Lahiri/ayanamsa puzzle - BV Raman IS right

[Guest guest]

Dear Visti,

 

Pranam.

 

>Your right. Did you know that conception also occurs when the Sun is in

>trines to Darapada?

 

Wow, that's interesting information. Does that mean that male and female's

darapada have to be in trines to each other to conceive a child, or it only

counts for the female?

 

>Actually there are some exceptions, and especially in the charts of saints,

>we shouldn't be to quick to time death.

 

That's right, what are the exceptions?

 

>However the Sun's transit isn't excuse enough, to rectify a birthtime that

>much. Instead try to rectify the charts using other basic principles.

 

I didn't rectify the birthtime of Bhaktivedanta Swami, this was done by our

param-guru Pt Sanjay Rath. I rectified my own birthchart again (with kunda

and janma vighati rectification) in regard to the calculations I made today.

This morning when I was doing my morning puja, my mind was spinning around

and thinking about this ayanamsa question, and after my puja I started

calculating on this subject. Yesterday evening already I was inspired to

read from the Srimad Bhagavata Purana, 12th canto, chapter 2, texts 26-34.

Please read it if you have a copy at hand. Time is a little short for me

now, otherwise I would type it out. Maybe tomorrow.

It states there that one naksatra is traversed by ayanamsa in a time period

of 1.200 years! If you read carefully, you'll understand. Whereas Lahiri

uses a time of about 960 years for one naksatra to be traversed! This is the

mistake. According to my calculations, BV Raman would have introduced his

ayanamsa in the year 1978? I don't have any information on him or books of

him at hand, maybe you can tell me where to find something on the internet?

While for Lahiri, it seems that he used the ephemeris of about 1450-1460,

which is about the time of Lord Chaitanya and started calculating from

there.

 

>I don't have Bhaktivedanta's chart, so i won't comment on why he died on

>that specific date, but i would like to see it nevertheless, as i have some

>ideas as to why it happened.

 

I have attached Bhaktivedanta's chart, as well as mine. Please have a look.

I'll report further tomorrow in regard to my findings, time is getting short

now.

 

Your sishya,

Dhira Krsna dasa

Attachment: (APPLICATION/octet-stream) DhiraKrs.jhd [not stored]

Attachment: (APPLICATION/octet-stream) Prabhupa.jhd [not stored]

[Guest guest]

Namaste Dhira,

 

> It states there that one naksatra is traversed by ayanamsa in a

time period

> of 1.200 years!

 

 

Thank you for intersting reference regarding this puzzle.

 

 

regards, V

 

If you read carefully, you'll understand. Whereas Lahiri

> uses a time of about 960 years for one naksatra to be traversed!

This is the

> mistake. According to my calculations, BV Raman would have

introduced his

> ayanamsa in the year 1978? I don't have any information on him or

books of

> him at hand, maybe you can tell me where to find something on the

internet?

> While for Lahiri, it seems that he used the ephemeris of about 1450-

1460,

> which is about the time of Lord Chaitanya and started calculating

from

> there.

>

> >I don't have Bhaktivedanta's chart, so i won't comment on why he

died on

> >that specific date, but i would like to see it nevertheless, as i

have some

> >ideas as to why it happened.

>

> I have attached Bhaktivedanta's chart, as well as mine. Please have

a look.

> I'll report further tomorrow in regard to my findings, time is

getting short

> now.

>

> Your sishya,

> Dhira Krsna dasa