some stale and antiquated > > ways > > > of thinking, but that does not mean that I will tolerate any > > > personal flings like this! > > > > > > Please keep your personal attributions and in that sense 'name- > > > callings' to yourself. This is not in keeping with your self- > > > proclaimed monastic, austere spiritual way that you have talked > > > about here earlier. > > > > > > Also, I do not want you to misuse your internet cafe time for > > > useless pursuits like trashing 'RRji' who has already admitted > to > > > being this janitor at this high school and busy cleaning messes! > > > > > > Please do not take it personally, but since you pointed your > laser > > > at me by name, I must respond, because that is my right! > > > > > > RR > > > > > > , "panditarjun2004" > > > <panditarjun2004@> wrote: > > > > > > > > dear friends > > > > > > > > in the last few mails, RR ji let his reliased thoughts flow in > > his > > > > own uninimitable style. needless to say RR is the (un) > disputed > > > > leader of JR. > > > > > > > > let me share my own realisation experiences with the more > > > fortunate > > > > members of this group. > > > > > > > > gods and planets are like ATMs for an unrealised person and > they > > > > exist somewhere else from where the native expects to receive > > > > something and lives in a permanent physchological order to > > believe > > > > that his wealth is somewhere else in these ATMs. Also these > > > > unrealised persons believe that god is somewhere in the higher > > > > altitudes or in the caves and in that process they keep going > on > > > in > > > > circles to find god nowhere. all great realised people have > > > shared > > > > and penned these experiences in their autobiographies and i > can > > > > quote many. these unrealised people keep marching untiringly > in > > > > their bahar yatra forever endlessly changing their > destinations > > > > continuously on a consistent basis. > > > > > > > > Gita (can give verse numbers) says that for a reliased person, > > > vedas > > > > and shastras are meaningless. also for a realised person god > is > > > > within. all these realised persons speak truth and march > > inwards > > > > (antar yatra) and control their body, mind and soul with which > > > they > > > > realise their self and the invisible formless god within. > once > > > > these realised persons realise the god and align with the god > > > within > > > > they are gods. these realised persons possess the power to do > > and > > > > undo things whether one believes them or not or whether > science > > > > accepts them or not. > > > > > > > > what people like me does is a psychic job which is why i > > consider > > > > myself a healer first and an astrologer second. in healing > when > > a > > > > native comes with a problem with a pre-mindset to diagnoise > only > > > > through planets, we speak the native's language with empathy > and > > > > give him or her the much needed healing and relieve him or her > > of > > > > the pain or suffering. > > > > > > > > once a customer who is a doctor mentioned that only a best > > lunatic > > > > can treat and cure the lunatics as he only knows and feel the > > > > problems of a lunatic. request more learnt members to correct > > > this > > > > doctor's observation if he is wrong. > > > > > > > > with best wishes > > > > arjun > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Tatvamasi > > > > <om_tatsat_om@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Friends, > > > > > > > > > > A horoscope is true representation of a person's > > > > > chromosomal(genetic) structure. > > > > > Planets and their placements in different houses > > > > > indicate genes placement and they have specific > > > > > predefined course of actionwhich can be equated to > > > > > a genetic code of a plant which gives only specific > > > > > colour to a flower etc. You alter such properties by > > > > > sexual cross pollination/gene mutation. > > > > > > > > > > Speaking about freewill, may be it is also your fate > > > > > that you exercise freewill. God knows the truth. > > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > > > --- rohiniranjan <rrgb@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Through your statement below "Many people were led > > > > > > to belive that > > > > > > they were let down ..] I am getting the impression > > > > > > that you truly > > > > > > believe that planets make things happen, and hence > > > > > > humans have no > > > > > > free-will or freedom of choice and that we are > > > > > > subservient to > > > > > > astrological factors -- all of us. > > > > > > > > > > > > I disagree. We have only recently talked about > > > > > > Yogananda and his > > > > > > statements and how he overcame planetary restraints > > > > > > and of course > > > > > > this forum is about remedies, about changing fate > > > > > > and at least that > > > > > > belief operates here. > > > > > > > > > > > > My viewpoint indicates that this is not so. Not > > > > > > everyone is equally > > > > > > subservient to planets. Planets are just alphabets. > > > > > > > > > > > > To use a very graphic example. A HATE message > > > > > > written on your garage > > > > > > is ver hurtful, powerful, but it is not the letters > > > > > > (planets) that > > > > > > give that negative emotional impact to that hate > > > > > > message which > > > > > > brought about this transformational moment in your > > > > > > life when you > > > > > > came back home and saw the hate message! > > > > > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > > > > > , vattem > > > > > > krishnan > > > > > > <bursar_99@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All 27 asterisms contribute to morality as well as > > > > > > leaders.Aslesha > > > > > > is no exceptio as world has seen what Mahatma > > > > > > Gandhi,Paul Macartney > > > > > > and oscar wilde. > > > > > > > The Stars certainly have say in all aspects and > > > > > > beyond doubt > > > > > > morality as an instinct too comes as a contribution. > > > > > > > If we do not really mix up and able to steer for > > > > > > clear > > > > > > views,Astrology as an assorted subjects has several > > > > > > parameters > > > > > > including signs,houses and bhavas and the > > > > > > interactions and > > > > > > conjunctions that gets imposed and influence life.Of > > > > > > these some have > > > > > > no issues with Mars in Cancer and other have no > > > > > > problems with 7th > > > > > > jupiter.If these for a moment are considered as some > > > > > > kind of > > > > > > exceptions,many people find that they were let down > > > > > > in lives by > > > > > > these conjunctions and aspects. > > > > > > > But a leader is one who is able to overcome and > > > > > > show his great > > > > > > and has a binding(at least the will to achieve).This > > > > > > issue of > > > > > > morality(commitment) has pronounced visibility that > > > > > > provides > > > > > > opportunity(considering as role model) to some thing > > > > > > to "do like > > > > > > that".Astrology in deep perspective could make > > > > > > revealations out of > > > > > > stars.The so called leaders where ever they have > > > > > > emerged and > > > > > > contributed for the goodwill of universe have base > > > > > > in their stars > > > > > > irrespective of Rahu,ketu and saturn etc which we > > > > > > often veer around > > > > > > and fail to appreciate the positive aspects of > > > > > > stars. > > > > > > > krishnan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rohiniranjan <rrgb@> wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Ragaji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What I had to say about morality, I have already > > > > > > stated :-) > > > > > > > I have also repeatedly stated my views based on > > > > > > personal > > > > > > > observations that it is futile to begin to believe > > > > > > that in > > > > > > astrology > > > > > > > opinions like "what ashlesha represents or will do > > > > > > to morality or > > > > > > > mars in cancer would or jupiter in 7th would" are > > > > > > dangerous red > > > > > > > herrings. And these start a myth and a > > > > > > superstition (a belief > > > > > > which > > > > > > > is held without challenging it, without observing > > > > > > it critically > > > > > > and > > > > > > > often just basing judgment on hearsay and not even > > > > > > informed > > > > > > > anecdotal evidence). I am opposed to that and > > > > > > through data keep > > > > > > > demonstrating and challenging such myths, be they > > > > > > some yoga, KSY > > > > > > or > > > > > > > sadesati or whatever. And I am happy to note that > > > > > > I am not alone. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am waiting now for an informed astrological > > > > > > response from you in > > > > > > > this new leadership role you have volunteered for! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please lead us ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Ahir > > > > > > Bhairav > > > > > > > <aahir_bhairav@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > RR ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please continue your discussion on > > > > > > morality and moon's > > > > > > > nakshatra ? What is your observation about > > > > > > Aslesha, the clinging > > > > > > > star ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail > > > > > > > > Use Photomail to share photos without annoying > > > > > > attachments. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE > > > > > > DIVINITY AND RELISH > > > > > > THE TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic astrology Astrology chart > > > > > > Astrology software > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Visit your group "" on the > > > > > > web. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To from this group, send an email > > > > > > to: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your use of is subject to the > > > > > > Terms of > > > > > > Service. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail > > > > > > > Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing > > > > > > a breeze. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection > > around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE DIVINITY AND RELISH > THE TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic astrology Astrology chart Astrology software > > > > > > > > > > > > Visit your group "" on the web. > > > > > > > > > > Terms of > Service. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail > > Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2006 Report Share Posted March 3, 2006 Respected Ranjan ji, I did not use the word 'guru' in any lighter vein. To me , any one I learn from, is a guru. And I have learnt from you , like from many others. They are all gurus , as far as I am concerned. With naman to all gurujan, Varun Trivedi , "rohiniranjan" <rrgb wrote: > > Dear Varunji, > > I am truly touched by your taking the time to respond. One humble > request to you and all. I have never and will not like to be so > lightly called 'Guru' or 'teacher' in this forum or elsewhere or be > listed with those who you think are teachers or gurus here or > elsewhere. > > The more loosely and callously we use the term Guru and Teacher, in > some way our personal learning suffers! > > I have not spoken so harshly before but I ask you to please be very > sensitive to my absolute abhorrance to the loose and reckless use of > these terms because that does disservice to Jyotish and to some of > the truly fine individuals who are working hard and trying to serve > it, here and elsewhere. > > To all -- we do not need or care for your respect -- but please keep > your disrespect and complexes to yourself! > > Enough said -- More cleaning to be done for the poor janitor in this > high school of Jyotish (not meaning this forum alone, by the way!) > > RR > > , "varun_trvd" > <varun_trvd@> wrote: > > > > Respected Gurujan, > > > > I do not know if I speak for the entire group or not, over a year > or > > so , I have realized that four respected gurus of this group are > > shri Ranjan ji , Krishnan ji , Ashutosh ji , and Arjun ji , not > > necessarily in that order. > > > > These four stalwarts are the pillars of this group. We feel hurt > > when any body shows disrespect to any of these luminaries. > > It becomes all the more painful if any of these stalwarts feels > hurt > > and says so. > > > > With naman to all gurujan, > > > > Varun Trivedi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , vattem krishnan > > <bursar_99@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Shri Rohini ji > > > When several views forth coming from a broad spectrum covering > > morality,astrology,psychology and even genitics,probably the > issues > > of leaders and issue of leadership is only a passing reference.I > do > > not think that needs to be taken personally and even I would like > to > > initiate a kind of remorse for the unintentional inklings and > > reflections.In the spirit of forgive and forget let us forge a > > balanced view.if some kind of thoughts were made to feel you > > otherwise please forgive.I think Arjun ji has already come out by > > taking back his writings.probably it is nice if we can really > switch > > over to very very interesting forth coming.No doubt all of us some > > how some times in our enethusiasm forget some basics.All these > views > > may not be taken as very personal as none of us for that have > > anything in person against any one. > > > May be we tend to go by the style of references and > > observe.Certainly some more restraint and patience is need when we > > really button back to reply. > > > iam sure you are at ease to accept to the reformed views > > tenedered by Mr Arjun ji as in very certain terms he felt sotty > and > > expressed > > > krishnan > > > > > > rohiniranjan <rrgb@> wrote: > > > Tanvir, Neeraj, members -- > > > > > > Please respond publicly and explain to me why this sarcasm > > directed > > > by member Mr. Arjun (which he claims is his penname in some > > message) > > > is justified or allowed to be published on this forum? > > > > > > Have I claimed to be a leader here? > > > DO I deserve this kind of insult?? > > > > > > Is this now the acceptable code of conduct by general spiritual > > > acceptance on this forum, by vocal and silent members regardless > > of > > > whether they love or hate what I feel I have the right to say? > > > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > > > > , "rohiniranjan" <rrgb@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Sorry if I hit some sensitive button Mr. Arjun! > > > > > > > > I am not and have never claimed to be the leader here, > disputed > > or > > > > otherwise. So please do not get personal for whatever personal > > > > reasons and issues you have, which I am unaware of -- but I > did > > > not > > > > fall off the turnip truck yesterday! > > > > > > > > I am pushing some buttons, obviously, some stale and > antiquated > > > ways > > > > of thinking, but that does not mean that I will tolerate any > > > > personal flings like this! > > > > > > > > Please keep your personal attributions and in that sense 'name- > > > > callings' to yourself. This is not in keeping with your self- > > > > proclaimed monastic, austere spiritual way that you have > talked > > > > about here earlier. > > > > > > > > Also, I do not want you to misuse your internet cafe time for > > > > useless pursuits like trashing 'RRji' who has already admitted > > to > > > > being this janitor at this high school and busy cleaning > messes! > > > > > > > > Please do not take it personally, but since you pointed your > > laser > > > > at me by name, I must respond, because that is my right! > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > , "panditarjun2004" > > > > <panditarjun2004@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > dear friends > > > > > > > > > > in the last few mails, RR ji let his reliased thoughts flow > in > > > his > > > > > own uninimitable style. needless to say RR is the (un) > > disputed > > > > > leader of JR. > > > > > > > > > > let me share my own realisation experiences with the more > > > > fortunate > > > > > members of this group. > > > > > > > > > > gods and planets are like ATMs for an unrealised person and > > they > > > > > exist somewhere else from where the native expects to > receive > > > > > something and lives in a permanent physchological order to > > > believe > > > > > that his wealth is somewhere else in these ATMs. Also these > > > > > unrealised persons believe that god is somewhere in the > higher > > > > > altitudes or in the caves and in that process they keep > going > > on > > > > in > > > > > circles to find god nowhere. all great realised people have > > > > shared > > > > > and penned these experiences in their autobiographies and i > > can > > > > > quote many. these unrealised people keep marching > untiringly > > in > > > > > their bahar yatra forever endlessly changing their > > destinations > > > > > continuously on a consistent basis. > > > > > > > > > > Gita (can give verse numbers) says that for a reliased > person, > > > > vedas > > > > > and shastras are meaningless. also for a realised person > god > > is > > > > > within. all these realised persons speak truth and march > > > inwards > > > > > (antar yatra) and control their body, mind and soul with > which > > > > they > > > > > realise their self and the invisible formless god within. > > once > > > > > these realised persons realise the god and align with the > god > > > > within > > > > > they are gods. these realised persons possess the power to > do > > > and > > > > > undo things whether one believes them or not or whether > > science > > > > > accepts them or not. > > > > > > > > > > what people like me does is a psychic job which is why i > > > consider > > > > > myself a healer first and an astrologer second. in healing > > when > > > a > > > > > native comes with a problem with a pre-mindset to diagnoise > > only > > > > > through planets, we speak the native's language with empathy > > and > > > > > give him or her the much needed healing and relieve him or > her > > > of > > > > > the pain or suffering. > > > > > > > > > > once a customer who is a doctor mentioned that only a best > > > lunatic > > > > > can treat and cure the lunatics as he only knows and feel > the > > > > > problems of a lunatic. request more learnt members to > correct > > > > this > > > > > doctor's observation if he is wrong. > > > > > > > > > > with best wishes > > > > > arjun > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Tatvamasi > > > > > <om_tatsat_om@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Friends, > > > > > > > > > > > > A horoscope is true representation of a person's > > > > > > chromosomal(genetic) structure. > > > > > > Planets and their placements in different houses > > > > > > indicate genes placement and they have specific > > > > > > predefined course of actionwhich can be equated to > > > > > > a genetic code of a plant which gives only specific > > > > > > colour to a flower etc. You alter such properties by > > > > > > sexual cross pollination/gene mutation. > > > > > > > > > > > > Speaking about freewill, may be it is also your fate > > > > > > that you exercise freewill. God knows the truth. > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > > > > > --- rohiniranjan <rrgb@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Through your statement below "Many people were led > > > > > > > to belive that > > > > > > > they were let down ..] I am getting the impression > > > > > > > that you truly > > > > > > > believe that planets make things happen, and hence > > > > > > > humans have no > > > > > > > free-will or freedom of choice and that we are > > > > > > > subservient to > > > > > > > astrological factors -- all of us. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I disagree. We have only recently talked about > > > > > > > Yogananda and his > > > > > > > statements and how he overcame planetary restraints > > > > > > > and of course > > > > > > > this forum is about remedies, about changing fate > > > > > > > and at least that > > > > > > > belief operates here. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My viewpoint indicates that this is not so. Not > > > > > > > everyone is equally > > > > > > > subservient to planets. Planets are just alphabets. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To use a very graphic example. A HATE message > > > > > > > written on your garage > > > > > > > is ver hurtful, powerful, but it is not the letters > > > > > > > (planets) that > > > > > > > give that negative emotional impact to that hate > > > > > > > message which > > > > > > > brought about this transformational moment in your > > > > > > > life when you > > > > > > > came back home and saw the hate message! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , vattem > > > > > > > krishnan > > > > > > > <bursar_99@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All 27 asterisms contribute to morality as well as > > > > > > > leaders.Aslesha > > > > > > > is no exceptio as world has seen what Mahatma > > > > > > > Gandhi,Paul Macartney > > > > > > > and oscar wilde. > > > > > > > > The Stars certainly have say in all aspects and > > > > > > > beyond doubt > > > > > > > morality as an instinct too comes as a contribution. > > > > > > > > If we do not really mix up and able to steer for > > > > > > > clear > > > > > > > views,Astrology as an assorted subjects has several > > > > > > > parameters > > > > > > > including signs,houses and bhavas and the > > > > > > > interactions and > > > > > > > conjunctions that gets imposed and influence life.Of > > > > > > > these some have > > > > > > > no issues with Mars in Cancer and other have no > > > > > > > problems with 7th > > > > > > > jupiter.If these for a moment are considered as some > > > > > > > kind of > > > > > > > exceptions,many people find that they were let down > > > > > > > in lives by > > > > > > > these conjunctions and aspects. > > > > > > > > But a leader is one who is able to overcome and > > > > > > > show his great > > > > > > > and has a binding(at least the will to achieve).This > > > > > > > issue of > > > > > > > morality(commitment) has pronounced visibility that > > > > > > > provides > > > > > > > opportunity(considering as role model) to some thing > > > > > > > to "do like > > > > > > > that".Astrology in deep perspective could make > > > > > > > revealations out of > > > > > > > stars.The so called leaders where ever they have > > > > > > > emerged and > > > > > > > contributed for the goodwill of universe have base > > > > > > > in their stars > > > > > > > irrespective of Rahu,ketu and saturn etc which we > > > > > > > often veer around > > > > > > > and fail to appreciate the positive aspects of > > > > > > > stars. > > > > > > > > krishnan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rohiniranjan <rrgb@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Ragaji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What I had to say about morality, I have already > > > > > > > stated :-) > > > > > > > > I have also repeatedly stated my views based on > > > > > > > personal > > > > > > > > observations that it is futile to begin to believe > > > > > > > that in > > > > > > > astrology > > > > > > > > opinions like "what ashlesha represents or will do > > > > > > > to morality or > > > > > > > > mars in cancer would or jupiter in 7th would" are > > > > > > > dangerous red > > > > > > > > herrings. And these start a myth and a > > > > > > > superstition (a belief > > > > > > > which > > > > > > > > is held without challenging it, without observing > > > > > > > it critically > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > often just basing judgment on hearsay and not even > > > > > > > informed > > > > > > > > anecdotal evidence). I am opposed to that and > > > > > > > through data keep > > > > > > > > demonstrating and challenging such myths, be they > > > > > > > some yoga, KSY > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > sadesati or whatever. And I am happy to note that > > > > > > > I am not alone. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am waiting now for an informed astrological > > > > > > > response from you in > > > > > > > > this new leadership role you have volunteered for! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please lead us ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Ahir > > > > > > > Bhairav > > > > > > > > <aahir_bhairav@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > RR ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please continue your discussion on > > > > > > > morality and moon's > > > > > > > > nakshatra ? What is your observation about > > > > > > > Aslesha, the clinging > > > > > > > > star ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail > > > > > > > > > Use Photomail to share photos without annoying > > > > > > > attachments. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE > > > > > > > DIVINITY AND RELISH > > > > > > > THE TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic astrology Astrology chart > > > > > > > Astrology software > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Visit your group "" on the > > > > > > > web. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To from this group, send an email > > > > > > > to: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your use of is subject to the > > > > > > > Terms of > > > > > > > Service. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail > > > > > > > > Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing > > > > > > > a breeze. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection > > > around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE DIVINITY AND > RELISH > > THE TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic astrology Astrology chart Astrology software > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Visit your group "" on the web. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Terms of > > Service. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail > > > Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2006 Report Share Posted March 3, 2006 Dear Trivediji. Your kind sincerity and gratitude where it was not even necessary, particularly towards me, is appreciated and gratefully received. The day I will be able to read astrological language and scripts to the tune of 100%, not 99 or 95, but 100 -- and PURELY through astrologics, I will proudly announce myself as the Guru and will demand that people call me so! Magar abhi dili door hai -- bahut door hai. In fact and Mr, KN Rao has written about this regarding jyotishmati nadi and his revered Mother in this context -- before any jyotishi reaches that 100% mark of achievement, they are promoted to the next level where they do not even need a horoscope to tell someone's future! On the one hand, this is a bonus as all of us who have suffered through wrong software and other errors -- it also curiously fulfils and keeps alive the curse that I believe Ma Parwati cast on all astrologers that they will never be 100% accurate. This is the beauty of allegories if these are indeed true! Through switching the 'track' humans get the best, potentially and the Divine curse remains intact!! RR , "varun_trvd" <varun_trvd wrote: > > Respected Ranjan ji, > > I did not use the word 'guru' in any lighter vein. To me , any one I > learn from, is a guru. And I have learnt from you , like from many > others. They are all gurus , as far as I am concerned. > > With naman to all gurujan, > > Varun Trivedi > > > > , "rohiniranjan" <rrgb@> > wrote: > > > > Dear Varunji, > > > > I am truly touched by your taking the time to respond. One humble > > request to you and all. I have never and will not like to be so > > lightly called 'Guru' or 'teacher' in this forum or elsewhere or > be > > listed with those who you think are teachers or gurus here or > > elsewhere. > > > > The more loosely and callously we use the term Guru and Teacher, > in > > some way our personal learning suffers! > > > > I have not spoken so harshly before but I ask you to please be > very > > sensitive to my absolute abhorrance to the loose and reckless use > of > > these terms because that does disservice to Jyotish and to some of > > the truly fine individuals who are working hard and trying to > serve > > it, here and elsewhere. > > > > To all -- we do not need or care for your respect -- but please > keep > > your disrespect and complexes to yourself! > > > > Enough said -- More cleaning to be done for the poor janitor in > this > > high school of Jyotish (not meaning this forum alone, by the way!) > > > > RR > > > > , "varun_trvd" > > <varun_trvd@> wrote: > > > > > > Respected Gurujan, > > > > > > I do not know if I speak for the entire group or not, over a > year > > or > > > so , I have realized that four respected gurus of this group are > > > shri Ranjan ji , Krishnan ji , Ashutosh ji , and Arjun ji , not > > > necessarily in that order. > > > > > > These four stalwarts are the pillars of this group. We feel hurt > > > when any body shows disrespect to any of these luminaries. > > > It becomes all the more painful if any of these stalwarts feels > > hurt > > > and says so. > > > > > > With naman to all gurujan, > > > > > > Varun Trivedi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , vattem krishnan > > > <bursar_99@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Shri Rohini ji > > > > When several views forth coming from a broad spectrum > covering > > > morality,astrology,psychology and even genitics,probably the > > issues > > > of leaders and issue of leadership is only a passing reference.I > > do > > > not think that needs to be taken personally and even I would > like > > to > > > initiate a kind of remorse for the unintentional inklings and > > > reflections.In the spirit of forgive and forget let us forge a > > > balanced view.if some kind of thoughts were made to feel you > > > otherwise please forgive.I think Arjun ji has already come out > by > > > taking back his writings.probably it is nice if we can really > > switch > > > over to very very interesting forth coming.No doubt all of us > some > > > how some times in our enethusiasm forget some basics.All these > > views > > > may not be taken as very personal as none of us for that have > > > anything in person against any one. > > > > May be we tend to go by the style of references and > > > observe.Certainly some more restraint and patience is need when > we > > > really button back to reply. > > > > iam sure you are at ease to accept to the reformed views > > > tenedered by Mr Arjun ji as in very certain terms he felt sotty > > and > > > expressed > > > > krishnan > > > > > > > > rohiniranjan <rrgb@> wrote: > > > > Tanvir, Neeraj, members -- > > > > > > > > Please respond publicly and explain to me why this sarcasm > > > directed > > > > by member Mr. Arjun (which he claims is his penname in some > > > message) > > > > is justified or allowed to be published on this forum? > > > > > > > > Have I claimed to be a leader here? > > > > DO I deserve this kind of insult?? > > > > > > > > Is this now the acceptable code of conduct by general > spiritual > > > > acceptance on this forum, by vocal and silent members > regardless > > > of > > > > whether they love or hate what I feel I have the right to say? > > > > > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > > > > > > > , "rohiniranjan" > <rrgb@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Sorry if I hit some sensitive button Mr. Arjun! > > > > > > > > > > I am not and have never claimed to be the leader here, > > disputed > > > or > > > > > otherwise. So please do not get personal for whatever > personal > > > > > reasons and issues you have, which I am unaware of -- but I > > did > > > > not > > > > > fall off the turnip truck yesterday! > > > > > > > > > > I am pushing some buttons, obviously, some stale and > > antiquated > > > > ways > > > > > of thinking, but that does not mean that I will tolerate any > > > > > personal flings like this! > > > > > > > > > > Please keep your personal attributions and in that > sense 'name- > > > > > callings' to yourself. This is not in keeping with your self- > > > > > proclaimed monastic, austere spiritual way that you have > > talked > > > > > about here earlier. > > > > > > > > > > Also, I do not want you to misuse your internet cafe time > for > > > > > useless pursuits like trashing 'RRji' who has already > admitted > > > to > > > > > being this janitor at this high school and busy cleaning > > messes! > > > > > > > > > > Please do not take it personally, but since you pointed your > > > laser > > > > > at me by name, I must respond, because that is my right! > > > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > > > , "panditarjun2004" > > > > > <panditarjun2004@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > dear friends > > > > > > > > > > > > in the last few mails, RR ji let his reliased thoughts > flow > > in > > > > his > > > > > > own uninimitable style. needless to say RR is the (un) > > > disputed > > > > > > leader of JR. > > > > > > > > > > > > let me share my own realisation experiences with the more > > > > > fortunate > > > > > > members of this group. > > > > > > > > > > > > gods and planets are like ATMs for an unrealised person > and > > > they > > > > > > exist somewhere else from where the native expects to > > receive > > > > > > something and lives in a permanent physchological order to > > > > believe > > > > > > that his wealth is somewhere else in these ATMs. Also > these > > > > > > unrealised persons believe that god is somewhere in the > > higher > > > > > > altitudes or in the caves and in that process they keep > > going > > > on > > > > > in > > > > > > circles to find god nowhere. all great realised people > have > > > > > shared > > > > > > and penned these experiences in their autobiographies and > i > > > can > > > > > > quote many. these unrealised people keep marching > > untiringly > > > in > > > > > > their bahar yatra forever endlessly changing their > > > destinations > > > > > > continuously on a consistent basis. > > > > > > > > > > > > Gita (can give verse numbers) says that for a reliased > > person, > > > > > vedas > > > > > > and shastras are meaningless. also for a realised person > > god > > > is > > > > > > within. all these realised persons speak truth and march > > > > inwards > > > > > > (antar yatra) and control their body, mind and soul with > > which > > > > > they > > > > > > realise their self and the invisible formless god within. > > > once > > > > > > these realised persons realise the god and align with the > > god > > > > > within > > > > > > they are gods. these realised persons possess the power > to > > do > > > > and > > > > > > undo things whether one believes them or not or whether > > > science > > > > > > accepts them or not. > > > > > > > > > > > > what people like me does is a psychic job which is why i > > > > consider > > > > > > myself a healer first and an astrologer second. in > healing > > > when > > > > a > > > > > > native comes with a problem with a pre-mindset to > diagnoise > > > only > > > > > > through planets, we speak the native's language with > empathy > > > and > > > > > > give him or her the much needed healing and relieve him or > > her > > > > of > > > > > > the pain or suffering. > > > > > > > > > > > > once a customer who is a doctor mentioned that only a best > > > > lunatic > > > > > > can treat and cure the lunatics as he only knows and feel > > the > > > > > > problems of a lunatic. request more learnt members to > > correct > > > > > this > > > > > > doctor's observation if he is wrong. > > > > > > > > > > > > with best wishes > > > > > > arjun > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Tatvamasi > > > > > > <om_tatsat_om@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Friends, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A horoscope is true representation of a person's > > > > > > > chromosomal(genetic) structure. > > > > > > > Planets and their placements in different houses > > > > > > > indicate genes placement and they have specific > > > > > > > predefined course of actionwhich can be equated to > > > > > > > a genetic code of a plant which gives only specific > > > > > > > colour to a flower etc. You alter such properties by > > > > > > > sexual cross pollination/gene mutation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Speaking about freewill, may be it is also your fate > > > > > > > that you exercise freewill. God knows the truth. > > > > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- rohiniranjan <rrgb@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Through your statement below "Many people were led > > > > > > > > to belive that > > > > > > > > they were let down ..] I am getting the impression > > > > > > > > that you truly > > > > > > > > believe that planets make things happen, and hence > > > > > > > > humans have no > > > > > > > > free-will or freedom of choice and that we are > > > > > > > > subservient to > > > > > > > > astrological factors -- all of us. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I disagree. We have only recently talked about > > > > > > > > Yogananda and his > > > > > > > > statements and how he overcame planetary restraints > > > > > > > > and of course > > > > > > > > this forum is about remedies, about changing fate > > > > > > > > and at least that > > > > > > > > belief operates here. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My viewpoint indicates that this is not so. Not > > > > > > > > everyone is equally > > > > > > > > subservient to planets. Planets are just alphabets. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To use a very graphic example. A HATE message > > > > > > > > written on your garage > > > > > > > > is ver hurtful, powerful, but it is not the letters > > > > > > > > (planets) that > > > > > > > > give that negative emotional impact to that hate > > > > > > > > message which > > > > > > > > brought about this transformational moment in your > > > > > > > > life when you > > > > > > > > came back home and saw the hate message! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , vattem > > > > > > > > krishnan > > > > > > > > <bursar_99@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All 27 asterisms contribute to morality as well as > > > > > > > > leaders.Aslesha > > > > > > > > is no exceptio as world has seen what Mahatma > > > > > > > > Gandhi,Paul Macartney > > > > > > > > and oscar wilde. > > > > > > > > > The Stars certainly have say in all aspects and > > > > > > > > beyond doubt > > > > > > > > morality as an instinct too comes as a contribution. > > > > > > > > > If we do not really mix up and able to steer for > > > > > > > > clear > > > > > > > > views,Astrology as an assorted subjects has several > > > > > > > > parameters > > > > > > > > including signs,houses and bhavas and the > > > > > > > > interactions and > > > > > > > > conjunctions that gets imposed and influence life.Of > > > > > > > > these some have > > > > > > > > no issues with Mars in Cancer and other have no > > > > > > > > problems with 7th > > > > > > > > jupiter.If these for a moment are considered as some > > > > > > > > kind of > > > > > > > > exceptions,many people find that they were let down > > > > > > > > in lives by > > > > > > > > these conjunctions and aspects. > > > > > > > > > But a leader is one who is able to overcome and > > > > > > > > show his great > > > > > > > > and has a binding(at least the will to achieve).This > > > > > > > > issue of > > > > > > > > morality(commitment) has pronounced visibility that > > > > > > > > provides > > > > > > > > opportunity(considering as role model) to some thing > > > > > > > > to "do like > > > > > > > > that".Astrology in deep perspective could make > > > > > > > > revealations out of > > > > > > > > stars.The so called leaders where ever they have > > > > > > > > emerged and > > > > > > > > contributed for the goodwill of universe have base > > > > > > > > in their stars > > > > > > > > irrespective of Rahu,ketu and saturn etc which we > > > > > > > > often veer around > > > > > > > > and fail to appreciate the positive aspects of > > > > > > > > stars. > > > > > > > > > krishnan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rohiniranjan <rrgb@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear Ragaji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What I had to say about morality, I have already > > > > > > > > stated :-) > > > > > > > > > I have also repeatedly stated my views based on > > > > > > > > personal > > > > > > > > > observations that it is futile to begin to believe > > > > > > > > that in > > > > > > > > astrology > > > > > > > > > opinions like "what ashlesha represents or will do > > > > > > > > to morality or > > > > > > > > > mars in cancer would or jupiter in 7th would" are > > > > > > > > dangerous red > > > > > > > > > herrings. And these start a myth and a > > > > > > > > superstition (a belief > > > > > > > > which > > > > > > > > > is held without challenging it, without observing > > > > > > > > it critically > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > often just basing judgment on hearsay and not even > > > > > > > > informed > > > > > > > > > anecdotal evidence). I am opposed to that and > > > > > > > > through data keep > > > > > > > > > demonstrating and challenging such myths, be they > > > > > > > > some yoga, KSY > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > sadesati or whatever. And I am happy to note that > > > > > > > > I am not alone. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am waiting now for an informed astrological > > > > > > > > response from you in > > > > > > > > > this new leadership role you have volunteered for! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please lead us ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Ahir > > > > > > > > Bhairav > > > > > > > > > <aahir_bhairav@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > RR ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please continue your discussion on > > > > > > > > morality and moon's > > > > > > > > > nakshatra ? What is your observation about > > > > > > > > Aslesha, the clinging > > > > > > > > > star ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail > > > > > > > > > > Use Photomail to share photos without annoying > > > > > > > > attachments. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE > > > > > > > > DIVINITY AND RELISH > > > > > > > > THE TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic astrology Astrology chart > > > > > > > > Astrology software > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Visit your group "" on the > > > > > > > > web. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To from this group, send an email > > > > > > > > to: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your use of is subject to the > > > > > > > > Terms of > > > > > > > > Service. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail > > > > > > > > > Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing > > > > > > > > a breeze. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection > > > > around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE DIVINITY AND > > RELISH > > > THE TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic astrology Astrology chart Astrology software > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Visit your group "" on the web. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Terms > of > > > Service. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail > > > > Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 I have just joined the Group and am unaware of the long past backgrounds of this Forum. So I cannot put myself in any controversies or arguments. Secondly, I may be considered as a junior/raw member of the Forum. So, I will keep myself excluded in any type of controversies, polls (that I have still to comprehend), etc. Ayush Tripathi. , "rohiniranjan" <rrgb wrote: > > Tanvir, Neeraj, members -- > > Please respond publicly and explain to me why this sarcasm directed > by member Mr. Arjun (which he claims is his penname in some message) > is justified or allowed to be published on this forum? > > Have I claimed to be a leader here? > DO I deserve this kind of insult?? > > Is this now the acceptable code of conduct by general spiritual > acceptance on this forum, by vocal and silent members regardless of > whether they love or hate what I feel I have the right to say? > > Rohiniranjan > > > , "rohiniranjan" <rrgb@> > wrote: > > > > Sorry if I hit some sensitive button Mr. Arjun! > > > > I am not and have never claimed to be the leader here, disputed or > > otherwise. So please do not get personal for whatever personal > > reasons and issues you have, which I am unaware of -- but I did > not > > fall off the turnip truck yesterday! > > > > I am pushing some buttons, obviously, some stale and antiquated > ways > > of thinking, but that does not mean that I will tolerate any > > personal flings like this! > > > > Please keep your personal attributions and in that sense 'name- > > callings' to yourself. This is not in keeping with your self- > > proclaimed monastic, austere spiritual way that you have talked > > about here earlier. > > > > Also, I do not want you to misuse your internet cafe time for > > useless pursuits like trashing 'RRji' who has already admitted to > > being this janitor at this high school and busy cleaning messes! > > > > Please do not take it personally, but since you pointed your laser > > at me by name, I must respond, because that is my right! > > > > RR > > > > , "panditarjun2004" > > <panditarjun2004@> wrote: > > > > > > dear friends > > > > > > in the last few mails, RR ji let his reliased thoughts flow in > his > > > own uninimitable style. needless to say RR is the (un) disputed > > > leader of JR. > > > > > > let me share my own realisation experiences with the more > > fortunate > > > members of this group. > > > > > > gods and planets are like ATMs for an unrealised person and they > > > exist somewhere else from where the native expects to receive > > > something and lives in a permanent physchological order to > believe > > > that his wealth is somewhere else in these ATMs. Also these > > > unrealised persons believe that god is somewhere in the higher > > > altitudes or in the caves and in that process they keep going on > > in > > > circles to find god nowhere. all great realised people have > > shared > > > and penned these experiences in their autobiographies and i can > > > quote many. these unrealised people keep marching untiringly in > > > their bahar yatra forever endlessly changing their destinations > > > continuously on a consistent basis. > > > > > > Gita (can give verse numbers) says that for a reliased person, > > vedas > > > and shastras are meaningless. also for a realised person god is > > > within. all these realised persons speak truth and march > inwards > > > (antar yatra) and control their body, mind and soul with which > > they > > > realise their self and the invisible formless god within. once > > > these realised persons realise the god and align with the god > > within > > > they are gods. these realised persons possess the power to do > and > > > undo things whether one believes them or not or whether science > > > accepts them or not. > > > > > > what people like me does is a psychic job which is why i > consider > > > myself a healer first and an astrologer second. in healing when > a > > > native comes with a problem with a pre-mindset to diagnoise only > > > through planets, we speak the native's language with empathy and > > > give him or her the much needed healing and relieve him or her > of > > > the pain or suffering. > > > > > > once a customer who is a doctor mentioned that only a best > lunatic > > > can treat and cure the lunatics as he only knows and feel the > > > problems of a lunatic. request more learnt members to correct > > this > > > doctor's observation if he is wrong. > > > > > > with best wishes > > > arjun > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Tatvamasi > > > <om_tatsat_om@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Friends, > > > > > > > > A horoscope is true representation of a person's > > > > chromosomal(genetic) structure. > > > > Planets and their placements in different houses > > > > indicate genes placement and they have specific > > > > predefined course of actionwhich can be equated to > > > > a genetic code of a plant which gives only specific > > > > colour to a flower etc. You alter such properties by > > > > sexual cross pollination/gene mutation. > > > > > > > > Speaking about freewill, may be it is also your fate > > > > that you exercise freewill. God knows the truth. > > > > Tatvam-Asi > > > > > > > > --- rohiniranjan <rrgb@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Through your statement below "Many people were led > > > > > to belive that > > > > > they were let down ..] I am getting the impression > > > > > that you truly > > > > > believe that planets make things happen, and hence > > > > > humans have no > > > > > free-will or freedom of choice and that we are > > > > > subservient to > > > > > astrological factors -- all of us. > > > > > > > > > > I disagree. We have only recently talked about > > > > > Yogananda and his > > > > > statements and how he overcame planetary restraints > > > > > and of course > > > > > this forum is about remedies, about changing fate > > > > > and at least that > > > > > belief operates here. > > > > > > > > > > My viewpoint indicates that this is not so. Not > > > > > everyone is equally > > > > > subservient to planets. Planets are just alphabets. > > > > > > > > > > To use a very graphic example. A HATE message > > > > > written on your garage > > > > > is ver hurtful, powerful, but it is not the letters > > > > > (planets) that > > > > > give that negative emotional impact to that hate > > > > > message which > > > > > brought about this transformational moment in your > > > > > life when you > > > > > came back home and saw the hate message! > > > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > > > , vattem > > > > > krishnan > > > > > <bursar_99@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > All 27 asterisms contribute to morality as well as > > > > > leaders.Aslesha > > > > > is no exceptio as world has seen what Mahatma > > > > > Gandhi,Paul Macartney > > > > > and oscar wilde. > > > > > > The Stars certainly have say in all aspects and > > > > > beyond doubt > > > > > morality as an instinct too comes as a contribution. > > > > > > If we do not really mix up and able to steer for > > > > > clear > > > > > views,Astrology as an assorted subjects has several > > > > > parameters > > > > > including signs,houses and bhavas and the > > > > > interactions and > > > > > conjunctions that gets imposed and influence life.Of > > > > > these some have > > > > > no issues with Mars in Cancer and other have no > > > > > problems with 7th > > > > > jupiter.If these for a moment are considered as some > > > > > kind of > > > > > exceptions,many people find that they were let down > > > > > in lives by > > > > > these conjunctions and aspects. > > > > > > But a leader is one who is able to overcome and > > > > > show his great > > > > > and has a binding(at least the will to achieve).This > > > > > issue of > > > > > morality(commitment) has pronounced visibility that > > > > > provides > > > > > opportunity(considering as role model) to some thing > > > > > to "do like > > > > > that".Astrology in deep perspective could make > > > > > revealations out of > > > > > stars.The so called leaders where ever they have > > > > > emerged and > > > > > contributed for the goodwill of universe have base > > > > > in their stars > > > > > irrespective of Rahu,ketu and saturn etc which we > > > > > often veer around > > > > > and fail to appreciate the positive aspects of > > > > > stars. > > > > > > krishnan > > > > > > > > > > > > rohiniranjan <rrgb@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Ragaji, > > > > > > > > > > > > What I had to say about morality, I have already > > > > > stated :-) > > > > > > I have also repeatedly stated my views based on > > > > > personal > > > > > > observations that it is futile to begin to believe > > > > > that in > > > > > astrology > > > > > > opinions like "what ashlesha represents or will do > > > > > to morality or > > > > > > mars in cancer would or jupiter in 7th would" are > > > > > dangerous red > > > > > > herrings. And these start a myth and a > > > > > superstition (a belief > > > > > which > > > > > > is held without challenging it, without observing > > > > > it critically > > > > > and > > > > > > often just basing judgment on hearsay and not even > > > > > informed > > > > > > anecdotal evidence). I am opposed to that and > > > > > through data keep > > > > > > demonstrating and challenging such myths, be they > > > > > some yoga, KSY > > > > > or > > > > > > sadesati or whatever. And I am happy to note that > > > > > I am not alone. > > > > > > > > > > > > I am waiting now for an informed astrological > > > > > response from you in > > > > > > this new leadership role you have volunteered for! > > > > > > > > > > > > Please lead us ... > > > > > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > > > > > , Ahir > > > > > Bhairav > > > > > > <aahir_bhairav@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > RR ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please continue your discussion on > > > > > morality and moon's > > > > > > nakshatra ? What is your observation about > > > > > Aslesha, the clinging > > > > > > star ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail > > > > > > > Use Photomail to share photos without annoying > > > > > attachments. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE > > > > > DIVINITY AND RELISH > > > > > THE TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic astrology Astrology chart > > > > > Astrology software > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Visit your group "" on the > > > > > web. > > > > > > > > > > > > To from this group, send an email > > > > > to: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your use of is subject to the > > > > > Terms of > > > > > Service. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail > > > > > > Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing > > > > > a breeze. > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection > around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2006 Report Share Posted March 6, 2006 Hello Everybody, First of all I apologize that I am not participating for last couple of weeks. There were some family problems and hence I was unable to look the messages. There were two deaths in the family (my grand father and his elder brother expired) due to which I could not devote time here. I hope you people can understand. I know that Rohini Ji is an active member of the group and respond the messages and queries in a good way. Further, I would like to tell you and request all of the members that this group is solely for the discussion and learning purpose. There are many different kinds of people and everybody has its own writing style. However, sarcasm or using wrong language (it should not hurt other person feelings) is not allowed. Please maintain the group decorum. As our group has a large number of members, so if there is any specifice issue, please let mark a mail to Tanvir or me and we will take care of this. I apologize for the delay in responding to this thread. Regards, Neeraj Gupta (JR-Group-Moderator) --- varun_trvd <varun_trvd wrote: > Respected Gurujan, > > I do not know if I speak for the entire group or > not, over a year or > so , I have realized that four respected gurus of > this group are > shri Ranjan ji , Krishnan ji , Ashutosh ji , and > Arjun ji , not > necessarily in that order. > > These four stalwarts are the pillars of this group. > We feel hurt > when any body shows disrespect to any of these > luminaries. > It becomes all the more painful if any of these > stalwarts feels hurt > and says so. > > With naman to all gurujan, > > Varun Trivedi > > > > > , vattem > krishnan > <bursar_99 wrote: > > > > Dear Shri Rohini ji > > When several views forth coming from a broad > spectrum covering > morality,astrology,psychology and even > genitics,probably the issues > of leaders and issue of leadership is only a passing > reference.I do > not think that needs to be taken personally and even > I would like to > initiate a kind of remorse for the unintentional > inklings and > reflections.In the spirit of forgive and forget let > us forge a > balanced view.if some kind of thoughts were made to > feel you > otherwise please forgive.I think Arjun ji has > already come out by > taking back his writings.probably it is nice if we > can really switch > over to very very interesting forth coming.No doubt > all of us some > how some times in our enethusiasm forget some > basics.All these views > may not be taken as very personal as none of us for > that have > anything in person against any one. > > May be we tend to go by the style of references > and > observe.Certainly some more restraint and patience > is need when we > really button back to reply. > > iam sure you are at ease to accept to the > reformed views > tenedered by Mr Arjun ji as in very certain terms he > felt sotty and > expressed > > krishnan > > > > rohiniranjan <rrgb wrote: > > Tanvir, Neeraj, members -- > > > > Please respond publicly and explain to me why this > sarcasm > directed > > by member Mr. Arjun (which he claims is his > penname in some > message) > > is justified or allowed to be published on this > forum? > > > > Have I claimed to be a leader here? > > DO I deserve this kind of insult?? > > > > Is this now the acceptable code of conduct by > general spiritual > > acceptance on this forum, by vocal and silent > members regardless > of > > whether they love or hate what I feel I have the > right to say? > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > , > "rohiniranjan" <rrgb@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Sorry if I hit some sensitive button Mr. Arjun! > > > > > > I am not and have never claimed to be the leader > here, disputed > or > > > otherwise. So please do not get personal for > whatever personal > > > reasons and issues you have, which I am unaware > of -- but I did > > not > > > fall off the turnip truck yesterday! > > > > > > I am pushing some buttons, obviously, some stale > and antiquated > > ways > > > of thinking, but that does not mean that I will > tolerate any > > > personal flings like this! > > > > > > Please keep your personal attributions and in > that sense 'name- > > > callings' to yourself. This is not in keeping > with your self- > > > proclaimed monastic, austere spiritual way that > you have talked > > > about here earlier. > > > > > > Also, I do not want you to misuse your internet > cafe time for > > > useless pursuits like trashing 'RRji' who has > already admitted > to > > > being this janitor at this high school and busy > cleaning messes! > > > > > > Please do not take it personally, but since you > pointed your > laser > > > at me by name, I must respond, because that is > my right! > > > > > > RR > > > > > > , > "panditarjun2004" > > > <panditarjun2004@> wrote: > > > > > > > > dear friends > > > > > > > > in the last few mails, RR ji let his reliased > thoughts flow in > > his > > > > own uninimitable style. needless to say RR is > the (un) > disputed > > > > leader of JR. > > > > > > > > let me share my own realisation experiences > with the more > > > fortunate > > > > members of this group. > > > > > > > > gods and planets are like ATMs for an > unrealised person and > they > > > > exist somewhere else from where the native > expects to receive > > > > something and lives in a permanent > physchological order to > > believe > > > > that his wealth is somewhere else in these > ATMs. Also these > > > > unrealised persons believe that god is > somewhere in the higher > > > > altitudes or in the caves and in that process > they keep going > on > > > in > > > > circles to find god nowhere. all great > realised people have > > > shared > > > > and penned these experiences in their > autobiographies and i > can > > > > quote many. these unrealised people keep > marching untiringly > in > > > > their bahar yatra forever endlessly changing > their > destinations > > > > continuously on a consistent basis. > > > > > > > > Gita (can give verse numbers) says that for a > reliased person, > > > vedas > > > > and shastras are meaningless. also for a > realised person god > === message truncated === http://www.neerajgupta.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2006 Report Share Posted March 7, 2006 Dear Sir, The August 'jyotishremedies' group is suggestive by name that it offers astrological remedies based on natal chart and its technical analysis or by some other suitable methods that have scriptural sanctions of respective religions. It's true a querent cannot demand free service,but your noble intentions were many a time expressed through mails that the services will be given free of cost depending upon feasibility of the time and willingness of benevolent contributors/analysts.It's also true that some of the seekers started to take it for granted and started demanding serial queries postings either for themselves or by proxy for others,and the same were gently admonished by founders as well as contributors.This is a general problem which you people have effectively been dealing with. But another big problem(more bigger than former) is occupation of space and attention for elaborative philosophical musings and generic dealing of the analysis(seems sometimes without looking at chart at all) being indulged by some members ,and thus distracting the founding spirit of the forum. I've been watching the treatment of a querent by persons like Sri Asutoshji,Sri Krishnanji,Sri Arjunji,Sri Kadji,Sri Trivediji,Sri Chopraji,SriKuldhirJi etc and few others,who are keeping to the true tenets of the founding spirit of the forum and rendering wonderful "jyotish" service with in their possible limitations of their time and knowledgebase. But some inspite of their gifted knowledge base are not doing any(or say very little) technical analysis and indulging in elaborate generic/philosophical treatment / musings or with their gift of jab of one or two liners ,triggering the innocents(some of the seekers) to become loquacious and thus distracting the founding principles of the forum. It's natural that there is every chance for other service contributors who've been doing jyotish technical based anlysis for good of the seekers,will start to divert their precious time for such generic philosophical musings and thus denying a seeker of redemption of his suffering. You please advise these people to give a pause on the forum and contimue on one to one(or among select few) if they deem that it is necessary.It's true that sometimes the philosophical discussion will alone quench the thirst of suffering soul instead of technical analysis of the chart.But the seekers who come to this August forum (by seeing the forum name) expects more of astro-technical analysis than the generic philososphy. It's like drawing lines between a physician(here generic philosopher) job and surgeon(jyotish expert)job.In short when physician fails the surgeon has to enter.When a seeker comes with expectation of astro remedies and instead exposed to more of generic philosophical expostion he either loose interest or feel like not recommending for suffering souls about this noble group and gradually the group will turn into generic philosophical forum instead of standing upto the named spirit. Many a person has great philosophical currents of thoughts going inside them but they donot have expressive power due to so many reasons.But most of the seekers flocking to this group certainly doesn't have astro knowledge,and they come with great hope for a treatment of their soul through scripturally laiddown principles on jyotish principles. As a beneficiary of this August forum I'm writing this mail witha thankful attitude and asking the benevolent founders and service contributors to keep the true founding objectives of the forum. regards srinivas Neeraj Gupta <gupta_neeraj_2000 wrote: Hello Everybody, First of all I apologize that I am not participating for last couple of weeks. There were some family problems and hence I was unable to look the messages. There were two deaths in the family (my grand father and his elder brother expired) due to which I could not devote time here. I hope you people can understand. I know that Rohini Ji is an active member of the group and respond the messages and queries in a good way. Further, I would like to tell you and request all of the members that this group is solely for the discussion and learning purpose. There are many different kinds of people and everybody has its own writing style. However, sarcasm or using wrong language (it should not hurt other person feelings) is not allowed. Please maintain the group decorum. As our group has a large number of members, so if there is any specifice issue, please let mark a mail to Tanvir or me and we will take care of this. I apologize for the delay in responding to this thread. Regards, Neeraj Gupta (JR-Group-Moderator) --- varun_trvd <varun_trvd wrote: > Respected Gurujan, > > I do not know if I speak for the entire group or > not, over a year or > so , I have realized that four respected gurus of > this group are > shri Ranjan ji , Krishnan ji , Ashutosh ji , and > Arjun ji , not > necessarily in that order. > > These four stalwarts are the pillars of this group. > We feel hurt > when any body shows disrespect to any of these > luminaries. > It becomes all the more painful if any of these > stalwarts feels hurt > and says so. > > With naman to all gurujan, > > Varun Trivedi > > > > > , vattem > krishnan > <bursar_99 wrote: > > > > Dear Shri Rohini ji > > When several views forth coming from a broad > spectrum covering > morality,astrology,psychology and even > genitics,probably the issues > of leaders and issue of leadership is only a passing > reference.I do > not think that needs to be taken personally and even > I would like to > initiate a kind of remorse for the unintentional > inklings and > reflections.In the spirit of forgive and forget let > us forge a > balanced view.if some kind of thoughts were made to > feel you > otherwise please forgive.I think Arjun ji has > already come out by > taking back his writings.probably it is nice if we > can really switch > over to very very interesting forth coming.No doubt > all of us some > how some times in our enethusiasm forget some > basics.All these views > may not be taken as very personal as none of us for > that have > anything in person against any one. > > May be we tend to go by the style of references > and > observe.Certainly some more restraint and patience > is need when we > really button back to reply. > > iam sure you are at ease to accept to the > reformed views > tenedered by Mr Arjun ji as in very certain terms he > felt sotty and > expressed > > krishnan > > > > rohiniranjan <rrgb wrote: > > Tanvir, Neeraj, members -- > > > > Please respond publicly and explain to me why this > sarcasm > directed > > by member Mr. Arjun (which he claims is his > penname in some > message) > > is justified or allowed to be published on this > forum? > > > > Have I claimed to be a leader here? > > DO I deserve this kind of insult?? > > > > Is this now the acceptable code of conduct by > general spiritual > > acceptance on this forum, by vocal and silent > members regardless > of > > whether they love or hate what I feel I have the > right to say? > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > , > "rohiniranjan" <rrgb@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Sorry if I hit some sensitive button Mr. Arjun! > > > > > > I am not and have never claimed to be the leader > here, disputed > or > > > otherwise. So please do not get personal for > whatever personal > > > reasons and issues you have, which I am unaware > of -- but I did > > not > > > fall off the turnip truck yesterday! > > > > > > I am pushing some buttons, obviously, some stale > and antiquated > > ways > > > of thinking, but that does not mean that I will > tolerate any > > > personal flings like this! > > > > > > Please keep your personal attributions and in > that sense 'name- > > > callings' to yourself. This is not in keeping > with your self- > > > proclaimed monastic, austere spiritual way that > you have talked > > > about here earlier. > > > > > > Also, I do not want you to misuse your internet > cafe time for > > > useless pursuits like trashing 'RRji' who has > already admitted > to > > > being this janitor at this high school and busy > cleaning messes! > > > > > > Please do not take it personally, but since you > pointed your > laser > > > at me by name, I must respond, because that is > my right! > > > > > > RR > > > > > > , > "panditarjun2004" > > > <panditarjun2004@> wrote: > > > > > > > > dear friends > > > > > > > > in the last few mails, RR ji let his reliased > thoughts flow in > > his > > > > own uninimitable style. needless to say RR is > the (un) > disputed > > > > leader of JR. > > > > > > > > let me share my own realisation experiences > with the more > > > fortunate > > > > members of this group. > > > > > > > > gods and planets are like ATMs for an > unrealised person and > they > > > > exist somewhere else from where the native > expects to receive > > > > something and lives in a permanent > physchological order to > > believe > > > > that his wealth is somewhere else in these > ATMs. Also these > > > > unrealised persons believe that god is > somewhere in the higher > > > > altitudes or in the caves and in that process > they keep going > on > > > in > > > > circles to find god nowhere. all great > realised people have > > > shared > > > > and penned these experiences in their > autobiographies and i > can > > > > quote many. these unrealised people keep > marching untiringly > in > > > > their bahar yatra forever endlessly changing > their > destinations > > > > continuously on a consistent basis. > > > > > > > > Gita (can give verse numbers) says that for a > reliased person, > > > vedas > > > > and shastras are meaningless. also for a > realised person god > === message truncated === http://www.neerajgupta.com SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE DIVINITY AND RELISH THE TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS. Vedic astrology Astrology chart Astrology software Visit your group "" on the web. Mail Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2006 Report Share Posted March 7, 2006 Dear Mr. Neeraj, I have joined the Group a few days back as hobby astrologer. I am really sorry to know about the demise of your grand father and his elder brother. May their Souls rest in peace. With regards, Ayush Tripathi., Neeraj Gupta <gupta_neeraj_2000 wrote: > > Hello Everybody, > > First of all I apologize that I am not participating > for last couple of weeks. There were some family > problems and hence I was unable to look the messages. > There were two deaths in the family (my grand father > and his elder brother expired) due to which I could > not devote time here. I hope you people can > understand. > > I know that Rohini Ji is an active member of the group > and respond the messages and queries in a good way. > Further, I would like to tell you and request all of > the members that this group is solely for the > discussion and learning purpose. There are many > different kinds of people and everybody has its own > writing style. However, sarcasm or using wrong > language (it should not hurt other person feelings) is > not allowed. > > Please maintain the group decorum. As our group has a > large number of members, so if there is any specifice > issue, please let mark a mail to Tanvir or me and we > will take care of this. > > I apologize for the delay in responding to this > thread. > > Regards, > > Neeraj Gupta > (JR-Group-Moderator) > > --- varun_trvd <varun_trvd wrote: > > > Respected Gurujan, > > > > I do not know if I speak for the entire group or > > not, over a year or > > so , I have realized that four respected gurus of > > this group are > > shri Ranjan ji , Krishnan ji , Ashutosh ji , and > > Arjun ji , not > > necessarily in that order. > > > > These four stalwarts are the pillars of this group. > > We feel hurt > > when any body shows disrespect to any of these > > luminaries. > > It becomes all the more painful if any of these > > stalwarts feels hurt > > and says so. > > > > With naman to all gurujan, > > > > Varun Trivedi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , vattem > > krishnan > > <bursar_99@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Shri Rohini ji > > > When several views forth coming from a broad > > spectrum covering > > morality,astrology,psychology and even > > genitics,probably the issues > > of leaders and issue of leadership is only a passing > > reference.I do > > not think that needs to be taken personally and even > > I would like to > > initiate a kind of remorse for the unintentional > > inklings and > > reflections.In the spirit of forgive and forget let > > us forge a > > balanced view.if some kind of thoughts were made to > > feel you > > otherwise please forgive.I think Arjun ji has > > already come out by > > taking back his writings.probably it is nice if we > > can really switch > > over to very very interesting forth coming.No doubt > > all of us some > > how some times in our enethusiasm forget some > > basics.All these views > > may not be taken as very personal as none of us for > > that have > > anything in person against any one. > > > May be we tend to go by the style of references > > and > > observe.Certainly some more restraint and patience > > is need when we > > really button back to reply. > > > iam sure you are at ease to accept to the > > reformed views > > tenedered by Mr Arjun ji as in very certain terms he > > felt sotty and > > expressed > > > krishnan > > > > > > rohiniranjan <rrgb@> wrote: > > > Tanvir, Neeraj, members -- > > > > > > Please respond publicly and explain to me why this > > sarcasm > > directed > > > by member Mr. Arjun (which he claims is his > > penname in some > > message) > > > is justified or allowed to be published on this > > forum? > > > > > > Have I claimed to be a leader here? > > > DO I deserve this kind of insult?? > > > > > > Is this now the acceptable code of conduct by > > general spiritual > > > acceptance on this forum, by vocal and silent > > members regardless > > of > > > whether they love or hate what I feel I have the > > right to say? > > > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > > > > , > > "rohiniranjan" <rrgb@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Sorry if I hit some sensitive button Mr. Arjun! > > > > > > > > I am not and have never claimed to be the leader > > here, disputed > > or > > > > otherwise. So please do not get personal for > > whatever personal > > > > reasons and issues you have, which I am unaware > > of -- but I did > > > not > > > > fall off the turnip truck yesterday! > > > > > > > > I am pushing some buttons, obviously, some stale > > and antiquated > > > ways > > > > of thinking, but that does not mean that I will > > tolerate any > > > > personal flings like this! > > > > > > > > Please keep your personal attributions and in > > that sense 'name- > > > > callings' to yourself. This is not in keeping > > with your self- > > > > proclaimed monastic, austere spiritual way that > > you have talked > > > > about here earlier. > > > > > > > > Also, I do not want you to misuse your internet > > cafe time for > > > > useless pursuits like trashing 'RRji' who has > > already admitted > > to > > > > being this janitor at this high school and busy > > cleaning messes! > > > > > > > > Please do not take it personally, but since you > > pointed your > > laser > > > > at me by name, I must respond, because that is > > my right! > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > , > > "panditarjun2004" > > > > <panditarjun2004@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > dear friends > > > > > > > > > > in the last few mails, RR ji let his reliased > > thoughts flow in > > > his > > > > > own uninimitable style. needless to say RR is > > the (un) > > disputed > > > > > leader of JR. > > > > > > > > > > let me share my own realisation experiences > > with the more > > > > fortunate > > > > > members of this group. > > > > > > > > > > gods and planets are like ATMs for an > > unrealised person and > > they > > > > > exist somewhere else from where the native > > expects to receive > > > > > something and lives in a permanent > > physchological order to > > > believe > > > > > that his wealth is somewhere else in these > > ATMs. Also these > > > > > unrealised persons believe that god is > > somewhere in the higher > > > > > altitudes or in the caves and in that process > > they keep going > > on > > > > in > > > > > circles to find god nowhere. all great > > realised people have > > > > shared > > > > > and penned these experiences in their > > autobiographies and i > > can > > > > > quote many. these unrealised people keep > > marching untiringly > > in > > > > > their bahar yatra forever endlessly changing > > their > > destinations > > > > > continuously on a consistent basis. > > > > > > > > > > Gita (can give verse numbers) says that for a > > reliased person, > > > > vedas > > > > > and shastras are meaningless. also for a > > realised person god > > > === message truncated === > > > http://www.neerajgupta.com > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2006 Report Share Posted March 7, 2006 dear neeraj ji firstly my prayers for the departed souls in your family to rest in peace. even though this august group is number two in membership, it is number one astrology group in the web in popular perception of the querents as most of their queries get answered here (reading of charts and suggestion of remedies) and it is these querents who publicised this group to add more members and made the group to this level. also the group name Jyotish Remedies denotes and connotes that one can find jyotish remedies in this group. members like myself, krishnanji, ashutoshji and several others are more active in this group mainly to help the querents in reading charts and suggestion of remedies within our limited capacities. most of the members and visitors of this group are querents and if you say this group is SOLELY for discussion and learning, they may get discouraged. hence you may kindly advise if this group gives a platform to all those suffering querents in getting their queries answered by willing astrologers. since we are using this group space owned/managed by tanvirji and yourself, we would be happy if you could allow the willing astrolgoers to continue to read charts and suggest remedies freely which does not fall under "discussion and learning" objective. with best wishes and regards arjun , Neeraj Gupta <gupta_neeraj_2000 wrote: > > Hello Everybody, > > First of all I apologize that I am not participating > for last couple of weeks. There were some family > problems and hence I was unable to look the messages. > There were two deaths in the family (my grand father > and his elder brother expired) due to which I could > not devote time here. I hope you people can > understand. > > I know that Rohini Ji is an active member of the group > and respond the messages and queries in a good way. > Further, I would like to tell you and request all of > the members that this group is solely for the > discussion and learning purpose. There are many > different kinds of people and everybody has its own > writing style. However, sarcasm or using wrong > language (it should not hurt other person feelings) is > not allowed. > > Please maintain the group decorum. As our group has a > large number of members, so if there is any specifice > issue, please let mark a mail to Tanvir or me and we > will take care of this. > > I apologize for the delay in responding to this > thread. > > Regards, > > Neeraj Gupta > (JR-Group-Moderator) > > --- varun_trvd <varun_trvd wrote: > > > Respected Gurujan, > > > > I do not know if I speak for the entire group or > > not, over a year or > > so , I have realized that four respected gurus of > > this group are > > shri Ranjan ji , Krishnan ji , Ashutosh ji , and > > Arjun ji , not > > necessarily in that order. > > > > These four stalwarts are the pillars of this group. > > We feel hurt > > when any body shows disrespect to any of these > > luminaries. > > It becomes all the more painful if any of these > > stalwarts feels hurt > > and says so. > > > > With naman to all gurujan, > > > > Varun Trivedi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , vattem > > krishnan > > <bursar_99@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Shri Rohini ji > > > When several views forth coming from a broad > > spectrum covering > > morality,astrology,psychology and even > > genitics,probably the issues > > of leaders and issue of leadership is only a passing > > reference.I do > > not think that needs to be taken personally and even > > I would like to > > initiate a kind of remorse for the unintentional > > inklings and > > reflections.In the spirit of forgive and forget let > > us forge a > > balanced view.if some kind of thoughts were made to > > feel you > > otherwise please forgive.I think Arjun ji has > > already come out by > > taking back his writings.probably it is nice if we > > can really switch > > over to very very interesting forth coming.No doubt > > all of us some > > how some times in our enethusiasm forget some > > basics.All these views > > may not be taken as very personal as none of us for > > that have > > anything in person against any one. > > > May be we tend to go by the style of references > > and > > observe.Certainly some more restraint and patience > > is need when we > > really button back to reply. > > > iam sure you are at ease to accept to the > > reformed views > > tenedered by Mr Arjun ji as in very certain terms he > > felt sotty and > > expressed > > > krishnan > > > > > > rohiniranjan <rrgb@> wrote: > > > Tanvir, Neeraj, members -- > > > > > > Please respond publicly and explain to me why this > > sarcasm > > directed > > > by member Mr. Arjun (which he claims is his > > penname in some > > message) > > > is justified or allowed to be published on this > > forum? > > > > > > Have I claimed to be a leader here? > > > DO I deserve this kind of insult?? > > > > > > Is this now the acceptable code of conduct by > > general spiritual > > > acceptance on this forum, by vocal and silent > > members regardless > > of > > > whether they love or hate what I feel I have the > > right to say? > > > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > > > > , > > "rohiniranjan" <rrgb@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Sorry if I hit some sensitive button Mr. Arjun! > > > > > > > > I am not and have never claimed to be the leader > > here, disputed > > or > > > > otherwise. So please do not get personal for > > whatever personal > > > > reasons and issues you have, which I am unaware > > of -- but I did > > > not > > > > fall off the turnip truck yesterday! > > > > > > > > I am pushing some buttons, obviously, some stale > > and antiquated > > > ways > > > > of thinking, but that does not mean that I will > > tolerate any > > > > personal flings like this! > > > > > > > > Please keep your personal attributions and in > > that sense 'name- > > > > callings' to yourself. This is not in keeping > > with your self- > > > > proclaimed monastic, austere spiritual way that > > you have talked > > > > about here earlier. > > > > > > > > Also, I do not want you to misuse your internet > > cafe time for > > > > useless pursuits like trashing 'RRji' who has > > already admitted > > to > > > > being this janitor at this high school and busy > > cleaning messes! > > > > > > > > Please do not take it personally, but since you > > pointed your > > laser > > > > at me by name, I must respond, because that is > > my right! > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > , > > "panditarjun2004" > > > > <panditarjun2004@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > dear friends > > > > > > > > > > in the last few mails, RR ji let his reliased > > thoughts flow in > > > his > > > > > own uninimitable style. needless to say RR is > > the (un) > > disputed > > > > > leader of JR. > > > > > > > > > > let me share my own realisation experiences > > with the more > > > > fortunate > > > > > members of this group. > > > > > > > > > > gods and planets are like ATMs for an > > unrealised person and > > they > > > > > exist somewhere else from where the native > > expects to receive > > > > > something and lives in a permanent > > physchological order to > > > believe > > > > > that his wealth is somewhere else in these > > ATMs. Also these > > > > > unrealised persons believe that god is > > somewhere in the higher > > > > > altitudes or in the caves and in that process > > they keep going > > on > > > > in > > > > > circles to find god nowhere. all great > > realised people have > > > > shared > > > > > and penned these experiences in their > > autobiographies and i > > can > > > > > quote many. these unrealised people keep > > marching untiringly > > in > > > > > their bahar yatra forever endlessly changing > > their > > destinations > > > > > continuously on a consistent basis. > > > > > > > > > > Gita (can give verse numbers) says that for a > > reliased person, > > > > vedas > > > > > and shastras are meaningless. also for a > > realised person god > > > === message truncated === > > > http://www.neerajgupta.com > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2006 Report Share Posted March 7, 2006 Hello Neeraj Ji, Further to your views what I would like to add is the level of profiency of a(an alien)language in which all of us dabble and express,this might be pose unwanted riddles which become problems/issues at a later stage. Mostly, all of us are matured enough that is how we are in the group to make positive contributions.Along with these our temeperments generic to our personalities do matter and all of us in this connection need to portray positivel by a cautious approach.Language and expressions matters and has to be courteous.That dignifies the one who is expressing and one who is trying to decipher the thoughts.These interactions have to be in a give and take that makes the group most renowned for it's talents and for it's positive contributions how ever small may be. krishnan Neeraj Gupta <gupta_neeraj_2000 wrote: Hello Everybody, First of all I apologize that I am not participating for last couple of weeks. There were some family problems and hence I was unable to look the messages. There were two deaths in the family (my grand father and his elder brother expired) due to which I could not devote time here. I hope you people can understand. I know that Rohini Ji is an active member of the group and respond the messages and queries in a good way. Further, I would like to tell you and request all of the members that this group is solely for the discussion and learning purpose. There are many different kinds of people and everybody has its own writing style. However, sarcasm or using wrong language (it should not hurt other person feelings) is not allowed. Please maintain the group decorum. As our group has a large number of members, so if there is any specifice issue, please let mark a mail to Tanvir or me and we will take care of this. I apologize for the delay in responding to this thread. Regards, Neeraj Gupta (JR-Group-Moderator) --- varun_trvd <varun_trvd wrote: > Respected Gurujan, > > I do not know if I speak for the entire group or > not, over a year or > so , I have realized that four respected gurus of > this group are > shri Ranjan ji , Krishnan ji , Ashutosh ji , and > Arjun ji , not > necessarily in that order. > > These four stalwarts are the pillars of this group. > We feel hurt > when any body shows disrespect to any of these > luminaries. > It becomes all the more painful if any of these > stalwarts feels hurt > and says so. > > With naman to all gurujan, > > Varun Trivedi > > > > > , vattem > krishnan > <bursar_99 wrote: > > > > Dear Shri Rohini ji > > When several views forth coming from a broad > spectrum covering > morality,astrology,psychology and even > genitics,probably the issues > of leaders and issue of leadership is only a passing > reference.I do > not think that needs to be taken personally and even > I would like to > initiate a kind of remorse for the unintentional > inklings and > reflections.In the spirit of forgive and forget let > us forge a > balanced view.if some kind of thoughts were made to > feel you > otherwise please forgive.I think Arjun ji has > already come out by > taking back his writings.probably it is nice if we > can really switch > over to very very interesting forth coming.No doubt > all of us some > how some times in our enethusiasm forget some > basics.All these views > may not be taken as very personal as none of us for > that have > anything in person against any one. > > May be we tend to go by the style of references > and > observe.Certainly some more restraint and patience > is need when we > really button back to reply. > > iam sure you are at ease to accept to the > reformed views > tenedered by Mr Arjun ji as in very certain terms he > felt sotty and > expressed > > krishnan > > > > rohiniranjan <rrgb wrote: > > Tanvir, Neeraj, members -- > > > > Please respond publicly and explain to me why this > sarcasm > directed > > by member Mr. Arjun (which he claims is his > penname in some > message) > > is justified or allowed to be published on this > forum? > > > > Have I claimed to be a leader here? > > DO I deserve this kind of insult?? > > > > Is this now the acceptable code of conduct by > general spiritual > > acceptance on this forum, by vocal and silent > members regardless > of > > whether they love or hate what I feel I have the > right to say? > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > , > "rohiniranjan" <rrgb@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Sorry if I hit some sensitive button Mr. Arjun! > > > > > > I am not and have never claimed to be the leader > here, disputed > or > > > otherwise. So please do not get personal for > whatever personal > > > reasons and issues you have, which I am unaware > of -- but I did > > not > > > fall off the turnip truck yesterday! > > > > > > I am pushing some buttons, obviously, some stale > and antiquated > > ways > > > of thinking, but that does not mean that I will > tolerate any > > > personal flings like this! > > > > > > Please keep your personal attributions and in > that sense 'name- > > > callings' to yourself. This is not in keeping > with your self- > > > proclaimed monastic, austere spiritual way that > you have talked > > > about here earlier. > > > > > > Also, I do not want you to misuse your internet > cafe time for > > > useless pursuits like trashing 'RRji' who has > already admitted > to > > > being this janitor at this high school and busy > cleaning messes! > > > > > > Please do not take it personally, but since you > pointed your > laser > > > at me by name, I must respond, because that is > my right! > > > > > > RR > > > > > > , > "panditarjun2004" > > > <panditarjun2004@> wrote: > > > > > > > > dear friends > > > > > > > > in the last few mails, RR ji let his reliased > thoughts flow in > > his > > > > own uninimitable style. needless to say RR is > the (un) > disputed > > > > leader of JR. > > > > > > > > let me share my own realisation experiences > with the more > > > fortunate > > > > members of this group. > > > > > > > > gods and planets are like ATMs for an > unrealised person and > they > > > > exist somewhere else from where the native > expects to receive > > > > something and lives in a permanent > physchological order to > > believe > > > > that his wealth is somewhere else in these > ATMs. Also these > > > > unrealised persons believe that god is > somewhere in the higher > > > > altitudes or in the caves and in that process > they keep going > on > > > in > > > > circles to find god nowhere. all great > realised people have > > > shared > > > > and penned these experiences in their > autobiographies and i > can > > > > quote many. these unrealised people keep > marching untiringly > in > > > > their bahar yatra forever endlessly changing > their > destinations > > > > continuously on a consistent basis. > > > > > > > > Gita (can give verse numbers) says that for a > reliased person, > > > vedas > > > > and shastras are meaningless. also for a > realised person god > === message truncated === http://www.neerajgupta.com SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE DIVINITY AND RELISH THE TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS. Vedic astrology Astrology chart Astrology software Visit your group "" on the web. Mail Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2006 Report Share Posted March 7, 2006 Srinivas, If you do so detest the writings of these individuals who do not indulge in technical analysis or merely philosophise -- and from the couple of missives you have posted here -- find very frustrating and objectionable, the *remedy* is very easy! Rather than sounding a call for the banishment of such individuals or their style and substance in writing (which some may like, others not), simply refrain from reading their posts! That is what I do when someone stops making sense in their postings! Highly recommended and very effective. ;-) Rohini , srinivasa murthy adavi <smadavi wrote: > > Dear Sir, > The August 'jyotishremedies' group is suggestive by name that it offers astrological remedies based on natal chart and its technical analysis or by some other suitable methods that have scriptural sanctions of respective religions. > It's true a querent cannot demand free service,but your noble intentions were many a time expressed through mails that the services will be given free of cost depending upon feasibility of the time and willingness of benevolent contributors/analysts.It's also true that some of the seekers started to take it for granted and started demanding serial queries postings either for themselves or by proxy for others,and the same were gently admonished by founders as well as contributors.This is a general problem which you people have effectively been dealing with. > But another big problem(more bigger than former) is occupation of space and attention for elaborative philosophical musings and generic dealing of the analysis(seems sometimes without looking at chart at all) being indulged by some members ,and thus distracting the founding spirit of the forum. > I've been watching the treatment of a querent by persons like Sri Asutoshji,Sri Krishnanji,Sri Arjunji,Sri Kadji,Sri Trivediji,Sri Chopraji,SriKuldhirJi etc and few others,who are keeping to the true tenets of the founding spirit of the forum and rendering wonderful "jyotish" service with in their possible limitations of their time and knowledgebase. > But some inspite of their gifted knowledge base are not doing any(or say very little) technical analysis and indulging in elaborate generic/philosophical treatment / musings or with their gift of jab of one or two liners ,triggering the innocents(some of the seekers) to become loquacious and thus distracting the founding principles of the forum. > It's natural that there is every chance for other service contributors who've been doing jyotish technical based anlysis for good of the seekers,will start to divert their precious time for such generic philosophical musings and thus denying a seeker of redemption of his suffering. > You please advise these people to give a pause on the forum and contimue on one to one(or among select few) if they deem that it is necessary.It's true that sometimes the philosophical discussion will alone quench the thirst of suffering soul instead of technical analysis of the chart.But the seekers who come to this August forum (by seeing the forum name) expects more of astro-technical analysis than the generic philososphy. > It's like drawing lines between a physician(here generic philosopher) job and surgeon(jyotish expert)job.In short when physician fails the surgeon has to enter.When a seeker comes with expectation of astro remedies and instead exposed to more of generic philosophical expostion he either loose interest or feel like not recommending for suffering souls about this noble group and gradually the group will turn into generic philosophical forum instead of standing upto the named spirit. > Many a person has great philosophical currents of thoughts going inside them but they donot have expressive power due to so many reasons.But most of the seekers flocking to this group certainly doesn't have astro knowledge,and they come with great hope for a treatment of their soul through scripturally laiddown principles on jyotish principles. > > As a beneficiary of this August forum I'm writing this mail witha thankful attitude and asking the benevolent founders and service contributors to keep the true founding objectives of the forum. > > regards > srinivas > > Neeraj Gupta <gupta_neeraj_2000 wrote: > Hello Everybody, > > First of all I apologize that I am not participating > for last couple of weeks. There were some family > problems and hence I was unable to look the messages. > There were two deaths in the family (my grand father > and his elder brother expired) due to which I could > not devote time here. I hope you people can > understand. > > I know that Rohini Ji is an active member of the group > and respond the messages and queries in a good way. > Further, I would like to tell you and request all of > the members that this group is solely for the > discussion and learning purpose. There are many > different kinds of people and everybody has its own > writing style. However, sarcasm or using wrong > language (it should not hurt other person feelings) is > not allowed. > > Please maintain the group decorum. As our group has a > large number of members, so if there is any specifice > issue, please let mark a mail to Tanvir or me and we > will take care of this. > > I apologize for the delay in responding to this > thread. > > Regards, > > Neeraj Gupta > (JR-Group-Moderator) > > --- varun_trvd <varun_trvd wrote: > > > Respected Gurujan, > > > > I do not know if I speak for the entire group or > > not, over a year or > > so , I have realized that four respected gurus of > > this group are > > shri Ranjan ji , Krishnan ji , Ashutosh ji , and > > Arjun ji , not > > necessarily in that order. > > > > These four stalwarts are the pillars of this group. > > We feel hurt > > when any body shows disrespect to any of these > > luminaries. > > It becomes all the more painful if any of these > > stalwarts feels hurt > > and says so. > > > > With naman to all gurujan, > > > > Varun Trivedi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , vattem > > krishnan > > <bursar_99@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Shri Rohini ji > > > When several views forth coming from a broad > > spectrum covering > > morality,astrology,psychology and even > > genitics,probably the issues > > of leaders and issue of leadership is only a passing > > reference.I do > > not think that needs to be taken personally and even > > I would like to > > initiate a kind of remorse for the unintentional > > inklings and > > reflections.In the spirit of forgive and forget let > > us forge a > > balanced view.if some kind of thoughts were made to > > feel you > > otherwise please forgive.I think Arjun ji has > > already come out by > > taking back his writings.probably it is nice if we > > can really switch > > over to very very interesting forth coming.No doubt > > all of us some > > how some times in our enethusiasm forget some > > basics.All these views > > may not be taken as very personal as none of us for > > that have > > anything in person against any one. > > > May be we tend to go by the style of references > > and > > observe.Certainly some more restraint and patience > > is need when we > > really button back to reply. > > > iam sure you are at ease to accept to the > > reformed views > > tenedered by Mr Arjun ji as in very certain terms he > > felt sotty and > > expressed > > > krishnan > > > > > > rohiniranjan <rrgb@> wrote: > > > Tanvir, Neeraj, members -- > > > > > > Please respond publicly and explain to me why this > > sarcasm > > directed > > > by member Mr. Arjun (which he claims is his > > penname in some > > message) > > > is justified or allowed to be published on this > > forum? > > > > > > Have I claimed to be a leader here? > > > DO I deserve this kind of insult?? > > > > > > Is this now the acceptable code of conduct by > > general spiritual > > > acceptance on this forum, by vocal and silent > > members regardless > > of > > > whether they love or hate what I feel I have the > > right to say? > > > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > > > > , > > "rohiniranjan" <rrgb@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Sorry if I hit some sensitive button Mr. Arjun! > > > > > > > > I am not and have never claimed to be the leader > > here, disputed > > or > > > > otherwise. So please do not get personal for > > whatever personal > > > > reasons and issues you have, which I am unaware > > of -- but I did > > > not > > > > fall off the turnip truck yesterday! > > > > > > > > I am pushing some buttons, obviously, some stale > > and antiquated > > > ways > > > > of thinking, but that does not mean that I will > > tolerate any > > > > personal flings like this! > > > > > > > > Please keep your personal attributions and in > > that sense 'name- > > > > callings' to yourself. This is not in keeping > > with your self- > > > > proclaimed monastic, austere spiritual way that > > you have talked > > > > about here earlier. > > > > > > > > Also, I do not want you to misuse your internet > > cafe time for > > > > useless pursuits like trashing 'RRji' who has > > already admitted > > to > > > > being this janitor at this high school and busy > > cleaning messes! > > > > > > > > Please do not take it personally, but since you > > pointed your > > laser > > > > at me by name, I must respond, because that is > > my right! > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > , > > "panditarjun2004" > > > > <panditarjun2004@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > dear friends > > > > > > > > > > in the last few mails, RR ji let his reliased > > thoughts flow in > > > his > > > > > own uninimitable style. needless to say RR is > > the (un) > > disputed > > > > > leader of JR. > > > > > > > > > > let me share my own realisation experiences > > with the more > > > > fortunate > > > > > members of this group. > > > > > > > > > > gods and planets are like ATMs for an > > unrealised person and > > they > > > > > exist somewhere else from where the native > > expects to receive > > > > > something and lives in a permanent > > physchological order to > > > believe > > > > > that his wealth is somewhere else in these > > ATMs. Also these > > > > > unrealised persons believe that god is > > somewhere in the higher > > > > > altitudes or in the caves and in that process > > they keep going > > on > > > > in > > > > > circles to find god nowhere. all great > > realised people have > > > > shared > > > > > and penned these experiences in their > > autobiographies and i > > can > > > > > quote many. these unrealised people keep > > marching untiringly > > in > > > > > their bahar yatra forever endlessly changing > > their > > destinations > > > > > continuously on a consistent basis. > > > > > > > > > > Gita (can give verse numbers) says that for a > > reliased person, > > > > vedas > > > > > and shastras are meaningless. also for a > > realised person god > > > === message truncated === > > > http://www.neerajgupta.com > > > > > > > > > > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE DIVINITY AND RELISH THE TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS. > > > > > > > Vedic astrology Astrology chart Astrology software > > > > > > Visit your group "" on the web. > > > > > Terms of Service. > > > > > > > > > > Mail > Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2006 Report Share Posted March 7, 2006 Dear Rohini Ji I am indeed sorry that you were offended by Arjun Ji's post. While of course I am not defending him in any way (I have no reason for doing so) I truly think that as he apologized, you could accept it and take it with a forgiving spirit. That is of course not a suggestion for you but an expection from you. As Arjun Ji said he did not mean anything else and when he knew about you being offended, he instantly aplogized. As they say to err is human and to apologize is humbleness, and to forgive is divine. I am sorry for my unwilling delay because the number of message is big and I have a great difficulty to read them all. In this month of March we have been having more than 50 messages per day. Dear all : About the thread of morality ------ I was very busy to respond to the thread - I have got a lot of good points to speak about in response and a lot more to speak. But I realized that it is not being good for me. As I think to discover by myself, speaking ill of any religion or religious sytems, or comparing such religions weakens the 9th house. For most it does not work but I am very sensitive and it works for me. I felt this earlier but was not sure but this time after posting the morality write up I am very sure. Morality = 9th house same way. Today I talked about religion with someone and I feel the effect again, of course very slight, but I feel it through the happenings. The effect is a bit notable with such big articles like morality that I posted and deep discussions with that has a bit strong effect. MORE THAN THIS, I have also seen that when I use my knowledge to suggest remedies etc. with others, it often brings me problems. It always happens. When I prescribed a gemstone often I felt that for the next one or two months the related planet gave me some sort of unexpected negative effects. When I suggested someone a mantra (And esp. he or she did it a lot) the same mantra next time did not SUIT MYSELF for next one or two months or so. I know many will not agree, but I have repeatedly observed this. For last two years or so I have been trying to develop a personal style of doing mantras for the strongest result and sharing information about this gives me the strongest bad effect possible, very quickly !!!! This is a reason behind I have not been doing a lot of charts for a long time. Only some paid readings. While I receive a "back-fire" helping people with mantras and stuff, I receive immense mental satisfaction helping people in common ways and they never back fire rather give me peace and satisfaction. By common ways I mean like donating money to poor people or donating medicine to a sick begger etc. These are fine. But suggesting mantras and gemstones and other remedies often gets me in some problem. So I these days help people only through general, conventional ways, if I can. I try to do it plenty, whenever possible. I have stopped chart readings for relatives and friends unless very necessary (or just for learning purpose) and these days I do not even reveal to people that I can read charts. Thanks Tanvir What cannot happen, can never happen. Which is mine, is forever mine. http://www.jyotish-remedies.com - Vedic Astrology (Jyotish) Predictive astrology with incredibly powerful problem solving remedies Where relief and solutions are found Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2006 Report Share Posted March 7, 2006 Dear Neeraj ji, My sincere condolences on your losses. I pray for their peace and for consolation and strength to those that they left behind. I have long realized that the story of the Brahmin, his son and the donkey is very true in this world. No one can satisfy everyone's taste and everyone wants to see more of what they like to taste. The reading seeker simply wants readings, the student wants to know all the technical aspects, and so on ... I generally refrain from mixing readings with discussion. I have for a long time been giving free readings at other sites for some years now and I shall continue that practice without feeling guilty for not providing readings here. Recently, although it takes more time, I have also been discussing technical aspects and giving birthdata etc. Protecting the privacy of individuals whether they are paying or not is uppermost in my view - hence no i.d.s etc are given. While some individuals may feel that technical discussion somehow is supreme, my personal opinion is that sometimes people grasp at straws (read most of the magazine articles and see how they pin sometime great on one or two factors). On the one hand people pose as scientists and scientific and yet the basic premise of things that must underlie 'scientific method'get tossed by even accomplished jyotishis and writers of acclaim! So be it, we are all human! Another thing is that different jyotishis look at the same chart in many different ways, some miss a few points here, the others miss a few points there. Then there are different ayanamshas and so on. Unless all jyotishis in a forum use the identical set of basic tools, the mish-mash, though tasty can be terribly confusing to the beginner. To me, in all of these forums with such varying and mixed levels of expertise and experience, the beginner is the most important not to confuse! The others are all advanced anyway and would be able to figure their way out. So, in the end technical analysis may or may not be useful. And there is already a lot of contradiction in the technical information even in classics! What remains safe territory then is focusing on the aspects of astrology that are not at all covered in texts. These have been called esoteric by some, philosophy by others, depending on where the mental filter is set and what the mind-set is. Others find these aspects interesting and mentally more challenging. After all, jyotish is a very creative and comprehensive description of the human experience. I don't see it as a simple A+B=9 (or more complex but still an equation!). This could be the difference in my world-view, my view on jyotish, etc. And those who do not or cannot tune into that perspective, they are free to stop reading my posts. What could be simpler? And it is very effective to weed out any posts or posters who do not make sense consistently, according to my reading of them. RR , Neeraj Gupta <gupta_neeraj_2000 wrote: > > Hello Everybody, > > First of all I apologize that I am not participating > for last couple of weeks. There were some family > problems and hence I was unable to look the messages. > There were two deaths in the family (my grand father > and his elder brother expired) due to which I could > not devote time here. I hope you people can > understand. > > I know that Rohini Ji is an active member of the group > and respond the messages and queries in a good way. > Further, I would like to tell you and request all of > the members that this group is solely for the > discussion and learning purpose. There are many > different kinds of people and everybody has its own > writing style. However, sarcasm or using wrong > language (it should not hurt other person feelings) is > not allowed. > > Please maintain the group decorum. As our group has a > large number of members, so if there is any specifice > issue, please let mark a mail to Tanvir or me and we > will take care of this. > > I apologize for the delay in responding to this > thread. > > Regards, > > Neeraj Gupta > (JR-Group-Moderator) > > --- varun_trvd <varun_trvd wrote: > > > Respected Gurujan, > > > > I do not know if I speak for the entire group or > > not, over a year or > > so , I have realized that four respected gurus of > > this group are > > shri Ranjan ji , Krishnan ji , Ashutosh ji , and > > Arjun ji , not > > necessarily in that order. > > > > These four stalwarts are the pillars of this group. > > We feel hurt > > when any body shows disrespect to any of these > > luminaries. > > It becomes all the more painful if any of these > > stalwarts feels hurt > > and says so. > > > > With naman to all gurujan, > > > > Varun Trivedi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , vattem > > krishnan > > <bursar_99@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Shri Rohini ji > > > When several views forth coming from a broad > > spectrum covering > > morality,astrology,psychology and even > > genitics,probably the issues > > of leaders and issue of leadership is only a passing > > reference.I do > > not think that needs to be taken personally and even > > I would like to > > initiate a kind of remorse for the unintentional > > inklings and > > reflections.In the spirit of forgive and forget let > > us forge a > > balanced view.if some kind of thoughts were made to > > feel you > > otherwise please forgive.I think Arjun ji has > > already come out by > > taking back his writings.probably it is nice if we > > can really switch > > over to very very interesting forth coming.No doubt > > all of us some > > how some times in our enethusiasm forget some > > basics.All these views > > may not be taken as very personal as none of us for > > that have > > anything in person against any one. > > > May be we tend to go by the style of references > > and > > observe.Certainly some more restraint and patience > > is need when we > > really button back to reply. > > > iam sure you are at ease to accept to the > > reformed views > > tenedered by Mr Arjun ji as in very certain terms he > > felt sotty and > > expressed > > > krishnan > > > > > > rohiniranjan <rrgb@> wrote: > > > Tanvir, Neeraj, members -- > > > > > > Please respond publicly and explain to me why this > > sarcasm > > directed > > > by member Mr. Arjun (which he claims is his > > penname in some > > message) > > > is justified or allowed to be published on this > > forum? > > > > > > Have I claimed to be a leader here? > > > DO I deserve this kind of insult?? > > > > > > Is this now the acceptable code of conduct by > > general spiritual > > > acceptance on this forum, by vocal and silent > > members regardless > > of > > > whether they love or hate what I feel I have the > > right to say? > > > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > > > > , > > "rohiniranjan" <rrgb@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Sorry if I hit some sensitive button Mr. Arjun! > > > > > > > > I am not and have never claimed to be the leader > > here, disputed > > or > > > > otherwise. So please do not get personal for > > whatever personal > > > > reasons and issues you have, which I am unaware > > of -- but I did > > > not > > > > fall off the turnip truck yesterday! > > > > > > > > I am pushing some buttons, obviously, some stale > > and antiquated > > > ways > > > > of thinking, but that does not mean that I will > > tolerate any > > > > personal flings like this! > > > > > > > > Please keep your personal attributions and in > > that sense 'name- > > > > callings' to yourself. This is not in keeping > > with your self- > > > > proclaimed monastic, austere spiritual way that > > you have talked > > > > about here earlier. > > > > > > > > Also, I do not want you to misuse your internet > > cafe time for > > > > useless pursuits like trashing 'RRji' who has > > already admitted > > to > > > > being this janitor at this high school and busy > > cleaning messes! > > > > > > > > Please do not take it personally, but since you > > pointed your > > laser > > > > at me by name, I must respond, because that is > > my right! > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > , > > "panditarjun2004" > > > > <panditarjun2004@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > dear friends > > > > > > > > > > in the last few mails, RR ji let his reliased > > thoughts flow in > > > his > > > > > own uninimitable style. needless to say RR is > > the (un) > > disputed > > > > > leader of JR. > > > > > > > > > > let me share my own realisation experiences > > with the more > > > > fortunate > > > > > members of this group. > > > > > > > > > > gods and planets are like ATMs for an > > unrealised person and > > they > > > > > exist somewhere else from where the native > > expects to receive > > > > > something and lives in a permanent > > physchological order to > > > believe > > > > > that his wealth is somewhere else in these > > ATMs. Also these > > > > > unrealised persons believe that god is > > somewhere in the higher > > > > > altitudes or in the caves and in that process > > they keep going > > on > > > > in > > > > > circles to find god nowhere. all great > > realised people have > > > > shared > > > > > and penned these experiences in their > > autobiographies and i > > can > > > > > quote many. these unrealised people keep > > marching untiringly > > in > > > > > their bahar yatra forever endlessly changing > > their > > destinations > > > > > continuously on a consistent basis. > > > > > > > > > > Gita (can give verse numbers) says that for a > > reliased person, > > > > vedas > > > > > and shastras are meaningless. also for a > > realised person god > > > === message truncated === > > > http://www.neerajgupta.com > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2006 Report Share Posted March 7, 2006 Thanks Tanvir -- as far as I am concerned, the trail has gone cold, as Sherlock would say! Since I admire you, I will write very candidly about my viewpoint on this, privately to save bandwidth for more useful discussions on the space allocated to this group! RR , "Tanvir" <ultimate wrote: > > Dear Rohini Ji > > I am indeed sorry that you were offended by Arjun Ji's post. While of course I am not defending him in any way (I have no reason for doing so) I truly think that as he apologized, you could accept it and take it with a forgiving spirit. That is of course not a suggestion for you but an expection from you. > > As Arjun Ji said he did not mean anything else and when he knew about you being offended, he instantly aplogized. As they say to err is human and to apologize is humbleness, and to forgive is divine. > > I am sorry for my unwilling delay because the number of message is big and I have a great difficulty to read them all. In this month of March we have been having more than 50 messages per day. > > > Dear all : About the thread of morality > ------ > > I was very busy to respond to the thread - I have got a lot of good points to speak about in response and a lot more to speak. But I realized that it is not being good for me. As I think to discover by myself, speaking ill of any religion or religious sytems, or comparing such religions weakens the 9th house. For most it does not work but I am very sensitive and it works for me. > > I felt this earlier but was not sure but this time after posting the morality write up I am very sure. Morality = 9th house same way. Today I talked about religion with someone and I feel the effect again, of course very slight, but I feel it through the happenings. The effect is a bit notable with such big articles like morality that I posted and deep discussions with that has a bit strong effect. > > MORE THAN THIS, I have also seen that when I use my knowledge to suggest remedies etc. with others, it often brings me problems. It always happens. When I prescribed a gemstone often I felt that for the next one or two months the related planet gave me some sort of unexpected negative effects. When I suggested someone a mantra (And esp. he or she did it a lot) the same mantra next time did not SUIT MYSELF for next one or two months or so. I know many will not agree, but I have repeatedly observed this. > > For last two years or so I have been trying to develop a personal style of doing mantras for the strongest result and sharing information about this gives me the strongest bad effect possible, very quickly !!!! > > This is a reason behind I have not been doing a lot of charts for a long time. Only some paid readings. > > While I receive a "back-fire" helping people with mantras and stuff, I receive immense mental satisfaction helping people in common ways and they never back fire rather give me peace and satisfaction. By common ways I mean like donating money to poor people or donating medicine to a sick begger etc. These are fine. But suggesting mantras and gemstones and other remedies often gets me in some problem. > > So I these days help people only through general, conventional ways, if I can. I try to do it plenty, whenever possible. > > I have stopped chart readings for relatives and friends unless very necessary (or just for learning purpose) and these days I do not even reveal to people that I can read charts. > > Thanks > Tanvir > > > > > > What cannot happen, can never happen. > Which is mine, is forever mine. > > http://www.jyotish-remedies.com - Vedic Astrology (Jyotish) > Predictive astrology with incredibly powerful problem solving remedies > Where relief and solutions are found > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2006 Report Share Posted March 7, 2006 Dear Tanvir, I have heard the same kind of experience from some of my energy healer (Reiki, QiGong, several other forms) friends whose charts and personal experiences I was studying for my research article on the signature of divine healers a few years ago. Some also observed that when they healed one person, someone else in the client/patient's family suffered. There was no really consistent correlation between the type or severity of the original healed problem and the second problem that started. it was not always in the area of health too. you have earlier indicated that you are a very sensitive individual and can feel when a subperiod or sub-sub period changes. Perhaps that is not a negative thing but a golden opportunity to study what is in the chart that makes you (and similar others) so sensitive. Why are others not similarly affected? A comparison would reveal new insights. One would even think that since you are deflecting and even shielding someone from the wrath of a planet by giving gemstone, the angry planet is going after you. But that would be magical thinking (used in its freudian sense). We know that plantes are not causative but just indicative. Someone recently posted something about compelling and impelling -- I think quoted from Astrological Magazine. But my guess would be that a study of the trikonas will be where one would start to study this rare and very curious experience that you shared. In the meantime, since you have identified, the sensitivity, the pragmatic thing is to be watchful. That is simple commonsense and used by those with asthma and other disorders. It is is dusty and pollen is floating outside, take it easy, and read a book or listen to music, stay inside. Prevention works in all areas. I have a few horoscopes of individuals who wore gemstones as big as their heads, and not one but many (exaggerating the size a bit!) and they remained unchanged. Maybe they have the reverse of that 'sensitivity' signature that you and others might have. Once you can find the astrological signature that makes some individuals sensitive, it would be easy to find and design remedies for those using standard procedures. Everything is treatable to some or greater extent, right? However, correct diagnosis, like in medicine, is the crucial key. Once someone/you find the true signature of such sensitivity, the remaining steps would be a lot easier. Rohiniranjan > , "Tanvir" <ultimate@> > wrote: > > > Dear all : About the thread of morality > > ------ > > > > I was very busy to respond to the thread - I have got a lot of > good points to speak about in response and a lot more to speak. But > I realized that it is not being good for me. As I think to discover > by myself, speaking ill of any religion or religious sytems, or > comparing such religions weakens the 9th house. For most it does not > work but I am very sensitive and it works for me. > > > > I felt this earlier but was not sure but this time after posting > the morality write up I am very sure. Morality = 9th house same way. > Today I talked about religion with someone and I feel the effect > again, of course very slight, but I feel it through the happenings. > The effect is a bit notable with such big articles like morality > that I posted and deep discussions with that has a bit strong effect. > > > > MORE THAN THIS, I have also seen that when I use my knowledge to > suggest remedies etc. with others, it often brings me problems. It > always happens. When I prescribed a gemstone often I felt that for > the next one or two months the related planet gave me some sort of > unexpected negative effects. When I suggested someone a mantra (And > esp. he or she did it a lot) the same mantra next time did not SUIT > MYSELF for next one or two months or so. I know many will not agree, > but I have repeatedly observed this. > > > > For last two years or so I have been trying to develop a personal > style of doing mantras for the strongest result and sharing > information about this gives me the strongest bad effect possible, > very quickly !!!! > > > > This is a reason behind I have not been doing a lot of charts for > a long time. Only some paid readings. > > > > While I receive a "back-fire" helping people with mantras and > stuff, I receive immense mental satisfaction helping people in > common ways and they never back fire rather give me peace and > satisfaction. By common ways I mean like donating money to poor > people or donating medicine to a sick begger etc. These are fine. > But suggesting mantras and gemstones and other remedies often gets > me in some problem. > > > > So I these days help people only through general, conventional > ways, if I can. I try to do it plenty, whenever possible. > > > > I have stopped chart readings for relatives and friends unless > very necessary (or just for learning purpose) and these days I do > not even reveal to people that I can read charts. > > > > Thanks > > Tanvir > > > > > > > > > > > > What cannot happen, can never happen. > > Which is mine, is forever mine. > > > > http://www.jyotish-remedies.com - Vedic Astrology (Jyotish) > > Predictive astrology with incredibly powerful problem solving > remedies > > Where relief and solutions are found > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2006 Report Share Posted March 7, 2006 Dear Friends, I have been noticing for quite some time that members have varied interest in the jyotish.some partcipate willingly to learn and know more technicalities,others have no interest as they have found jyotish in way or other of little solace but indulge in some esoteric aspects and the last category want no astrological connotation but would they be able to get waht they seek. With such varied interest we would like to sense the objectivity and respond to them by analysing where ever required technically,esoterically and also button what they just seek for their problems. Ofcourse all of us started genuinely from classicals.There might be in consistencies in technicalities like some observe jaimini principles etc.with lot of supplementary information these days getting generated through various elaborate discussions in jyotish forums,magazines bringing out technical difficulties solved and by talking to some known experts as on date we certainly get enlightened.I do not thing it is necessary to surmise about inconsisitencies in technicalities in classics here except for argumentative purpose.Most importantly for me this platform is not really to be converted into advancing arguments as we know such approaches very little purposes.what is meant for a beginner(a true learner) will not hesitate to seek more details and information where ever necessary and we have been endeavouring with our little knowledge.Today Astrology to address various issues and problems looks for eccletical approach by viewing the problems from various perspectives.In this regard classicals do help us and support us in refering them apart from various other problem solving sciences and arts.To consider as scientific and non scientific it is own cup of tea.Definetely it is an open subject as there is lot to emerge from basics.ultimately a deserving person who finds some time lost his way seeks guidance and we need to address this honestyly,seeking remuneration or no remunaration,drilling the chart or otherwise suggesting possible remedies where ever essential to boost the confidnece levels of concerned persons and requesting them to handle their problems with patience. Some have really benifited and endorsed positively,some continue to wade through their issues as they do not really follow up with consistency and other come here only for their enlightenment not through pure Vedic apparoach. lastly I only plead for strengthening the objectives and promote collective approach in learning but not to control remotely and stick to their own notions.All of us in what ever way we can contribute let us do by feeling the sensitivity and giving due regard to others view and expecting moderators to devote their energy and time only to bring in sharpness and clarity further in the issues like morality initiated by shri Tanvir ji. It is nice of shri Niraj ji to have got in to tackel some odd mails despite the fact that he was breaved with the loss of his close family members.ceratinly it is time we share the grief and pray for the souls.At the same time let us also be able to accommodate various styles and expressions in what ever way they are useful.the judgement has to be made finally by those customers wholand into this group with some expectations.Their time is most important no doubt and we alway keep our consciousness open to be subtle and advance further. krishnan crystal pages <rrgb wrote: Dear Neeraj ji, My sincere condolences on your losses. I pray for their peace and for consolation and strength to those that they left behind. I have long realized that the story of the Brahmin, his son and the donkey is very true in this world. No one can satisfy everyone's taste and everyone wants to see more of what they like to taste. The reading seeker simply wants readings, the student wants to know all the technical aspects, and so on ... I generally refrain from mixing readings with discussion. I have for a long time been giving free readings at other sites for some years now and I shall continue that practice without feeling guilty for not providing readings here. Recently, although it takes more time, I have also been discussing technical aspects and giving birthdata etc. Protecting the privacy of individuals whether they are paying or not is uppermost in my view - hence no i.d.s etc are given. While some individuals may feel that technical discussion somehow is supreme, my personal opinion is that sometimes people grasp at straws (read most of the magazine articles and see how they pin sometime great on one or two factors). On the one hand people pose as scientists and scientific and yet the basic premise of things that must underlie 'scientific method'get tossed by even accomplished jyotishis and writers of acclaim! So be it, we are all human! Another thing is that different jyotishis look at the same chart in many different ways, some miss a few points here, the others miss a few points there. Then there are different ayanamshas and so on. Unless all jyotishis in a forum use the identical set of basic tools, the mish-mash, though tasty can be terribly confusing to the beginner. To me, in all of these forums with such varying and mixed levels of expertise and experience, the beginner is the most important not to confuse! The others are all advanced anyway and would be able to figure their way out. So, in the end technical analysis may or may not be useful. And there is already a lot of contradiction in the technical information even in classics! What remains safe territory then is focusing on the aspects of astrology that are not at all covered in texts. These have been called esoteric by some, philosophy by others, depending on where the mental filter is set and what the mind-set is. Others find these aspects interesting and mentally more challenging. After all, jyotish is a very creative and comprehensive description of the human experience. I don't see it as a simple A+B=9 (or more complex but still an equation!). This could be the difference in my world-view, my view on jyotish, etc. And those who do not or cannot tune into that perspective, they are free to stop reading my posts. What could be simpler? And it is very effective to weed out any posts or posters who do not make sense consistently, according to my reading of them. RR , Neeraj Gupta <gupta_neeraj_2000 wrote: > > Hello Everybody, > > First of all I apologize that I am not participating > for last couple of weeks. There were some family > problems and hence I was unable to look the messages. > There were two deaths in the family (my grand father > and his elder brother expired) due to which I could > not devote time here. I hope you people can > understand. > > I know that Rohini Ji is an active member of the group > and respond the messages and queries in a good way. > Further, I would like to tell you and request all of > the members that this group is solely for the > discussion and learning purpose. There are many > different kinds of people and everybody has its own > writing style. However, sarcasm or using wrong > language (it should not hurt other person feelings) is > not allowed. > > Please maintain the group decorum. As our group has a > large number of members, so if there is any specifice > issue, please let mark a mail to Tanvir or me and we > will take care of this. > > I apologize for the delay in responding to this > thread. > > Regards, > > Neeraj Gupta > (JR-Group-Moderator) > > --- varun_trvd <varun_trvd wrote: > > > Respected Gurujan, > > > > I do not know if I speak for the entire group or > > not, over a year or > > so , I have realized that four respected gurus of > > this group are > > shri Ranjan ji , Krishnan ji , Ashutosh ji , and > > Arjun ji , not > > necessarily in that order. > > > > These four stalwarts are the pillars of this group. > > We feel hurt > > when any body shows disrespect to any of these > > luminaries. > > It becomes all the more painful if any of these > > stalwarts feels hurt > > and says so. > > > > With naman to all gurujan, > > > > Varun Trivedi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , vattem > > krishnan > > <bursar_99@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Shri Rohini ji > > > When several views forth coming from a broad > > spectrum covering > > morality,astrology,psychology and even > > genitics,probably the issues > > of leaders and issue of leadership is only a passing > > reference.I do > > not think that needs to be taken personally and even > > I would like to > > initiate a kind of remorse for the unintentional > > inklings and > > reflections.In the spirit of forgive and forget let > > us forge a > > balanced view.if some kind of thoughts were made to > > feel you > > otherwise please forgive.I think Arjun ji has > > already come out by > > taking back his writings.probably it is nice if we > > can really switch > > over to very very interesting forth coming.No doubt > > all of us some > > how some times in our enethusiasm forget some > > basics.All these views > > may not be taken as very personal as none of us for > > that have > > anything in person against any one. > > > May be we tend to go by the style of references > > and > > observe.Certainly some more restraint and patience > > is need when we > > really button back to reply. > > > iam sure you are at ease to accept to the > > reformed views > > tenedered by Mr Arjun ji as in very certain terms he > > felt sotty and > > expressed > > > krishnan > > > > > > rohiniranjan <rrgb@> wrote: > > > Tanvir, Neeraj, members -- > > > > > > Please respond publicly and explain to me why this > > sarcasm > > directed > > > by member Mr. Arjun (which he claims is his > > penname in some > > message) > > > is justified or allowed to be published on this > > forum? > > > > > > Have I claimed to be a leader here? > > > DO I deserve this kind of insult?? > > > > > > Is this now the acceptable code of conduct by > > general spiritual > > > acceptance on this forum, by vocal and silent > > members regardless > > of > > > whether they love or hate what I feel I have the > > right to say? > > > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > > > > , > > "rohiniranjan" <rrgb@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Sorry if I hit some sensitive button Mr. Arjun! > > > > > > > > I am not and have never claimed to be the leader > > here, disputed > > or > > > > otherwise. So please do not get personal for > > whatever personal > > > > reasons and issues you have, which I am unaware > > of -- but I did > > > not > > > > fall off the turnip truck yesterday! > > > > > > > > I am pushing some buttons, obviously, some stale > > and antiquated > > > ways > > > > of thinking, but that does not mean that I will > > tolerate any > > > > personal flings like this! > > > > > > > > Please keep your personal attributions and in > > that sense 'name- > > > > callings' to yourself. This is not in keeping > > with your self- > > > > proclaimed monastic, austere spiritual way that > > you have talked > > > > about here earlier. > > > > > > > > Also, I do not want you to misuse your internet > > cafe time for > > > > useless pursuits like trashing 'RRji' who has > > already admitted > > to > > > > being this janitor at this high school and busy > > cleaning messes! > > > > > > > > Please do not take it personally, but since you > > pointed your > > laser > > > > at me by name, I must respond, because that is > > my right! > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > , > > "panditarjun2004" > > > > <panditarjun2004@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > dear friends > > > > > > > > > > in the last few mails, RR ji let his reliased > > thoughts flow in > > > his > > > > > own uninimitable style. needless to say RR is > > the (un) > > disputed > > > > > leader of JR. > > > > > > > > > > let me share my own realisation experiences > > with the more > > > > fortunate > > > > > members of this group. > > > > > > > > > > gods and planets are like ATMs for an > > unrealised person and > > they > > > > > exist somewhere else from where the native > > expects to receive > > > > > something and lives in a permanent > > physchological order to > > > believe > > > > > that his wealth is somewhere else in these > > ATMs. Also these > > > > > unrealised persons believe that god is > > somewhere in the higher > > > > > altitudes or in the caves and in that process > > they keep going > > on > > > > in > > > > > circles to find god nowhere. all great > > realised people have > > > > shared > > > > > and penned these experiences in their > > autobiographies and i > > can > > > > > quote many. these unrealised people keep > > marching untiringly > > in > > > > > their bahar yatra forever endlessly changing > > their > > destinations > > > > > continuously on a consistent basis. > > > > > > > > > > Gita (can give verse numbers) says that for a > > reliased person, > > > > vedas > > > > > and shastras are meaningless. also for a > > realised person god > > > === message truncated === > > > http://www.neerajgupta.com > > > > > > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE DIVINITY AND RELISH THE TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS. Vedic astrology Astrology chart Astrology software Visit your group "" on the web. Mail Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 8, 2006 Report Share Posted March 8, 2006 Respected Rohiniji, Seems my mails have served intended purpose;your scholarship is blooming again in serving more purposefully by the way you've started back to solve/expalin the technicalities of jyotish to discerning and eager knowledge seekers of jyotish.This is evident from your prompt tackling of the questions like 'nodes position',usage/utility of jyotish software etc. For your learned scholarship ,I never advised(the founders/moderators) that you've to be secluded from group's activities,what I said is priorities of group's intended objectives are supposed to be more of diagnosis through jyotish principles /consequent remedial measures that can be offered/ enrichment of related knowledge through discussions.I also said if generic philosophies / discussions are needed in an individual case ,let them be carried so initially in the forum and gradually confining to select few behind the group. Any way i donot wish to add more to the debate which is bordering on polemics. My true apologies to seekers by not explaining more meaningfully the well intentioned advise of not coming back for serial queries.What I mean is that repeated different set of queries for the same individuals will deprive other deserving cases unknowingly .And this well intentioned free service if misused by us, we'll be loosing these noble contributors services like the moral story of golden eggs laying goose.Suppose if you put a query and if you donot understand its implemetational aspects,then please certainly a querent can comeback;like someone from Australia is expressing his anguish for procuring Rudraakshaas;others may have similar or some other genuine clarifications to come back for clarification.Please understand that my advise is not directed for such genuine querents serial clarification of doubts. This is my last mail on the subject . Thanking for the founders/moderators and benevolent service contributors. regards srinivas crystal pages <rrgb wrote: Srinivas, If you do so detest the writings of these individuals who do not indulge in technical analysis or merely philosophise -- and from the couple of missives you have posted here -- find very frustrating and objectionable, the *remedy* is very easy! Rather than sounding a call for the banishment of such individuals or their style and substance in writing (which some may like, others not), simply refrain from reading their posts! That is what I do when someone stops making sense in their postings! Highly recommended and very effective. ;-) Rohini , srinivasa murthy adavi <smadavi wrote: > > Dear Sir, > The August 'jyotishremedies' group is suggestive by name that it offers astrological remedies based on natal chart and its technical analysis or by some other suitable methods that have scriptural sanctions of respective religions. > It's true a querent cannot demand free service,but your noble intentions were many a time expressed through mails that the services will be given free of cost depending upon feasibility of the time and willingness of benevolent contributors/analysts.It's also true that some of the seekers started to take it for granted and started demanding serial queries postings either for themselves or by proxy for others,and the same were gently admonished by founders as well as contributors.This is a general problem which you people have effectively been dealing with. > But another big problem(more bigger than former) is occupation of space and attention for elaborative philosophical musings and generic dealing of the analysis(seems sometimes without looking at chart at all) being indulged by some members ,and thus distracting the founding spirit of the forum. > I've been watching the treatment of a querent by persons like Sri Asutoshji,Sri Krishnanji,Sri Arjunji,Sri Kadji,Sri Trivediji,Sri Chopraji,SriKuldhirJi etc and few others,who are keeping to the true tenets of the founding spirit of the forum and rendering wonderful "jyotish" service with in their possible limitations of their time and knowledgebase. > But some inspite of their gifted knowledge base are not doing any(or say very little) technical analysis and indulging in elaborate generic/philosophical treatment / musings or with their gift of jab of one or two liners ,triggering the innocents(some of the seekers) to become loquacious and thus distracting the founding principles of the forum. > It's natural that there is every chance for other service contributors who've been doing jyotish technical based anlysis for good of the seekers,will start to divert their precious time for such generic philosophical musings and thus denying a seeker of redemption of his suffering. > You please advise these people to give a pause on the forum and contimue on one to one(or among select few) if they deem that it is necessary.It's true that sometimes the philosophical discussion will alone quench the thirst of suffering soul instead of technical analysis of the chart.But the seekers who come to this August forum (by seeing the forum name) expects more of astro-technical analysis than the generic philososphy. > It's like drawing lines between a physician(here generic philosopher) job and surgeon(jyotish expert)job.In short when physician fails the surgeon has to enter.When a seeker comes with expectation of astro remedies and instead exposed to more of generic philosophical expostion he either loose interest or feel like not recommending for suffering souls about this noble group and gradually the group will turn into generic philosophical forum instead of standing upto the named spirit. > Many a person has great philosophical currents of thoughts going inside them but they donot have expressive power due to so many reasons.But most of the seekers flocking to this group certainly doesn't have astro knowledge,and they come with great hope for a treatment of their soul through scripturally laiddown principles on jyotish principles. > > As a beneficiary of this August forum I'm writing this mail witha thankful attitude and asking the benevolent founders and service contributors to keep the true founding objectives of the forum. > > regards > srinivas > > Neeraj Gupta <gupta_neeraj_2000 wrote: > Hello Everybody, > > First of all I apologize that I am not participating > for last couple of weeks. There were some family > problems and hence I was unable to look the messages. > There were two deaths in the family (my grand father > and his elder brother expired) due to which I could > not devote time here. I hope you people can > understand. > > I know that Rohini Ji is an active member of the group > and respond the messages and queries in a good way. > Further, I would like to tell you and request all of > the members that this group is solely for the > discussion and learning purpose. There are many > different kinds of people and everybody has its own > writing style. However, sarcasm or using wrong > language (it should not hurt other person feelings) is > not allowed. > > Please maintain the group decorum. As our group has a > large number of members, so if there is any specifice > issue, please let mark a mail to Tanvir or me and we > will take care of this. > > I apologize for the delay in responding to this > thread. > > Regards, > > Neeraj Gupta > (JR-Group-Moderator) > > --- varun_trvd <varun_trvd wrote: > > > Respected Gurujan, > > > > I do not know if I speak for the entire group or > > not, over a year or > > so , I have realized that four respected gurus of > > this group are > > shri Ranjan ji , Krishnan ji , Ashutosh ji , and > > Arjun ji , not > > necessarily in that order. > > > > These four stalwarts are the pillars of this group. > > We feel hurt > > when any body shows disrespect to any of these > > luminaries. > > It becomes all the more painful if any of these > > stalwarts feels hurt > > and says so. > > > > With naman to all gurujan, > > > > Varun Trivedi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , vattem > > krishnan > > <bursar_99@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Shri Rohini ji > > > When several views forth coming from a broad > > spectrum covering > > morality,astrology,psychology and even > > genitics,probably the issues > > of leaders and issue of leadership is only a passing > > reference.I do > > not think that needs to be taken personally and even > > I would like to > > initiate a kind of remorse for the unintentional > > inklings and > > reflections.In the spirit of forgive and forget let > > us forge a > > balanced view.if some kind of thoughts were made to > > feel you > > otherwise please forgive.I think Arjun ji has > > already come out by > > taking back his writings.probably it is nice if we > > can really switch > > over to very very interesting forth coming.No doubt > > all of us some > > how some times in our enethusiasm forget some > > basics.All these views > > may not be taken as very personal as none of us for > > that have > > anything in person against any one. > > > May be we tend to go by the style of references > > and > > observe.Certainly some more restraint and patience > > is need when we > > really button back to reply. > > > iam sure you are at ease to accept to the > > reformed views > > tenedered by Mr Arjun ji as in very certain terms he > > felt sotty and > > expressed > > > krishnan > > > > > > rohiniranjan <rrgb@> wrote: > > > Tanvir, Neeraj, members -- > > > > > > Please respond publicly and explain to me why this > > sarcasm > > directed > > > by member Mr. Arjun (which he claims is his > > penname in some > > message) > > > is justified or allowed to be published on this > > forum? > > > > > > Have I claimed to be a leader here? > > > DO I deserve this kind of insult?? > > > > > > Is this now the acceptable code of conduct by > > general spiritual > > > acceptance on this forum, by vocal and silent > > members regardless > > of > > > whether they love or hate what I feel I have the > > right to say? > > > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > > > > , > > "rohiniranjan" <rrgb@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Sorry if I hit some sensitive button Mr. Arjun! > > > > > > > > I am not and have never claimed to be the leader > > here, disputed > > or > > > > otherwise. So please do not get personal for > > whatever personal > > > > reasons and issues you have, which I am unaware > > of -- but I did > > > not > > > > fall off the turnip truck yesterday! > > > > > > > > I am pushing some buttons, obviously, some stale > > and antiquated > > > ways > > > > of thinking, but that does not mean that I will > > tolerate any > > > > personal flings like this! > > > > > > > > Please keep your personal attributions and in > > that sense 'name- > > > > callings' to yourself. This is not in keeping > > with your self- > > > > proclaimed monastic, austere spiritual way that > > you have talked > > > > about here earlier. > > > > > > > > Also, I do not want you to misuse your internet > > cafe time for > > > > useless pursuits like trashing 'RRji' who has > > already admitted > > to > > > > being this janitor at this high school and busy > > cleaning messes! > > > > > > > > Please do not take it personally, but since you > > pointed your > > laser > > > > at me by name, I must respond, because that is > > my right! > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > , > > "panditarjun2004" > > > > <panditarjun2004@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > dear friends > > > > > > > > > > in the last few mails, RR ji let his reliased > > thoughts flow in > > > his > > > > > own uninimitable style. needless to say RR is > > the (un) > > disputed > > > > > leader of JR. > > > > > > > > > > let me share my own realisation experiences > > with the more > > > > fortunate > > > > > members of this group. > > > > > > > > > > gods and planets are like ATMs for an > > unrealised person and > > they > > > > > exist somewhere else from where the native > > expects to receive > > > > > something and lives in a permanent > > physchological order to > > > believe > > > > > that his wealth is somewhere else in these > > ATMs. Also these > > > > > unrealised persons believe that god is > > somewhere in the higher > > > > > altitudes or in the caves and in that process > > they keep going > > on > > > > in > > > > > circles to find god nowhere. all great > > realised people have > > > > shared > > > > > and penned these experiences in their > > autobiographies and i > > can > > > > > quote many. these unrealised people keep > > marching untiringly > > in > > > > > their bahar yatra forever endlessly changing > > their > > destinations > > > > > continuously on a consistent basis. > > > > > > > > > > Gita (can give verse numbers) says that for a > > reliased person, > > > > vedas > > > > > and shastras are meaningless. also for a > > realised person god > > > === message truncated === > > > http://www.neerajgupta.com > > > > > > > > > > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE DIVINITY AND RELISH THE TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS. > > > > > > > Vedic astrology Astrology chart Astrology software > > > > > > Visit your group "" on the web. > > > > > Terms of Service. > > > > > > > > > > Mail > Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. > > > SURRENDER JOYFULLY TO THE WILL OF THE ULTIMATE DIVINITY AND RELISH THE TASTE OF ABSOLUTE BLISS. Vedic astrology Astrology chart Astrology software Visit your group "" on the web. Mail Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 8, 2006 Report Share Posted March 8, 2006 Srinivas, Actually, I never stopped doing that, despite your obviously narrow perception of me based on what I write in one forum or format :-) , srinivasa murthy adavi <smadavi wrote: >snip< > Respected Rohiniji, > > Seems my mails have served intended purpose;your scholarship is blooming again in serving more purposefully by the way you've started back to solve/expalin the technicalities of jyotish to discerning and eager knowledge seekers of jyotish.This is evident from your prompt tackling of the questions like 'nodes position',usage/utility of jyotish software etc. >snip< Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.