Yugas - scientific proof of 3.5 mill old humans

[Guest guest]

Hello Murali,

 

The following is related to this discussion, so I have added it. It

shows scientific proof that humans existed in their current form 3.5

million years ago, which is the Satya yuga proposed in the Sastras.

The belief that humans existed in this time was rejected by

westerners in the early 20th century as uneducated mythological

musings of the ancient Indians, but as with many other things, they

have proven to be correct. Please forgive me that this post does not

directly address your questions.

 

There is not much in the ways of scientific evidence that proves that

humans existed millions of years ago. However there are a few pieces

of evidence that are undisputed, and that severely challenge the

current scientific model in vogue.

 

Please view the following links. They deal with the Laetoli

footprints, that date back 3,600,000 years. This puts them into the

Satya yuga. The footprints themselves match current human ones in

form, and do not show evolution, which is against the scientific

thought. They are indistinguishable from any Homo Sapien footprint,

and do not tally with the apelike footprints evolutionists

hypothesize belong to humanity's ancestors of the time.

 

http://www.evol.net/evol/laetoli.htm

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aso/tryit/evolution/footprints.html

http://www.humanevolution.f2s.com/laetolifoot.html

http://wupa.wustl.edu/record/archive/1996/02-15-96/2767.html

 

regards,

 

Alex J

[Guest guest]

They had a very interesting documentary on one of our scientific channels in the

U.S. awhile back (Discovery channel) regardin these footprints and how man in

his present form DID exist 3.5 million years ago. One theory is that the

orthodox mentality of the time discouraged the general population from believing

that man has existed WAY back ....therefore everything is 'eternal' in a sense.

Orthodox (Catholic/christian) groups like to be in power and chain people with

idea's that they are the ONLY ones who really know what is going 'on'

spiritually and historically. There are other 'artifacts' that have been found

showing that man existed long ago including pieces of an airplane that has been

carbon dated thousands of years ago (at least if I'm not mistaken). Hmmmmmm....

 

Me

 

>>> lostinmotion 07/18/01 09:21AM >>>

Hello Murali,

 

The following is related to this discussion, so I have added it. It

shows scientific proof that humans existed in their current form 3.5

million years ago, which is the Satya yuga proposed in the Sastras.

The belief that humans existed in this time was rejected by

westerners in the early 20th century as uneducated mythological

musings of the ancient Indians, but as with many other things, they

have proven to be correct. Please forgive me that this post does not

directly address your questions.

 

There is not much in the ways of scientific evidence that proves that

humans existed millions of years ago. However there are a few pieces

of evidence that are undisputed, and that severely challenge the

current scientific model in vogue.

 

Please view the following links. They deal with the Laetoli

footprints, that date back 3,600,000 years. This puts them into the

Satya yuga. The footprints themselves match current human ones in

form, and do not show evolution, which is against the scientific

thought. They are indistinguishable from any Homo Sapien footprint,

and do not tally with the apelike footprints evolutionists

hypothesize belong to humanity's ancestors of the time.

 

http://www.evol.net/evol/laetoli.htm

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aso/tryit/evolution/footprints.html

http://www.humanevolution.f2s.com/laetolifoot.html

http://wupa.wustl.edu/record/archive/1996/02-15-96/2767.html

 

regards,

 

Alex J

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Your use of is subject to

[Guest guest]

Namaste Renee,

 

That makes sense about the orthodox mentality, as the Darwinism

theories appeared during the early 20th century, which was a time

period heavily under the limiting conceptions of Biblical history,

which makes the claim that the world was created in 4004 BC. So even

with the radically different theory of evolution, these people were

working under conceptual restraints due to the clime of the time.

 

A similar parallel was in how the historians of that time attempted

to insert the total history of the Vedas into this time frame, dating

all Indian scriptures against their biblical conceptual model.

 

Other than the footprints, there are other artifacts as you say, such

as tools, some dating back tens of millions of years, that have been

found in layers of rock.

 

regards,

 

Alex J

 

vedic astrology, "Renee Serrano" <RSERRANO@R...> wrote:

> They had a very interesting documentary on one of our scientific

channels in the U.S. awhile back (Discovery channel) regardin these

footprints and how man in his present form DID exist 3.5 million

years ago. One theory is that the orthodox mentality of the time

discouraged the general population from believing that man has

existed WAY back ....therefore everything is 'eternal' in a sense.

Orthodox (Catholic/christian) groups like to be in power and chain

people with idea's that they are the ONLY ones who really know what

is going 'on' spiritually and historically. There are

other 'artifacts' that have been found showing that man existed long

ago including pieces of an airplane that has been carbon dated

thousands of years ago (at least if I'm not mistaken). Hmmmmmm....

>

> Me

>

> >>> lostinmotion@h... 07/18/01 09:21AM >>>

> Hello Murali,

>

> The following is related to this discussion, so I have added it. It

> shows scientific proof that humans existed in their current form

3.5

> million years ago, which is the Satya yuga proposed in the Sastras.

> The belief that humans existed in this time was rejected by

> westerners in the early 20th century as uneducated mythological

> musings of the ancient Indians, but as with many other things, they

> have proven to be correct. Please forgive me that this post does

not

> directly address your questions.

>

> There is not much in the ways of scientific evidence that proves

that

> humans existed millions of years ago. However there are a few

pieces

> of evidence that are undisputed, and that severely challenge the

> current scientific model in vogue.

>

> Please view the following links. They deal with the Laetoli

> footprints, that date back 3,600,000 years. This puts them into the

> Satya yuga. The footprints themselves match current human ones in

> form, and do not show evolution, which is against the scientific

> thought. They are indistinguishable from any Homo Sapien footprint,

> and do not tally with the apelike footprints evolutionists

> hypothesize belong to humanity's ancestors of the time.

>

> http://www.evol.net/evol/laetoli.htm

> http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aso/tryit/evolution/footprints.html

> http://www.humanevolution.f2s.com/laetolifoot.html

> http://wupa.wustl.edu/record/archive/1996/02-15-96/2767.html

>

> regards,

>

> Alex J

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-

 

>

> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

>

>

>

> Your use of is subject to