Guest guest Posted October 1, 2001 Report Share Posted October 1, 2001 This is the second time I am sending this message: maybe it will be posted this time. The inharmonious aspect of Uranus to the Sun is always a conspicuous feature of the horoscopes of *leaders of the occult. Robert Hand has this aspect but how many others today ? Good luck, Henry Jackson/PLUTO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 1, 2001 Report Share Posted October 1, 2001 Dear Henry, In Vedic Astrology, We dont consider Uranus. Of course, Western Astrologers say Uranus in 10th house makes one as occultist. You can see an email for Sanjay related why Vedic astrology consider 9 grahas. Best Regards, Venkat > This is the second time I am sending this > message: maybe it will be posted this time. > > The inharmonious aspect of Uranus to the Sun > is always a conspicuous feature of the > horoscopes of *leaders of the occult. > > Robert Hand has this aspect but how many > others today ? > > Good luck, Henry Jackson/PLUTO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2001 Report Share Posted October 2, 2001 vedic astrology, plutopredicts wrote: > This is the second time I am sending this > message: maybe it will be posted this time. > > The inharmonious aspect of Uranus to the Sun > is always a conspicuous feature of the > horoscopes of *leaders of the occult. > > Robert Hand has this aspect but how many > others today ? > > Good luck, Henry Jackson/PLUTO Helou Henry, I am too new member in group and study both western and jyotish, just beginner in both. My first "touch" to jyotish came from Mark Kröger, he´s Finn just like me. He made for me amazing astrological interpretation based on his experience both in western and jyotish and i feel him one of the best astrologers in our time. He have uranus-connection too (Feb 20, 1969, 10:25, 62N54-27E41) by aquarius-mercury/MC-120-jupiter/uranus/ketu, pisces-sun in 11th (aquarian/uranian) placidushouse and moon/venus/saturn in 12th (tropically). I guess water signs and houses takes mind to occult, but air signs are needed too. Mark used to interpret himself by sideral placidus system, where aquarius-sun is in aquarius-house. His vedic nature is unknown for me, can anyone tell does he have astrological talent also by vedic "eyes"? Is Mark in this list (huhuu!?), does anyone know where he impress today? He unexplainedly vanished from finnish postlists in last summer and i am "yearning" him. Näkemiin!! Piia Ps. here is some interesting links for everyone... Asko Parpola´s homepage (professor in vedic knowledge): http://www.helsinki.fi/~aparpola/ http://www.harappa.com/welcome.html http://www.harappa.com/script/parpola0.html http://sarasvati.simplenet.com/html/sarastemplate1.htm http://www.tamil.net/projectmadurai/pub/pm0044/addendum.html http://www.asiatica.org/ http://www.asiatica.org/publications/ejvs/issues.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2001 Report Share Posted October 2, 2001 vedic astrology, "Venkateshwara A Reddy" <venkateshwara_reddy> wrote: > Dear Henry, In Vedic Astr Dear Venkat;i have been a vedic astrologer for 30 years and I and many, many other vedic astrologers use Uranus, Neptune & Pluto. Following the 11 Sept. incident ( Saturn opp Pluto ) maybe the traditional vedic astrologers will take their heads out of the sand and recognise that that these 3 planets do exist and use them. i made no mention of the 10th house and my statement is fully supported by the *eminent astrologers who have had Sun in inharmonious aspect with Uranus. In fact this was observed by one of the greatest astrologers of the 20th century. PLUTO ology, We dont consider Uranus. Of course, Western > Astrologers say Uranus in 10th house makes one as occultist. > You can see an email for Sanjay related why Vedic astrology consider > 9 grahas. > > Best Regards, Venkat > > > This is the second time I am sending this > > message: maybe it will be posted this time. > > > > The inharmonious aspect of Uranus to the Sun > > is always a conspicuous feature of the > > horoscopes of *leaders of the occult. > > > > Robert Hand has this aspect but how many > > others today ? > > > > Good luck, Henry Jackson/PLUTO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2001 Report Share Posted October 2, 2001 Hello, Vedic Astrology does not use Uranus, Nepture and Pluto. If you read BPHS or UPJS or any other classic there is no mention of these planets. So I do not know which vedic astrologer uses these planets for their prediction. These are very slow moving planets. Yes they do exists so do the various other moons of Saturn, Jupiter which are much larger than mercury, venus, earth and mars, but Vedic Astrologers do not use it. Cheers !!! Ash vedic astrology, plutopredicts wrote: > vedic astrology, "Venkateshwara A > Reddy" <venkateshwara_reddy> wrote: > > Dear Henry, In Vedic Astr > > Dear Venkat;i have been a vedic astrologer for > 30 years and I and many, many other vedic > astrologers use Uranus, Neptune & Pluto. > Following the 11 Sept. incident ( Saturn opp > Pluto ) maybe the traditional vedic astrologers > will take their heads out of the sand and > recognise that that these 3 planets do exist and > use them. > i made no mention of the 10th house and my > statement is fully supported by the *eminent > astrologers who have had Sun in inharmonious > aspect with Uranus. > In fact this was observed by one of the greatest > astrologers of the 20th century. PLUTO ology, We dont consider Uranus. Of course, > Western > > Astrologers say Uranus in 10th house makes > one as occultist. > > You can see an email for Sanjay related why > Vedic astrology consider > > 9 grahas. > > > > Best Regards, Venkat > > > > > This is the second time I am sending this > > > message: maybe it will be posted this time. > > > > > > The inharmonious aspect of Uranus to the > Sun > > > is always a conspicuous feature of the > > > horoscopes of *leaders of the occult. > > > > > > Robert Hand has this aspect but how many > > > others today ? > > > > > > Good luck, Henry Jackson/PLUTO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2001 Report Share Posted October 2, 2001 vedic astrology, ashsam73@h... wrote: I have read works by eminent vedic astrologers who like to claim that these 3 planets were know by ancient astrologers but different names were used !! So why do not vedic astrologers today use these planets under the old indian names? you cannot have it both ways. Why do you mention" the various other moons of saturn and jupiter".? I was talking about planets, not moons. Saturn too is a slow moving planet ! Read some books by Indian vedic astrologers and you wiill see the names of those who use these 3 planets. ..K S Krishnamurti and Manik Chand Jain used these planets and they were *eminent Vedic astrologers. Have a look at some vedic websites and you will see vedic astrologers using these 3 planets. regards, PLUTO > Hello, > > Vedic Astrology does not use Uranus, Nepture and Pluto. If you read > BPHS or UPJS or any other classic there is no mention of these > planets. So I do not know which vedic astrologer uses these planets > for their prediction. These are very slow moving planets. Yes they > do exists so do the various other moons of Saturn, Jupiter which are > much larger than mercury, venus, earth and mars, but Vedic > Astrologers do not use it. > > Cheers !!! > Ash > > > vedic astrology, plutopredicts wrote: > > vedic- astrology, "Venkateshwara A > > Reddy" <venkateshwara_reddy> wrote: > > > Dear Henry, In Vedic Astr > > > > Dear Venkat;i have been a vedic astrologer for > > 30 years and I and many, many other vedic > > astrologers use Uranus, Neptune & Pluto. > > Following the 11 Sept. incident ( Saturn opp > > Pluto ) maybe the traditional vedic astrologers > > will take their heads out of the sand and > > recognise that that these 3 planets do exist and > > use them. > > i made no mention of the 10th house and my > > statement is fully supported by the *eminent > > astrologers who have had Sun in inharmonious > > aspect with Uranus. > > In fact this was observed by one of the greatest > > astrologers of the 20th century. PLUTO > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ology, We dont consider Uranus. Of course, > > Western > > > Astrologers say Uranus in 10th house makes > > one as occultist. > > > You can see an email for Sanjay related why > > Vedic astrology consider > > > 9 grahas. > > > > > > Best Regards, Venkat > > > > > > > This is the second time I am sending this > > > > message: maybe it will be posted this time. > > > > > > > > The inharmonious aspect of Uranus to the > > Sun > > > > is always a conspicuous feature of the > > > > horoscopes of *leaders of the occult. > > > > > > > > Robert Hand has this aspect but how many > > > > others today ? > > > > > > > > Good luck, Henry Jackson/PLUTO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2001 Report Share Posted October 2, 2001 > wrote: > I have read works by eminent vedic astrologers > who like to claim that these 3 planets were > know by ancient astrologers but different names > were used !! well, They might consider those 3 planets as Upagrahas in Vedic Astrology. But it is not true. > So why do not vedic astrologers today use > these planets under the old indian names? you > cannot have it both ways. > Why do you mention" the various other moons > of saturn and jupiter".? I was talking about > planets, not moons. > Saturn too is a slow moving planet ! > Read some books by Indian vedic astrologers > and you wiill see the names of those who use > these 3 planets. > .K S Krishnamurti and Manik Chand Jain used > these planets and they were *eminent Vedic > astrologers. I read KP readers. KM did not mention abt Various Vargas. He only consider Rasi and Navamsa. He bombarded other astrologers with a question ~Twins birth~. I think, he did not fully assimilate BPHS Of course, I am ameteur. Best Regards, Venkat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2001 Report Share Posted October 2, 2001 I personally don't use the outer planets and,considering only the 9 traditional Vedic planets, was able to offer a prediction in advance of the 9/11 disaster: "There may also be some religious fanaticism aggravating the situation - Mideast stuff? I see 9/10 - 9/14 as being really bizarre." This is on my website www.vedicpredictiveastrology.com While I certainly don't object to anyone using the outer planets, in my experience, they are redundant and using them thereby can mislead by giving false confluence - repeatition of influences. On the other hand, I expect those astrologers using the outer planets are aware of this issue and interpret charts accordingly. In summary, as "Each occult system is complete within itself," and Jyotish predates the outer planets, I would be very careful in incorporating Uranus, Neptune and Pluto into interpretations. doug riemer vedic astrology, plutopredicts wrote: > vedic astrology, "Venkateshwara A > Reddy" <venkateshwara_reddy> wrote: > > Dear Henry, In Vedic Astr > > Dear Venkat;i have been a vedic astrologer for > 30 years and I and many, many other vedic > astrologers use Uranus, Neptune & Pluto. > Following the 11 Sept. incident ( Saturn opp > Pluto ) maybe the traditional vedic astrologers > will take their heads out of the sand and > recognise that that these 3 planets do exist and > use them. > i made no mention of the 10th house and my > statement is fully supported by the *eminent > astrologers who have had Sun in inharmonious > aspect with Uranus. > In fact this was observed by one of the greatest > astrologers of the 20th century. PLUTO ology, We dont consider Uranus. Of course, > Western > > Astrologers say Uranus in 10th house makes > one as occultist. > > You can see an email for Sanjay related why > Vedic astrology consider > > 9 grahas. > > > > Best Regards, Venkat > > > > > This is the second time I am sending this > > > message: maybe it will be posted this time. > > > > > > The inharmonious aspect of Uranus to the > Sun > > > is always a conspicuous feature of the > > > horoscopes of *leaders of the occult. > > > > > > Robert Hand has this aspect but how many > > > others today ? > > > > > > Good luck, Henry Jackson/PLUTO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2001 Report Share Posted October 2, 2001 Sorry, Pluto, but I can't resist adding that I like having my head in the sand, for sticking with traditional Vedic knowledge offers a pretty nice view. doug riemer vedic astrology, "Doug Riemer" <vedic@k...> wrote: > I personally don't use the outer planets and,considering only the 9 > traditional Vedic planets, was able to offer a prediction in advance > of the 9/11 disaster: > > "There may also be some religious fanaticism aggravating the > situation - Mideast stuff? I see 9/10 - 9/14 as being really > bizarre." > > This is on my website www.vedicpredictiveastrology.com > > While I certainly don't object to anyone using the outer planets, in > my experience, they are redundant and using them thereby can mislead > by giving false confluence - repeatition of influences. On the other > hand, I expect those astrologers using the outer planets are aware of > this issue and interpret charts accordingly. > > In summary, as "Each occult system is complete within itself," and > Jyotish predates the outer planets, I would be very careful in > incorporating Uranus, Neptune and Pluto into interpretations. > > doug riemer > > > > > > vedic astrology, plutopredicts wrote: > > vedic astrology, "Venkateshwara A > > Reddy" <venkateshwara_reddy> wrote: > > > Dear Henry, In Vedic Astr > > > > Dear Venkat;i have been a vedic astrologer for > > 30 years and I and many, many other vedic > > astrologers use Uranus, Neptune & Pluto. > > Following the 11 Sept. incident ( Saturn opp > > Pluto ) maybe the traditional vedic astrologers > > will take their heads out of the sand and > > recognise that that these 3 planets do exist and > > use them. > > i made no mention of the 10th house and my > > statement is fully supported by the *eminent > > astrologers who have had Sun in inharmonious > > aspect with Uranus. > > In fact this was observed by one of the greatest > > astrologers of the 20th century. PLUTO > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ology, We dont consider Uranus. Of course, > > Western > > > Astrologers say Uranus in 10th house makes > > one as occultist. > > > You can see an email for Sanjay related why > > Vedic astrology consider > > > 9 grahas. > > > > > > Best Regards, Venkat > > > > > > > This is the second time I am sending this > > > > message: maybe it will be posted this time. > > > > > > > > The inharmonious aspect of Uranus to the > > Sun > > > > is always a conspicuous feature of the > > > > horoscopes of *leaders of the occult. > > > > > > > > Robert Hand has this aspect but how many > > > > others today ? > > > > > > > > Good luck, Henry Jackson/PLUTO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2001 Report Share Posted October 2, 2001 Dear Henry, > Dear Venkat;i have been a vedic astrologer for > 30 years and I and many, many other vedic > astrologers use Uranus, Neptune & Pluto. Yes, there are astrologers who claim to be "Vedic astrologers" and yet use these planets. However, Vedic astrologers like Dr. B.V. Raman always vehemently opposed this idea. Some like Prof. P.S. Sastry show verses from Mahabharata suggesting that Vyasa knew about outer planets, but he does not show a single verse from Vyasa or Parasara showing that they have to be *used* in predictive horoscopy. > Following the 11 Sept. incident ( Saturn opp > Pluto ) maybe the traditional vedic astrologers > will take their heads out of the sand and > recognise that that these 3 planets do exist and > use them. We are very happy with our heads in the sand. Not only was Saturn opposite Pluto, but Mars was in an exact conjunction with Ketu - considered a harmful conjunction in Vedic astrology - very close to the natal ascendant of USA. In fact, Doug Reimer said on the night before the attack on the basis of the same conjunction that world might be a changed place before the end of September. Note that it happened in an agni rasi. If one wants to call oneself a Vedic/Hindu astrologer, one should first understand what Hindu Sages taught. Sadly, some people are only too happy to introduce corruptions in the knowledge that they only barely understand. May Jupiter's light shine on us, Narasimha PS: I received your "irrefutable proof" of Krishnamoorthy ayanamsa in personal mail a few weeks back, but was busy to reply. I do not see any "a proof" - let alone "irrefutable proof" - in that highly questionable argument based on one event for one nation and based on one factor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2001 Report Share Posted October 2, 2001 Hare Rama Krishna Dear Henry! I hope others also went through this mail and thought over it also... We donot consider Extra Saturnine planets in vedic astrology as they are not of much significance in vedic astrology. They are not mentioned by the seers in the treatise, not because they didn't know it, but they found everything can be explained with the 9 planets only (with Sun, Rahu and Ketu). Even I know Uranus gives thoughts and insights much ahead and Sun is the naisargika atmamaraka and there could be relations which show interest in astrology or occult. However the same can be explained in many more ways through vedic astrology... regards Sarajit - <plutopredicts <vedic astrology> Tuesday, October 02, 2001 5:11 AM [vedic astrology] SJVC Discussion group: Combinations for Astrologers > This is the second time I am sending this > message: maybe it will be posted this time. > > The inharmonious aspect of Uranus to the Sun > is always a conspicuous feature of the > horoscopes of *leaders of the occult. > > Robert Hand has this aspect but how many > others today ? > > Good luck, Henry Jackson/PLUTO > > > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > Your use of is subject to > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 2001 Report Share Posted October 3, 2001 Dear Pluto Predicts, Vedic astrologers do not use Uranus, Neptune and Pluto as other names. Could you please cite an example with the names of the supposidly planets that are refering to uranus, neptune and pluto. Yes, Saturn is a slow moving planet but it does cover a sign in 2.5 years. Uranus, Neptune and Pluto are even slower but the Maharishis drew a line and Planets till Saturn are used. BTW, What is your point with this email ? Cheers !!! Ash vedic astrology, plutopredicts wrote: > vedic astrology, ashsam73@h... > wrote: > I have read works by eminent vedic astrologers > who like to claim that these 3 planets were > know by ancient astrologers but different names > were used !! > So why do not vedic astrologers today use > these planets under the old indian names? you > cannot have it both ways. > Why do you mention" the various other moons > of saturn and jupiter".? I was talking about > planets, not moons. > Saturn too is a slow moving planet ! > Read some books by Indian vedic astrologers > and you wiill see the names of those who use > these 3 planets. > .K S Krishnamurti and Manik Chand Jain used > these planets and they were *eminent Vedic > astrologers. Have a look at some vedic websites > and you will see vedic astrologers using these 3 > planets. regards, PLUTO > > > > > > Hello, > > > > Vedic Astrology does not use Uranus, Nepture > and Pluto. If you read > > BPHS or UPJS or any other classic there is no > mention of these > > planets. So I do not know which vedic > astrologer uses these planets > > for their prediction. These are very slow > moving planets. Yes they > > do exists so do the various other moons of > Saturn, Jupiter which are > > much larger than mercury, venus, earth and > mars, but Vedic > > Astrologers do not use it. > > > > Cheers !!! > > Ash > > > > > > vedic astrology, > plutopredicts wrote: > > > vedic- > astrology, "Venkateshwara A > > > Reddy" <venkateshwara_reddy> wrote: > > > > Dear Henry, In Vedic Astr > > > > > > Dear Venkat;i have been a vedic astrologer > for > > > 30 years and I and many, many other vedic > > > astrologers use Uranus, Neptune & Pluto. > > > Following the 11 Sept. incident ( Saturn opp > > > Pluto ) maybe the traditional vedic > astrologers > > > will take their heads out of the sand and > > > recognise that that these 3 planets do exist > and > > > use them. > > > i made no mention of the 10th house and > my > > > statement is fully supported by the *eminent > > > astrologers who have had Sun in > inharmonious > > > aspect with Uranus. > > > In fact this was observed by one of the > greatest > > > astrologers of the 20th century. PLUTO > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ology, We dont consider Uranus. Of course, > > > Western > > > > Astrologers say Uranus in 10th house > makes > > > one as occultist. > > > > You can see an email for Sanjay related > why > > > Vedic astrology consider > > > > 9 grahas. > > > > > > > > Best Regards, Venkat > > > > > > > > > This is the second time I am sending > this > > > > > message: maybe it will be posted this > time. > > > > > > > > > > The inharmonious aspect of Uranus to > the > > > Sun > > > > > is always a conspicuous feature of the > > > > > horoscopes of *leaders of the occult. > > > > > > > > > > Robert Hand has this aspect but how > many > > > > > others today ? > > > > > > > > > > Good luck, Henry Jackson/PLUTO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 2001 Report Share Posted October 3, 2001 Aum Gurave Namah Dear Pluto and Ash! I suggest that the thread of this discussion should be dropped here only. This won't lead anywhere. There are astrologers like P.S.Shastri who used the extra-saturnine planets but that does mean that vedic astrology require their use. As Narasimha mentioned, he (Shastri) drew the conclusion fromMahabharata, that maharshis knew about the planets and could have used them. However that is not substantiated by the available treatise on jyotish. This is quite true that the maharishis knew their presence (they have indian names too such as Varun, Yama etc.), but they didn't use as they thought their use to be redundant.When most of the events can be explained by the 9 planets why should be try to complicate matter. If we consider the extra-saturnine planets, we could very well consider many other bodies too such as asteroids or planetary moons as well. Somewhere we have to draw a line. Maharshis drew the line upto Saturn. There are still astrologers who try to incorporate the best practices of the eastern and western astrology. However this can complicate matter if done by an "non-expert". For the time-being isn't it better to stick to what maharshis have taught rather than speculating.. regards Sarajit - <ashsam73 <vedic astrology> Wednesday, October 03, 2001 6:08 PM [vedic astrology] Re: SJVC Discussion group: Combinations for Astrologers > Dear Pluto Predicts, > > Vedic astrologers do not use Uranus, Neptune and Pluto as other > names. Could you please cite an example with the names of the > supposidly planets that are refering to uranus, neptune and pluto. > > Yes, Saturn is a slow moving planet but it does cover a sign in 2.5 > years. Uranus, Neptune and Pluto are even slower but the Maharishis > drew a line and Planets till Saturn are used. > > BTW, What is your point with this email ? > > Cheers !!! > Ash > > vedic astrology, plutopredicts wrote: > > vedic astrology, ashsam73@h... > > wrote: > > I have read works by eminent vedic astrologers > > who like to claim that these 3 planets were > > know by ancient astrologers but different names > > were used !! > > So why do not vedic astrologers today use > > these planets under the old indian names? you > > cannot have it both ways. > > Why do you mention" the various other moons > > of saturn and jupiter".? I was talking about > > planets, not moons. > > Saturn too is a slow moving planet ! > > Read some books by Indian vedic astrologers > > and you wiill see the names of those who use > > these 3 planets. > > .K S Krishnamurti and Manik Chand Jain used > > these planets and they were *eminent Vedic > > astrologers. Have a look at some vedic websites > > and you will see vedic astrologers using these 3 > > planets. regards, PLUTO > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Vedic Astrology does not use Uranus, Nepture > > and Pluto. If you read > > > BPHS or UPJS or any other classic there is no > > mention of these > > > planets. So I do not know which vedic > > astrologer uses these planets > > > for their prediction. These are very slow > > moving planets. Yes they > > > do exists so do the various other moons of > > Saturn, Jupiter which are > > > much larger than mercury, venus, earth and > > mars, but Vedic > > > Astrologers do not use it. > > > > > > Cheers !!! > > > Ash > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, > > plutopredicts wrote: > > > > vedic- > > astrology, "Venkateshwara A > > > > Reddy" <venkateshwara_reddy> wrote: > > > > > Dear Henry, In Vedic Astr > > > > > > > > Dear Venkat;i have been a vedic astrologer > > for > > > > 30 years and I and many, many other vedic > > > > astrologers use Uranus, Neptune & Pluto. > > > > Following the 11 Sept. incident ( Saturn opp > > > > Pluto ) maybe the traditional vedic > > astrologers > > > > will take their heads out of the sand and > > > > recognise that that these 3 planets do exist > > and > > > > use them. > > > > i made no mention of the 10th house and > > my > > > > statement is fully supported by the *eminent > > > > astrologers who have had Sun in > > inharmonious > > > > aspect with Uranus. > > > > In fact this was observed by one of the > > greatest > > > > astrologers of the 20th century. PLUTO > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ology, We dont consider Uranus. Of course, > > > > Western > > > > > Astrologers say Uranus in 10th house > > makes > > > > one as occultist. > > > > > You can see an email for Sanjay related > > why > > > > Vedic astrology consider > > > > > 9 grahas. > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, Venkat > > > > > > > > > > > This is the second time I am sending > > this > > > > > > message: maybe it will be posted this > > time. > > > > > > > > > > > > The inharmonious aspect of Uranus to > > the > > > > Sun > > > > > > is always a conspicuous feature of the > > > > > > horoscopes of *leaders of the occult. > > > > > > > > > > > > Robert Hand has this aspect but how > > many > > > > > > others today ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Good luck, Henry Jackson/PLUTO > > > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > Your use of is subject to > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 2001 Report Share Posted October 3, 2001 Hi A saturn opposition to pluto lasts for a very long time as both are slow planets. You can say that something major somewhere will happen during a saturn opposition to pluto, or in fact saturn in any relationship to pluto. We need something a bit more finegrained than the outer planets, whether they are useful or not in astrology. However, it is possible they have a bearing on inner energies. Here again, I am not sure. I have moon exactly opposite pluto on the 2nd 8th axis. This should cause me trauma via my mother I would have thought. However, this is very far from being the case. In fact, I owe a lot of my early education to her. Regards, Nimmi - <plutopredicts <vedic astrology> Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:27 PM [vedic astrology] Re: SJVC Discussion group: Combinations for Astrologers > > vedic astrology, "Venkateshwara A > Reddy" <venkateshwara_reddy> wrote: > > Dear Henry, In Vedic Astr > > Dear Venkat;i have been a vedic astrologer for > 30 years and I and many, many other vedic > astrologers use Uranus, Neptune & Pluto. > Following the 11 Sept. incident ( Saturn opp > Pluto ) maybe the traditional vedic astrologers > will take their heads out of the sand and > recognise that that these 3 planets do exist and > use them. > i made no mention of the 10th house and my > statement is fully supported by the *eminent > astrologers who have had Sun in inharmonious > aspect with Uranus. > In fact this was observed by one of the greatest > astrologers of the 20th century. PLUTO ology, We dont consider Uranus. Of course, > Western > > Astrologers say Uranus in 10th house makes > one as occultist. > > You can see an email for Sanjay related why > Vedic astrology consider > > 9 grahas. > > > > Best Regards, Venkat > > > > > This is the second time I am sending this > > > message: maybe it will be posted this time. > > > > > > The inharmonious aspect of Uranus to the > Sun > > > is always a conspicuous feature of the > > > horoscopes of *leaders of the occult. > > > > > > Robert Hand has this aspect but how many > > > others today ? > > > > > > Good luck, Henry Jackson/PLUTO > > > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > Your use of is subject to > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 2001 Report Share Posted October 3, 2001 vedic astrology, ashsam73@h... wrote: It was in reply to Venkatechwara Reddy's email to me. henry/pluto > Dear Pluto Predicts, > > Vedic astrologers do not use Uranus, Neptune and Pluto as other > names. Could you please cite an example with the names of the > supposidly planets that are refering to uranus, neptune and pluto. > > Yes, Saturn is a slow moving planet but it does cover a sign in 2.5 > years. Uranus, Neptune and Pluto are even slower but the Maharishis > drew a line and Planets till Saturn are used. > > BTW, What is your point with this email ? > > Cheers !!! > Ash > > vedic astrology, plutopredicts wrote: > > vedic astrology, ashsam73@h... > > wrote: > > I have read works by eminent vedic astrologers > > who like to claim that these 3 planets were > > know by ancient astrologers but different names > > were used !! > > So why do not vedic astrologers today use > > these planets under the old indian names? you > > cannot have it both ways. > > Why do you mention" the various other moons > > of saturn and jupiter".? I was talking about > > planets, not moons. > > Saturn too is a slow moving planet ! > > Read some books by Indian vedic astrologers > > and you wiill see the names of those who use > > these 3 planets. > > .K S Krishnamurti and Manik Chand Jain used > > these planets and they were *eminent Vedic > > astrologers. Have a look at some vedic websites > > and you will see vedic astrologers using these 3 > > planets. regards, PLUTO > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Vedic Astrology does not use Uranus, Nepture > > and Pluto. If you read > > > BPHS or UPJS or any other classic there is no > > mention of these > > > planets. So I do not know which vedic > > astrologer uses these planets > > > for their prediction. These are very slow > > moving planets. Yes they > > > do exists so do the various other moons of > > Saturn, Jupiter which are > > > much larger than mercury, venus, earth and > > mars, but Vedic > > > Astrologers do not use it. > > > > > > Cheers !!! > > > Ash > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, > > plutopredicts wrote: > > > > vedic- > > astrology, "Venkateshwara A > > > > Reddy" <venkateshwara_reddy> wrote: > > > > > Dear Henry, In Vedic Astr > > > > > > > > Dear Venkat;i have been a vedic astrologer > > for > > > > 30 years and I and many, many other vedic > > > > astrologers use Uranus, Neptune & Pluto. > > > > Following the 11 Sept. incident ( Saturn opp > > > > Pluto ) maybe the traditional vedic > > astrologers > > > > will take their heads out of the sand and > > > > recognise that that these 3 planets do exist > > and > > > > use them. > > > > i made no mention of the 10th house and > > my > > > > statement is fully supported by the *eminent > > > > astrologers who have had Sun in > > inharmonious > > > > aspect with Uranus. > > > > In fact this was observed by one of the > > greatest > > > > astrologers of the 20th century. PLUTO > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ology, We dont consider Uranus. Of course, > > > > Western > > > > > Astrologers say Uranus in 10th house > > makes > > > > one as occultist. > > > > > You can see an email for Sanjay related > > why > > > > Vedic astrology consider > > > > > 9 grahas. > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, Venkat > > > > > > > > > > > This is the second time I am sending > > this > > > > > > message: maybe it will be posted this > > time. > > > > > > > > > > > > The inharmonious aspect of Uranus to > > the > > > > Sun > > > > > > is always a conspicuous feature of the > > > > > > horoscopes of *leaders of the occult. > > > > > > > > > > > > Robert Hand has this aspect but how > > many > > > > > > others today ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Good luck, Henry Jackson/PLUTO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.