Guest guest Posted June 24, 2001 Report Share Posted June 24, 2001 Namaste Mahalinga and other list members, A wonderful debate indeed. I will very briefly point a few things as per what I have been taught, learnt or inferred from my experience with Jyotish. The charts of parents, children, siblings, country etc DO NOT AFFECT the individual chart. They only show INTER-RELATED destinies. We are born in a family, country etc by virtue of our karmas. We get exactly what we deserve. It is of course a different matter that astrologers read other family members' charts to get points that they failed to read in the individual chart itself. What we have either overlooked or misread or underestimated in the native's chart sometimes hits us on the face in the chart of a family member. But when we come back and see again, it is clear in the original chart itself. Luck or bad luck cannot be attributed to the entry of a new member into the family. No use blaming a Moola nakshatra girl for the father-in-law's death. His own chart would indicate his death anyway. The mid-heaven also doesn't change in the example given by Mahalinga.It remains the same in most divisional charts including D24. We would realize this if we do such examples practically or if we had questioned ourselves in a similar fashion in our quest for precision. Having done this myself over the years I am convinced that the nadiamshas and Krishnamurthi subs and subsubs could shed more light. Theoretically though one could argue that if all parameters are considered the highest level of precision can be attained, that level of precision WILL NOT be revealed to the human mind in Kali Yuga. Firstly life will become miserable, boring and mechanical. Secondly Karma, Prarabdha Vs Purushardha ( destiny versus free will) has bogged even the best human minds forever. The greatest sages have differed on these issues. We cannot do better. But that level of precision can also be attained though only partly. This is the area of Prasna. While the natal chart reveals Prarabdha, the prasna chart reveals both prarabdha and freewill. It is like the current bank balance in the savings account. That is why it IS possible to attain the highest precision in prashna because we are taking into account other parameters which are missing in the natal chart. DKP factors have no role absolutely in the Prashna chart. If we know where to look for in the prashna chart for a particular question, we will have definite answers. Clear and intelligent questions get clear and intelligent answers in Prashna. If it can be proved that Astrology is accurate and that its principles work independently without any reference to DKP etc, it can be done ONLY in Prashna. Though this will convince the most skeptical, unfortunately Prashna answers only one issue at a time or at the most a few. So life will still remain an enigma for all including the astrologer. Natal horoscopy will NEVER have that level of precision. Even DKP are included in Jyotish. It is by virtue of one's karma that one is born in a particular DKP. Jyotish is the practical study of Karma. But the natal chart alone cannot give a complete idea since it reveals only the Prarabdha which is just a fraction of Sanchita. Moreover the planets don't affect us as we think. The planets themselves are PART of a universal order.Jyotish sheds light on life by revealing our karmic patterns. When a soul is born into a family, it is because of the karmic debts with the others in that family. When everything is ideal, the situations and the persons fit into the karmic patterns and the soul takes birth. In other words the individual karmic pattern selected for this life has to fit in or correspond to the group (whole) karmic patterns of the family, society, etc. This happens not just by chance, but in accordance with the cosmic patterns. What relation does the horoscope have to destiny? Do planets dictate our lives? These are often asked questions. The planets do not control our lives. They reflect the cosmic patterns. The universe works in certain natural cyclic patterns. Both the macrocosm and microcosm operate in a similar way. The planets revolve around the sun. The electrons revolve around the nucleus in the atom. `As above so below'. This is the fundamental law. A man can be born only at a time when his individual karmic pattern (Prarabdha) matches that of the macrocosm, that is, the planetary and stellar patterns. What is happening at a macrocosmic level is also happening at a microcosmic level. By this cosmic law, the karmic pattern matches with the planetary pattern. In other words the time of birth is Prarabdha (destiny)! By studying the patterns created by the stellar bodies, we can infer the karmic patterns of the individual, because they both are co- extensive. The horoscope thus reveals the Prarabdha karma of an individual. An intelligent astrologer can analyse to a reasonable extent, the Prarabdha with which a person is born, and based on that, the situations in which the individual may be placed in life at different times. The character, the tendencies, the Prakriti (Constitution), mental make-up and the situations in life are all Prarabdha indicated by the horoscope through the patterns revealed. Hence study of Jyotish or Hindu astrology can shed a lot of light on the unknown aspects of life and is very illuminating. That is why it is called the best light (Jyoti:light; Ish:Lord). Astrology is the best light on life. Let me point out the difference between the physical body called planet and Graha. The physical planet is just one more manifestation of the Universal principle Graha. While Jyotish talks of the grahas, we actually make use of the planetary positions to understand the correlated working of the grahas. Since everything in the manifest universe has to come under the vibration of the nine principles of energy (grahas), everything falls under the signification(karakatwa) of a graha. But since each graha has multiple karakatwas, the scope for confusion arises. A particular combination will come under a graha. But there are other things that also come under the same. For instance Mercury-Jupiter conj could indicate an accountant, journalist or an astrologer among other things (if these grahas turn out to be the strongest determinants of profession in a chart). That an astrologer cannot precisely pinpoint the career is not proof of the limitations of Jyotish. It is rather the result of simplifying a very complicated phenomenon. Karma is an enigma that has baffled even sages. The patterns of karma are myriad, exceedingly intricate and perplexing. It is very difficult to understand because karma is an eternal mystery that defies all description. Yet we should try to understand what little we could with the guiding `light' of Jyotish. For those who wish to know more (at least for the new comers who have only more questions after all this debate for the past few days) I sending an article of mine that was published last year. It is rather too long for a mail. I APOLOGISE TO those who dont need it. I will follow this mail by one more on Ruling planets with a clear example sometime tonight. This will reveal that it is possible to attain a high level of precision indeed even if it is only in one area of Jyotish. Satya Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.